Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kentucky Basketball: Where the Wildcats Stand as of Today

2009 Playoff Preview

So it's official—with 109 points in the standings—2008-2009 is the best regular season the Sharks have ever played.  Unfortunately, subsequent to clinching home-ice advantage in the playoffs, the rest of the season becomes almost a needless mundane task.  After the seemingly endless regular season of 82 games, we are almost to what it all comes down to: the Stanley Cup Playoffs.  I mean, yes, a lot of us are for the great battle with the Detroit Red Wings and Boston Bruins (sorta) for the President's Trophy, but personally if I were a Shark (oh, if only life was so kind) that would only be a second objective compared to lifting the holy grail of hockey—Lord Stanley's Cup.

So let's face the music, as many hockey fans have been thrilled to obsessively repeat through this season, the Sharks clearly do not have the best record in the playoffs.  However, in condolence Mike Babcock of the vile Red Wings offered one description of what it is like to play in the NHL Playoffs and one possible explanation for the Sharks' woes.  One of the biggest factors in playoff success is location, location, location.  Babcock said, the Wings "hope for distance."  By that he means the shortest distance traveled in the playoffs always is the best route.  So, in the case of the Sharks, playing Anaheim or Vancouver in the first round would be more beneficial than playing Nashville or Edmonton.  "Distance was the greatest thing (last season), because we got to play Nashville so barely traveled in the first round," Babcock said.  "The year before, we played Calgary, San José, and Anaheim, and with all those time zones and distances, that's a huge wear and tear on you."

Point taken, but that should be enough crap about the Red Wings, what about the Sharks?  Let's go analyze and size-up the Sharks' potential 1st round opponents!

Star-divide

St. Louis Blues (currently 9th—81 pts.)

Playoff History:  Taking advantage of an odd NHL rule that required an expansion team to make it to the Stanley Cup Finals every year, from 1967-1970 the Blues were that team.  However, they were swept all 3 times by Montréal twice and Boston the final time.

vs. Sharks: 1 Win; 2 Eliminations

1.  In 1999-2000, the St. Louis Blues achieved the Presidents' Trophy for the league's best record and were finally poised to win it all.  In spite of this accomplishment, the San José Sharks posted a stunning 7-game upset and eliminated the midwestern Stanley Cup favorites.  If you don't recall, that was during the Owen Nolan era and this fantastic goal took place.

2.  The 2000-2001 St. Louis Blues got their revenge for the early departure in the prior postseason and eliminated the 5th-seeded Sharks in 6 games, but that was all for naught when they got in the way of the Abominable Avalanche motivated by the cup-starved Ray Bourque and the god-like goaltending of the legendary Patrick Roy.

3.  Then finally, in 2003-2004, their playoff hopes were once again dashed by the San José Sharks for the final time in 5 games.  And as of today, it was the last time the St. Louis Blues ever qualified for the playoffs, at all.

Chances:  Sorry to our Blues Brothers, but in spite of the current winning streak they do not have the best chances ever.  St. Louis' playoff hopes largely depend on their road games, (7 games left—1 home; 6 Away).  Their current record on the road, according the NHL.com standings page, 14-17-4, and at this point in the race they cannot afford any losses. 


Final Games: @ Columbus (3/29), @ Chicago (4/1), @ Detroit (4/2), @ Stars (4/4), @ Coyotes (4/7), Columbus (4/10), and finally @ Colorado for, hopefully, the easy finish.

Prediction:  If they do make the playoffs, it will be a very tight fit into 7th or 8th place.  Then again what is not tight about this years' playoff race?  With that said, no matter what they are either playing our Sharks or the Red WIngs.  Regardless, of which they play the Blues will be extremely tired from their long arduous playoff push, but I have watched miracles in the playoffs before (1993 Sharks vs. the Red WIngs) so I won't assume an early elimination for the Blues' but it is highly likely if they make it at all. 


 

Nashville Predators (currently 7th—82 pts.)

Playoff History: Not much to write about... 4 qualifications, 4 first round exits.  The only playoff opponents they have ever had are the San José Sharks (twice) and the Detroit Red Wings (also twice).

vs. Sharks: 2 eliminations (both within 5 games)  Anyone remember Patrick Rissmiller's redemption?  

Chances: Similar to the Blues, the Predators' playoff hopes depend almost entirely (although, not quite as drastic) on their work away from home.  They have 7 games left, 2 at home, while 5 on the road.  Currently, their away record stands at an almost identical 14-8-4.  Right now, their last 10 record is 4-2-4, and if they are serious about making the playoffs: overtime losses will not get them there.

Final Games: @ Detroit (3/29), @ Columbus (3/31), @ Chicago (4/3), Columbus (4/4), Chicago (4/7), @ Detroit again (4/9), and @ Minnesota (4/10)

Prediction: Sadly enough, from a Nashville perspective, their only chance at the playoff advance is going through the Sharks or the Red Wings.  Is this their year?  Can they finally make it to the 2nd round?  I hate Nashville hockey and as much as I hate to say it, their 3 goals in 2:15 against the Sharks was amazing (*shudder*).  However, if they do face the Sharks in the first round, the Sharks will be looking for revenge for that mess-up and I've found Nabokov to be quite prideful of his work.  It will not be pretty. 

 

Edmonton Oilers (currently 8th—81 pts)

Playoff History: 5 time Stanley Cup Champions! (1983-85; 1986-88; 1989-90).  What more do you need to say?  In the latest news, they came close to winning it a 6th time by prying it from the Carolina Hurricanes (former Hartford Whalers) in 2006, but fell 3-1 in Game 7.

vs. Sharks: 1 win.

It was a situation the Sharks unfortunately are all too familiar with as they were eliminated in 6 games in the Conference semifinals of the 2005-2006 playoffs.  Although there is one factor that semi-absolved the Sharks' of that horrific "choke"; the 5-on-1.5 situation that took place and as Dan Rusanowsky calls it the loudest moment in the history of the Shark Tank.

Chances: Almost likely.  They have 7 games left and for 6 of those games they will be comfortable on home-ice in Rexall Place.  Sure, right now they're in 9th place, but nothing beats being pumped up by your own fans.  However, somehow Edmonton has managed to screw up that up a bit.  Their current home record is 16-13-6 and oddly enough have a better road record.  I am curious, if they will manage to turn that around on the back of Dwayne Roloson.

Final Games:  Wild (3/29), Ducks (3/31), SHARKS (4/2), Canucks (4/4), Kings (4/7), Flames (4/10), and finish close to home @ Calgary (4/11)

Prediction: Personally, I think the Oilers will make it to 7th place.  However, for their best interests they will probably want to face the Sharks instead of the Red Wings.  Red Wings swept them in the season series of 4 games all within regulation, while the Sharks have had some bad nights getting passed that bastard Roloson.

 

Anaheim Ducks (10th—80 pts.)

Playoff History: Unless anyone forgot in 2006-2007 the formerly mighty Ducks of Anaheim became the first California-based hockey team to win Lord Stanely's Cup.  No one in Anaheim seemed to care....  I will give them the benefit of the doubt, it may have been thanks to Paris Hilton's synchronized prison escape.

vs. Sharks: Surprisingly, it never happened.  However, I kinda really hope it happens this year.  Light travel for the Sharks = damn good prospects for the future.  Predicting a win of course, (KNOCK ON WOOD DAMMIT!).

Chances: Slight balance of a yes and a no.  With a remarkably horrible start to their season, the Ducks have 3 Home games left, while 4 on the road.  Yet at the same time, their playoff future is simultaneously left to the physical whim of the Sharks ("Should we let them pass?") in 2 last back-to-back home-and-away games next weekend.

Final Games: Avalanche (3/29), @ Oilers (3/31), @ Canucks (4/2), @ Sharks (4/4), Sharks again (4/5), after a nice break Stars (4/10), and finally @ Phoenix (4/11)

Prediction: Obviously, they think their chances are purely excellent, as they have already put playoff tickets up for sale.  If so, I hope they play the Sharks.  Sure it will be an extremely physical series, but as Babcock suggested, the Sharks get the bonus of absolutely no jet lag.

 

Overall Prediction for the Western Conference 1st Round:

Sharks vs. Ducks

Detroit vs. Edmonton

Vancouver vs. Columbus

Chicago vs. Calgary 

What do you think?

Poll
Who do you hope the Sharks have for a 1st Round opponent?
Nashville Predators
8 votes
St. Louis Blues
12 votes
Edmonton Oilers
7 votes
Anaheim Ducks
31 votes
Minnesota Wild (slight possibility)
2 votes
Dallas Stars (slighter possibility)
0 votes

60 votes | Poll has closed

This item was created by a member of this blog's community and is not necessarily endorsed by Fear The Fin.

Comment 20 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

very good writeup

I vote Edmonton. Though it was between them and the Blues. The Oilers have been a bad team this year to me. And I mean a really bad team. Plus I don’t believe we’ve lost to the Oilers this year.

V- "I'm not questioning your powers of observation. I'm merely remarking on the paradox of asking a masked man who he is."

by KA1Z3R on Mar 29, 2009 7:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Oilers vs. Sharks

Technically the Sharks have not lost to the Oilers, this season. The official record is 2-0-1, but overtime losses is still a loss in the playoffs. We will just have to see how the Sharks do on Thursday to determine if it would be a tight series or a Sharkie blow out.

Let the end of the world begin with us!!

by insanewidget on Mar 29, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

we lost to them in OT?

I forgot about that

V- "I'm not questioning your powers of observation. I'm merely remarking on the paradox of asking a masked man who he is."

by KA1Z3R on Mar 29, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good stuff

On a strictly professional level I would take Nashville, with Edmonton being a close second. I have a good feeling we would have a fairly easy time with both of those teams providing we are healthy. Also, they lack a lot of physicality that could wear us down.

However, a matchup with Anaheim (possible upset, very physical etc.) would be a great way to light a fire to the California hockey scene. It’s about time we faced them in the playoffs and began to establish a rivalry. That’s what the heart says at least.

Fear The Fin: Where The Second Round Is Overrated

by Mr. Plank on Mar 29, 2009 7:41 AM PDT reply actions  

would definitely be ideal to face the blues, but looking at their record alongside their future games.

umm… maybe next year.

Let the end of the world begin with us!!

by insanewidget on Mar 29, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

You are just mean. You really want to put Nashville through another 5 game round 1 exit? I am giddy at the thought of an ANA/SJS round 1, but of course I’m looking at it from another perspective (no doubt most neutral hockey fans want to see PIT/WAS in round 1 but I’d prefer to save those fireworks for a later round).

by Rob Parker on Mar 29, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

PIT/WAS

Round 1, I might have to go buy a TiVO for that one………………..

by Tahoe on Mar 29, 2009 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lol

I’d go with either Caps or Flyers, personally really.
Maybe Flyers more, because then it’d be like a total intense, hair-pulling experience.
And I would love to savour their delicious defeat :)

by AppleSweetRose on Mar 29, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’d like to see PIT/PHI play the 4/5 round and then only have to potentially deal with one of them down the line. CAR needs to cool off a little bit and let PIT/PHI settle into those spots for that to happen though. Regardless of how the seeding shakes out (east and west) I think there are going to be some amazing rounds in the playoffs (again) this year.

by Rob Parker on Mar 29, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm

Actually that does sound like a good match-up that way.
The Canes have been on a hot streak… the bastards. Not sure if they’ll stay in that place for long though, there are enough games left to make their spot shaky.

by AppleSweetRose on Mar 29, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

nice writeup

Don’t need to speak any more about the travel, you know where I stand on that from my posts (less is more). Unless I’m wrong, I don’t think there has ever been a California playoff series. Aside from that, and my internal feeling that I’d like to play the Ducks, I think Nashville might be the better option for a couple of reasons. First, we have a history with them in the playoffs and perhaps a confidence factor (not overconfidence) that we can win. Second, the Ducks are hotter right now than Nashville, and Nashville has a brutal end of season so they are liable to be more tired. And third, if we get Nashville, Detroit doesn’t, which means they gotta travel…….Babcock already said they don’t wanna play Edmonton.

Go Sharks!!

by Tahoe on Mar 29, 2009 2:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Very nice.

Voted Anaheim!
And not because you persuaded me.
St. Louis = boring.
Oilers = um… yah, we’ll have to see.
Ducks = Woo! I mean, the California action war would be pretty cool to watch.
The buildup to that game would be phenomenal. So just for sparks… the Ducks hands down :)

by AppleSweetRose on Mar 29, 2009 2:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Good stuff dude.

I have to say Nashville. Despite the awesomeness that a BoC round would be. I’d hope the Preds would make for yet another quick series win, which is what you want in the first round. The Blues have been on fire lately and they did beat us twice this season. Yes one of those was a shootout, but so was one of our wins.

It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker

by Lurker Shark on Mar 29, 2009 4:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Speaking of Nashville,

just took a 2-1 deficit and turned it into a 3-2 lead in under a minute… Deja vu all over again

by Chicago Shark on Mar 29, 2009 4:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Vancouver vs. Chicago

There was just a huge brawl between the two teams triggered by Byfuglien taking a shot on goal and then giving Robert Luongo an uppercut after he made the save. Now I am not sure who I’d rather see play for the 4th vs. 5th series. Calgary v. Chicago or Vancouver v. Chicago?? Ugh, CHOICES!

Let the end of the world begin with us!!

by insanewidget on Mar 29, 2009 6:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I have Ducks playoff tickets to game "2" and game "3"

So I’m hoping for a Sharks vs Ducks quarterfinal with the Sharks winning in 4 or 6.

by buddahead9 on Mar 31, 2009 8:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Edmonton

might be the easiest opponent followed by Anaheim then St Louis
i mean yeah Rolosson had 41 saves that one night against us but we can’t let that intimidate us

by Brian5517209 on Mar 31, 2009 8:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

Managing Editor

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Xbox360hockey_small Jon Allred

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikeyicon_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady