Special Teams Rankings
While only slightly related, this photo was too good to pass up.
Every broadcast I've watched, whenever there is a power play opportunity, the announcers always see fit to point out the offending team's penalty kill ranking and/or percentage in comparison to the beneficiary's stats in the power play department. Games can be won on these "special teams," as well as be lost - failing to kill a penalty for the entire game is one such example, and failing to score on the power play in a close game is another.
And yet, there is a lack of an overall ranking system that uses both the penalty kill and power play stats to determine a team's overall effectiveness at special teams. There could be a team that has a shut-down defense that rarely lets a goal through, but an absolutely anemic offense that can't score goals for beans (and no, this is not a thinly-veiled reference to a certain Northwest Division team, just an extreme example that happens to be similar). How would they rate? What about a team that is exactly the opposite, that can score goals all day and yet has a horrible defense/goaltending situation? And that kind of curiosity has led me to create this.
The only stat I use for this ranking system is the percentage effectiveness of each special team, and no extra variables like short-handed goals are calculated into this (it would take far too much work and math). The baseline percentage is 100%, meaning that the team is basically even in goals they have scored and goals they have allowed on special teams. Anything below that means that special teams are hurting them, while anything above means that it is helping. Pretty simple, right? So here are the numbers
|
|
Power Play |
Penalty Kill |
|
||||
|
|
Team |
League |
PP % |
Rk |
PK % |
Rk |
Overall % |
|
1 |
San Jose |
2 |
23.5 |
3 |
83.6 |
5 |
107.1 |
|
2 |
Minnesota |
21 |
19.4 |
14 |
86.8 |
2 |
106.2 |
|
3 |
Philadelphia |
7 |
22.5 |
4 |
83.1 |
6 |
105.6 |
|
4 |
Boston |
3 |
22.4 |
5 |
82.4 |
12 |
104.8 |
|
5 |
Detroit |
1 |
26.3 |
1 |
77.9 |
26 |
104.2 |
|
6 |
Washington |
5 |
24.3 |
2 |
79.9 |
20 |
104.2 |
|
7 |
Buffalo |
20 |
21.0 |
7 |
82.6 |
8 |
103.6 |
|
8 |
Calgary |
6 |
19.3 |
15 |
84.0 |
3 |
103.3 |
|
9 |
St. Louis |
19 |
20.6 |
9 |
82.4 |
10 |
103.0 |
|
10 |
Los Angeles |
25 |
20.1 |
11 |
82.9 |
7 |
103.0 |
|
11 |
Anaheim |
17 |
22.0 |
6 |
80.8 |
18 |
102.8 |
|
12 |
NY Rangers |
12 |
14.4 |
29 |
87.5 |
1 |
101.9 |
|
13 |
Chicago |
8 |
20.8 |
8 |
80.8 |
17 |
101.6 |
|
14 |
Ottawa |
23 |
19.1 |
16 |
81.4 |
16 |
100.5 |
|
15 |
NY Islanders |
30 |
17.5 |
20 |
82.4 |
11 |
99.9 |
|
16 |
New Jersey |
4 |
19.9 |
12 |
79.9 |
21 |
99.8 |
|
17 |
Montreal |
14 |
17.3 |
21 |
81.8 |
13 |
99.1 |
|
18 |
Vancouver |
9 |
18.6 |
18 |
80.3 |
19 |
98.9 |
|
19 |
Pittsburgh |
11 |
16.9 |
22 |
81.5 |
15 |
98.4 |
|
20 |
Nashville |
18 |
14.5 |
28 |
83.9 |
4 |
98.4 |
|
21 |
Florida |
15 |
15.3 |
26 |
82.6 |
9 |
97.9 |
|
22 |
Tampa Bay |
29 |
18.6 |
17 |
79.1 |
24 |
97.7 |
|
23 |
Carolina |
10 |
17.6 |
19 |
79.2 |
23 |
96.8 |
|
24 |
Atlanta |
27 |
20.3 |
10 |
75.7 |
30 |
96.0 |
|
25 |
Toronto |
22 |
19.6 |
13 |
75.8 |
29 |
95.4 |
|
26 |
Colorado |
28 |
16.3 |
24 |
79.0 |
25 |
95.3 |
|
27 |
Dallas |
24 |
15.4 |
25 |
79.2 |
22 |
94.6 |
|
28 |
Columbus |
13 |
12.5 |
30 |
81.7 |
14 |
94.2 |
|
29 |
Edmonton |
16 |
16.8 |
23 |
76.7 |
28 |
93.5 |
|
30 |
Phoenix |
26 |
14.8 |
27 |
76.9 |
27 |
91.7 |
Unsurprisingly, San Jose is on top with both the power play and penalty kill in the top five, allowing them to have the best overall special teams situation. Minnesota as second is surprising, although their special teams percentage is held up by their extremely stingy penalty kill. It is a similar occurance with Detroit - they have a horrible penalty kill, but their potent power play makes up for their defensive and goaltending lapses.
This data also reveals a bit about a team's play overall. The Islanders's position at 15th in the league for special teams - achieving almost a 100 - suggests that their woes mainly come at even strength, while Columbus's surprisingly horrible position suggests that their even strength play is what is keeping them in the playoffs picture.
It is a trend, though, that the better teams in the league have better special teams than those that are tanking for Tavares. Not a completely new revelation, but the numbers themselves are still something to think about when watching some of these teams play.
This item was created by a member of this blog's community and is not necessarily endorsed by Fear The Fin.
19 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
there was an old saying at serra for football
“special teams wins championships”
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
Oh wait that was preschool
Haha, that made me laugh for a good minute.
Fear The Fin: Where The Second Round Is Overrated
well that's definitly true
i agree with that a lot more than the old serra saying. i wasn’t at serra when that was the motto, when i was a freshman i just saw some of the seniors wearing it, and even then it was a couple years older than them. that old saying just matches the fanpost.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 25, 2009 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions
uh
an 8 seed in the playoffs can win the stanley cup and still have a worse record than a 1 seed.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 27, 2009 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions
like this
1 seed 120 points + 24 playoff points = 144
8 seed 90 points + 32 playoff points = 132
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 27, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions
other than the NCAA
championships aren’t won in a game. in the NHL they have 82 + at least 16 more. and by the way, they’re called goals.
that’s one thing that annoys me. in baseball saying “oh the giants scored 2 points” it’s runs. and in hockey “hey they got a point” it’s called a goal.
the 2 points you get for winning, the 1 for an OTL or nothing for losing? is that what you mean?
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 27, 2009 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Stop making sense of my useless information!
I was going for the John Madden “The team with the most points usually wins the game”
oh
9=8?
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 28, 2009 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions
huh?
19=1?
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 28, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
ops
i was thinking of joe maddon
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Mar 28, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Very nice stuff- funny how we both focused on two aspects of the team on the same day haha.
Fear The Fin: Where The Second Round Is Overrated

by 























