Game 4 Wrap Up: Pathetic
Sick. Of. This.
This game was practically an elimination game, and the Sharks played like a team that didn't care.
Not the best way to win a series.
I'm disgusted. I've got nothing left to say.
Well, I always have a little bit to say. Here are my keys to the Sharks loss tonight:
- No Sustained Pressure: The Sharks were unable to keep the offense moving for any substantial amount of time tonight. Anaheim did a great job of clogging up the lanes, getting bodies in the way of passes and shots.
- Nabokov: I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing it anymore. Nabby let in two soft goals (1st goal, 3rd goal), that are just plain inexcusable. I'm not saying that Boucher should start, but Nabby's best days are behind him. I used to trust him to put together a solid string of saves, but not anymore. The five-hole goals are killing me.
- Thornton: I'm the biggest Joe apologist in San Jose, but Joe has been awful this whole series. He's tried to make the big pass instead of making the smart pass, but has only helped to stagnate the offense.
- No speed: The Sharks skated heavily, with absolutely no drive whatsoever. I can hardly remember an odd man rush all game, and the transition was stagnant. Pitiful.
0 recs |
122 comments
|
Comments
Well said
Lucky Signature...
It brings good luck. Don't Question it.
by idunno723 on Apr 23, 2009 10:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No heart.
and with that. looks like I do have an extra ticket for Saturday’s game. ugh! I’ve been to an elimination game before (season before last) and I hated it!!! So hoping that isn’t what I’m going to on Saturday. workcycle dude, email me if you are serious and we can work out the details.
(sighs)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Apr 23, 2009 10:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Perry goal was tipped in. Hard to blame Nabokov there. But yeah, your game assessment is bang on.
by Sean Zandberg on Apr 23, 2009 10:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's not as much as it was soft...
But the goals to the five hole are straight disgusting. Besides the Getzlaf shot, the Ryan flying tip in, and the Wisniewski shot (which should have been saved also, IMO), most of the other shots have been straight five hole goals.
Blah!
Fear the Fin: Where we just have to want it more!
by That'll Cheech You on Apr 24, 2009 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
mailed in this game
unfortunately, I think there will be some serious questions whenver the offseason starts, even if we make it out of this series alive. My biggest concern right now is actually Pavs and the second line, they really have been off their consistent game.
by a10dency2ask on Apr 23, 2009 10:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree
First two losses stung, but I saw the heart there. I saw positive signs. Nothing tonight. Absolutely nothing. Sub-par goaltending, hardly any generated offense and defensive breakdowns. I’d like to think that we can hold serve on home ice and then steal one on the road in Game 6, but this is the first time I’ve seriously doubted this team.
by Sharkbit12 on Apr 23, 2009 10:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
There's just so much wrong
Hockey Night in Canada did a good job breaking it down: look at Thornton on all 3 goals. He’s just floating around out there – near the puck carrier, but just putting forth a minimal effort. And he directly caused the 3rd goal! Pavs can’t win a faceoff. Get dirty, dammit! Play with some urgency!
Sickening to watch. This hurts.
by Prairie Shark on Apr 23, 2009 10:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
AP got it right on
From the newswire:
Evgeni Nabokov made 22 saves in another unspectacular effort for the Sharks. They won the Presidents’ Trophy with a franchise-best 117 points, but they’re now one game away from the worst postseason flop yet in a recent history full of embarrassing faceplants.
San Jose was knocked out in the second round in each of the past three seasons, leading to coach Ron Wilson’s firing. The Sharks have never advanced past the conference finals during five consecutive playoff appearances—and unless their top two lines awaken from their four-game slumber, the franchise could be in for a wholesale overhaul.
by HitThePost on Apr 23, 2009 10:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
this is depressing
something needs to change
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 23, 2009 11:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Embarrasing. I love the Sharks, but I find it very hard to back them after this performance. This isn’t about losing the game, this is about our best players being invisible. I could rag on Thornton myself, but others will be more much eloquent then I can be right now. When your leaders play the way ours’ did tonight, what can you expect from the rest of the team. F—-ing shameful. I’ll be selling my ticket for Game 5 because I will not support a team that simply doesn’t care about winning the big games.
Joe Thornton, Hart and Presidents’ Trophy winner – and no one will remember him in 20 years. Just shameful.
by Teas on Apr 23, 2009 11:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
and the problem is not Nabokov. I don’t think he’s been spectacular, but he’s good enough with a strong team in front of him to win it all.
by Teas on Apr 23, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course the problem is Flopokov i don’t understand why people can’t figure that out ….remember when Steve shields and his 8th seeded sharks beat the President trophy winning blues ! I do Steve shields wasn’t that great of a goalie but he still got it done against a team that had a overated goalie in Roman Turek hmmmmm…what ever happen to roman turek after that season?
by izinya_dick on Apr 24, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, it’s not. I don’t think he’s the solution by any stretch, but if had any offense and a half competent then Nabby’s soft goals wouldn’t be an issue cause he still makes enough big saves to keep us in enough games to win a 7 game series.
by Teas on Apr 24, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pathetic
is right.
What else is there to say?
by Tim Weiss on Apr 23, 2009 11:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
that is the word I kept saying over and over during the 3rd period. They not only did so many things wrong, they had no heart. Most everyone on the Sharks should be ashamed of themselves. Everything they brought to game 3 was left at game 3. Do they think it’s the best of 16?
I'll drink that! oh...I'll drink TO that.
by theneverman on Apr 24, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dan nailed it, this was embarrassing.
If we’re going down, at least go down swinging. Bakes says take it one game at a time and I hope the boys do so Saturday.
And while TCY may be one of the biggest Thornton apologists around, I’m one of the biggest Marleau ones. But we need more than just d out of you, Patty. We need you on the scoresheet.
Oh, and if Colin Campbell suspends JR for the endgame extracurriculars I wouldn’t be surprised. Extremely pissed, but not surprised. That man has used this postseason to prove just how incompetent he is and how little consistency the league’s supplemental discipline has.
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 23, 2009 11:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The problem is one game isn’t enough now. They had the ‘one game’ in Games 2, 3 and 4 and we got collectively one games’ effort. How a team with so much talent can simply disappears just makes no sense.
These performance have rocked the confidence of the team and the support that we really have no reason to believe the Sharks will show up on any given night, whether it’s a Game 1 or a Game 7.
by Teas on Apr 23, 2009 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand it either...
Boyle, Blake, Thornton, Marleau, Clowe, Pavelski, Seto??? Where the hell are they?
Vlasic played like crap tonight, again.
I never thought that I could get bored watching a Sharks game ever. But I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by anything they do – or don’t do – in the playoffs anymore.
Hopefully they can pull off a miracle…
I’ll forever be a Sharks fan though. Not too much to be a fan of right now, however.
by Tim Weiss on Apr 23, 2009 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Ill be a Sharks fan eternally, but this year is a wash. A comeback means nothing cause the Sharks have already shown their colors in the first round to an 8th seed.
by Teas on Apr 23, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
they can only win one at a time
so it is senseless to say a comeback from a 3-1 deficit wouldn’t mean anything. seriously now, if the Sharks can pull out the game tonight and stave off elimination again in game 6 in Anaheim, come home for a 7th game and find a way.
Then how would that do anything except give them plenty of confidence. Especially against whoever comes out of the Hawks/Flames series.
if the Sharks do comeback and beat the Ducks, then that will be the teams real true colors.
the ability to comeback from anything is what Champions are made of.
they can take their first step towards that by winning tonight.
Lets Go Sharks!!
by #1Sharksfan on Apr 25, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's about breaking a large problem down into manageable parts.
As he put it, the Sharks can’t look at it as winning three in a row. You have to win one game. Then you have to win one more and so on. Focusing on all three is just going to increase your chances of losing one. How many times does this happen in baseball? After losing an elimination game the manager explains not using a given player because he was saving him for the next game. That’s just stupid and the same thing applies here.
The boys can’t hold anything back Saturday. Can they play like that? Yes. Will they play like that? I sure as hell hope so.
Go Sharks
It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
by Lurker Shark on Apr 24, 2009 6:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perfectly stated TCY...
I can’t add anything to this. This mirrors my thoughts exactly.
I’m convinced that the Sharks will have huge changes this offseason. They’ve assembled a great team the past 5 years, and still, every year, they come out and do the same shit in the playoffs…no matter who’s coaching or who’s on the team that’s won cups. There is one consistant thread through all our playoff failures, though…Marleau. Now, don’t get me wrong, I love Marleau. Like, seriously, we share a first name, and he’s been my favorite player for a while now. I think he’s a good player. But he’s not a leader, and not a player that can lead a team through the playoffs. The Sharks need a capitan they can rally around, and, sadly, I do not think that Marleau is it. Boyle might be, though. I wouldn’t be surprised to see both Marleau and Thornton shopped this offseason…
Ugh, I need to sleep off this hangover…and I haven’t even been drinking. Probably should have been though, that was pathetic.
Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!
by ZeroIndulgence on Apr 23, 2009 11:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And just to be clear...
I’m not blaming or hanging this all on Marleau, the player. It takes everyone working together to look this bad in the playoffs. My problem is with Marleau, the Capitan.
Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!
by ZeroIndulgence on Apr 23, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I don't get is...
-Why pull Nabby when the best scoring chance for us was when R. Niedermayer tipped S. Niedermayer’s pass over the net?
-Why we were playing pre-season hockey in April?
-Why Duck fans take off with five minutes left in the game? Sure getting out of parking is a biatch down here in LA of Anaheim, but you dropped a lot of money to see your team take a 3 games-to-1 lead on the “best” team in the NHL? why not watch it and celebrate a little?
by buddahead9 on Apr 23, 2009 11:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
despite everything
I’m happy about this season, I hope they can beat the odds and win out but even if they can’t…
go sharks
by a10dency2ask on Apr 23, 2009 11:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That'll Cheech You-- Couldn't have said it better
When a team falls, you look first to the Captain. This team has been on a steady decline since January and has failed to right the ship up. I don’t blame McClellan, because it’s fairly obvious now that the problem is in the lockerroom. I don’t blame DW because this team on paper has the wheels to be a dynasty.
Your best players have to be your best players. Marleau, Thornton, Nabokov, Pavelski, Michalek, and Setoguchi have all had a very poor playoff.
I’m frustrated as well with Nabby giving up soft goals. I know if we start Boucher in game 5 it might spell the end of Nabby’s tenure here. But it’s the 11th hour. And Nabby has to leave his ego at the door and sit himself out if he’s not playing to his usual standard.
It frustrates me to understand what separates the development of players in San Jose versus the development of players in Detroit. In Detroit, everyone’s held responsible and it seems that everyone contributes. Osgood had a horrid regular season, but stepped up his game huge in the first 3 games of the playoffs. Two-bit players like Ericsson, Franzen, Stuart, Hudler all contributed huge in addition to Datsyuk, Lidstrom and Z.
What separates a Thornton from a Crosby? It’s that winning attitude. I see that competitive streak in Crosby’s eyes every time he hits the ice.
Well, Saturday’s elimination day. Sharks have their backs to the walls. Let’s see if they can approach this a game at a time. Go Sharks. We’ll be behind you.
Where hockey injuries in San Diego are thumb blisters from your XBox controller.
by Will Bulldozer on Apr 23, 2009 11:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
WoW
I couldn’t even watch the last 3 minutes of the game. I was that disgusted by the lackluster play of a team that can dominate others when it feels like it. Now is the time of year where they have to stop remembering how we beat the D..I..C..K…S in the regular season and start playing on a “we want this as a team” level. Forced passes, face-offs losses, stagnant PP, and a rep for buckling under pressure. We suck when teams play aggressive against us. Each second round exit, starting with the Oilers, they apply pressure; we blow it. The thing that pisses me off the most about all this, the people that question Marleau and his abilities in the playoffs. Last time I checked, Joe has no goals and was -3 in game 4. Marleau does not have the jump he had during the season, and I agree with the people that think that he is playing hurt. Everyone points the finger at Marleau, but where has Joe been? Where has Nabby been? Our other “big guns”? Stop bitching about Marleau, period. Captains can give all the Kevin Costner speeches in the world, but if your team isn’t playing well, it is all for nothing. Start focusing on the team as a whole. Stop pointing the finger at one guy. No one has been that great this series (Boyle was good in game 3, but he, like Marleau and Seto, can often be seen trying to carry the puck into a gang of Ducks, trying to do it all himself, not good). We can come back, but we need to see an inspiring team effort. We can come back, but only if we want it badly enough.
Oh BTW, why didn’t we pick up Nolan in the off-season? He had a respectable year with the Wild and could really be helping us now..
GO SHARKS!
by paintwhite2gray on Apr 24, 2009 12:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
they suck…theyll never win. they have no drive. end of story.
by Sir Snipesalot on Apr 24, 2009 12:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not Suprised
and neither should any of you die hards. The Sharks went 17-17 over the last 2 1/2 months of the season going into the playoffs. Only the strong survive at playoff time and the Sharks blew their wad back in January. I’m happy they will go out early so the most ignorant fans in hockey can move on with their lives.
by Ricky Reed on Apr 24, 2009 12:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Finishing strong or not makes no difference in the playoffs
St. Louis had the 2nd best record since February, yet got blown out by Vancouver in four games.
Right now, I feel sorry for Jeremy Roenick.
Where hockey injuries in San Diego are thumb blisters from your XBox controller.
by Will Bulldozer on Apr 24, 2009 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
St. Louis was just happy to be there ………..there’s a big difference. If the Sharks are playing like they did in Jan. they would sweep the Ducks. Of course finishing strong does not guarantee playoff success but in this case it is exactly the reason the Sharks will be playing golf next week.
by Ricky Reed on Apr 24, 2009 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what you’re saying is that finishing strong is important and gives you an advantage over others, but only if you were expected to be there. While if you weren’t expected to be there, finishing strong is meaningless because you reach game #83, exhale, and say “gee, its nice to be here”??
http://redwingsvbluejackets.blogspot.com/
by IAmJoe on Apr 24, 2009 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ricky Reed
is a huge douche-bag. Are you sure you want to call the bay area ignorant?
You’re welcome for apple computers. Enough said. If you want to continue this, we should compare SAT scores. I guarantee mine are at least 25% higher.
Although I’m impressed with your ability to use the correct “their” twice! Well constructed first sentence, douche.
We have been, and most of us remain, behind the best team in the National Hockey League. Do you know what that means?
It means I can tell you my team was better than yours all season, and I’m guaranteed to be right. Feels good. Or is it well? Could you please help me? I’m so ignorant.
Ricky Reed you are to this forum as ticks are to a brush-brushing hiker. There’s an SAT analogy for you. Dick.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 3:56 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Also
Thank you for joining four hours ago.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 4:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just so you could post this ridiculous rant.
If you are over the age of 15; inexcusable.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 4:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed, there’s nothing ignorant about being frustrated with a team you watch all season long, totally under-performing in the playoffs. RR is indeed, the douchebag of the day.
I'll drink that! oh...I'll drink TO that.
by theneverman on Apr 24, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not really nabbys fault sure some blame is on him but it helps when you DONT turn the puck over right in front of him
by sPaNiArD440 on Apr 24, 2009 12:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nabby has always consistently been inconsistent. Any team would prefer to have a goalie who stops all the ones he’s expected to stop, and only some of the hard ones, as opposed to all of the hard ones, but only some of the easy ones. Nabby is good enough to do fine on a good team, but he is not in that top echelon of goalies. And he certainly doesn’t deserve to be paid like it.
http://redwingsvbluejackets.blogspot.com/
by IAmJoe on Apr 24, 2009 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree completely
with your assesment of Nabby’s play. Stop the hard ones, let in the easy ones
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 9:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
joe thornton.
doesn’t even deserve caps.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 3:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No cruise control?
How far the mighty have fallen.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Embarassing level of effort
As a longtime (over a decade) Sharks fan that saw every game they played season, I can honestly say that most of this team simply doesn’t care if they win or lose. They only want to play hockey when it is fun. If they are not having fun, you see a performance like this.
Sharks fans deserve better than this. No matter where I go in the country, everyone loves to hate the Sharks. It’s “California Hockey”. Or, Sharks fans are “ignorant” for liking their team. I have been to almost every hockey arena in the league. I can assure you that there are both good and bad hockey fans for every team.
Before all of the Ducks fans get too proud of themselves, take your duck glasses off and roll tape of game 3, then game 4 side by side. If you can tell me with a straight face that the Sharks played hard tonight, then I wish you the continued luck of playing other pathetic teams that care more about themselves than the sport. This series is entirely about the bad play of a team with superior talent and absolutely no heart whatsoever.
If I owned the Sharks, I would send a personal apology to the fans for this effort. I don’t care if the Sharks lose; I care when they don’t try to win. Doug Wilson is going to have to shake a lot of heartless crap out of the roster, resulting in fewer wins but hopefully more honest hockey. I don’t like to watch pro athletes that think this is some kind of joke. I have better things to do with my time (this post notwithstanding)
by Multiple Cells on Apr 24, 2009 1:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
the ducks aren’t winning, the Sharks are losing.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 3:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's One Thing
To lose 6-5 like the Blue Jackets did tonight, on a bad beat, to a team infinitely more talented than they were, is not an embarrassment. To lose the way the Sharks did tonight, mailing the effort in, is unspeakable. We don’t know who’s hurt; we don’t know what’s being said behind closed doors; but we do know that we allegedly signed talent that had Cup experience to make sure what happened tonight didn’t happen. Right now, it’s evident we have a fractured organization that is in need of repair.
Saturday night begins three one-game seasons. It’s not impossible, but it is if the same team shows up then that showed up tonight. And the real potential losers here are the fans, spending hundreds of dollars for tickets, not knowing which group is going to show up. I won’t be there, I’ve already spent my money for playoffs this year, and $110 buys a whole lot of beer that I can drink at home to watch what is turning out to be as bad as the crapshootout.
by Tahoe on Apr 24, 2009 2:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i noticed you used stagnate and stagnant
any interest in knowing what stagnation means in fluid mechanics? It’s when the flow stops completely, slowed by its own resistance to itself. Sound like any Shark’s offense you know?
does to me. im going to game five, and it will be the first of three wins in a row.
by perkins.kit on Apr 24, 2009 3:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Spot on assesment....
You know… I have a question: Where the hell was Murray tonight? Where was the “I am the damn crankshaft and I’m going to tear Selanne’s friggin head clean off” mentality that made game 3 such a huge success??? He is our driving force right now it seems, and by my accounts only really went off about twice that I saw, besides some after-the-whistle-face-washing (which is normal and hardly a motivating factor for teammates). What happened to our boy?
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Apr 24, 2009 5:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
From a player's standoint, pathetic
From a fan’s standpoint, disheartening. Most of the above comments are dead on, as is the post by TCY. The real losers here are the fans, because clearly we want it more than the players. I only caught the 2nd and 3rd, and from the first shift of the third I told the person I was watching with that the Sharks didn’t look like they wanted to be there. I was pissed, swearing at the TV, waiting for our boys to get angry…didn’t happen. It’s a sad day in San Jose (or Chicago for me) when the fans are more angry during a game than the players are.
For 82 games we waited for the playoffs, knowing that if our boys showed up and did what they had done for the better part of those 82 games we would roll through the postseason. We’ve all tried to put past playoff failures behind us, defended our team from those who call us “ignorant” “bandwagoners” and “nontraditional.” Every season after an early exit we hope that the next will bring more heart, will determination and whatever other intangibles we think the Sharks need. Yet, the next season, after the big acquisition, the Stanley Cup experience, the addition of the “missing piece,” something familiar always happens. This year is proving to be no exception.
As I said, the fans are the biggest losers at this point. We love our team, support them through thick and thin, defend their honor against those who would disrespect them (and us), and we get repaid with an effort like this. I put up with shit every year at the United Center from some trashy Hawks fans (not all of them are bad) only to be rewarded with a bush league effort in a critical game. Our cries of “next year” are starting to sound very familiar (Cubs fans, anyone?). I for one will always be a fan of the San Jose Sharks, and that is backed up by the fact that I will still watch game 5 after a disheartening, demoralizing Game 4.
I love our team, as much as any of you. I just hope that they can put on their skates on Saturday knowing that they still have the support of their loyal fanbase. I also hope, for our sake, that they play knowing that they’re here for the fans, because of the fans.
Go Sharks
by Chicago Shark on Apr 24, 2009 6:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Coaching
I’ll admit I don’t know what is said behind closed doors, and I also only got to watch the 3rd period, but why were the forwards trying to continue carrying the puck into the zone when Anaheim was clearly interested in stacking 3-4 players at center ice/their blue line and stick checking the puck away. And the few times they did try and dump the puck, they forgot about the chase part afterwards…dump and line change or dump and stand at the blue line are both ineffective ways to come back from 2-0 and/or 3-0 deficits. I read here on a previous post the prediction the Ducks would do exactly what they did…is there a reason the coaches couldn’t have predicted the same? And why is there no in-game adjustments. I can understand wanting to stick with a scheme, but there is only so many times you should continue to bash your head into a wall before you stop unless you are a fan of serious brain damage. Oh well, as pissed as I am about the lackluster play, I hold out hope that something magical will happen.
by BleedingTheTeal on Apr 24, 2009 6:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
if you really consider that third goal a soft goal,
then you are literally expecting nabby to get a shutout every game, which is obviously impossible to expect someone to be perfect, throwing boucher out there as a name is an absolute joke, don’t get me wrong nabby has been perfect but he’s the best we got. Besides, does it really matter if we can’t score one damn goal.
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 7:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Matt
Don’t be combative just because you can. I never said start Boucher, in fact, I said not to.
Nabby defenders are a dime a dozen, and I’ve been one for years. I don’t expect him to get a shutout every game, but I expect him to play like he’s paid. For the amount he makes, Nabokov should be able to keep us in games. He should make all the saves he is supposed to make, and stop some of the ones he shouldn’t. He’s let in soft goal after soft goal, and he’s always the first to pass the blame onto his teammates.
Granted, we should be scoring, but having an elite goalie is supposed to be like having an elite pitcher. He’ll win you the games you’re supposed to win, and keep you in the games you aren’t. Nabby is not elite. Enough said.
Fear the Fin: Where we just have to want it more!
by That'll Cheech You on Apr 24, 2009 7:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I’m one of the biggest Nabby homers there is, and while I do think our defense could have given him much better support and effort (as has been mentioned–especially regarding joe thorton–Nabby still needs to step it up and start playing out of his mind. If there is one person that can single-handedly impact this team more than anyone else, it’s our goaltender. If he can start making the incredible saves we’ve seen occasionally in the past, it can get his teammates fired up and get us back in this series. And if not, he’s still a solid goaltender and unquestionably a starter, but not elite; not even close.
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm just saying that
you can’t expect him to stop that 3rd goal
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh yea,
and my point about boucher was in my mind even mentioning him is a disrespect but i guess if we are losing nabby is going to take the blame, wrongly in my mind but so be it
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 9:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nabby won't take all the blame...
But he has been so bad this series. Terrible.
Fear the Fin: Where we just have to want it more!
by That'll Cheech You on Apr 24, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
to me the sickest part about this series
is that the ducks have actually skated equally as well as the sharks in the series, which is amazing, we should’ve had a huge advantage here
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our guys haven't come to play yet.
If this “cup experience” is really going to help, we should have seen it last night.
Tomorrow is the last chance for a few guys (Roenick, Blake). If they care, they will get this team ready.
Hustle, hustle, hustle.
Fear the Fin: Where we just have to want it more!
by That'll Cheech You on Apr 24, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if they care
marleau and thornton will get ready too
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 24, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
to me this series boils down to 3 simple things,
a) work ethic- we are getting out worked bottom line no sense of urgency
b) puck management- a lot of our turnovers have directly lead to goals
c) hiller- enough said he’s hot and we’re not “passing of the pads” he gives up no rebounds" and not enough traffic he’s seeing everything
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anytime I see nabby on the goal cam
I look for that puck to whiz under a 5 hole that looks completely closed.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lutefisk history is playoff prologue
It ain’t the red elephant from the grand ol’ party…
This is not the gray elephant from those Oakland A’s, although it may be a distant cousin…
The big ghost white elephant of playoffs past is sitting on bench, pacing locker room floors, and is the sixth player disrupting each shift.
This powerful ghost of playoffs past may even have caused a nearby 4.0 earthquake in Yorba Linda during first intermission.
F*&^ “Puck Luck” as an excuse to explain this dismal series. That sound bite deserves a major penalty.
The fact that the Honda center did not sell out is a very sad reflection by the Duck fan base and irritates me above all other ills.
Yah for sure don-chya-no dat next game looks pretty good to me…
Game 5: Lutefisk Fear and Loathing in San Jose
by Lemon Shark on Apr 24, 2009 7:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
unfortunately
last night’s performance will be my last watching of the Sharks for this series.
That’s not to say I don’t want them to win and that I don’t want to watch, but I have a competition on Sunday and I need to spend my mental energy and focus on getting ready for that instead of on the Sharks “effort”.
its really too bad.
by isaku900 on Apr 24, 2009 8:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
nhl.com
GAME 1: ANA 2, SJS 0 | Video | Photos
GAME 2: ANA 3, SJS 2 | Video | Photos
GAME 3: SJS 4, ANA 3 | Video | Photos
GAME 4: ANA 4, SJS 3 | Video | Photos
uh yea, this is the bright spot in my day.
"It aint over till the fat lady sings." - Not Yogi Berra
by serrapadre716 on Apr 24, 2009 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
the League feels bad for us.
by Chicago Shark on Apr 24, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
with goals by
staubitz, lukowich, and the ghost of christmas past
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
from the future
The fat lady is clearing her pipes. Time to shove some corn down her throat.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
to me this game is the equivalent
of Game 6 Calgary last year. Remember back then, we had them on the ropes, the opportunity to put them out in 6 games after coming from behind in the series and the team went and laid a complete egg in Calgary, allowing for a game 7.
The most frustrating thing about this series for me is that we have to look back to the Nashville Series 2 years ago to remember what it felt like to not be chasing a series. Watching your team chase is a pretty poo feeling.
Go sharks
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 9:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
one positive here
we’re seeing the emergence of Murray as a solid playoff performer
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 9:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Who cares?
This team is full of players that at one point were solid playoff performers. Doesn’t seem to frickin’ matter, huh?
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well all of those you mention
are having a better series than the people who have not been consistent playoff performers
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's times like these
I sometimes wish we could suit up a classic Sharks lineup using only members of the organization. Doug Wilson, Bryan Marchment, Mike Ricci, etc. Could be an interesting team haha
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mike Ricci would’ve kicked the shit out of someone on his own team last night, if they played like that with him out there. Mike Ricci is one of the reasons why I started to root for the Sharks in the late 90’s.
http://redwingsvbluejackets.blogspot.com/
by IAmJoe on Apr 24, 2009 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's always nice...
When people come out of the woodwork to say bad things.
Go back into your woodwork.
To the regulars:
This series is still not over.
by Morti on Apr 24, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's why I'm anticipating watching Game 5,
but with significantly lowered expectations. I’ve come to terms with an early exit, but I’m still rooting for us to come out and shellac the Ducks in Game 5. If they don’t come out pissed off and ready to bust some heads (even on their own team, if necessary), then I will be one disappointed FtFer.
by Chicago Shark on Apr 24, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
am I a regular...
or just irregular?
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Check your fiber intake.
Then get back to us.
The fat lady is clearing her pipes. Time to shove some corn down her throat.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some people are pointing out “oh we don’t know who’s injured”, etc. etc…. It doesn’t matter who is hurt, or how bad. Frankly, they’re still skating, so its not an excuse. Brett Hull scored a cup winning goal (ok, it wasn’t a goal, but he was still out there and doing it) with a torn groin. Steve Yzerman dragged the Red Wings through the first two rounds with only one knee. Those are two high-profile cases of stars playing like stars, whether they’re hurt or not, refusing to use it as an excuse, doing what they have to do. I don’t know whats wrong with Marleau, why he isn’t skating the way he should, but if he’s a star, if he’s a captain, he can’t be using it as an excuse.
http://redwingsvbluejackets.blogspot.com/
by IAmJoe on Apr 24, 2009 9:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
if you’re hurt you’re hurt man, he’s out there giving it what he’s got and i commend him for that
I don't like you Detroit.
by mattman on Apr 24, 2009 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Every team has injuries right now. Every one. Every excuse that us Sharks fans have used over the last 5 years has applied just as much to the other playoff teams, but they don’t faceplant like this.
Tough 1st round draws? Check. Every team that makes the playoffs has had to play well at some point in the season.
Injuries? See above. Bad calls? Yup. Cold stretches on offense/defense? Every team has those.
What the Sharks haven’t done is rise above it.
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to type a 5 paragraph treatise, but really, I just want the Sharks to play like they really really want to win. Dump it in, carry it in, Marleau with a hat trick or goals by Mitchell, Grier, and Goc, Nabby with a 1-0 win a goaltending duel or a 6-4 barnburner, it doesn’t matter to me. Even if they lose, if they had played every game like games 2 and 3, I really wouldn’t have much to complain about. I understand no effort in game 80 against Colorado . . . but I just don’t understand not having it now.
I remember what it was like cheering to just make the playoffs, or being stoked to make it to the second round. I don’t demand results like some others, the other team is trying to win too, you know. But all I ever expect is that they care more than I do. I think that’s why Game 4 was probably the most disappointing game I have went through as a Sharks fan. It just . . . wasn’t there. I hope it is there Saturday so I can have a reason to be proud to be a Sharks fan, whether they win or not.
by ruben398 on Apr 24, 2009 10:19 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
excellent
rec’d
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know I’m pissed right now about this team, but honestly, there’s nothing to be proud about with this team. It was crystal clear all season long that any regular season success was just a prelude to the playoffs. The players knew it, the coaches knew it, the management knew it, and the fans knew it.
I’ll be seriously peaved if the Sharks make any sort of ceremony about their Presidents Trophy. They should have the maintenance guys hang the banner before the season and let it just sit there. Better yet, put it in the Sharks locker room next to the sinks so at least they can use it to dry their hands, for all the good it did.
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's not going to happen
but personally, I’m very proud of the Presiden’t Trophy, I’m not sure why everyone is so negative about it
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The entire organization has said repeatedly, even before the season started, that their success as a team would be judged on their performance in the playoffs. If that’s the criteria, the Sharks have failed, President’s Trophy or not.
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the President’s Trophy has no effect on whether or not you win the Stanley Cup or do well in the playoffs. In my mind, it’s an accomplishment in its own right. Obviously it isn’t a Stanley Cup, but there’s no reason to deride it just because it isn’t.
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
and even if they failed
it doens’t have anything to do with winning the President’s Trophy
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want to beat this topic to death, but failing in the post-season makes the PT irrelevant, and therefore not something to be celebrated.
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe in the organization's opinion
in my opinion, the president’s trophy is a good accomplishment
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
personally
I don’t buy the “choking” stuff. To me the most frustrating characteristic of the sharks is exactly what you’ve said: stringing together a few soid competitive games, and then mailing in/giving away a few crucial ones.
Like I said, I don’t feel they really showed up for game 1 or 4, and unfortunately they lost game 2 which they showed up for, so now they’re in a pretty deep hole
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give the Ducks Some Credit
Always hated and feared the Ducks. Was ecstatic when they looked like they they might miss the playoffs. Then this Hiller guy appears and the nightmare begins.
We can say that the Sharks are behind 3-1 because they mailed in game 4, and couldn’t buy a break in the first two games. We should also recognize that the Ducks have played their style each time, and played it very well indeed. Pile on the Sharkies if you must, but give the Ducks their due as the NJ Devils of the West.
by DetroiterInNorCal on Apr 24, 2009 10:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe so
but it sure doesn’t seem like the Ducks have played all that well
by a10dency2ask on Apr 24, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If it were true, that makes it more embarrassing we’re on the ropes against them.
Meh. Doesn’t really matter anyway. We knew we were going to have to beat good teams in the playoffs, whatever the round.
Scoring 5 goals in 4 games, only scoring first once in 4 games, letting in at least one soft goal per game, getting beat defensively, completely failing on special teams, et cetera et f*$%ing cetera.
by ievans on Apr 24, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Skarks! Show the fans some respect!
This team is soft because of the player the front office selects, not that they are not talented but wanting they get pushed around the ice for 60 minutes of playoff hockey is embarrassing. Even Sidney Crosby fights! Come on Patrick be a leader in all areas of the game especially if you’re not hitting the score sheet drop the gloves show your own player you want it!
To The Front Office – It’s great that you get players that are also quality people but this team needs tough hockey players that understand sacrifice during the playoff for the good of the team that want nothing more than their name on that Cup.
Theory – If this was Boston or Chicago the sports writers would be ripping the team, and the player would be worried they have to go all summer hearing it from the fans about what happened in the playoffs, their kids would even get heckled in school. Our players just disappear once they exit the playoff’s and go on vacation until next September and all is forgotten!
I am in the team corner all the way and I hope this team proves me 100% wrong than I’ll be the first to apologize but you got to give a sh_t!
by PebbleBeach on Apr 24, 2009 11:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
May I please...
have permission to go all “chicken little” now??
by Pizzle on Apr 24, 2009 11:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
only
if it turns out the sky isn’t falling like in the book
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup - but only for this year
It’s hard to see the Sharks winning this series at this point.
With that said, it’s still a really good team. If they fold or shine during the rest of this desperate situation will determine how the product changes next year.
by DetroiterInNorCal on Apr 24, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Skarks! Show the fans some respect!
This team is soft because of the players the front office selects, not that they are not talented but watching them get pushed around the ice for 60 minutes of playoff hockey is embarrassing. Even Sidney Crosby fights! Come on Patrick be a leader in all areas of the game especially if you’re not hitting the score sheet drop the gloves show your own player you want it!
To The Front Office – It’s great that you get players that are also quality people but this team needs tough hockey players that understand sacrifice during the playoff for the good of the team that want nothing more than their name on that Cup.
Theory – If this was Boston or Chicago the sports writers would be ripping the team, and the player would be worried they have to go all summer hearing it from the fans about what happened in the playoffs, their kids would even get heckled in school. Our players just disappear once they exit the playoff’s and go on vacation until next September and all is forgotten!
I am in the team corner all the way and I hope this team proves me 100% wrong than I’ll be the first to apologize but you got to give a sh_t!
by PebbleBeach on Apr 24, 2009 11:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, you said that already
but good points nonetheless
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
time to start Boucher
it work for carolina a few years back when Gerber showed he wasn’t that great
and Boucher has been on the the wrong side of a 3-1 comeback….give him the chance to redeem himself
by izinya_dick on Apr 24, 2009 11:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Last night
was harsh. The guys didn’t show up to play and I had to spend the whole evening around a Ducks fan…
With that being said, I think if anyone can climb this mountain it’s our San Jose Sharks. Still love these guys, just hope they finish this series in a manner that’s respectable. Win or lose. (Preferably win)

by Juicebag on Apr 24, 2009 11:51 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
Can somebody please tell me
the last time we saw the Captain throw a really good check? I keep waiting for him to get physical (he is a good size player) but he always seems to “peel off” from contact. Sure he might glide into a player on the forecheck but what the team needs is for the “skill” players to get physical and the physical players to show “skill”. Perhaps that’s what the Picasso quote could have meant…
by Pizzle on Apr 24, 2009 12:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Irony... in French
Fear the “fin” = fear the “end.”
(groan)
Fear The Fin = Anyone who doesn’t like fighting in the NHL can go watch poker on ESPN. [Jamie Baker]
by Mr. K. on Apr 24, 2009 12:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
or spanish
Tememos al fin
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Apr 24, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A bright spot
Worcester took a 3-2 series lead last night after being down 2-0 initially. Thomas Greiss has played very strong, Nabokov better be ready to fight for his job next season cause I think Greiss is ready to challenge.
by Teas on Apr 24, 2009 1:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
If the sharks get eliminated, Plank, Mr. K, and TCY should start covering the Wor Sharks run for the Calder Cup before going to the "great hockey bloggers’ summer golf course in the sky, where no one on the driving range chastises your team for being another playoff failure ".
Because Wor was down 0-2 just like the sharks, but what did they do? Proceed to steal the NEXT THREE GAMES. Wouldn’t an effort like that from our NHL club be nice?
The fat lady is clearing her pipes. Time to shove some corn down her throat.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
New headlines
Fear the Fin: We Overanalyze!
Fear the Fin: It’s a pity party and you’re invited!
Fear the Fin: Because it really is life or death!
Fear the Fin: Where letting down is living up!
Fear the Fin: The Internet’s #1 “Groundhog Day” re-eneactment fansite! ON ICE!
Fear the Fin: Still got nothing on the Buffalo Bills!
Fear the Fin: In a Jungian analysis, Chris Pronger is our shadow aspect!</p%Pr
by senor_k on Apr 24, 2009 1:50 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
The buffalo bills part is true.
Imagine if this team lost 4 straight Cup Finals.
The fat lady is clearing her pipes. Time to shove some corn down her throat.
by joe579 on Apr 24, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Puck Daddy Analysis of Our Chances
San Jose Sharks
The Situation: Down 3-1 to the Anaheim Ducks, with Game 5 on Saturday night.
They’ve Got That Going For Them Which Is Nice: Er … uh … teal is a lovely color heading into the heart of spring fashion season. But seriously, the only hope is that the Sharks have yet to put together a complete game offensively, defensively or in goal. Like Coach Todd McLellan’s assessment of the Game 4 loss:
“Disappointing, because we’re better than we showed,” McLellan said. “I think our character was questioned tonight. We’ll have to see how we respond. I thought their team was extremely hungry. They won a lot of board battles, a lot of puck battles. Their back pressure was second to none. They were very committed. I’m not surprised they were hungry. I’m disappointed that we weren’t.”
Harbingers of Doom: That Bobby Ryan won’t be recruited by the KHL before Game 5; that Jonas Hiller isn’t giving them an inch; and that things have gotten so bad for Joe Thornton that he’s now a playoff disappointment offensively and defensively.
Probability of a Game 7: Poor, because the Anaheim Ducks now believe, to a man, that they’re actually the President’s Trophy winners.
Probability of a Series Victory: While we’d never go as far as to say anything is impossible … they’re going to have to beat the Scott Niedermayer/Chris Pronger/ Francois Beauchemin/Ryan Whitney defense, and then find a way to beat Hiller. In three games straight. While attempting to slow down arguably the hottest line in the playoffs.
Welcome to Ron Wilson’s former personal hell, Mr. McLellan. Nope, sorry … no one around here knows the Heimlich …
by Tahoe on Apr 24, 2009 2:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
gee thanks … been avoiding reading all hockey related news … cept coming to this site … and you go and post that … a simple link for those that want to read depressing news would have sufficed. (sighs)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Apr 24, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are the brightest, sunniest person i know
but it’s just not a bright, sunny day today
:(
by Tahoe on Apr 24, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
First Period good...
…the rest, not so much. Seems like the Sharks were a better playoff team in seasons when they were the underdog. As a favorite they grip those sticks a widdle bit too hard.
We need a little bit of Owen Nolan type grit out of our guys – not this sorry excuse for effort….wish I was not so bitter, but this just reeks
by GeeEssDub on Apr 24, 2009 3:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Suit Jamie Baker up!
And bring in Mike Ricci and Bryan Marchment from the Front Office.
Sharks were able to stave off elimination against Dallas in games 4 and 5, and pushed to 4-OTs in game 6. There’s hope. There’s hope. But things have to change. I don’t think there’s a magic switch. But if the Sharks look to game 3 and what they did right in that game, having the fans behind them in the Shark Tank can only help as well.
I suppose we’ll know the outcome of Saturday’s game in the first 10 minutes.
Where hockey injuries in San Diego are thumb blisters from your XBox controller.
by Will Bulldozer on Apr 24, 2009 9:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Time for Change!
Time to BENCH THORTON, MARLEAU and NABBY!
If the Sharks are going to lose … may as well put a few FRESH players in their spots that will have the HEART to PLAY to WIN ….
Who Knows … it might even work!
Nothing else is ….
by DDawg on Apr 25, 2009 7:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thoughts from a Duck Fan
A few thoughts from the other side.
Give the ducks some credit. Since the trade deadine, they’ve had one of the best records in the NHL, if not the best. During that same period, the Sharks were up and down, do to injuriies in part. In contrast, the ducks are the healthiest they’ve been all year now that Beauchamin is back.
The ducks have the best overall defensive corps in the league. Beauchamin is their 5th defenseman – on most teams he’d be a number 2. The trade deadline additions of wisniewski and Whitney have been huge for the ducks. This is a team built for the playoffs. Defensive depth, a good checking line, and a dominant top line (the second line has been not so good, but not a defensive liabiiity).
Hiler has played well – he’s been more solid than spectacular. The key for the ducks is that positionally the ducks defense has been unbelievable. When Hiller gives up rebounds, the ducks have been there to clear the puck (except a few times in Game 3). This is part good defense and part bad offense – the Sharks players have been unwilling to pay the price to create traffic in front of the net and fight for rebounds/screnes (except a few times in game 3).
Don’t let shots on goal fool you into thinking the sharks have been unlucky. The key is where the shots come from and, in most cases, the shots have been from the outside. Also, the sharks block a lot of shots – my guess is that if you add blocks + shots on goal for each team, the numbers would be close.
Coaching – I think your coach panicked after game 1 by switching lines. Implicitly, it showed a lack of confidence in a president’s trophy winning team. Also, I personaly would like to thank him for playing Cheechoo so little – that guy kills the ducks.
Finally, it is apparent that the Sharks have leadership and chemistry problems. The quotes from Thornton after losses have been pathetic – “we played well. No need to make changes” etc. No accountability. Same for Marleau. Totally pathetic that they snuck out and refused to speak with the media after game 4. Contrast there behaviour with that of Boyle (and the ducks players coaches after game 3) who all basically said “I” need to be better.
Good luck – as a ducks fan I would have been rooting for the sharks in all other circumstances. It will be interesting to see what happens in the offseason for the sharks if the ducks close out the series (which I don’t take for granted).
by duckpuck on Apr 25, 2009 12:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's hard to do this..
I’m a die hard Preds fan, but I obtained a lot of respect (not fear) of the Sharks this season. However, one thing I did consistently notice was Nabby’s inability to handle the puck with pressure. I watched him countless times in games against the Preds where he would drop it in front of the net, and not realize it (which, unfortunately, the Preds never seemed to capitalize on..) I always thought to myself, “Man, if it weren’t for the great forecheck these guys have, they’d be screwed.” It finally caught up to them, and I just see everyone running out of gas. I wish the Sharks the best of luck, because I want to see a hell of a series these last couple games. We need some good entertaining hockey.
by Rawtaters on Apr 25, 2009 3:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
ducks get credit...
for their solid play – Sharks get credit for their foul cruddy play.
by GeeEssDub on Apr 27, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















