Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NCAA Tournament Bubble Watch

Off the Post - October 18th

SHARKS NEWS

Star-divide

OTHER NHL NEWS

 

  • [UPDATE, 7:55pm] = The Bruins trade Chuck Kobasew to Minnesota for Craig Weller, the rights to Alex Fallstrom, and a 2nd rounder in 2011.
  • [UPDATE, 9:30pm] = Yesterday's news, but the Blackhawks pick up Andrew Ebbett from the Ducks off of waivers.
  • Saying Phoenix's attendance in home game 2 is woeful sounds almost complimentary.
  • No pressure, Milan...
  • What do Steve Ott and Daniel Sedin both have in common?  Besides screwing over Conico's fantasy league team, that is....
  • If someone asked you to declare the worst division in the NHL, chances are pretty good you'd say the Southeast... and you'd be wrong.
  • The Copper & Blue alter scripture once again, and the Oilers win yet again.
  • Mike Van Ryn is done for the season.
  • You might have noticed, but Marc-Andre Fleury is playing out of his mind.
  • The NHL vs. Georges Laraque, Exhibit A = the offending video.

  • Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

    Do you like this story?

    Comments

    Display:

    About Nabby/Greiss

    The Sharks are not good enough on defense right now to throw Greiss in net. In the last two games first period shots against are 19 and 17. I doubt the staff thinks Greiss can hold the game together when the rest of the team is not helping him. They probably do not even want him to begin his career that way.

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 8:14 AM PDT reply actions  

    true

    but I think there will always be a million reasons to start Nabby – either he’s on a hot streak or he needs a chance to redeem himself after a bad game or the defense is bad or the defense is too good and it won’t be reflective of whether griess can handle it…etc. I think they have to start playing him. Good job though Nabby

    by a10dency2ask on Oct 18, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

    I think the last thing Greiss needs is to start a game where are D doesn't show up, let in 5 goals, and have nightmares for weeks

    This might damage his confidence, so then I would wait until we played toronto, then start him

    I'm warning you! I have ADHD and I know how to use it!!!

    by Diamondback15 on Oct 18, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

    I'll go with the opposing view.

    The way I see it is a goaltender needs to gain experience. If Greiss let’s in 5 goals, the next game he’ll be determined to do better.

    But I’m not a goaltender so what do i know? Let’s ask Dave. Uh, Dave what’s it like to be a goaltender?

    by idunno723 on Oct 18, 2009 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

    I think we need to see what griess is made of. If he isn’t a good goaltender unless the D is doing all the work, then we need to know that.

    by a10dency2ask on Oct 18, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

    That's a terrible reason.

    What’s the point of having a back up goalie if you can’t put him in net against the Islanders? If he isn’t good enough for that then waive him, send him down and bring up a guy you feel can take a few games.

    This is frankly getting absurd and we need to know what we have in Greiss.

    by Evilducks on Oct 18, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

    What is the point of playing the Islanders if you don't win?

    Not to say the Sharks would have definitely lost, but these points are worth just as much as the ones at the end of the season. The whole Sharks team gives up if they go down by a couple goals in the first. The season is going to come to the point soon where the Sharks have to stop giving up that many opportunities. They have to win the division, no team wants to be a 4 or 5 seed.

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Obviously my gameday yesterday explains full well where I stand on this, but I don’t really understand this argument.

    Do we think Nabokov is going to start 82 games this year in a compressed schedule, play for Team Russia, and be fresh at the end of the year?

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 2:51 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

    Nabokov is certainly not the only goalie who has started all his team’s games. Why take him out right now, if he has been the best player on the team? I think the 500 game had something to do with it, but also because the rest of the team has not played well. Nabokov earned the point alone vs. Phoenix and gave the Sharks a chance to do something against Washington.

    Griess will get his start during the road trip, but I would rather see the Sharks play him with some momentum rather than coming off a horrible performance.

    Seeing what we have in Griess for next year is not an argument I understand. We could have a ton of money next year to buy a goalie. Not to mention it is next year.

    And it is not that Greiss is going to suck, it is that I think our defensive play sucks.

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

    but why buy a goalie

    if we can have a great one for almost the league minimum and then improve the defense?

    by a10dency2ask on Oct 18, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Well the Sharks are probably looking to do that too. I am just saying there are probably better times to develop a goalie than when the Sharks are not playing even average defense.

    I think he already got an unfair amount of blame for the LA game even though that goal was ugly. Our best defensive players were -2,-3, and -4.

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

    there are probably better times

    but unfortunately this is the time we need to do it, because this is Nabby’s contract year.

    by a10dency2ask on Oct 18, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Since the Sharks have “bad defense” and that’s something that “won’t change.” When do you believe Greiss should play?

    by idunno723 on Oct 18, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

    What are you quoting? “won’t change”

    Maybe against Tampa or Atlanta.

    Or…maybe even tomorrow against one of the hottest teams in the league and Clowe will get a hat trick and Heatley won’t get a hooking penalty.

    Seriously though, I just understand why Nabokov started against the Islanders. See above.

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Seeing what we have in Griess for next year is not an argument I understand. We could have a ton of money next year to buy a goalie. Not to mention it is next year.

    Not a lot of money to “buy a goaltender” next season, unless you plan on letting Marleau, Pavelski, and/or Setoguchi walk. Here’s a breakdown of the salary structure (roughly halfway through the piece). The recent Hockey Hot Stove with Ron Maclean on CBC stated that the cap is either going to stagnate (at best) or drop around one million dollars. If that happens, there is less money to spend.

    And it is not that Greiss is going to suck, it is that I think our defensive play sucks.

    I mentioned it here, but the only players you can really expect to improve defensively from last season are Vlasic and Demers. The blueline is going to be a weakness all season long- does it improve on the first eight games? I think it does, considering Vlasic has looked off thus far and the defenseman will eventually learn their pair’s tendencies. It doesn’t mean that you’re suddenly going to have a Norris candidate back there. Greiss, as well as Nabokov, are going to have to deal with that whenever they get the start.

    I’m curious- how many games would you like to see Greiss start this season? If McLellan isn’t comfortable starting Greiss against the Islanders, is there any other time we see him besides a back to back? Do you think Nabokov can handle a heavy workload at his age? Do you think he will be fresh at the end of the season considering it’s likely he plays for Team Russia?

    What about the big picture?

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Problem with the Sharks’ defensive play is not just the Sharks’ 6 or 7 defense…see Ortmeyer on not picking up Ovechkin on the backcheck.

    I think you are going to get just about the same number of starts from Nabokov as you saw last season. Greiss will play and soon too. And if he gets hot like Boucher did for awhile last season, then maybe he deserves more starts. I don’t know if Nabokov can handle it but if the Sharks go down 2-0 in our first playoff series, the Sharks will be hoping for a Varlamov in Greiss.

    Maybe the management hopes Nabokov does really well at the Olympics?

    I think that have been the issue last year. Boucher deserved more because for awhile he was doing really well.

    Big picture? I think the Sharks put as many eggs into their basket this season with the cup in mind keeping all the players that gave them the best chance to win. I think you will see the Sharks let some of those UFAs maybe not the RFAs. But do you really want to see a Griess/Sexsmith/Stalock combo in net next year?

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Nabokov went down with multiple injuries last season which accounted for a lot of Boucher’s starts (roughly half, I think). There wasn’t a whole lot of instances where McLellan gave the nod to Boucher over Nabokov when both were healthy. Dave Valentine and I thought Boucher should have seen more starts last season as well.

    But do you really want to see a Griess/Sexsmith/Stalock combo in net next year?

    Hard to say considering I haven’t seen Greiss get a regular season start this season.

    Sorry if I’m coming off a little strong or whatever- it’s just an opinion, and I appreciate you voicing yours. I just think that between next year, the Olympics, a compressed schedule, Nabokov’s increasing age, multiple injuries last season, staying fresh for the stretch run etc. it’s in the best interest of the organization to give Greiss an opportunity. I wasn’t impressed with him during the preseason, but he’s on the roster as your number two goaltender.

    Just because the Sharks defense is average doesn’t mean you hold off starting Greiss, especially against the Islanders. Like a10dency2ask mentioned above, there’s always going to be an excuse to start Nabokov. He’s obviously playing well right now.

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

    That is true about Boucher, I hope Greiss gets his starts not because of a Nabokov injury. Assuming Nabokov stays healthy and in view of the first 8 games, how many starts do you really see Greiss getting?

    Maybe McLellan was afraid of the slightest chance that the Sharks could have fallen below 500 so he bet on the safe side.

    I think Greiss has two starts this road trip and then against LA or Colorado at home. You?

    by sharkbuddy on Oct 18, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

    While I’d rather see him get more starts, my guess is that McLellan only taps him once this month- next Saturday against Atlanta. Save Nabokov for Philadelphia on Sunday.

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

    It bugs me

    that everyone thinks Greiss is going to suck.

    by idunno723 on Oct 18, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

    I don't

    I saw Greiss play very well in the preseason against LA. Only gave up a goal in the late seconds thanks to a bunch of rookies hanging him out to dry and I gotta say he’s better than Nabby in a Shootout.

    Still, I have to see what he can do against full time NHL’ers, and I’m irritated that we’ve started Nabokov 8 times. I think the only other goalie that hasn’t rested might be Kipper and he’s always out of gas by the playoffs. I don’t think that’s a good model to follow.

    by Evilducks on Oct 18, 2009 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

    They’ve play under 10 games. I’ll start to worry/wonder about Greiss not seeing ice time around game 20.

    resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

    by CTGray on Oct 18, 2009 9:40 AM PDT reply actions  

    Even after that point

    I’d be willing to bet that the management and coaching staff would still recognize the need to not overwork Nabby, and would try to throw Greiss some starts. I also agree with sharkbuddy up there, it’s probably better to put Greiss in once the D jells a little better. I wouldn’t want to see the kid get peppered in the first period, let in a couple, then lose confidence for the rest of the season and not be able to play. Granted, he’s a professional athlete and should be able to play regardless, he’s still a rookie. Someone said it in here the other day, he needs to get that goalie swagger, and he won’t unless the D gives him some quality play in front.

    by Chicago Shark on Oct 18, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

    I’d be willing to bet that the management and coaching staff would still recognize the need to not overwork Nabby, and would try to throw Greiss some starts.

    I’m not too sure about this- McLellan let Nabokov dictate his own starts at the end of last season (i.e. going into the playoffs) when he was still dealing with his injury. That doesn’t seem like a recognition not to overwork him.

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

    In other news

    I saw that video last week. I’ll come right out and say that I’m a twenty-something male, so the video doesn’t strike me as offensive. That being said, I do think it’s a little over-the-top as far as the female body shots and camera angles, and probably should’ve been relegated to the Octane website (although the Canadians are a little more liberal about the body than we puritanical Americans are).

    Referring to the Lighthouse’s recap, was there a blown offsides call before the first goal? I don’t recall that, but I was carving a pumpkin so I could have missed it.

    Otherwise, great stuff, keep it coming!

    by Chicago Shark on Oct 18, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions  

    I almost didn't post the video

    Because most people have seen it by now – I guess it’s my version of “filler” ;-)

    The video is racy, but it’s more the fact that Laraque is sponsoring an alcoholic beverage, which (and I didn’t know this) goes against the CBA. Whoopsie….

    Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

    by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 18, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Sorry, last thing for now

    The link to Japer’s Rink goes to the Yahoo numbers story, not Japer’s Rink.

    by Chicago Shark on Oct 18, 2009 10:58 AM PDT reply actions  

    Whoops

    I was dog tired last night while doing this, so I’ll fix that now.

    Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

    by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 18, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

    The only thing I find offensive about that ad

    is how amazingly cheesy it is.

    resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

    by CTGray on Oct 18, 2009 11:14 AM PDT reply actions  

    (shrugs @ the ad) … I think some feminists groups go a little overboard, just like other groups, in promoting what they think others should and shouldn’t do.

    they say sex sells, but anyone silly enough to rush out and buy anything cause they see an ad (sexual or not) is just another sheep in my book … :)

    aside from my last comment, if they wish to make more ads showing scantily dressed men, I wouldn’t object.

    Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality? (boycott Hollywood!)

    by ang6666 on Oct 18, 2009 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

    Where can I get me some of that stuff???

    /effective advertising

    And you think Canadians are liberal with their use of sex appeal, you guys should check out any random Mexican channel. I can’t remember the last time I saw good acting on a mexican novella, but I’ll be damned if 95% of the women that show up on TV in that country aren’t at least a 9.5 out of 10 in the looks department.

    Oh yeah, McGinn is getting jerked around. He deserves to be on the second line more than Clowe does, let alone not being sent down to Worchester. Not the best message being sent there. Good for Vesce on his first goal, though.

    FREE GREISS!!!

    by ruben398 on Oct 18, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

    I guess the Sharks aren’t so high on McGinn as we thought they were.

    by idunno723 on Oct 18, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Jamie’s definitely struggled a bit to begin the season. He’s had a good opportunity to play on the 2nd line, and he’s been fairly invisible, especially when you look at the various contribution of Ferriero. Putting McGinn on the 4th line or leaving him in the press box right now would be a waste and slow his development. With that said, the article does mention Worcester’s game today and that both guys need the minutes.

    Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

    by Teas on Oct 18, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

    I shall now add this as an update

    And give you full credit

    Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

    by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 18, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Well, the article did say that

    the players were sent down to get more ice time, because Woostah had a game and NYR doesn’t play too far away…I suspect it has more to do with that than anything else.

    resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

    by CTGray on Oct 18, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

    One of them is going to be recalled at least. They need to be up here.

    Also, I highly support starting 7 dmen over both Shelley and Staubitz any day of the week.

    by Evilducks on Oct 18, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

    It does?

    This is all it says for me:

    San Jose Sharks Executive Vice President and General Manager Doug Wilson announced today that the club has reassigned forward Jamie McGinn and defenseman Derek Joslin to the Worcester Sharks, the team’s top development affiliate in the American Hockey League.

    McGinn has played in five games with San Jose this season, posting six penalty minutes.

    Joslin played in two games, is a plus-two and had two penalty minutes

    am i crazy or misreading or something?

    by idunno723 on Oct 18, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

    WTC

    resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

    by CTGray on Oct 18, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Very true. I believe it also accumulates cap space, which is something the Sharks desperately need.

    Honestly, this move wouldn’t have happened if it was a homestand or a road trip in the West. But because all the teams are pretty bunched up in the East, why not do it? It’s a no-lose situation, since neither player is subject to waivers and there’s little travel involved.

    "I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
    Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
    Fools and Sages

    by mymclife on Oct 18, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

    It's a smart move

    When you think about it, cap wise anyway.

    Though Joslin could be really exhausted tomorrow after playing a back to back to back.

    McGinn would just be on a back to back.

    by Evilducks on Oct 18, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

    With the back to back to back and Murray “cleared” to play, maybe we don’t even see Joslin tomorrow?

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Yeah, I don’t have a problem with it at all. Get a small amount of cap relief and Worcester is close enough where it’s not a huge travel drain.

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Trade Demand Inevitable.

    Heatley’s been put on the 2nd line of the power play, it’s only a matter of time. (according to the WTC post today)

    Sorry, had to.

    by Evilducks on Oct 18, 2009 1:31 PM PDT reply actions  

    Heh, the same thing came to mind last night when I saw Heatley and Malhotra together on the PP at the end of the game. I figured it was just a result of the score and not something that McLellan was plannng on doing going forward.

    Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

    by Mr. Plank on Oct 18, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Did anyone watch the NHL Store interview video?

    Where did Boyle say he goes to eat? Aldo’s?

    by PNK on Oct 18, 2009 2:40 PM PDT reply actions  

    a lot of the players eat at Aldo’s. It’s like their fav food joint.

    resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

    by CTGray on Oct 18, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

    road trip to Aldo’s? :)

    Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality? (boycott Hollywood!)

    by ang6666 on Oct 18, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Turns out Malhotra still has a few connections and scored eight to ten tickets to Game 1 of the ALCS series between the Yankees and Angels on Friday night.

    WOOO!!!!

    Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

    by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 18, 2009 6:18 PM PDT reply actions  

    Oooooooo

    Laraque video taken down due to copyright infringement…

    /Conico goes and hides all his concert videos on his YouTube channel…

    Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

    by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 18, 2009 9:29 PM PDT reply actions  

    It’s still available here

    Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality? (boycott Hollywood!)

    by ang6666 on Oct 18, 2009 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

    Comments For This Post Are Closed


    User Tools

    The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

    FanPosts


    Managing Editor

    Photo_388_small Mr. Plank

    Editor

    Slappy_small Matthew_Taylor

    Authors

    Pavs2_small idunno723

    Poseypavelski_small mymclife

    Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

    Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

    Shfe_small Jon Allred

    Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

    Moderators

    2296_s_small Nael M.

    Mikey_small ElvisVF101

    Z_small ZeroIndulgence

    313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady