The Long and Winding Road
If you remember all the way back to February, FTF took a look at the bubble boys of the Western Conference. It's purpose was to see who the Sharks would draw in the first round.
Funny how things change.
St. Louis wasn't even on the list, and only a Chris Mason shutout on the final game of the season against the Colorado Avalanche prevented the Note from heading to San Jose. Pronger was predicted to be headed out East at the deadline. Now? He's one of a multitude of things that will be giving San Jose headaches during the upcoming series.
After the jump we'll take a look at how the season series played out and see if we can find some key matchups for what's shaping up to be one whale of a series.
Two days to go ladies and gentlemen.
Hold onto your butts.
Season Series
| Dec. | GF |
GA |
PPG | PPop. | PPGA | TS |
SF |
SA |
EVGD | |
| Game One | W (H) | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 41 | 29 | +1 |
| Game Two | L (A) | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 38 | 20 | -3 |
| Game Three | W (H) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 27 | 31 | +2 |
| Game Four | W (A) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 34 | +1 |
| Game Five | L (H) | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 28 | -3 |
| Game Six | W (A) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 21 | 0 |
| TOTAL |
4-2-0 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 31 | 3 | 21 | 192 | 163 | -2 |
| GF/G | GA/G | PP% | PK% | SF/G | SA/G |
| 3.0 | 3.0 | 19.4 | 85.7 | 32.0 | 27.2 |
- No team has won a game by being outscored at even strength. On the same token, no team has won without at least drawing even on special teams. Call it a wash?
- Shots (and most likely scoring opportunities) were in the Sharks favor during 2008, while it has been much closer in that department during the last four tilts. Bears resemblance to the Sharks overall play this season.
- There has been only one game where the Sharks have had less power play opportunities than the Ducks. Seems like a trend. It's been mentioned here and there throughout the comments, but for the sake of mass consumption we will reiterate- a tightly officialed series will be beneficial to the Sharks, while a typical "let the players play" series will benefit the Ducks. The profoundness of that statement is shocking, no?
- In reality only games five and six will be able tell us anything about the series; Anaheim's roster went through a fairly major overhaul at the trade deadline.
Getzlaf's bald noggin is scary, but it's his line that really frightens me. In terms of shutting them down, I liked the promise of Moen-Goc-Grier in that it did two things. For starters, it put defensively oriented players together who play heavy PK minutes. With the last change in San Jose, McLellan would have ample opportunity to match this line up against them more the majority of shifts. On a second note, it gave us a good man from the dot to win faceoffs and keep the puck out of our zone.
However, David Pollak is now reporting that Cheechoo will be replacing Mike Grier on that line. Cheech's skating ability makes me a little wary to include him in a shutdown line- the speed of Ryan and Perry on the wings could cause some issues in our defensive zone. From what I can garner from this print edition piece, it seems we may see top line against top line (Getzlaf v. Thornton). I'm comfortable with that, while at the same time a bit disappointed- having Moen, Goc, and Grier eat minutes against Getzlaf has the potential to give our top tandem better looks in the offensive zone, especially when you factor in the last change that will be alloted in San Jose.
Regardless of the match up, Getzlaf's line is the horsepower in Anaheim's offensive engine- shut them down, and the Ducks fairly porous secondary scoring will be hard-pressed to keep them in games. Pavelski, Michalek, and Clowe will be instrumental in taking the load off Big Joe's shoulders, as he'll probably be drawing top dog Captain Elbows. The second line just might be the ones who send us to the second round.
When it comes to the blueline, let's roll out the ol' sports cliches- defense wins championships. Both teams are fairly well stacked in that regard, and I go from giving the nod to Anaheim back to giving the nod to San Jose on a minute-by-minute basis. Pronger and Niedermayer are going to eat big minutes for the Ducks, while Boyle and Vlasic will do the same for San Jose. It's really the depth where things get interesting.
For the Sharks, Christian Ehrhoff is going to be the key here. There's no real need to explain why- he's been inconsistent this season, and yet possesses the tools to be a huge difference maker, maybe even a series changer. With Francoise Beauchemin returning and Ryan Whitney looking to regain last season's playoff form, it's going to be essential that Ehrhoff ends up putting his best foot forward. He might be the X Factor, at least on the Sharks blueline- it's hard to imagine Blake or Boyle making too many mistakes, Vlasic will be rock solid as he has been all year, Murray's skating won't be too much of an issue against the lines he will most likely draw etc. If Ehrhoff elevates his game the Sharks will be looking very good indeed.
As for the sixth defensemen, I've been a bit underwhelmed by Brad Lukowich since he came back from surgery. He's made some bad reads behind the net and in the neutral zone, something that wasn't happening in the early part of the year. Semenov is a big body that could be useful against Anaheim, and he has improved immensely this season. All that being said I'm wary to see him dressed. If you're going to give him starts (which is pretty unlikely, at least until the series gets underway and McLellan can reassess his pairing performance), you'd have to think it's at home and not in Anaheim. Kent Huskins is a nice idea, but I think he may be in the same boat as Torrey Mitchell- do you play a guy who hasn't suited up for a single game with the team all year? Especially in the playoffs? It's a risky maneuver, and one you might take when you have a decent cushion in a series- say game five at home up 3-1. Anything before that would be surprising and maybe a little haphazard.
Goaltending? It's pretty simple in my opinion- Hiller is going to play well and keep the Ducks in games, Nabokov is going to play well and keep the Sharks in games while stealing a couple along the way. They're both good goaltenders, but Nabby can be great. I like how it looks in this department, even though Jiggy waiting on the bench could be a wildcard. We'll see.
*******
Let's talk about the elephant in the room- San Jose hasn't scored an even strength goal in 222 minutes. That's three non-OT playoff games and a healthy chunk of a fourth. Yikes.
It's disheartening, and it hasn't been the Sharks strong point all season. We've touched on it's importance here, as well as in other assorted posts throughout the year. Click that link if you need an explanation.
Even Strength Stats
| GF (5v5) | GF(4v4) | GF(3v3) | TotalGF | GA(5v5) | GA(4v4) | GA(3v3) | TotalGA | Goal Dif. | |
| SJS | 136 | 10 | 0 | 146 | 125 | 11 | 0 | 136 | +10 |
| ANA | 150 | 4 | 2 | 156 | 137 | 6 | 0 | 143 | +13 |
A three goal differential advantage over the course of 82 games is really nothing to fret about, but when San Jose has shown chinks in the offensive armor it's been during the course of even strength play. Relying on the power play to get you through a series, let alone a deep playoff run, is not a very comforting idea at all.
That being said, Anaheim does take a lot of penalties (4th in NHL), and their PK hasn't helped them out at all this year, currently resting at 23rd in the NHL. It killed them against Dallas last season in the first round and could be their achilles heel for the second straight. If 5 v 5 continues to sputter for San Jose, that just may be the ticket to the second round.
*******
All in all, the Sharks scoring depth matches up very nicely when compared to Anaheim. San Jose's in a position where Big Joe and Patty could be relatively quiet on the scoresheet and still win the series; outplaying Anaheim's top line is not necessary, but breaking even with them will be.
To put it in perspective- six twenty goal scorers on San Jose, four on Anaheim. Ten skaters with double digits on San Jose, seven on Anaheim. Go point for point with Getzlaf, Perry, and Ryan, and there's going to be a favorable window to the second round. Selanne has looked like he's found a new gear the last ten games, but I'm not too sure he has a consistent pivot man that can set him up with enough scoring chances to outplay Michalek, Clowe, and Pavelski.
It's going to be a rough ride, but I like our chances.
Go Sharks.
82 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
what up dude
i’m up early with ya. Nice analysis.
In my opinion the sharks need to get out to a quick start. They’ve been damned this year by falling behind early and the same kind of thing could happen in a series if they aren’t careful. The team has had hte luxury of holding back during the second half of the season. I’m hoping the coaching staff has some tricks up their sleeve to throw the Ducks off in the first couple of games. If we can put them in a hole, I’d be pretty confident. But hey we never know what’s gonna happen right!? good work man
All about dominating early....
Most experts seem to think that this series will last seven games, but I doubt itt’l make it to six. If the Sharks come out and lay it on the Ducks early, Anaheim won’t have a chance. I’m looking for the solid puck movement and crisp plays that we saw earlier in the season. With everyone back healthy, I’m thinking that will happen.
I liked Boyle’s interview during the first intermission of the Kings game. He was PISSED that the Sharks didn’t understand the importance of that game. I’m hoping that he brings that competitive fire into the postseason and drives this team to compete at its highest level.
I don’t think the Ducks are what the Flames were last season, and because of that, I don’t think they will give this new, tougher, more experienced Sharks team more trouble than Calgary did last year. Remember, the Sharks went 1-1-2 against the Flames in the 2007-2008 season, each game was decided by one goal. Calgary had San Jose’s number all year and forced 7, the Ducks have played two good games against the Sharks all year.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
i like your positivity
since i consider you an expert, it gives me a boost. I also agree wholeheartedly about dominating early!
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions
last sentence should read:
Calgary had San Jose’s number all year and forced 7, the Ducks have played two (maybe three) solid games against the Sharks this season and will be lucky to make it back to Anaheim to play game 6.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
by Matthew_Taylor on Apr 14, 2009 7:51 AM PDT up reply actions
What did I miss?
I missed a lot of hockey didn’t I?
I think this was the match up that we all wanted right? I’d much rather play Anaheim than the blues.
I havent been able to read anything about any of the last 5 games. I saw we beat Colorado 1-0 in a shoot out. What the flip happened there?
Good to be back! Lets keep it together sharks!
I knew that was coming!
Fear the Fin....where being an old guy isn't all bad
by Dave Valentine on Apr 14, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
Welcome back.
You didn’t miss much. And you’re back just in time for the important stuff.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions
Yea...
I just read ESPN and SI’s coverage of the first round, and they both have the Ducks as their upset special. It sickens me.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
Nice work, Plank
@TCY: I heard that when they briefly covered hockey the other day. Actually made me sit there and “watch” their Master’s coverage to get to the Western match ups. They seemed to love the Ducks. Good thing is, I don’t have to agree. It will be a heckuva series, I tell you what.
resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com
Oh I definitely don’t agree. I guess I’m ok with the Sharks having few believers again. Doesn’t matter to me, and it’s not like this will be decided based on who picks who.
I just can’t wait for these teams to start skating. God… please… start skating.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
by Matthew_Taylor on Apr 14, 2009 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions
I have to admit to being worried
but I think any fan or player going into to the first round over confident is in peril.
resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com
it's ok
i think i prefer it this way to the sharks going in red hot and expecting to walk all over the ducks, only to be surprised – kind of like what happened last year.
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously?
What did they base it on? Anaheim won a cup a few years ago and Sharks haven’t won one yet? I pretty sure we all know these are different teams
I don’t know if you guys read Puck Prospectus, but they have a bunch of numbers and stuff that don’t really make much sense to me. At least they picked San Jose. You guys with your smartyness will probably understand it more than me…
i still think
sharks take the series in 5 games. now that i think that, it’s last 6 games.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
Sharks in 6
Detroit beats Columbus in 6, Blues in 7, Chicago in 6.
1. Sharks
2. Detroit
3. Chicago
4. St. Louis
Sharks in 6, Chicago in 7
Then its Sharks in 7 over Chicago.
That’s my prediction. I think they play the Devils in the Finals. We’ll see though!
Make sure to put this...
in the prediction thread.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
by Matthew_Taylor on Apr 14, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Nice stuff Plankster
The only part I’m in a bit a disagreement with is Luckowich. I agree he hasn’t been on top of his game the last few bouts. But feel like his Cup experience will come through and pay off. Everyone seems to forget him when they talk about all the Cup winners on this team. Here’s hoping he makes some folks go “Oh yeah.”
Fear the Fin....where being an old guy isn't all bad
I guess I should have been more specific- I definitely agree Luko should be the sixth man. His play lately has just concerned me a bit.
Talking about Cup rings, it’s going to be interesting to see how much the addition of six (eight if you include coaching staff) play going forward.
Here’s hoping he makes some folks go "Oh yeah."

Fear The Fin: Where The Second Round Is Overrated
That looks more like me after a hard workout….fat and red faced
Fear the Fin....where being an old guy isn't all bad
by Dave Valentine on Apr 14, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm pretty much on board here
I think even the last couple of games aren’t a great read, as the Sharks didn’t have a full squad.
I’m actually okay with the current lines, for now. In Anaheim, Shelly has to sit, there is no way Shelly-JR-Greir can get stuck on the ice against Perry and Getzlaf with Anaheim having the last change. In the end, though, I hope to see McGinn-Goc-Moen, they gave the Ducks fits.
If the Sharks do get up 2-0 or 3-1, I think we will see Huskins, if only to see what he can do and to shake the rust out. Huskins may very well be the Shark’s victory cigar.
Good read Plank
I agree with you, I like our chances too. I feel really positive about this team unlike the end of the season.
plank
you nailed the key to this series..can the ducks stay out of the penalty box….our pk is a nightmare to watch…we play a passive box style…pk..ive been screaming for our coaches to change it….im guessing we employ it to save energy and jump on any mistakes a tired PP would make..which have lead to some todd marchant short-handed goals…but i hate it
our 2nd line will be nuetrilized (when i say say second line i mean selanne) by the better sharks D..the lonly way selanne is a threat is on the PP…
the only way we when is with some good getz-pears-ryan forechecking and some lucky 3rd or 4th line scoring….or if the sharks go out of character and start taking penalties….which is why (and i hope i dont get my head bit off again) we should try to antogonize the sharks a little……and we all know who can start that up “Lorrey Jerry”
someone mentioned the dallas series last year….thats right..we lose a special teams battle hands down
El Spade-o
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Apr 14, 2009 9:56 AM PDT reply actions
PP
can the ducks stay out of the penalty box
that’s easy, NO. we’ll get plenty off PP time, as long as the refs call the games tight like they tend to do during the playoffs(at least in regulation). in overtime or overtimes, i don’t see a lot of penalties being called, just look at last year.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions
PP in Playoffs
As some of you know, the ref’s are MUCH more reluctant to blow the whistle in the playoffs. So what does that mean. It means that the Quacks will still do what they did in the regular season, hook, hold, etc. however they will get away with it in the playoffs. We just need to keep our heads in the game and not get the retaliation penalty.
I wrote this in WTC as well but I think it bears repeating.
There’s a lot of talk about Anaheim being a big team but what are we? a small team? If I remember correctly, we are the biggest, most physical team in the league. I don’t care what anyone says, the Sharks have been hurt the last two months, have had relatively nothing to play for and are now ready and hungrier than ever for the cup.
I take the Sharks in 5. Bring it.
2 days and counting….
-SD_Sharks_Fan aka Timmaaay
by SD_Sharks_Fan on Apr 14, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions
I have to disagree a bit
I was watching some of the games from the Flames series, as well as Game 5 from the Dallas series, and there was still a fair share of penalties called. If I remember correctly, in Game 7 the Sharks got something like 5 PP, and was able to cash in either two or three of them. And then of course, there was the 4OT Game 6 in the Dallas series which was decided on a PP (stupid Brian Campbell).
The Ducks are the second most penalized team in the league, so even if the number of penalties called in the playoffs decrease, the Sharks should still see an advantage in number of powerplays.
Oh, and believe it or not, but the Sharks (for all their reputation of being a finesse team) is fourth in the league in hits, after only the Rangers, Kings, and Stars. And Anaheim, with their reputation of being physical, is fourteenth. Just something to think about :)
great perspective...
when it comes to hits. Makes me wonder whether we are appraising anaheim more on their reputation than on their actual play this season
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh, and believe it or not, but the Sharks (for all their reputation of being a finesse team) is fourth in the league in hits, after only the Rangers, Kings, and Stars.
Well that statistic lost a bit of importance in my book, I guess.
None of those teams strike me as particularly scary to go up against from a physical standpoint, and not many of them even strike me as good. But keep counting whatever-it-is, NHL!
http://www.battleofcali.com/
OMG, HOLY @#$%
the Sharks (for all their reputation of being a finesse team) is fourth in the league in hits
shouldn’t it be the Sharks ARE 4th in the league? i think i’m right. so this is what it feels like, it feels wierd, i’ll stick to my bs.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions
I think that’s exactly what the Ducks will do, Spado. Best case scenario for Ducks fans is something like the Spurs-Suns matchup a few years ago when Horry knocked down Nash and somehow got Amare and Diaw(?) suspended. If Perry can get, say, Clowe and Ehrhoff suspended a game for trying to stick up for Nabby, he can go scoreless and be considered a positive for the Ducks.
agree with u for once…if all trends…play out….should be a short series..yes
El Spade-o
by SPADE-IN-VICTORHELL on Apr 14, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm also on the Sharks in 5 bandwagon
Sharks are healthy, motivated, more talented, almost impenetrable at home, and facing a team that plays into their greatest strength, their PP. Other than Pronger, Parros, and Getlaf, they aren’t that physical. Honestly, this was my #1 choice for the first round (I know, blasphemy!).
But to respond to Plank's post
I agree pretty much entirely. The Ducks go as the Getzlaf line goes. If we can reasonably neutralize them, which is very possible over a 7 game series, then I don’t see how we don’t finish them off in 6 (and if it goes to 7, then the Tank will surely play a role in the Ducks’ ousting). If the Sharks stay disciplined, then Selanne is pretty much a non-factor. Pronger, Niedermayer, Whitney and co.‘s offense is a wash with our blueline’s offense. They’re shutdown forwards are good, but if we use our size, we should be able to grind them down. While our shutdown players are all at least 6’1 and 200lbs +. Hiller is good, but inexperienced in the playoffs, while Giguere is experienced, but even more inconsistent then Nabby’s been this year.
Besides keeping the Getzlaf linein check, I think the 1st periods for Nabokov will be the telling factor. When it comes to 1st periods, either Nabokov is great or terrible. When he makes it through the 1st without getting lit up, he seems to click into gear and finish the game strong, but when he comes out soft, he seems to struggle to make a real impact in a game. Yes, it’s not always about how many saves, but when they occur – however, giving up 2 to 3 goals in the 1st on 6 or 7 shots is is just too hard to overcome the majority of the time, even if he’s making circus saves in the 2nd and 3rd. Instead of putting the onus on our offense to win the games, it be much better to take the pressure off our 5 on 5 play and let them work their magic without the stress of needing to score.
The Ducks go as the Getzlaf line goes.
I’d argue they go as the goaltending goes. There’s been plenty of stretches this season where Getzlaf has been dominant and the Ducks have lost anyways, and there’s been stretches where he’s been invisible but the team wins in other ways.
When Getzlaf was briefly atop the league in scoring, the Ducks weren’t atop the league in much of anything.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
But I didn’t say just Getzlaf’s play, I said the whole line’s play. I think having competent goaltending goes without saying as far as the playoffs go. No team is going to go very far if they’re keeper can’t make saves. With that said, Getzlaf and Perry (and Ryan for the most part) has been the backbone of the team this year. As soon as the three of them began to play together, Anaheim’s season started to turn around. Yes, switching to Hiller provided stability that helped anchor their rise and it remains to be seen who they lean on against the Sharks. However, so much of their offense and moment derives from their top line. If they aren’t scoring, the Ducks won’t make it out of this series. If the top line plays the way they did in the last game at the Tank, then the Ducks can afford to be less then stellar in net. If whoever is in net really nose-dives then obviously any team would be screwed, but I definitely believe the Ducks’ fate lies with Perry-Getzlaf-Ryan
Go be heard!
Over at Mirtle’s site, he has a poll asking who will win the Cup. Before the Blues fans get wind of this, go vote!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Apr 14, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions
Done
So, what in the knick-knack-paddywack-give-a-dog-a-bone is going on around here? — Dan Rusanowsky
Heh….I smell upset possibly….but this Ducks-Sharks series will go the distance.
Craziest Devils Fan West of the Mississippi
I smell nothing of the sort.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
by Matthew_Taylor on Apr 14, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions
You lock it up...
I will not tolerate anything but support! :D
by SD_Sharks_Fan on Apr 14, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
alright guys check it
according to my calculations, the Sharks’ “Birthday” is May 5, 1990. This makes the Sharks’ sign a Taurus. This is the Sharks’ weekly horoscope:
“The week gets off to a sexy start, thanks to the Sagittarius moon. If you’re passionate about a person or an issue, let your feelings be known. Your forthright declarations will be ultra inspiring to others. If you’ve been struggling to kick a nagging cold or feeling fatigued, the “virus” may be guilt that’s lingering in your subconscious. Do you feel as if you’ve let someone down? Have you had a thought or emotion that you deemed “bad”? The more you judge yourself, the bigger the issue will swell. Make plans with a compassionate and trustworthy friend over the weekend. You need to talk this one out. The truth shall set you free and give you a major dose of perspective. By next week, you’ll wonder what the big deal was all along."
I wonder what it means!!!
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 4:17 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
update!
Now I put “San Jose Sharks” and “Stanley Cup” into the Love Calculator online.
73% chance of a successful relationship
Seems like things are looking up
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions
however...
“Dr. Love thinks a relationship might work out between Anaheim Ducks and The Second Round, but the chance is very small”
(14%!!!!)
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I love this so much. Great idea.
Fear the Fin: Approved by ESPN and Logan Couture
by Matthew_Taylor on Apr 14, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m almost weirded out by it.
Fear the Fin....where being an old guy isn't all bad
by Dave Valentine on Apr 14, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah just a little
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Is love in the air?
The Sharks and I both share our star sign.
Does this mean that we are a good love match or a bad love match?
“Dr. Love thinks that a relationship between Morti and San Jose Sharks has a very good chance of being successful, but this doesn’t mean that you don’t have to work on the relationship. Remember that every relationship needs spending time together, talking with each other etc.”
by a10dency2ask on Apr 14, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions
ESPN.com's picks are up...
…and Barry Melrose picked the Ducks in 7.
I think we’re good.
I has good practice. Mike Grier keep shooting puck at me, and my confidence boosted very more. - "Evgeni Nabokov"
ducks in 7 years?
this is good news
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions
barry who?
never heard of him, but that matthew barNABY guy seems like he knows a lot. his prediction:
Sharks
(win in 5)
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Man
I want all of this predictions to stop, cause I’m ready for the playoffs!!!
Wait it starts in two days? ughhhkhflksdflewjhroiejwopirjadlkfjsd;lkjeo
same to you?
and shouldn’t it be these predictions?
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions
i'm not just crazy
i’m much more! woooooooooooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooo
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions
getting kuhrayzeer by the second
summer is close, so close i can taste it with my ear
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions
sounds like something you can get from Colbert’s pharmaceutical company.
“side effects include taster’s ear, summer toes, and rabid sun burn”
resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com
Sounds like fun.
And here’s hoping they name the urine recycler after him. Sad to see his followers out game us Browncoats.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions
I really thought they’d name it Serenity. I still think they will. Though I have a feeling Colbert can swear in Chinese…
resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com
warning
this product is not for men or women who are pregnant, not pregnant or may become pregnant
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 14, 2009 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions
So who does that leave?
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions
men/women are adults
so that would leave babies, kids and teenagers.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 15, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions
i'm going to assume
that’s a compliment
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 15, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Hopefully they do.
We shall see though. The NASA PAO is notoriously bad at dealing with free publicity or publicity of any kind for that matter.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Well done NASA. Kinda.
They named Node 3 Tranquility and branded the new treadmill the Combined Operational Load Bearing External Resistance Treadmill (COLBERT). You acronymphiles could learn a few things from them.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Haha, that’s pretty solid. How many votes did he win by?
Fear The Fin: Where The Second Round Is Overrated
Yeah I know.
Apparently someone thought naming it after Tranquility Base was better than a Firefly transport.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 14, 2009 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions
dude
then why hold a vote? They picked the 8th on the list. Whatever. Color me disappointed, NASA.
resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com
Yeah they're bad at this kind of thing.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 15, 2009 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions

by 

























