Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Tick Tock

Mymclife had a really good piece on Heatley earlier this month, which serves as a basis for this short mathematical exercise. Mine will be slightly less involved with an emphasis on plain numbers, so if you're looking for more please take full advantage of the wonderful in-text linking capabilities provided by the good tech folks here at SB Nation.

Unlike previous pieces detailing salary structure, we will not include Jamie McGinn. It will operate under the assumption McLellan will have one forward and a defenseman scratched, and will solely focus on the 2009-2010 roster- the future ramifications will deserve a much more in-depth look if the time is appropriate.

Assuming Dany Heatley find himself in a Sharks sweater at some point this offseason, here is where the Sharks currently stand:

Heatley-Thornton-Setoguchi

Marleau-Pavelski-Clowe

Michalek-None-Cheechoo

Shelley-Nichol-None

None

Lukowich-Boyle

Vlasic-Blake

Ehrhoff-Murray

Huskins

Nabokov

None

Needs: 3 Forwards, 1 goaltender

Cap Space: -$6.6 M

 

Star-divide

Ehrhoff, Cheechoo, Michalek, and Lukowich are moved:

Heatley-Thornton-Setoguchi

Marleau-Pavelski-Clowe

None-None-None

Shelley-Nichol-None

None

Murray-Boyle

Vlasic-Blake

None-Huskins

None

Nabokov

None

Needs: 5 Forwards, 2 defenseman 1 goaltender

Cap Space: $5.4 M, roughly $675,000 per player

*******

Marleau, Ehrhoff, Cheechoo, Michalek, and Lukowich are moved:

Forwards: Heatley-Thornton-Setoguchi

None-Pavelski-Clowe

None-None-None

Shelley-Nichol-None

None

Defenseman: Murray-Boyle

Vlasic-Blake

None-Huskins

None

Goaltenders: Nabokov

None

Needs: 6 Forwards, 2 defenseman 1 goaltender

Cap Space: $11.7 M, roughly $1.3 M per player

*******

Nabokov, Ehrhoff, Cheechoo, Michalek, and Lukowich are moved:

Forwards: Heatley-Thornton-Setoguchi

Marleau-Pavelski-Clowe

None-None-None

Shelley-Nichol-None

None

Defenseman: Murray-Boyle

Vlasic-Blake

None-Huskins

None

Goaltenders: None

None

Needs: 5 Forwards, 2 defenseman 2 goaltenders

Cap Space: $10.8 M, roughly $1.2 M per player

*******

I know Heatley has been beaten to death around here for the last three weeks, but with Don Brennan's rumor clock reaching the forty-eighth hour (admittedly, talks have stalled) I felt this would be appropriate.

The underlying point is what I tried to convey two days ago- the personnel you give up when trading for Dany Heatley is much more than just who will be playing in Ottawa next season. His $7.5 M cap hit will force multiple transactions to occur, and these transactions that will include some very notable names.

Looking at the raw numbers, it seems as if either Nabokov or Marleau will be playing elsewhere in October. I just don't think you can field a competitive team otherwise. In a perfect world Nabokov is moved and Halak gets the starting job, but the kicker here (discluding any concerns over an unproven tandem of Halak-Greiss) is that Marleau looks to be the sole piece who will get you Halak. The plausibility of a Cristobal Huet esque deal looks pretty slim at this moment.

 

Go Sharks.

Poll
Assuming the situation presents itself....
Move Marleau
97 votes
Move Nabokov
150 votes
I have a different solution (qualify in comments)
74 votes

321 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 284 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’m all for getting rid of Nabby. His prime has definitely gone by.

by 420Sharksfan on Aug 7, 2009 7:52 AM PDT reply actions  

Ha

Remember during the regular season when people were saying “The Sharks have a problem, but it’s a good one though” because it was hard to fill out the roster? Yeah, this problem right now isn’t as fun…

If the Sharks, for some reason, made the trade I’d say to hell with it and make Greiss the starter.

This makes me want Heatley less and less.

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm sure it was said before

but I wouldn’t be too surprised to see Heatley still on the Sens come October, while the Sharks found another dance partner.

Damn the media, buncha shit disturbers if you ask me. Except you guys, but you don’t count as media (I’m not sure what bloggers are).

by Chicago Shark on Aug 7, 2009 8:57 AM PDT reply actions  

Option 4: Vote of No Confidence

Off all the options presented, I’d support shipping Nabokov. His regular season performance is one thing, but lets in too many inexplicable soft goals and consistently outdueled by opposition goaltenders in the playoffs. (Hiller, Turco, Kiprusoff)
Unless they can find a way to play 4 consecutive series against the Nashville Predators, I really don’t see Nabby leading the Sharks to the Cup.

I don’t want to hear anymore blameshifting when you lose a series, I want you to steal a couple of games. Sorry John, but your the odd man out in my eyes.

by DownRUpLYB on Aug 7, 2009 9:06 AM PDT reply actions  

not that I want Heatley

but I wouldn’t really have a problem with getting rid of Nabby, for the reasons mentioned above. Unfortunately the most logical solution here would be to trade Marleau, in terms of not sacrificing goaltending or overall depth. It would be trading a top liner for a top liner, so it makes the most sense. however it still doesn’t make sense and I’m highly against it. So there

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

Put Heatley in goal

I can solve any problem.

I'll drink that! oh...I'll drink TO that.

by theneverman on Aug 7, 2009 9:54 AM PDT reply actions  

Ehrhoff, Cheechoo, Michalek, and Lukowich

for me, it’s that, or no heatley at all. bring up the young guns, and pray that they work out.

couture? joslin? they need to be given a shot at some point. why not now?

MeThinksSports, Giants, Sharks, and Randomosity

by serrapadre716 on Aug 7, 2009 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

ops. didn't know that.

but after 11 games, i’m sure he’ll be ready :)

MeThinksSports, Giants, Sharks, and Randomosity

by serrapadre716 on Aug 7, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Michalek/Cheechoo/Ehrhoff/Luko go

First order of business is to add in Joslin in the #6 spot and have someone like Joe Callahan as your #7 for the minimum. If someone gets hurt, you play Callahan a couple of games until you can bring up someone like Mike Moore (or Petrecki if he shows he is ready, but you leave them on the farm for salary/development reasons). Joslin is lined up for $550k-ish. I can’t imagine Callahan would make more as the #7. So you have your D filled with $4.3 mil left for 5 forwards and a Dman.

Lets go ahead and fill in Greiss here to fill the backup goalie spot. I would assume he would get an RFA offer at around $650k? Does that sound about right? So now we have to get in 5 forwards at $3.65 million.

Next, Mcginn and Mitchell will get spots. I can’t imagine Mitchell getting more than $1mil with his production and injury history. McGinn will be paid about $1 mil. So two spots filled at $2 mil. Now we have $1.65 mil for three spots. Gettin tight.

Lets let new guy Jed Ortemeyer take the last slot on the 3rd line. $550k for him, $1.1mil left for one starter and an extra forward. Brad Staubitz is an RFA, I would bet he signs with the Sharks for $600k. That fills out the lineup with $500k and change left for the extra forward. That sounds like Ryan Vesce money (though I can’t find exact figures).

So what do we have?

Heatley-Thornton-Setoguchi
Marleau-Pavelski-Clowe
McGinn-Mitchell-Ortemeyer (or Ryan Vesce)
Shelly-Nichol-Staubitz

Boyle-Murray
Vlasic-Blake
Joslin-Huskins (with Callahan as a practice guy)

Nabby
Greiss

That is lineup with about 68 cents of cap space depending on some RFA deals. And that is a MONSTER lineup. You have talent. You have hustle. You have grit. You have offense from the backline and defensive responsibility from the front. Right and left handed shots from the point. Physicality and finesse from the back. Big bodies and speed. And if it doesn’t work, Marleau and Nabby walk and you build around Joe and Heatley.

by ruben398 on Aug 7, 2009 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

hahaha i knew i was right...sort of

and that jed ortemeyer guy sounds like dan ortmier from the giants a year ago…career and name change?

MeThinksSports, Giants, Sharks, and Randomosity

by serrapadre716 on Aug 7, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Very nice work. There are a few reservations I have about the lineup including Vesce, Ortemeyer, and that fourth line, but it might be the best case situation if Heatley is brought on.

For the sake of discussion, here’s some earlier thoughts I had on Staubitz joining the fourth line:

Brad Staubitz played with the big club last season and could be slated into a fourth line role. I have to tell ya though, throwing him on a line with Nichol seems like a goddamn shorthanded fest. He’s a good energy guy and all that, but we don’t need a fourth line heading to the box all night. My hope is that he gets spot duty in San Jose like last season, beats the shit out of Tootoo a couple times, and then replaces Shelley in a year.

I also mentioned Vesce’s size in that piece as a huge detriment- half of your checking lines are now are compiled of players under 6’0. I’m also not sure whether Jed Ortmeyer will be able to contribute anything more than a fourth line role- his career numbers don’t exactly scream secondary scoring to me.

All in all there’s a real lack of goal scoring depth once you get past the second lines, but with Heatley coming over, that’s what we all would expect. I’m not sure it addresses some major issues from last postseason, but as we mentioned before free agency began, the Sharks do possess a lot shooters but not a pure scorer. Heatley provides that at least.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure it addresses some major issues from last postseason

that’s my main problem with all of this

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

From my couch, it seemed that the two problems the Sharks had in the playoffs last year were an inability to crack Hiller and an inability to come out hard for the beginning of Game 1 and all Game 4.

Heatley solves the first problem, at least as much as anyone can outside of Alex Ovechkin. And I don’t think anyone knows how to solve the second problem. Shoot, I’ve seen nights Joe Sakic’s Avalanche and Steve Yzerman’s Wings came out flat. Steve yzerman’s Wings lost to an 8 seed to, remember?. It happens. It sucks. Game 4 was my worst day as a sports fan. That said, I believe in “chemistry” in sports a heck of a lot less than most folks. The only sure solution to that is to be way more freakin talented that the other guy. Heatley does that too. Really, thats how Steve Y’s Wings finally won. They just kept getting better players. If DW can do that within the confines of the cap, I say do it.

by ruben398 on Aug 7, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

my couch disagrees with that assessment, although I think it is partially correct

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I left off “leadership,” but that’s because I don’t think the fact that Patrick Marleau was wearing the C instead of Dan Boyle caused Joe Pavelski to only score one point in the playoffs. On the other hand, I was just as in shock as everyone else during Game 4 by the effort. Like I said, my worst moment as a sports fan.

by ruben398 on Aug 8, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except that Stevie Y’s Wings team didn’t have to work under a cap, they could just go out and buy all the players they wanted as long as they had the money. In the modern-day NHL, its extremely hard to completely out-skill another team unless you have a bunch of superstars and great players on ELCs, which happens once in a blue moon. And even then you need luck with injuries, good bounces, and hot goaltending.

And let’s say we move Nabokov, Ehrhoff, Cheechoo, Michalek, and Lukowich to get Heatley. Okay, so we upgraded Michalek’s offense by around 25 goals, and downgraded a bit on backchecking. But with $1.2 million per player, we will downgrade severely on goaltending, defense (even on Lukowich), and forward depth. I can’t imagine getting good goaltending with only $1.2M; even if you go cheap on the other positions you have to fill, it will likely either be a former backup or a lower-end goalie (Biron, Auld, Legace, etc.).

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with you there, mymclife. Nabby shouldn’t be moved, at least not for the purposes of getting Heatley. Heatley is a swing for the fences move, and moving Nabby would leave the chances in the hands of an untested Greiss (though if Biron were still available, I would have less of an issue with it).

But I think that, right now, it is the once in a blue moon situation. You have Pavs, Mitchell, McGinn and Seto still on below market contracts. If it fails, it doesn’t handicap the future with lots of salary coming off next year.

Luck, well, that woman is finicky. No pleasing that one.

by ruben398 on Aug 8, 2009 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except that both Pavs and Seto will get substantial raises next year, and maybe Mitchell will as well (depends on his contract this year). Because Heatley’s contract is a multi-year deal, and because all indications point to the cap falling, adding him this year will severely handicap the team cap-wise next year. All that money coming off the cap includes Pavelski, Seto, Marleau, Nabokov, Shelley, Lukowich, Blake, Nichol, and likely Mitchell. All of those guys either have to be replaced or re-signed, so that $20M actually isn’t much.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 8, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ve said before, if adding Heatley means no more Pavelski next year, Im ok with that. I know many aren’t, but its not like Pavelski stepped it up in the playoffs either. On that note, why aren’t more people pissed about that? For someone who is future captain material, Pavs seems to have gotten off easy around here considering his disappearing act.

Nabby will be replaced by Greiss for 1/5 of the cost. Pavs will be replaced by Couture for 2/3 the cost. Blake will be replaced by Petrecki for 1/3 of the cost. Luko will be replaced by Mike Moore or something like that for 1/2 the cost. Anybody replacing Shelly will be an upgrade at the same cost. Will the team be “better” than this year? No way, but such is like in the salary cap era. Competitiveness goes in cycles. I think right now the Sharks are near the peak, might as well go for it all.

by ruben398 on Aug 8, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is why

I know it wasn’t this year, and it didn’t even win the series, but that fact that he stepped up and did it is what makes everybody love him. That, and the fact that he leaves it all out on the ice no matter what happens. And he’s one of the best defensive forwards in the NHL at 24. And one of the best faceoff artists. And keeps pushing his ceiling higher and higher.

Yeah, he wasn’t the best in the playoffs this year, but that’s just one year, an anomaly in his career (and I’m including his days in the USHL and in college).

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 8, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

I post that picture whenever I have a chance, because it is awesome in its Bobby Orr-esque way.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 8, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

:-)

I can bring up Nabby if you want to post that awesome save against Brad Richards. Best clutch save I have ever seen live.

by ruben398 on Aug 8, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Brad Richards save:

Owen Nolan save (which was almost as impressive):

You know, despite losing that Dallas series, there were certainly a lot of great moments.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 8, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

i thought pavs played decently well in the playoffs

he didn’t help on the scoreboard, and his faceoffs dropped off terrible, but he didn’t get much help from his linemates either. I just sort of erase these playoffs from memory – it’s almost too hard to judge anyone based on the awful showing

by a10dency2ask on Aug 8, 2009 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Def agree there. Just a bad 6 game stretch for that 2nd line at the worst time. But it seems Pavs has gotten a free pass when players like Michalek got a lot of crap who played just as hard as Pavs.

by ruben398 on Aug 8, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

All good points Plank

I remember having a discussion about size on that 3rd line. I don’t think it is an issue, but I can see why you and many others might. Same thing with depth, though really that is based on line combinations. If the lines were:

Heatley-Thornton-McGinn
Marleau-Pavelski-Vesce
Clowe-Mitchell-Setoguchi
Shelly-Nichol-Staubitz (or Ortemeyer)

that lineup looks a lot “deeper” but with weaknesses in a few spots (though McGinn and Vesce would have nice career years). Considering the top 6 guys will play 70% of the minutes, I think depth is not too much of an issue.

I do see your point with a Shelly-Nichol-Staubitz penalty-fest line. Hopefully the threat of Ortemeyer calms each of those guys down.

by ruben398 on Aug 7, 2009 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just in case someone wants an opportunity to chime in, here’s the back and forth ruben398 referenced:

ruben398: Second, are we overvaluing size at the forward position? At least at forward, I would have no problem sending Mitchell, McGinn, and Ryan Vesce on a line out there to create havoc. Are they going to be able to grind? No, but shoot, grinding didn’t help Michalek and Clowe against Anaheim. Our best chances were off Mitchell applying a great forecheck, all 5’11 of him. I wonder if "grinding" has become overglamorized in hockey to the point that it is an overrated skill, and simply being able to put the puck in the net is being analyzed too minutely.

misterplank: My main problem with sending out a line like that (as well as the size issue) would be Vesce’s ability to put the puck in the net. I believe he was in the top 20 point leaders with Worcester last season, but from what I saw during his time with the big club, expecting that to translate to the NHL level is unlikely. A big defensive team like Calgary would knock him around, he doesn’t have good enough hands to create shots from the circles, and he doesn’t have the skating ability to blow by people.

If McLellan expects to fuel his offense with shots from the point again this season, that third line would be a wasteland. There’s no one who is going to be able to set up shop in front of the net. I don’t think it’s an issue of overvaluing grinding, more of taking into account size. Nichol and Mitchell already make us pretty small on the checking lines- can we can afford to bring in another "energy" guy that isn’t a true offensive threat at the expense of a bigger more physical player who will probably give the team a better opportunity to score some dirty goals?

What I’m looking for is a third and fourth line who are going to wear down defenses along the boards, raise some hell in front of the net, and cash in on a few rebounds. Vesce doesn’t seem like the answer there to me.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem with the deal is that it HAS to include a 3rd team as the Sens don’t want half the guys SJ is purposing. The other issue is, even if Nabby and Marleau end up leaving and you get Heatley… you still have to do something with Erhoff, Mikahelik, and /or Cheech.

The Habs did some re-calibrating on the HUGE scale this offseason. They have enough new guys in town to begin their own Welcome Wagon Organization. If Marleau and Nabby were the ones to come to MtL, the likelihood is that Halak, Plekanec and Sergie Kostitsyn are moved. And Erhoff… where would he end up? MTL couldn’t take on both Nabby’s and Marleau’s money and not get rid of Hamrlik (5.6mill).

So you have 3 teams with some big big moves necessary to move the ONE guys that wants to go.

If Boston, and Not Montreal are the 3rd team in this cluster….. I don’t have any idea (outside of Phil Kessel) who would be involved.

I say, as a Habs fan, leave well enough alone. Why would we help out a team in our division by becoming a part of this sham? It’s beyond me.

by Cruisin4aBruisin on Aug 7, 2009 10:06 AM PDT reply actions  

The inclusion of a third team

I’m going to go ahead and say the 48 hour report was pure paper selling. Anyone who can think sensibly about hockey (and therefore PROBABLY doesn’t blog for an Eastern Canadian Newspaper) knows that the math on this deal is ridiculous in so many ways. Just because Dany Heatley plays for the Senators DOES NOT make him the only option for the humble West Coast Sharks. There are other players and other deals out there. Whereas Heatley decided to handcuff his team by basically pouting and saying he wanted to play Joe Thornton’s wing or else he’d take his toys out of the sandbox, I’m pretty sure Doug Wilson has one or two smaller deals (think Chimera for Erhoff) that can be tweaked to get the Sharks under the cap and still not be a total fleecing.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is anyone else sore from all of the RosterCourse that went on this week?

I know I need a rest.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Chafing has become a serious problem.

We need to bring Sting in here, give us some lessons on Tantric Rostercourse… until a move is made, this is the reality we are faced with.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry TCY

I have a headache.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I need to wash my hair

sorry

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think I threw my back out.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

next time don’t yank so hard

(did I just say that?)

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

what is wrong with yanking hard? (yes, I just said that)

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Again, Chafing.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

well if you throw your back out while rosterbating it doesn’t help anyone

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good rosterbation takes soft, caring hands.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

is that why you wear gloves?

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

don’t know … seen some interesting rosterbating in my time and soft, caring hands weren’t around

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Surgeon General Says:

Rosterbation only works if the roster properly gels

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gotta squeeze the butt.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

tight glutes!

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rosterspooning!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'm considering

adopting a ideology of rostinence, because I’m getting sick of all this rostercation before marriage

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I heard

it can make you go blind! :0

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

i got to 3rd base with my rosterfriend the other day but I decided I wasn’t emotionally ready to go any further on the first rosterdate

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I believe in strict Rosterfarianism. It’s all about being one with the team man. Feel the love!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Irie!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm

I wouldnt be so fast. Once you get married Rostercation is often at a minimum.

Here are some examples:

“I’m too tired to talk about the Heatley tonight”

“Sorry, not tonight I’m washing my salary cap”

“I thought we already discussed Marleau’s captaincy? Do I have to repeat myself a million times? and why isnt the garbage out?”

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Holy shit, this is way too much funny for me brain.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

40 % of marriages end in rostervorce

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is anyone here indulging in a Rostaffair?

That’s discussing the Roster of a non shark based team!

Dont get caught or We’ll chop your fin off!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Watch out for Rosterrhea

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Be careful...

of rosterrape. I’m not sure what it is but I think it hurts.

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rosterrape is defined as trading Joe Thornton for Marco Sturm, Brad Stuart and Wayne Primeau.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would that also fall under surprise rostersecks?

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

i think

we all just had a simultaneous rostergasm remembering that trade

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't mind me

I’m basking in the rosterglow

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about “I don’t have a different solution, but I don’t like the two options you presented” button?

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 10:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Nabby

Since the death of Warren Strelow, Nabokov has not been the same goaltender. Physically, I think he can endure the 60 start workload. Mentally, not so much.

I still believe that had Nabby been the starter in ’06, the Sharks find a way to beat the Oilers. At that point, Nabby still had the mental toughness to carry this team. Even in ’08, Nabby was one of our better players. But last year was not very good.

Patrick Roy and Marty Brodeur are probably the last superstar netminders to win a cup. The rest of the teams that have won the cup have done so with solid D and TIMELY goaltending (which includes stealing a shot or two). The salary cap makes it tough for the Vancouvers of the world to compete with so much of their cap tied up in goal. It takes away from who you can put IN FRONT of your goal.

Somewhere out there, someone has to be interested in a 60 start goaltender who has both playoff and international experience, and could send us a servicable option. I’d say a team LIKE the Kings would be interested (we’re obviously not going to send Nabby to the Kings, they won’t have room what with signing Malkin and all).

If we got back a slight downgrade in goal and some third line pieces, I think that turns out as a win.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 10:39 AM PDT reply actions  

I love Nabokov...

but I love Marleau more. But I don’t think he’s past his prime in any way. 20 shutouts in 3 years is good in my book. 40 wins almost every year.

"It's the small things in life....and football."

by sunelf77 on Aug 7, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions  

I might disagree and say Nabby is past his prime, but he’s still in the top third of goaltenders out there. He didn’t really STEAL any games for us last season, something he seemed to have to do a lot of the year before. The drying up of our offense against Anaheim (and let’s face it, you can praise Hiller all you want, but the fact is, quantity of shots aside, we didn’t really trouble him all that much) probably exposed more gaps in Nabby’s game than anything.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

All other issues aside

If acquiring Heatly presents the Sharks with this many cap issues, I’m still not sure such a trade would be logical. Maybe we’re practicing for next seasons craptactular cap adventures?

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 11:08 AM PDT reply actions  

If it comes down to having to move one of Nabby or Marleau, I’d have to hope that we move Nabby. As has been stated around these parts already, Nabby hasn’t really looked quite the same over the last year or so. He has been solid, but definately not a goalie who can steal wins for your team. The Sharks have a pretty good defensive team, and I think that’s helped inflate his (and Boucher’s) numbers quite a bit…especially last season.

Continuing on the thread of this being a good defensive team, I think the Sharks can more afford to take a downgrade in goal for salary relief. Yes, goalies are important, but not as important as overall team defense and scoring (see Penguins, Pittsburgh).

So, in short, if one of the two has to go, ship off Nabby and keep Marleau. I still don’t think Heatley will be here any time soon, though.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Aug 7, 2009 11:09 AM PDT reply actions  

The problem here is that there are now too few openings for a starting goaltender. Most teams either have a good goalie, or a younger goalie that is being primed for the starting job. Look at the Hawks last year.

In other words, you can want to trade Nabby all you like, but you need to find someone who will take on his huge cap hit and perceived baggage.

by ievans on Aug 7, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Someone correct me if I'm wrong

But when the Sharks were rolling in the beginning of last season, they managed to pump out a lot of wins, but still gave up a lot of goals against.
That reflects on both the D AND Nabokov, but I remember thinking that it was cause for concern. You can only win so many 6-5 games.

Oh my Goc!!!

by DownRUpLYB on Aug 7, 2009 11:15 AM PDT reply actions  

i don't remember that

all i remember from the first half are those 2 wins against detroit and pitt. 4-2 and 2-1.

my memory sucks. and that 6-5 game against detroit was in the 2nd half.

MeThinksSports, Giants, Sharks, and Randomosity

by serrapadre716 on Aug 7, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

That Philly game was ridiculous. What was the score like 7-6? D fail on both sides.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

ohhhh

now i remember that one, they won in the shootout. but memory still fuzzy on the rest of the first half. wish i could remember it, it’s when they were dominating.

MeThinksSports, Giants, Sharks, and Randomosity

by serrapadre716 on Aug 7, 2009 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

6-5 was just a number I threw outta my head. But I looked back at the schedule and I think I found what I was referring to.

Fri Oct 17, 2008 Sharks Ducks 0 – 4 L
Sat Oct 18, 2008 Flyers Sharks 4 – 5 OT W
Wed Oct 22, 2008 Sharks Flyers 7 – 6 SO W - Man this game was fun to watch-
Fri Oct 24, 2008 Sharks Panthers 3 – 4 L

Snapshot of 4 consecutive games early in the season. Managed to win the 2 home-and-home against Philly, but gave up 22 goals in the process*, while scoring 15. EEP.

*not sure if Boucher was starting in these, but you gotta figure Nabby was in at least 3 of those games.

Oh my Goc!!!

by DownRUpLYB on Aug 7, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

It actually was a fun game to watch

because it was so unbelievable. How does the D for two teams fall apart so spectacular in the same game?!
I do recall the talk being about how many goals we gave up, despite the win, and how that could prove to be problematic later on.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

it was fun

i accidentally did a strikethrough on that comment. Wasn’t the score already insane by the end of the first (3-2???)

but back to the original topic, Nabby or Marleau
Nabby – 34 years old vs. Patty – 29 years old
You probably got 1-2 more good years outta Nabokov. Patty’s got at least 4-5.

I hate this anticipation, do the deal already.

Oh my Goc!!!

by DownRUpLYB on Aug 7, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

maths?

Am i the only one not seeing the math add up here…according to my addition its 18A v 15F not as big a discrepancy…unless im missing something entirely

by animadiversion on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nabby or Marleau? I guess I would keep Marleau.

by shark94112 on Aug 7, 2009 11:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Fluster Cluck..

I think this whole thing is a cluster of grand proportions. The dude should get his act together and stay in the great white north. I’m not one to think SJ should go out on a limb for D.H.. The team, in my opinion, has not reached a low where they should be putting players on the trading block to take a gamble for one player. Now, I suppose we look at a certain player that left Pittsburgh to play at Detroit and well, we know happened there. Although at this point I would love to see the Sharks get to the Finals, but seeing them lose to Montreal would send me to the looney bin. Could it be possible? Marleau in Red and White carrying the cup would cause a large disruption in The Force for me.

by Suisun Dan on Aug 7, 2009 11:32 AM PDT reply actions  

So reports have the Sens having no interest in Cheech

But I wonder if a Michalek, Ehrhoff and 1st rounder would get it done – reports say the two teams can’t agree, but I’ve heard so many reports that I don’t know.

I know there’s still other cap issues to deal with, but Cheech still has a market with other teams (Minnesota, NYI, Buffalo). I think the bigger headache is how to get someone take eat Luko’s contract.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 11:38 AM PDT reply actions  

I think the bigger headache is how to get someone take eat Luko’s contract.

Good point- usually salary dumps have to include another player to make things work. Maybe you package Cheechoo and Lukowich in return for a draft pick or something along those lines, but it doesn’t solve the lack of roster ready forwards in the system.

Who knows at this point. It seems to me like I’m living my life like a candle in the winddddd.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Murray supposedly will make the deal if Milan is one of the centerpieces, as he declined two deals with Cheechoo offered. I think that is a mistake, as a Cheech-Spezza-Alfreddson line could do really well, with Cheech easily scoring 20-30 goals.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Aug 7, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

The issue is that Alfreddson and Cheechoo both play on the right side, and Spezza is also a right handed shot. I’m not entirely familiar with the greater outlook of Ottawa’s roster, but I think Kovalev would play the wing on line one, with Cheech getting second line/third line duties.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

So guys

How bad is that Huskins signing hurting now? They don’t got a cream for that one!

"I suddenly hate Canada with a passion = BASTARDS!!!!!! " -Mr K, Upon hearing Moyes filing Chapter 11

by joe579 on Aug 7, 2009 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Don’t think it’s hurting at all – still don’t understand why people expect so little from this guy as if y’all know something DW doesn’t…

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

A solid player getting a raise

doesn’t seem too random to me.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

he's only played 1 full nhl season

there’s no reason for me to believe he’s good or bad, just doesn’t seem necessary to give that extreme of a raise

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

on the face of the deal

it does seem like a bit of an overpay – but I do think he stats warrant a raise and I have to believe DW was concerned about losing him so he spent a bit more. Time will tell, but I still think that this deal will turn out to be much better then some think.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heatley Cap Hit

Sorry, but this is bothering me whenever I see posts about the salary cap if we trade for Heatley. This is my understanding of the ACTUAL hit we take this season:

Heatley’s average annual salary over his entire contract = his cap hit = $7.5mil
His actual salary this year = $10mil
Heatley has already received $4mil of this years contract from Ottawa earlier this summer. That calculates to 40% of this year’s salary.
That counts towards his cap hit as well and therefore Ottawa is on the books for $3.0mil (40% of $7.5mil) of his cap hit this year no matter what deal gets done. Any team that acquires him this year is only hit with 60% of his annual cap.
This means that the Sharks would ONLY take a $4.5mil cap hit for Heatley (and then $7.5mil going forward).

This is why Ottawa was desperately trying to deal him before that $4mil payday came down and why the salary cap isn’t as dire for the Sharks with this deal.

Now, if I’m wrong, please explain / link me to the correct info on this one. Thanks!

by Haves on Aug 7, 2009 12:02 PM PDT reply actions  

If that is the case

I don’t see a deal being done.

"I suddenly hate Canada with a passion = BASTARDS!!!!!! " -Mr K, Upon hearing Moyes filing Chapter 11

by joe579 on Aug 7, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Correction: Heatley got $10mil LAST year and is only due $8mil this year, which would make that hit $3.75mil to both sides of the deal.

Once again though, I can’t say this 100% certain and I’m looking for backup/correction.

by Haves on Aug 7, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

That $4M bonus is an advance on his salary this year. The cap hit, on the other hand, is just an average of the salary over the course of his contract, so it doesn’t matter when he gets paid or traded, the cap hit will always remain constant.

The Senators wanted to trade him before July 1 because they didn’t want to pay that $4M bonus/advance if he wasn’t going to play for them this year. It has nothing to do with the cap.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your understanding is wrong.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Once a contract is signed, the cap hit never changes. The salary might, but the cap hit doesn’t. Ottawa just didn’t want to pay him.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I knew the total cap hit didn’t change. I just read elsewhere that Ottawa was on the books for what they already paid. Apparently that was wrong, thanks for the clear up.

by Haves on Aug 7, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

They are on the books for what they already paid, but salary paid doesn’t affect the cap hit. That remains constant.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Makes sense, once it’s set, cap hit is based on amount of play, not amount of pay.

by Haves on Aug 7, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

It seems like we get a question like this every day.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have a different solution

Don’t trade for Heatley, keep Nabokov and Marleau. See how easy that is! And this way, we’ll only need to trade Cheechoo and a defenseman, and we’re good. Both Tampa Bay and the Islanders are looking for a top six forward (Cheechoo), and Columbus has an interest in an offensive defenseman (Ehrhoff). Trade them for some picks/prospects/cheap forwards, and BAM! Cap issues solved.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 12:30 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Oh, you.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

The cap issues are solved. The crap issues? That’s another story.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Aug 7, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just thought it was funny, geeze!

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

It was funny

Again with the snark.

Not to worry. I consider myself piped.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haha nice.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

STOP MAKING SENSE!!!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m with you.

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m definitely on board with that obviously, but that wasn’t the point of this exercise.

You really are a handful sometimes lady ;)

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haha, I know, I just like be difficult.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Success!

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Problem with Nabokov and Michalek....

Michalek has way too many years left to be a viable trade option, and you can’t replace Nabokov with anybody that would be considered an upgrade (or even an equal) at the postion. If heatley comes, marleau goes, i don’t think there is any way around it.

by Jpynn on Aug 7, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Manny Fernandez

has apparently been offered a contract by Montreal. I think that means Halak to somewhere is a given.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 1:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Why isn’t trading Joe Thornton discussed more? He would free up the most cap space, he’d bring back the greatest return, and IMO he’s a bigger disappointment than Marleau in the playoffs. Thornton lights it up in the regular season, no doubt, but he generally plays a perimeter game despite his size. He isn’t able to generate offense from the outside in the playoffs like he does in the regular season, and while he is affective when he uses his size to drive the net, he rarely does that in the post-season. Yeah, trading Thornton probably kills Heatley’s interest in SJS, but really is the entire league supposed to bend over for this d-bag? There is still plenty of talent to play with up front on SJS and Thornton may very well fetch a guy that could be a long term top 6 C (the return will be based around high picks/prospects because it’s a cap dump). Forgive me if I missed a discussion of this possibility elsewhere but I’m interested in Sharks fans opinions on moving Joe.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 2:27 PM PDT reply actions  

Coach already called his job safe. And Boyle.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Aug 7, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Personally, after game 4 against Anaheim, there are only about 4 guys I wouldn’t move: Clowe, Mitchell, Boyle and Murray.

I’m usually more for keeping Joe, but if we were going to move him, there are certain things I’d want in return.

First would have to be an elite level player coming back one for one. There are very few teams willing to do this. Who is one for one with Joe? Short list. Lecavalier, Kovalchuk, Nash, Iginla, Kopitar, Malkin, Ovechkin, etc. Obviously, with some of these kinds of deals, there would have to be some value added, either by the Sharks or by the other team. Malkin and Lecavalier have Cups, the rest are stars, but basically, this would have to be what moves. Either as part of a package or straight up. The point being, if you trade Joe, you trade the cornerstone of the franchise. Yes, Thornton has not been Mr. April. But you know what, he’s still in the top 20 players on the face of the Earth. Probably even top 10. A lot of his game revolves around drawing penalties, and the whistle blows far less in the playoffs than it does in the regular season.

If you’re not going one for one, this has to be a Herschell Walker type deal where basically you get a LINE in exchange for Thornton.

The problem is that the more we continue to bash him for things that may or may not be his fault, his trade value slips, and we’re less likely to get ANYTHING we’d even want to consider for him.

With Joe, we make the playoffs. Without him? Who KNOWS what happens. ANYTHING can happen in the playoffs (see Oilers, Edmonton; Ducks, Anaheim).

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks. All fair points. Joe is only signed for one year longer than Marleau and he’s going to be more expensive to resign. There is a lot of talent up front and while Thornton is clearly the best, I think SJS would still score without him. A package of elite prospects/picks would allow SJS to bring in cheap talent and open a ton of money to fill out the rest of the current roster. It may not be his fault that fewer penalties are called in the playoffs, but as a GM when do you recognize reality and build your team accordingly?

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

as a GM when do you recognize reality and build your team accordingly?

I think it’s worth noting that the whole Heatley discussion we are currently having wouldn’t even be on the table if Joe Thornton was not a Shark.

Heatley wants to come here to play with Joe.

In the past, we’ve had trouble signing the big name free agents. In the past, we’ve also never spent to the cap.

The team might now be willing to spend to the cap. How else are you going to convince big names to come here? Big names are either going to go where they’ll make a crapload of money, or where they thing they have talent around them.

It’s all well and good to say we have young, emerging talent, but most prominent free agents are going to want something that’s a BIG selling point.

Love him or hate him (and 99 days out of 100, I love him) Joe Thornton is that for us.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I realize Heatley wants to go to SJS because of Thornton, but I don’t particularly care. He has done nothing to earn the role of fantasy GM for the NHL. Of course, if he gets traded to SJS and Joe gets moved he’ll pout and ask for a trade, so I guess you may as well suck it up and build around those two if you think that’s a way to win. Good point about the big draw for the franchise, I guess I just assumed players would recognize the rest of the talent around him as well.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I just assumed players would recognize the rest of the talent around him as well

We play on the West Coast. We’re lucky most of the rest of the league even remembers we exist and play halfway decent hockey.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wait, this team exists? I need to tell someone about this!

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t give a shit about fans and media. You don’t think every player in the league knows how good the guys on the Sharks are? Some Eastern Conference guys may not have as much first hand experience against the current iteration of the San Jose Sharks but they’ve played with and against them over the course of their lives and I’m sure have a pretty good handle of the talent around the league.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

The league knows Joe, Patty (based on being the recognized most underrated player), Blake and Nabby. The league probably doesn’t know Clowe, Pavs, Seto, Murray, etc.

You’re right, players know more than fans. That being said, the East is a fishbowl, and I think absent the draw of a big name like Joe, most of those guys are going to assume they have a better shot in some recognized hockey market rather than this San Joesey place that they’ve never heard of.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cheechoo’s got a Richard. Dan Boyle played for TBL and everyone saw his Cup run. Some of those other guys may be a little more under the radar but I honestly don’t think any player in the NHL doesn’t understand the Sharks are more than just Joe Thornton.

Oh yeah, and the President’s Trophy.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

All very fair points

That being said, before Joe, we were a middle of the pack team. And even WITH sophisticated and informed opinions from around the league, when it boils down to it, I think players still perceive us as Joe Thornton’s team.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Touche

Yeah, that’s a problem.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

And that’s part of the reason I asked in the first place. You hear all this news about GMDW making significant changes and changing the look of the team; but I don’t see how you can make significant changes if Joe is still there unless you tear it down and rebuild around him, which makes no sense.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

i gotta say

i’m still sick of people from other states having no idea where san jose is. We’re big and important damn it!

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

10th biggest city in the US, 3rd biggest in California. Larger population than San Francisco and Oakland combined.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

yea i know these things

plus we invented everyone’s technology and they still don’t know where we are. it makes me mad when i have to say “an hour south of San Francisco”

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most people: where are you from?
Me: how familiar with the area are you?
Most people: not very
Me: San Francisco.

My friend from Riverside? She says she’s from LA. It’s a common thing, living where you don’t.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't mind explaining it

I’m a Californian. I automatically assume I’m better than everyone and have to explain everything to them anyway.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

meh

I find it’s usually more trouble than it’s worth, though I do occasionally enjoy watching the confused expressions of folks.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

and I’m sure other people in other States are tired of others not knowing all their big cities … (shrugs)

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

i doubt it

most other big cities are famous

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 7:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm personally

very in favor of moving Joe Thornton. I think of the big 3, his presence is the biggest problem. I think the most dangerous aspect of his game, good player though he is, is the way in which he has become THE default top line center and THE default go-to guy. I think there’s a culture of idolatry from the team that defers to him to the overall detriment. I also think his slow-down game isn’t very good moving forward and seems to be easily neutralized. He seems to exemplify our criticism that the team doesn’t work hard enough or give enough effort to match the skill. I would move JT before Marleau, and I’m not sure why DW and the organization has to be so adamant that he is not the problem, but Marleau might be (other than the fact he brings the most butts to the most seats).

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I say no to a Thornton trade

The reason? The gaping talent hole that would open up would likely swallow West Santa Clara Street!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

i personally think we tend to overrated Joe Thornton

Marleau was much better than him last season, but somehow JT is still “the best player in the world”

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’ll admit to giving Joe homer treatment, but Joe can make players around him better in a way Patty hasn’t necessarily. Patty played Joe’s wing much of last season.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we tend to overrate Marleau as much, if not more, then Thornton

71 pts in 76 games is hardly mind-blowing. I’m happy to have a great two-way player, but his true offensive potential has never been realized, and he doesn’t show up when it matters most in the playoffs. You can post the point total stats all you want, but as I’ve stated previously, every series the Sharks have been eliminated in his stats are microscopic.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Marleau is my favorite player

What with him having been with the team since he was 19 and all.

Patty is a speed player, and speed goes fastest. He does have good hands and is big enough to hang around the net and clean up garbage. I think he needs to do more of that. If he does, he can go from being a young speedster to a more reliable playoff scorer.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

yea but i'm not talking abotu stats

i’m talking about watching them play, and for me Marleau made a much more noticeable impact than Joe last season, no matter what the stats say

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I might have to agree to disagree with you there. Joe still makes our offense move in my view. Given any amount of space, I still believe Joe can move the D and create a lane for himself to pass or shoot (I might be in the camp that wants him to shoot more). If he still has the physicality to earn that space might be a question worth debating. The man takes a pounding EVERY NIGHT.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who isn’t in the camp that wants him to shoot more? I know I am.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Aug 7, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

In the camp, I mean.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Aug 7, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Depending on the day of the week

The Sharks have racked up some ridiculous shot totals at certain points. Problem being that they tend to shoot a lot of perimeter shots that do nothing but bring the opposing goaltender into the game and making him seem better than he is (see Hiller, Jonas, Roloson, Dwayne).

If Joe sees things on the ice and knows shooting is not the best option, I’m okay with him holstering it and making the D make a mistake instead.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think everyone is.

A perfect example would be the 2 on 1 in game five where he tried to dish it to a winger (Seto maybe?) only for it to be broken up by a diving defenseman.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Joe Thornton: Most likely to pass on a breakaway.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

But doesn’t that just suggest that Marleau is probably the most important player to the Sharks in the playoffs? I mean, in the series they win, he has great stats. In series they don’t, he doesn’t.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

True up to a point

Patty and Joe have had statistically weak stats in our playoff losses. But Detroit found scoring from Justin Abdelkader, Darren Helm, Pittsburgh from Maxime Talbot, heck, Jeff Friesen had a good game when the Devils won a few years back.

This team is a one and a half line team in the playoffs.

Again, the run to the conference finals we had before Joe, how many 20 goal scorers were on that team?

Who ever heard of this Marcel Goc character who came in and had big games?

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

which is exactly why the heatley trade is a bad idea

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Max Talbot, superstar! But, yeah. Secondary support is needed. But I contend that if Mitchell played before the playoffs, he could be the Sharks’s Talbot. Or if McGinn played at all.

And in 03-04, there were 5 20-goal scorers on the team. 6 if you count Korolyuk, who had 19 goals, which would be just like this year’s team. Except that not one player had over 30 goals, which is kind of amazing. I’m just looking down the lineup of that team, and there isn’t really one amazing player, but just a bunch of guys who all could put up at least 20 points.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think what is suggests

Is that Patty is an elite player at times and occupies an essential role on the team, but he’s always lacked the consistency to be trusted with a top scoring role. Some folks have mentioned he’s not a pure sniper, but that’s what we need from a top line left winger. I like Patty a lot, but I just don’t know where he fits on this team anymore. I think his best role is a 2nd line with Pavs and Clowe (moving Michalek to another team in the process).

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Role Playing

I do have a hard time trying to figure out what everyone is supposed to do. I mean, Cheech can’t get top 2 line minutes, Michalek and Ehrhoff seem to never quite live up to expectations, Vlasic is solid but won’t score, Joe is our playmaker but doesn’t score enough goals according to some, and given a little bit of pressure, the whole team just seems to disappear.

One of my favorite hockey stories was the last Islanders Cup in the 80’s and how the Oilers peeked in on the Locker Room and saw how much winning that series took out of the Isles.

For all of the heartbreak this team has been through, for all of the rings that have been brought into the locker room, to a man, this team STILL does not seem committed to win in April and May.

Game 4 against Anaheim may have been the sickest moment for me as a sports fan (and that is worse than Joe Montana going down in the 1990 NFC Championship game).

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Game 4 and Game 1 – Game 3 actually made me rather sick, too, that it took dropping the first two games at home to a number 8 seed (and one of our arch rivals) to breath ANY life into the team.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have an excuse

I was in India for Game 1, listening to streaming radio. I SAW Game 4 (I wish I hadn’t).

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

driving home after Game 1 was one of the worst feelings I’ve ever had. I didn’t know if I should be sad, angry, embarrassed or hopeful (that the team just needed the game as a wake up call)

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

I bet

the Sharks had the same feeling but 100x worse.

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure they did

I just disapprove of how they handled it.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was stuck in traffic in LA for the first two periods of Game 1, and in a Japantown hotel room for the third. I had to listen to the Ducks guys on the radio the entire time. That’s never fun.

Except I found out the Ducks radio guys have a serious hard-on for Douglas Murray. He and Setoguchi were all they talked about.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dude, I was at game four.

Life doesn’t get any rougher than that.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah … still don’t know how you can live having that in your memory banks

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beer

It’s for more than helping ugly people have sex.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

wouldn’t that be … beer is more than for helping gorgeous people have sex with ugly people?

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

guess your way works too

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a very general thing

All hail the many uses of beer

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beer

“The cause of and solution to all of life’s problems.”
-Homer Simpson

Hi everyone new to the site here!

by 4Czech on Aug 8, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Welcome!

Nice Handle

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 8, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Trading Thornton would be insane

Don’t buy the playoff choker bs – Thornton is a playmaker and not a sniper. The problem is that the team gets to the playoffs and everyone just watches and waits for Joe to do everything. Joe is guilty of trying to do too much which ultimately leads him to being double teamed and removed as a threat. Does he always show up 100%? No, he has some growing still to do, but when you make your living playmaking and dominating along the boards it’s hard to constantly be the game-changer. I think the onus is as much on his wingers to help allow him to be the player he in the regular season. If they’re gonna double team him and not give him space, then his wingers need to help create space instead of standing around, waiting for the home run pass.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:26 PM PDT reply actions  

agreed with this

I’m for keeping joe if they change the culture of the team to idolize him less and have the other players step up in those situations

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

None of this matters,

He promised to shoot more this season anyway!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Aug 7, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long as we yell “Shoot!” at him during the PP, anyways. He couldn’t hear us last year.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Well said. I’ve made the point a few times over the past few weeks that Joe is the face of this team to the rest of the league and he’s an elite player. If you believe that as a player and a teammate, then you have to support him, and I don’t think the team does. The team doesn’t support each other enough when the chips are down. Chins hit chests and we feel like we’ve already lost.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does he always show up 100%? No, he has some growing still to do, but when you make your living playmaking and dominating along the boards it’s hard to constantly be the game-changer.

He’s 30. He’s in the middle of his prime. There is no more growing. There is no excuse for giving less than 100%, especially if you are the cornerstone of a team. He is plenty capable of dominating and constantly being the game-changer in the regular season. He hasn’t in the playoffs. That’s just true. I don’t know if he needs to stop being a perimeter player or if he has to just try harder. But he’s not going to draw guys out of position like he needs to if he hangs out on the outside and doesn’t challenge people.

I think the onus is as much on his wingers to help allow him to be the player he in the regular season.

Who has the Art Ross? Who has the Hart trophy? Who is constantly hailed as the guy that makes his linemates so much better? Obviously everyone has to do their part, but the burden doesn’t all of a sudden come off of Joe when the stakes get higher, I’d say it’s the opposite.

by Rob Parker on Aug 7, 2009 5:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Allow for a comparison

Joe can step up all he wants. There is another player in the league who does. His name is Jerome Iginla. He’s a stud (and I’d kill to have him play for us).

Fact is, he has NO ONE around him. At the end of the day, he loses same as us.

Team game. Yeah, Joe might only be at 95% out there. If everyone else is at only 75% around him, I cut him a marginal amount of slack.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Jarome Iginla is a stud, I can give him that. But, he is not a good example either, as his team has been eliminated four straight years in the first round. People also say I WANT A JAROME IGINLA type captain. Fact is, he only got past the first round as a captain ONCE.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Aug 7, 2009 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wait... we're all the way to Trade Thornton?

This offseason has to end like right now. You guys are losing it.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 3:36 PM PDT reply actions  

you guys should just shut down FTF until something noteworthy happens to the roster

CAUSE WE’RE ALL LOSING OUR MINDS!

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can’t stop a moving train!

BTW… thank you all for the support. We’re growing like crazy, visits last month were higher than most of last season combined.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great community

I’ve been lurking on WeBleedTeal and continued to when Plank came here. This offseason and my hockey withdrawals prompted me to start posting. I have to say, the fans here are great, and discussions are very interesting. The interwebs are usually scary places to have discussions.

You guys deserve a lot of credit for setting such a great tone for this site.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last August: 783 visits.
This August: 8,111 visits. And it’s only 8/7!

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

All (well deserved) praise aside

Do you think it speaks to a growing dissatisfaction in the fanbase?

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love this place

cause most everyone has an educated opinion and disagreements never devolve into arguments and personal attacks.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're ugly.

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

you smell

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Your mom.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

takes one to know one

(yeah, I don’t know)

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

SO’S YOUR FACE!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would assume that has a lot to do with it- if DW had already filled out the roster, I highly doubt everyone is showing up here on a daily basis.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Aug 7, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would!

Because I’m bored out of my mind.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

shouldn’t you be college shopping or something?

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Done with that early July.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's what I usually do

For this, I blame my mom. She made me do it.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mom’s don’t believe in putting things off.

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

what school are you heading to?

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

USC

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

nice dude, congrats – choose a major already?

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

dudette*

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not yet

Going in undeclared, but I’m leaning towards journalism or communications.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

right on, take a nice breadth of lower div classes this year, cause you might find a passion for a subject you never even considered.

I just took the GREs, and thinking about going to SJSU for a graduate degree in Kinesiology with a focus on becoming an athletic trainer.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice

Yeah, I’m just taking a bunch of GEs this semester, as well as French (language is required for most majors, so might as well get that over with) and Intro to Cinema (which might as well be required at USC, lol).

Oh, and a seminar on Sports and Legal Issues. Should be fun. And I fully expect to be the only girl there.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

very cool, have fun with it – it’s tough but rewarding, just make sure to choose something you enjoy, but has an actual career when you graduate.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

or don't think about that stuff

cuz you’ll scare yourself silly like me!!!

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

it's much scarier

to wake up and realize you paid a ton of money and have no career goals ;-)

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t worry, I’m planning on minoring in business or something sensible to fall back on.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

cool – I have my BA in history and spent the last year freaking out cause I don’t really wanna teach, but couldn’t come up with any other decent career options or a subject to go back to school for so.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

the trainer certification program I'm currently doing

actually also works with a school for a 1 year grad program in Kinesiology. (I THINK it was 1yr, maybe 18months) Although, after heaing how much fun Lurker’s had in grad school, I’m happy with my BFA, thank you very much!

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

hmm

I may need more information from ya, I just started considering this a week or two ago.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

letme see if I can find

where I put the pamphlets. Or better yet, I’ll check the website.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

thank you kindly

much appreciation

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

here we go
NASM/CUP Grad program

The other program with some school in AZ requires previous experience as a trainer for admission.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

fantastic, thanks again Gray

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

welcome!

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey don't let me discourage you.

18 months is nothing like the going on 4 years while working full time I’ve been doing.

It takes a big man to cry and it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. -Jamie Baker
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by Lurker Shark on Aug 8, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

you just don’t seem to be enjoying yourself, is all ;)

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 8, 2009 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Never put off today...

…eh, I’ll finish this post later.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Amen

Hey, sometimes, you have to wake up in a strange house wearing a pink tutu and covered in paint stains before you realize you have to lay off the sauce a bit…

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

personal experience?

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Of course not, this is a generalization

Besides, who would deign to wear a pink tutu when tiaras are available

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

this is a very good point.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Someone put me in a coma so hockey season could start faster. That’s a valid option right?

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

No worries

We’ve all had our “Trade Joe” moments. Tomorrow, I might have one too.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

What I really think the Sharks need this year

is some selfishness. A little ‘give me the puck cause I’m gonna drive the net, I may not make it, but it’s better then passing around the perimeter, waiting for the perfect pass, then watching the play peter out.’

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Woah, wait. Did you just ask for Heatley?

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Aug 7, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol, let's not go down that road

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe attend 49ers training camp?

Those guys seem to find self-important ball hogs each year.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Interesting.

8:10 Heatley deal to San Jose getting close
8:20 Heatley deal to San Jose falling apart?

I like how they use HockeyBuzz as a source.

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 3:58 PM PDT reply actions  

ugh! Can whatever is going to happen just happen!!!

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

But what if it’s not going to happen?

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 7, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

then that is what has happened, the non-deal … just all these rumors are upsetting my balance

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Aug 7, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

The more I see this "trade" covered

The more I want for Cheech to stay with us, play the top line and score a bazillion goals.

You want “no part” of the guy? I know his numbers have sucked the past two years, but have you seen him play?

I know he’s dead weight salary to us, but gorramit, he’s OUR deadweight salary, and his still a gamer!

Cheech is what Sean Avery would be if Sean Avery wasn’t a douchebag. A talented, gritty forward who scores goals and disrupts the other team by playing hard FOR his teammates.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except Sean Avery never scored 56 goals. Then again, neither did Dany Heatley.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Avery never did and never will, because that would require his head to come out of his ass.

However, a player with his skill-set could score 50 goals playing with Joe Thornton. Cheechoo, without Joe, probably won’t score 50, but he’s still got to be good for 20-30 playing top line minutes.

Heatley has hit the 50 mark twice without Joe. He’s also demanded trades twice, for, you know, whatever that’s worth stats-wise.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

here's some more overrating of joe in my opinion

how many other people have scored 56 goals on his wing? Let’s give cheech a little credit

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, didn’t mean to imply Cheech had no game. After Patty, Cheech is my favorite Shark. Just saying 56 may have been a bit of a fluke, but still, I think Cheech is legitimate top 6, and he might have 40 in him again, but 20-30/yr is probably what he is. And that’s not a bad thing.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

but Michalek, Cheech and Marleau have all had their best offensive seasons playing on Joe’s line, and when moved off, seen their stats dip.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

New plan

Trade Nabokov and just put 6 forwards on the ice. How else are we going to get Patty, Cheech, Seto, Milan and Clowe on the ice with Joe consistently?

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like your thinking

we’re looking at five 50 goal scorers and Thornton with about 500 assists… and like 2 goals.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, you got me on the one, I should’ve said goals.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

i mean joe is a great player

I just don’t think we can assume that any good player will get 50 goals playing on his line. I’m pretty certain Cheech is the only 50 goalscorer ever to play with Big Joe

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very true

Right players, right time, right team.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

05-06

Very good year… right up until the Sharks let that goal in after the 5 on 3 PK…

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Aug 7, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, no doubt

Scoring 50 isn’t a given at all, and not necessary either – but he does make good players great and great players that much better.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not true

Marleau’s best offensive season was 05-06, when he was centering the second line. In terms of goal-scoring, yes, this year was the best, but in both 05-06 and 06-07 he had more points than this year and didn’t play on Joe’s line.

Also, Michalek played on Joe’s line last season, and yet this season his point total rose. Yes, it was only by a point, and his best season was in 06-07 when I believe he did play on Joe’s line, but still.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Milan didn’t play on Joe’s line much, you definitely have to say he was primarily on a line with Pavs and Clowe.

Oh, so that's where you edit your signature

by Teas on Aug 7, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Personally, I’d have loved to see his tactics when negotiating with his dealer. Like, did he get a bonus Snuggie thrown in? Limited time offers of 2 Ks for 1? The mind reels.

by ievans on Aug 7, 2009 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

anyone interested in my continued defense of Ehrhoff's importance

I read on the Sharks boards someone pointed out this , which illustrates his team-best (by a good margin -disregard semenov) 1st assist on the powerplay totals (ASST1/60)

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 10:15 PM PDT reply actions  

correction*

that list shows team best for D-men. In the overall list you also have to disregard kaspar

by a10dency2ask on Aug 7, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

According to Eklund, talks have broken down and the Sharks shifted their focus to Phil Kessel. I know this is eklund, and not very reliable, but I wouldn’t mind Kessel. Thoughts?

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Aug 7, 2009 10:16 PM PDT reply actions  

At this point,

I would prefer to simply wake up one day to find all the deals finished. I guess I’m done rosterbating…for a while.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Aug 7, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

First thought: THANK GOD EKLUND IS OVER THIS HEATLEY TO SJ CRAP

Also, all reports have been that Boston and Kessel are both trying to work out a new contract for him. Well, all reports not from hockeybuzz, that is. So I’m definitely doubting any Kessel rumor.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

THIS JUST IN

PTBNL TO SAN JOSE e5!

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 7, 2009 10:49 PM PDT reply actions  

Its not later yet.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry. I can tell you later is sometime before October 1st. Probably before September 17th, as well. Later will not be whenever the NHL office is closed, so likely not on weekends. And certainly not when its past midnight in Toronto.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Aug 7, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

who was he traded for?

PTBNL for PTBNL?

-The dude responsible for this mess

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by idunno723 on Aug 8, 2009 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

PTBNL

was traded for PLTNL A, PLTBNL B, GTBNL, PLTBNL C and a bunch of grape flavored popsicles.
PTBNL A is reportedly quite put out by the trade and has been making negative statements regarding his old GM’s love for grape flavored popsicles in the press.

“He could have at least traded me for the blue flavor.” PTBNL A is quoted as saying.

resident cartoonist @couchtarts.blogspot.com. Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Aug 8, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

We need to shake up the team but adding Heatley may not pay off

This guy is a career prima donna. I think Rob Blake said it best at the end of last season…“Keep the same lineups and let us do it again. We won’t make the same mistakes twice. Now that we have experienced this together, we are going to make that final push towards the cup”.

I say keep it the same chemistry, one more playoff push before shaking up the team. Marleau is our captain and he’s a good captain. Don’t trade him.

by TonylovesKC on Aug 16, 2009 10:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thank you

Recent FanPosts

Snapshot_of_me_1_small
Hypothetical: California Classic OR Petition: Sharks Outdoor Game
Sharkslogotail_small
Sharkstistics - February 2012
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote
Small
What would you give for Jeff Carter
Snapshot_of_me_1_small
Hypothetical: If the Coyotes had to move...
Small
Selling 2 Club Level seats for tomorrow's game vs Columbus and others
Pavs2_small
All-Stars Skill Competition Open Thread
P257268-san_jose-opening_ceremonies_of_san_jose_sharks_game_small
Ryane Clowe Trade Rumors
Sharkslogotail_small
NHL Magic Numbers, Tragic Numbers, & Potential Points Standings - 2011-12 Running Charts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >