Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Madonna Promises No Wardrobe Malfunctions

The Defenseman Cometh

44418_sharks_flames_hockey_medium

Fact: Crankshaft caused 72% of underwear accidents nation wide during the 08-09 season

Twelve game in the books for the San Jose Sharks, and a 7-4-1 overall record coming out of a six game road trip.

Not too shabby.

During the course of October, many questions have been raised about the performance of the team as a whole, but none more prevalent than the strength of the blueline. Without the luxury of available cap room, it's doubtful Doug Wilson pursues an upgrade via trade lest he sacrifice scoring depth amongst the forwards or deplete the strength of the organization's prospect pool. It is likely we will live and die with these band of brothers until the 2009-2010 season rings it's final bell.

Which begs the question- how good have they been thus far?

Star-divide

To start things off, let's take a look at the location of where the defenseman are starting their shifts following a whistle. While by no means a defining measurement of worth, it does provide us a glimpse into the mind of Todd McLellan- who does he trust the most in the defensive zone?


Even Strength Faceoff Locations

Player GP Defensive Offensive Differential % Defensive
Vlasic
12 66 40 +26 62.26
Blake
12 62 41 +21 60.19
Demers
12 38 32 +6 54.29
Huskins
12 39 43 -4 47.56
Boyle
12 42 54 -12 43.75
Murray
11 35 48 -13 42.17

Takeaways: The Vlasic/Blake pairing takes a lot of draws in their own zone compared to the rest of the unit, while Boyle drags Murray along for those luscious offensive zone opportunities. Demers and Huskins fit right into the middle. It's safe to say that Vlasic/Blake are going to have fewer scoring opportunities than Boyle/Murray due to this role.

One thing that jumped out at me is the fact that McLellan has leaned heavily on the Vlasic/Blake pairing in the defensive zone, even with their less than impressive numbers thus far (more on that shortly). My guess is that he's locked into the notion that they are his shutdown pairing and is planning on giving them the benefit of the doubt for the time being. Is that the right decision? I'm not sure. The need to get Boyle a lot of looks in the attacking end is understandable, but McLellan is utilizing Murray in a highly offensive role directly off the draw the majority of his starts. Preseason hat-tricks notwithstanding, this goes against everything the Swedish behemoth stands for*.

*Namely liquefying bones and raising the dead from their graves.

If Blake/Vlasic are struggling at this point in the season why not ease off on the gas pedal and tap Boyle/Murray a bit more in front of Nabokov? Blake can still provide a big shot from the point to generate scoring opportunities in the offensive zone. You lose some defensive acumen with Boyle, but not a significant enough amount where you see the team as a whole take a huge dive- Murray's presence will help here. I think it's a strategy that needs to be explored until last year's shutdown pairing manages to find their game.

*****

Next up is even strength play. For a refresher course on the importance of this part of the game, or for those who are new to Fear The Fin, this article from last season should serve as a good place to get your feet wet.

Empty net goals have been discluded in both the GF and GA categories.


Even Strength +/-

Player GP EV TOI/G
GFON GAON
GFON/60
GAON/60
EV DIF.
Demers
12 11.66 8 3 3.43 1.29 +2.14
Huskins
12 14.50 11 6 3.79 2.07 +1.72
Boyle
12 17.92 9 7 2.51 1.95 +0.56
Murray
11 15.88 8 8 2.75 2.75 0
Vlasic
12 17.50 7 12 2.00 3.42 -1.42
Blake
12 16.10 5 10 1.55 3.10 -1.55

Takeaways: Huskins and Demers have had the most success here, with the Sharks outscoring opponents at a much greater rate whenever they are on the ice at even strength. And, as expected, Blake and Vlasic have clearly had a great deal of trouble keeping pucks out of their own net.

Admittedly, I haven't been the biggest fan of Huskins the last couple months. From the initial signing to his porous play during the preseason, I've worried aloud about the defensive depth in San Jose and how it would affect the team's ability to win hockey games.

Turns out he and Demers have been a pleasant surprise. Yes, they have seen sheltered minutes. Yes, I would like to see Demers clear the puck up the boards more often as he's prone to force his breakout passes and turn over the puck in the center of the defensive zone. Yes, Huskins could stand to lay on the body around the net. However, these are minor gripes at best- as ElvisVF101 and Evilducks have noted, they aren't getting paid a monetary sum that would cause us to expect much more than what they have provided. And that's a real bright spot for a team who has struggled at times in the defensive zone.

At the heart of the issue lies Vlasic and Blake. If the Sharks want to do some legitimate damage this season, it's essential these guys get going. As mentioned above, I think relieving them of the lion's share of d-zone draws might be a good short term solution- give them an opportunity to put pucks on net and create offensively. Blake seems like he's been fighting to find shooting lanes, and he's lost a bit of lateral quickness when moving at the point. Some more time in the easy part of the ice may get that big shot back it's net nose.

*****

The last thing on the docket today is special teams play. Demers hasn't logged sufficient enough minutes per game on the PK to warrant consideration (0:14), and has thus been left out. On the PP side of the ice, Murray (0:05) and Huskins (0:15) are in the same boat.


Penalty Kill (4v5) Plus/Minus

Player GP SH TOI/G
GFON GAON
GFON/60
GAON/60
SH DIF.
Huskins
12 1.17 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
Vlasic
12 3.19 1 2 1.57 3.13 -1.56
Blake
12 3.01 1 2 1.66 3.32 -1.66
Boyle
12 2.71 0 6 0.00 11.07 -11.07
Murray
11 2.48 0 6 0.00 13.19 -13.19


Power Play (5v4) Plus/Minus

Player GP PP TOI/G
GFON
GAON
GFON/60
GAON/60
PP DIF.
Vlasic
12 2.29 7 0 15.27 0.00 +15.27
Blake
12 2.15 6 0 13.96 0.00 +13.96
Demers
12 3.24 7 0 10.81 0.00 +10.81
Boyle
12 4.70 10 0 10.64 0.00 +10.64

Takeaways: It's hard to take too much stock into these numbers right now considering a fluke goal here or there can alter them quite a bit (with special teams time less frequent than even strength), but here's a few general observations:

  • Vlasic is giving up fewer goals per 60 minutes shorthanded than he is at even strength. Sample size is obviously a big factor here, but maybe McLellan should just have a forward cherry pick at the redline whenever he and Blake are on at evens.
  • Huskins hasn't been on the ice for a shorthanded goal against. He's gotten roughly two shifts a night, but that is still moderately impressive.
  • Boyle and Murray have been horrendous on the PK thus far. The average differential per sixty for defenseman who played at least 50 games and 1:30 per night last season was -5.54. They're both currently double that.
  • On the flip side, last year's defenseman who played at least 50 games and 1:30 per night on the power play were, on average, +5.66 per sixty minutes. All qualifying Sharks are at least close to double that.
  • If you expected Jason Demers to be second in PP time amongst defenseman before the season began you are either a pathological liar or related to Miss Cleo.
  • Towards the middle of last season teams began to pick up on what the Sharks wanted to do on the power play and started aggressive pressuring the puck-carrying blueliners. Might be repeating myself here, but I have been impressed with the defenseman's reads in these situations. They haven't forced many shots and therefore haven't had a problem with blocks above the circles turning into shorthanded opportunities going the other way.

*****

Inconsistent is the one word I would use to describe the Sharks blueline thus far, and hopefully they can use the two upcoming home dates to build on a good performance last night against Philadelphia. Even with a 7-4-1 record there's a lot of unanswered questions on how everything will eventually play out.

And I'm not expecting many concrete answers anytime soon.

 

Go Sharks.

Comment 36 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is fantastic stuff

Extremely thorough, no-holds barred analysis of the successes and failures of individual / paired / defensive-corp efforts.

Dave, Bell, Lurker and I were aghast at how we were in our defensive end for much of the game in Atlanta… but that’s a tale for tomorrow (preview alert!).

Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 26, 2009 8:21 AM PDT reply actions  

I think your math is wrong for Faceoff differential

Vlasic should be at +26 and Blake at +21, unless I don’t understand the chart.

by Very Serious Person on Oct 26, 2009 8:24 AM PDT reply actions  

You are most definitely 100% correct. I wrote this before the Philadelphia game and updated the numbers last night- not well enough apparently.

Fixed and thanks.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Great stuff, Plankerton.

Numbers don’t lie, but I think they normalize over the course of the season.

Gotta say, color me surprised about the bottom defensive pairing. Did not expect them to be near this good.

However, the defense as a whole is still vastly worse than last year. Hopefully it improves.

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by Matthew_Taylor on Oct 26, 2009 8:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow

I didn’t realize Boyle and Murray were that bad on the PK.

FIRE BRUCE BOCHY NOW!!!!!!
AND TAKE BRIAN SABEAN WITH HIM!!!!!

by 49er16 on Oct 26, 2009 8:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Wow

I knew Douglas Murray was responsible for many underwear accidents, but 72%!!

Hopefully the bad D plays won’t become a bad trend, and they could improve over the long course of the season.

by idunno723 on Oct 26, 2009 9:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Should we start a Petrecki pool?

As in, how many more games before he gets called up?

Of course, it’s possible that we don’t see him at all this season… but I’ll go out on a limb to say I don’t believe that.*

* Unless there’s some financial thingy-ma-bobber I’m too dense to properly take into account.

Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 26, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions  

Who would he replace? Huskins and Demers have proven so far that they belong here. None of the other 4 would get benched. Not sure I see room for him right now. He’s probably going to have to wait for an injury. I also think Moore and Joslin may be ahead of him, too.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Oct 26, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

So I guess the answer is...

No, don’t start a pool. ;-)

Fear the Fin: "Hope you bitches brought your guns! I’m always packing heat!" - Mr. Plank, 10/15/09

by Conico do Mayo Miracle on Oct 26, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know Huskins has only played 45 games in the last two years and Demers is young in his NHL career, but shouldn’t we at least put them in a few more PK situations to see what they can do? Boyle and Murray are better suited for PP time anyway.

We just traded who for who?!

by BawLa on Oct 26, 2009 9:59 AM PDT reply actions  

It's never to early to rosterbate

Solid analysis as usual Plank.

I had a few questions to throw out there:

1. Do you think the D are getting less help from the forwards? There’s been a LOT of roster turnover, and so it’s always hard to know the full ice system and know when and where to provide D support, so maybe the forwards aren’t chipping in as much as they should, and more chemistry over the course of the season could improve that?

2. If we WERE to make a trade, yeah, it kills scoring depth, but let’s pretend we’re awesome and can not be stopped. Does anyone have a D-man type they’d like to see brought in?

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Oct 26, 2009 10:02 AM PDT reply actions  

1) I think they have at times, but most of my issues have been with defenseman related mistakes. Chasing the puck across the zone, not clearing the front of the net, getting worked over on the cycle that leads to a scoring chance or goal etc.

2) If Robyn Regehr ever got traded to San Jose I would buy his jersey the very hour I heard the news. Love the man, but unfortunately, it’s not going to happen.

Excuse my language, but we need a motherfucker. In my opinion that’s a type of guy we’re always going to need and Wilson hasn’t really ever gone out and got. I’ve always held a deep-seated respect for teams who have built good bluelines, and while the Sharks aren’t a poor man’s group persay, they just don’t have that feel about them back there. They’re not willing to stand you up when you enter the zone and punch you in the mouth. They’re constantly backing in and giving up entry. That’s something you can’t teach, and unfortunately, I think it’s going to hurt down the road. Major road block to success. Hope I’m wrong.

I would love it if DW went out at the deadline and picked up a defenseman who could go out and play twenty five a night on the PK against opposing team’s top lines. If that doesn’t happen (when it doesn’t happen) I’ll just look forward and tell myself that Nick Petrecki is eventually going to become that type of player for San Jose.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's one bad mutha-

I’m with you on needing the junkyard dog. I still hate Pronger, but your admiration of him is built on all the right things.

Everyone else says this team is soft. When your best defenceman are slick puck movers like Boyle or solid positional guys like Vlasic, no one is afraid to play you. (People SHOULD be afraid of Douglas Murray).

I would not mind a guy in the mold of Pronger or Chara. Big, tall mofo who eats opposing forwards for brunch and isn’t afraid to admit he goes to brunch because he’d punch you in the mouth if you tried to say something. Rob Blake may once have been that player, but at this stage is his career, I don’t think he is. He’s still very good, and we’re lucky to have him, but we’re kidding ourselves a bit if we think he’ll fill that role.

The whole “Sharks are soft” issue is a hot button for all of us I’m sure. I think it’s fair to say, we don’t have to be a team of Prongers to shake that label. Be a team of Murrays. Douglas never shies away from physical contact, and he always makes the play. THAT’S what we need. Over the past 3-4 seasons, on average, the Sharks have been one of the biggest, if not THE biggest team in the NHL. But I don’t think anyone was afraid to play them. It’s perceived that Edmonton was able to push around a soft San Jose team. To a lesser extent in various playoff losses, the same could be said. The team just sorta vanished.

Even though he’s made mistakes at times, I’m still a fan of Scott Nichol. Guy plays BIGGER than his frame. Same is true of Ryan Vesce and Benn Ferrerio. These are not big guys, but they’re playing big. They’re overachieving. Before the Thornton trade, that was the hallmark of this team. They were a bunch of overachievers. It was a team of Mike Riccis.

I think you’ll find a lot of the same characteristics on the Cup Champions since the end of the dynasty era of the Wings, Avs and Devils, especially post lockout.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Oct 26, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ve tried to make it a point to watch Huskins over the last few games, and I have to say, he’s been pretty good. I mean, our expectations were pretty low for him, but as I see it, he’s been a Defenseman…no more, no less. Which is really all we can ask of the guy. Our bottom pairing isn’t the terrifying black hole of goals allowed we feared it would be, and for that, I am thankful!

Maybe a simple defensive line reshuffling is in order. Move Blake down to play with Huskins, put Demers with Murray, Vlasic with Boyle. Or put Murray with Vlasic for a defensive shutdown pairing. Then move Demers or Huskins up to play with Boyle. Might be worth exploring…at least in the short term.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Oct 26, 2009 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

I hate to see it, but the only forward I see making a consistent effort at aggressive backchecking is ….Dany heatley.

I like my goals like I like my booze..... Top shelf.

by GhostOfLinkGaetz on Oct 26, 2009 10:44 AM PDT reply actions  

And as great as that is for him

that’s a bad sign for the rest of the team.

"Fear the Fin: where some fans chose to swathe themselves in baseless optimism all season long." -CTGray

by workthecycle on Oct 26, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by Matthew_Taylor on Oct 26, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I feel like the main problem with the defense this year is that they seem to not know what the forwards are going to do. Especially earlier in the year, on transition opportunities, you’d have 2 or 3 forwards chasing the puck carrier when they should have been picking up a trailer and leaving the puck carrier to the dman. As a result, the dmen have been trying to do way too much and somehow cover everybody at the same time. That also sort of explains why the PK is better than even strength. There’s more of a clearly defined role for everyone on the PK, which helps avoids these screwups.

by tarlinian on Oct 26, 2009 11:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Trade Demers and Mitchell for another D, then bring up Petrecki. : X

I like my goals like I like my booze..... Top shelf.

by GhostOfLinkGaetz on Oct 26, 2009 12:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow, Plank! Someone’s been neglecting the college nightlife (or class, I suppose)!

It is curious that Murray and Boyle are getting so much PK time but they aren’t spending a lot of time on draws in the defensive zone. Do you think this might be an oversight? Or does TM think he’s trying to conserve them for intense pressure. Either way, I think it’s bizarre.

Warning, Grammar Nazi approaching
The word you’re looking for a couple of times in there is ‘fewer’. It denotes a smaller quantity, rather than a smaller amount.
For example…
“I broke a water glass, and now there are fewer.”
“I drank some of the water, and now there is less.”

/Sorry, serious pet peeve.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Oct 26, 2009 12:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Wow, Plank! Someone’s been neglecting the college nightlife (or class, I suppose)!
….
The word you’re looking for a couple of times in there is ‘fewer’. It denotes a smaller quantity, rather than a smaller amount.

Add those up and your question will be answered.

The draw location is measured only at even strength, not during special teams. I don’t think it’s necessarily an oversight on his part- he consciously chooses to give Boyle the most opportunities in the offensive zone and feels that Blake/Vlasic are the ones who need to take the majority of defensive zone draws. I agree with that in principle, but Blake/Vlasic have struggled mightily at evens. Giving Murray/Boyle more responsibility here would help remedy these problems, and I’m not sure McLellan has adapted his gameplan accordingly. That’s what I would like to see him do going forward.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, hang on. I read the table wrong. I thought the Shorthanded table was ordered by time, not the differential. Maybe I should get back to teaching my class instead of commenting here.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Oct 26, 2009 2:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I should have included that. From now on expect the differential to always be how players are ranked, unless noted otherwise.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

props for the It's Always Sunny reference

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Oct 26, 2009 12:40 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

The picture goes well with the reference

I’ve always suspected that Doug Murray is a master of karate, and friendship, for everyone.

If consequences dictate the course of action, then it doesn't matter what's right, it's only wrong if you get caught. If consequences dictate the course of action, then I should play God...

by Rob Parker on Oct 26, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Inportant question.
Fact: Crankshaft caused 72% of underwear accidents nation wide during the 08-09 season

Nation wide seems to indicate US underwear accidents. However, you show him knocking the poop out of someone from Calgary (in Calgary, by the looks of the jerseys), which is Canada. So which nation does this statistic apply to?

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Oct 26, 2009 2:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Heh, it was actually a reference to the kid in the right hand corner of the picture, but you’re right- both fans and opposing skaters are included in these empirical statistics.

However, you show him knocking the poop out of someone from Calgary (in Calgary, by the looks of the jerseys), which is Canada. So which nation does this statistic apply to?

Hockey nation, obviously.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

obviously…

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Oct 26, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I try. I really do.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Oct 26, 2009 3:20 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Obviously!

How could I be so dense?!?

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Oct 26, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hopefully Murray makes the Swedish Olympic Team, then he could knock the hockey poop out of people on an international scale.

CSNBA: Nabby was so good in goal against Minnesota, he could have saved everything but the Oakland Raiders’ season.

by DownRUpLYB on Oct 26, 2009 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

the ducks

are getting rolled by the maple leafs ;)

by sPaNiArD440 on Oct 26, 2009 9:28 PM PDT reply actions  

good stuff – thanks Plank

by AfroPuff on Oct 27, 2009 2:14 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

FanPosts


Managing Editor

Photo_388_small Mr. Plank

Editor

Slappy_small Matthew_Taylor

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Shfe_small Jon Allred

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikey_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady