Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

The Morning After: Marleau Remains A Shark

David_koechner5_medium

Boy, that escalated quickly...

With John Buccigross likely in a safehouse or with a relative somewhere, let's take brief look at the events that transpired yesterday:

  • Bruce "Malkin To The Kings" Garrioch floats a rumor of an impending Heatley deal early Thursday. It's only taken seriously when John Buccigross posts an update on Twitter.
  • Buccigross has another update around 5:30, which is immediately deleted- it states the Sharks will receive Heatley, the Kings will receive Marleau, and the Senators will receive Stoll and Frolov.
  • ESPN publishes the story around 6:00- it then proceeds to take various forms, with the most recent one appearing here.
  • Around 7:00 PM, the denials begin to roll in- Dean Lombardi of the LA Kings, Darren Dreger of TSN, and Michael Russo of the Minneapolis Star Tribune (among others) state the deal was never on the table.
  • David Pollak of Working The Corners puts the nail in the coffin and lays this rumor to rest.

I've got a couple points I'd like to make about the whole situation, as well as expound upon some ideas I mentioned in the live blog TCY and I were frantically attempting to run yesterday. Hit the jump for more.

Star-divide

There's so many possibilities as to how this all went down, it's almost a fool's errand to try and uncover what exactly happened- all three general manager's denied the trade was legitimate, Darren Dreger of TSN cited sources that said nothing was ever close, and Michael Russo of the Star Tribune stated that two of the teams involved hadn't even spoken for two and a half weeks. But why would John Buccigross, the most respected and informed hockey journalist ESPN has to offer, conjure something out of thin air? I trust him as a news source, partially because he provides a passionate take on the game and partially because he's not known for rumor mongering; there's nothing Eklund about him. I believe his source existed, even if the information turned out to be false- I don't see any other reason he would do such a thing.

Getting back to the initial point though- the circumstances surrounding the deal. Mind you all of this is complete speculation, but I think it's safe to assume everything involving Mr. Heatley from here on out should never be considered more than such.

1) Clout with the journalistic community and fans. Dany Heatley has been making headlines along with Jim Balsillie and the Phoenix Coyotes all offseason long- no other stories (besides Patrick Kane's ill-advised cab ride, which will amount to nothing more than a vestige of Crazy Taxi jokes by October 1st) even come close. If Buccigross comes in and makes breaking news by reporting the Heatley deal with certainty before any other respected news source sniffs it, he's immediately gained major recognition and will be lauded as the guy who, "broke the big deal." That seems to be important to a lot of people (fans and writers alike), and could have caused him to take a source that wasn't air-tight and say, "Screw it, I'm going all in". Essentially he's going to sit on the same quality of information if it involves a swap of Aaron Ward for Patrick Eaves. There's no need to swing for the fences in that situation.

2) It was one waived NTC away. Doug Wilson goes to Patrick Marleau and doesn't specifically ask him to waive his no trade clause- instead he gets creative and sees if Marleau would be okay with having his name thrown around in some potential deals. Marleau says he's quite alright with that, which eventually leads Wilson into a conversation with Dean Lombardi and Bryan Murray. The three general manager's compose a deal and Buccigross' source calls him with the tip; unbeknownst to both of them, Marleau has not officially waived his NTC. Wilson calls Marleau to inform him of the deal, which after some deliberation leads to a rejection of the offer.

Now you've got the same situation that occurred with Edmonton earlier this summer- a deal leaks before the applicable NTC/NMC's are waived, a player involved refuses to be traded, and an organization is left with egg on it's face as well as several players who realize they may not be as integral to the team as they initially thought. So what do the GM's do? Damage control. Lombardi, Wilson, and Murray get on the phone together and agree to protect their current assets- deny, deny, deny, right down the line.

3) So why would Patrick Marleau hypothetically refuse to waive his NTC? There's many potential reasons, although I want to stress this is the purest of speculation. For starters, he is comfortable in San Jose, playing here his entire career since breaking into the league in 1997. By all accounts he loves the city and wants nothing more than to succeed with the Sharks. He held the Captaincy for five years. He's the franchise leader in nearly every offensive category. His wife is from San Jose and they just had their second child last season- it's possible he does not want to uproot his family at all, especially considering the season is less than a month away. The list literally goes on and on.

One point I do want to make is this- Evgeni Nabokov has previously stated (in respect to his NTC), "If the organization wants me to leave, I will leave... I would never stay with an organization that didn’t want me." Patrick Marleau has done no such thing. If a Mats Sundin esque situation occurs where it becomes public that Marleau did in fact use his NTC to block a deal, and a public outcry from the fanbase ensues, I will hang my head in shame. Patrick Marleau earned that clause in his contract. Period.

4) Marleau's ties to Los Angeles. There's a lot of speculation as to why San Jose would deal their former Captain within the division, and my only answer would be that it's the only avenue left for Doug Wilson to land Heatley. LA is close enough to San Jose where family life wouldn't be vastly affected by the move, and while I'm completely unaware of the relationship Dean Lombardi and Patrick Marleau currently share, he was the Sharks GM from 1996-2003; during this time he drafted Marleau. Signing Marleau to an extension is the only way this move makes sense for LA, because they're not one piece away from being a bona-fide Cup contender and would be giving up two good young players in the process.

*******

During the 2007-2008 season a whirlwind of trade rumors and rumblings of differences with then head coach Ron Wilson led Marleau to post a paltry 19 goals and 48 points. This offseason has been no different, and it's arguably been worse. Doug Wilson has yet to come out and state that he is "safe", unlike the public vote of confidence he gave to Joe Thornton and Dan Boyle. Marleau was stripped of the Captaincy in mid-August, is not present on this season's tickets, and has been unfairly branded the poster child for San Jose's lack of postseason success. Now he's been named in a questionably factual high profile trade that made waves across the entire NHL just before training camp is set to begin.

Standing alone, each of those situations could be easily shrugged off. But together? In three months time? This is nothing short of a public humiliation in my eyes, a sign that the organization is attempting to bull their way in a different direction.

If you are Patrick Marleau would you want to play in San Jose under these circumstances? Two years ago you felt alienated and your on-ice performance suffered, only improving once the trade deadline had passed and the public's eye turned towards winning games instead of "heart" and "vocal leadership." This season those attributes will be the sole focus, born of a disappointing first round loss after winning the Presidents Trophy in yet another successful regular season. If you are Patrick Marleau do you re-sign with this franchise? It has been the only home you have ever known, but what has management done to make you feel welcome in that home heading into a contract negotiation year? Absolutely nothing. Nothing at all. You have been quietly and covertly dragged through the mud.

For the first time this offseason I'm straying from the assertion that Patrick Marleau should wear teal next season. He shouldn't. Not because of his on-ice performance, not because of the bullshit excuse he doesn't have leadership capabilities, not because he doesn't have heart, grit, guts, or any other goddamn intangible that is so easy to measure from section 227 while you're sucking down a fucking soda.

It's because this organization has lost faith in him. And when management doesn't believe in Patrick Marleau, I don't think he believes in himself.

Comment 227 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree with everything said here.

Partially because we talked it to shit last night.

But man, this was so crazy. Especially when ESPN has never really been in the “spread crazy rumors for hits” business. I want to know a few things this AM…

How does Patty feel? Who was Bucci’s source? Why is the ESPN story still up?

Something is going on here.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 7:03 AM PDT reply actions  

My guess is because ESPN is too lazy to do anything about it.

Pronger to the Kings is still up as well.

by Ivano M on Sep 11, 2009 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Look at the story difference too, on ESPN

When Heatley was apparently traded to Oilers: It appears that Dany Heatley will be staying in Ottawa for the time being.
TSN reported early Wednesday morning that Heatley refused to waive his no-trade clause in order to facilitate a trade to the Edmonton Oilers.

When Heatley was apparently traded to Sharks: The Ottawa Senators have reached an agreement to send Dany Heatley to the San Jose Sharks, NHL sources told ESPN’s John Buccigross. The 28-year-old forward is set to be part of a three-team deal that would send the Sharks’ Patrick Marleau to the Los Angeles Kings and the Kings’ Alexander Frolov and Jarret Stoll to the Senators.

It’s just so odd.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 7:09 AM PDT reply actions  

That is weird

Weird also is that my dad, who isn’t the most Internet savvy guy, sent me a message last night that Marleau had been traded. I asked him where he heard it and he said it was on ESPN, the tv network, not the website. Hopefully we’ll get some clarification today or this weekend.

by Chicago Shark on Sep 11, 2009 7:34 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I had weird dreams after all the hubububalu

I saw one of those “you have seen it here first” postings after a story that was either on espn or tsn.ca and the person had outlined the exact trade everyone crapped themselves about. It was time stamped hours before the shizzle hit the fizzle.

I wonder if the real trade isn’t involving Nabokov to Ott….
Yes its shameless speculation but its the goalie that teams depend on IN THE PLAYOFFS, and I don’t have a clue who any of the goalies in Ott are. Our Sharks don’t have a problem getting there but once there…well duh. Tis obvious we need a riser and not a faller in the big dance.

Maybe DW wants to promote a jr goalie or will trade later for a proven vet to push us through. Nabby could be sold as the Vez Trophy runner up/ workhorse that can take the Sens somewhere. Heater could add an obviously skilled skoring skater without the Sharks losing one. Both guys have flaws but both can be brilliant…

Just think of all the save Marleau posts and fan outcry whenever our beloved captain is threatened. I always flash back to the commercials highlighting the brutal beating he took in the playoffs 2 years ago and how he soldiered on…Contrast that with all the cries to “staple Nabbies fivehole shut”.

Go Sharks. Whatever happens.

Here's to the second round!

by Aero72 on Sep 11, 2009 7:21 AM PDT reply actions  

I wonder if the real trade isn’t involving Nabokov to Ott….

I’m not sure that’s going to be a possibility- Ottawa traded to get Pascal Leclaire at the deadline only a couple months ago. He had an injury last season (ankle I believe), but is young enough (26) and under contract for two more years at a decent price of $3.8 M. With Nabokov due to hit free agency next season and the fact that the Sens aren’t in a “buy” situation right now (one piece away from being a frontrunner in the East, especially with that piece being a netminder) it looks like a longshot.

Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Sep 11, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good points. I am salary cap illiterate.
Just seems like the trades fans expect, and that make sense from our perspective rarely pan out.

Out of all of the Sharks in the news, he seems to be the most willing to go elsewhere. He is also someone who shoulders much of the postseason blame.

Here's to the second round!

by Aero72 on Sep 11, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Expiring contract...

Wouldn’t getting Nabokov for Heatley at least look to Ottawa’s fan base like a big name for a big name + the added bonus of an expiring contract for next year?

Oh, never mind, I just miss Toskala.

Here's to the second round!

by Aero72 on Sep 11, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Headlines still are up and still BS

ESPN still has the story headline link :“Heatley goes to Sharks in 3-team deal”.

There is a lot of crap on the web but mainstream media should be held responsible for this kind of crap.
Headline = uproar
Story = just kidding
I = pissed

I am going to unplug my internet connection as a protest.

for five minutes.

(back in 5 to see if anything happened)

Here's to the second round!

by Aero72 on Sep 11, 2009 7:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Apologies...

That’s an uncertified account.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 8:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Damn it. Wanted to wake up with this picture being real..

by Ivano M on Sep 11, 2009 8:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Haha wow.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Anyway. Good post there Mr Plank. I have to fully agree with you. With the way DW treated our former Captain this off season, I do not expect much from Patty. I imagine his head is already somewhere else, and if he doesn’t get traded, he’ll walk to a team that can appreciate him more and where he doesn’t have to be the no. 1 leader. We’ll watch from the sidelines as he scores another 80 points somewhere while we get absolutely nothing in return and while Heatley is scoring 50 goals somewhere else.

I fully expect Marleau’s stats to sink to a new low this season and I won’t blame him.

by Ivano M on Sep 11, 2009 8:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Per Buccigross through Puck Daddy:

"Right now, obviously, nothing is officially done or it would have been announced by all parties. What I heard earlier tonight was that it was a three-team trade. First I had heard it was going to be tonight or tomorrow. Obviously they want to move him before training camp. So I sniffed around and my best source, who’s been perfect for me, mentioned he got an email from a front office personnel member. He forwarded me the email, and it’s a pretty significant name (laughs) in the NHL, and I thought ‘Boy, I would have gone on it just with my initial source, because he’s been great for me.’ Then he showed me this email, and it was completely supporting it.

“So I was surprised when it hasn’t come through tonight. Now, things are complicated, there could be other parts to it, but I still believe he will be moved. But it appears, as I was told, is not going to happen tonight anyway.”

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 8:35 AM PDT reply actions  

I hope Marleau doesn’t kill anyone with a trident.

by mepex on Sep 11, 2009 8:45 AM PDT reply actions  

There were horses

and a man on fire. And Marleau killed a guy with a hand grenade.

by Chicago Shark on Sep 11, 2009 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just remembered

my dad works at Cordevalle (country club where many of the Sharks are members), and he said DW is playing there today in a tournament. This makes me think that if something is going down, it might not be until later tonight.

I told my dad to tell DW to keep Marleau, so we’ll see what happens. Not sure that my dad or I carry much weight, but I’m doing my part from 1600 miles away.

by Chicago Shark on Sep 11, 2009 8:55 AM PDT reply actions  

I’m kind of ashamed at the way the organization has treated Marleau this off-season. He’s done nothing but good for this franchise and community, and the org rewards him with constant trade speculation and stripping him of his captaincy. Are they trying to decrease his value? Its almost bush league tactics, and I am not a fan of them.

But thank god that the Heatley trade never went down. That would have destroyed all my faith in DW.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I’m not quite sure what you mean by this comment. Are you saying the Sharks have no right to shop Marleau, or ask him to waive his NTC? By all accounts that I’ve seen, the Sharks haven’t leaked squat. DW is consistent in not discussing trade rumors or other players, so the hockey ops dept. seems to have acted above board in all things.

The fact is in that DW has to right to not want to re-sign Marleau after this year, and to try to get value before his contract expires. He also has the right to strip the captaincy at any time. There’s no tenure in the NHL. Clearly management (and many fans) think that Patty has not got it done in the leadership department.

by mepex on Sep 11, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think part of it is that many of us feel DW would be making the wrong judgment if he felt Marleau was the problem, and moreso if he felt Heatley was the solution to the “Marleau Problem”

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. I would say that Marleau isn’t the problem, but I would also say him wearing the C isn’t part of the solution.

by mepex on Sep 11, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

agreed

I don’t really have a problem with the Captaincy issue, but I don’t want to see Marleau become a scapegoat for last season, when he represents a lot of what went right

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t think any of us can say if Marleau being Captain is part of the solution or not … again, we don’t know what goes on in the locker room. The players themselves have not said if they have a problem with Marleau as Captain, so we can’t make any assumptions in that area.

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?

by ang6666 on Sep 11, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Given how the management has handled the situation, I think it’s pretty safe to say they had a problem with Marleau as captain. Never an easy thing to rip that off a guy’s jersey who’s been with the team for many years (ask Modano) but clearly they felt they had to do it.

by mepex on Sep 11, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Marleau may be a great leader

but he could leading the team in a direction different from what McLellan wants. It says a lot when TM takes away the C, but I’m glad he waited a year to see what kind of salt the team had.

I fell for the rumors and spread them to a couple of people last night, but I followed it each time with “I’d rather have Marleau than Heatley.” Now I’m not so sure. I think a lot of people are correct in saying that Marleau isn’t going to have a great year statistically in Teal. Heatley might, but I just don’t know if he’ll take any of the coaching he would get here. Anybody know if he is good friends with anyone already here? Boyle maybe? Thornton? If he’s just picking San Jose because of the weather or lack of media or championship potential, I don’t want him. However, if he knows the expectations to play here (via a current player) and still wants to come, I’ll welcome him with open arms. I’d rather not give up Marleau, but there’s obviously something going on between him and TM/DW to get left off season tickets, stripped of the C and generally not touted.

19 days until we have a good idea of what the roster looks like. Sucks because I’m impatient.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

when management doesn’t believe in Patrick Marleau, I don’t think he believes in himself.

I think in my hot and cold attitude on Patty, I’ve never been able to put this as well as you did. I concur wholeheartedly with this statement.

Patty is a great player, my personal favorite on the team. But winning the Stanley Cup is all about those “intangibles.”

If Patty doesn’t believe in himself, he doesn’t lead, either vocally, or by example. This, in a nutshell, is the whole team’s problem, Patty’s not the only one suffering from this. But, let’s face it, he had the “C” for 5 seasons. That’s not nothing. At some point, guys ARE going to look to you for leadership. That’s also been part of the teams problem. “Someone ELSE will lead us.” At some point, someone has to stand up and take that role. If Patty, for 5 seasons with the “C,” didn’t do that, maybe he wasn’t what this franchise needed. It sucks for him, it sucks for his teammates, it sucks for management, and it sucks for the fans.

I don’t think there’ll be a shortage of teams interested. When Montreal inevitable collapses, they’re going to run someone out of town, leaving a nice juicy spot open for Patty on their roster. Ditto New York. And that’s to say nothing of whoever this year’s Chicago Blackhawks turn out to be who decide they are one FA away from putting it all together.

Again, all my personal opinions, based on my personal musings of Doug Wilson’s actions this off-season. Given his comments on KNBR, I think he’s pegged Dan Boyle as the next leader of this team, and will then be looking for Clowe, Pavs and Seto to grow into those roles.

Just one point of clarification though on my personal view: if any of this existed, it was well before the “breaking” of this trade. I doubt seriously one way or the other that this particular rumor will sway Patty’s opinion on staying in Teal. Whether or not the Sharks win the Cup this season is, in my view, what will determine whether Doug Wilson gives Patty a new contract. It’s Cup or bust for him and Nabby. $11M in cap space is nothing to sneeze at, and I think Wilson would opt for a rebuild.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Sep 11, 2009 9:48 AM PDT reply actions  

I've stewed on all this for an evening, and I have some thoughts...

First, I really really really don’t get the absolute hatred being spewed at the idea of getting Dany Heatley. I understand the reasons against getting him (allegedly questionable character, contract size and legnth, etc.), but I don’t understand how this would make it an absolute abomination if he came to the Sharks. I mentioned this a few times last night, but getting a 40-50 (and on Thornton’s wing, 60) goal scorer is not a bad thing! Maybe it will impact us down the road, but jesus tittifucking christ, I’ve never seen a fanbase so appalled at the idea of GETTING an elite player. Its baffling.

Maybe its because I’ve been an A’s fan for so long, but I really don’t get as attached to players as I do to a team. Marleau is a good player, and has been an awesome Shark. He’s represented the organization and the city with class. But if he is moved to get a better player (which Heatley is), then hellz yes I’m going to support it! Also, when was the last time an elite player actually WANTED to come to San Jose (as has been reported that Heatley does)? We’ve always had a hell of a time getting top players to sign as free agents here in San Jose. Now we have one that wants to actually come play for us. I’d think we, as fans, would appreciate that and embrace it.

Next, I think, if I’m Marleau, and DW really has been dicking with him this offseason, we won’t be resignign him anyways come next season. One of the big points about keeping Marleau around is the assumption that he would resign for a rather significant hometown discount. Where’s his motivation to do that now? Now, I’m not sure he’s been treated as poorly by the front office as people here are claiming (he’s not on the season tickets, who fucking cares? …and of course the C was going to be stripped…but they stripped Thornton of the A, as well, and said it would all be decided at camp. They didn’t single Patty out there). So this is really two-fold for me. One, if what I believe is true, and he hasn’t been treated so poorly by the front office and its mostly media hype and people on blogs overreacting, then there really is no issue here. But, if he feels like he’s been slighted and dragged through the mud, we probably don’t want him here this season anyways. Someone so fragile in mind is not going to hold up to the rigors of a full hockey season plus playoffs. If you’re going to freak out and play like shit because you aren’t on season tickets and was among the team leaders who had their letters stripped, then I’d rather you did that for another team. Players should always believe in themselves, no matter what those around them say…they should be trying to prove people wrong rather than believe them. I don’t think this is the case, but there it is!

Finally, as I think this is getting too long, and I should probably, you know, actually do some work at work today… this whole situation is a win-win for Sharks fans, as I see it. In one scenario, we get a top-flight offensive player who will be lethal with Joe Thornton feeding him the puck, and who actually wants to be here. In the other scenario, we keep a former Capitain, great two-way player, and all around good guy. I mean, I see nothing to shit a brick over here! The Sharks are going to be good this year, either way.

God, I really can’t wait til next Friday when I’ll be at the first home preseason game of the year. Go Sharks!

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Sep 11, 2009 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm against Heatley...

to the extent that I don’t think he improves any of the issues the team has had, either from a culture standpoint or a skills standpoint.

That said, if a trade was inevitable, a straight-up trade for Marleau would probably be the least damaging way to go about it, because giving up any prospects or younger players as well would mean we would have to go for the cup now and then probably sit on a bad team for a few years as we wait for the pipeline to refill. I’m against that, too.

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Heatleys character

I would like to take a moment to point out that he would likely have a stanley cup ring from 2007 if he hadn’t been saddled with Ray Emery in goal.

by Jpynn on Sep 12, 2009 7:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I know we talked about a lot of this last night during the Heatley thread, but I figured I’d throw it out there for the record for anyone who doesn’t want to go back and relive that particular episode of FTF folklore:

In regards to Heatley, yes, elite player. We need another elite player.

Realistically, we only have two in Thornton and Boyle. Marleau has threatened to be an elite player, and the pure numbers would say he is. Given the lack of success in the post-season (WINS, not numbers) and how much of his numbers could potentially be attributed to Joe (either directly playing with him or shielding him from the top D pair), it’s hard to really solidify his status as an elite player. Nabby WAS an elite goaltender. He has to decide if he’s mentally still the best, because he has all the tools.

So why not Heatley? Because this isn’t the A’s. We don’t sell our emerging talent to keep the franchise running. Hockey is all about the people. Marleau is good people. I can root for him (maybe even if he went elsewhere). Hell, I still root for Owen Nolan. I rooted for the Devils in the Cup Finals when Friesen was with them.

I just can not bring myself to root for Dany Heatley. If it was just numbers, I’d play fantasy hockey more. But it’s not numbers. It’s blood, sweat and tears for 7 months, and THEN there’s the playoffs.

I’ll admit, I don’t know the guy personally, so, maybe this is all blown out of proportion. But given the evidence I have (his handling of the aftermath in Atlanta, his handling of the situation in Ottawa, his relationship to his agents, the seemingly negative influence of his father, my own sense of disingenuousness in his press conference, etc.), I just don’t see him as a positive for this team in the intangibles, and just don’t think I’d like the guy if I DID know him personally.

As to the rest of your post, yes. I love Marleau, but if his departure makes the team better, such is sport. I’ll cry, I’ll put my Marleau T-shirt in a box somewhere, and then I’ll break out the Teal and loose my voice for this team.

I just don’t think Heatley is the move that makes losing Marleau okay. Not for the numbers, but for the purely emotional reasons I list above. And I still think emotions win over numbers in April and May. If they didn’t, Patty’s big post-season numbers would have brought us a cup.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Sep 11, 2009 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think this boils down to, at least in the pro-Heatley vs. anti-Heatley argument here, is whether you think Heater will be an upgrade for this team over Marleau overall…including everything on the ice and off it.

First, I think you mis-read my A’s reference. I was referring to it more along the lines of not getting attached to individual players as much as I get attached to the team itself…not their business model of trading emerging talent for future talent. Marleau isn’t an emerging talent, he’s an established talent who’s been here for years. The point I was trying to make here is that while, yes, I love Marleau, I love the Sharks more, and losing him to make the team better is ok in my eyes. I don’t want the sharks trading away all their stars for rookies. That would be ridiculous.

Second, it sounds like you are jumping on the “heart over talent” bandwagon a little bit there:

I just can not bring myself to root for Dany Heatley. If it was just numbers, I’d play fantasy hockey more. But it’s not numbers. It’s blood, sweat and tears for 7 months, and THEN there’s the playoffs.

Yes, hockey is a grind. We all know that. And it takes a special kind of person to really excel at this kind of game. However, it is mostly about numbers. Number of goals. Number of wins. If you score more than the other team, you win! I believe Heatley will improve our ability to do this. Yes, based on the numbers. I don’t think there’s anything any of us can know about either of these two personally that will tell us how they will affect the heart, soul, grit, whatever this team shows when all the chips are on the table. All we have to go by are the numbers. Marleau has been good. Heatley would be better. At least in my eyes. And if Heatley was to become a Shark, I would root for him wholeheartedly, because he is wearing Teal.

Of course, none of this matters if the trade doesn’t actually go down, but I just think Heatley takes some really unfair shots here on these boards. It almost sounds like people here think the Sharks would actually be worse should we acquire a talent like Heatley. And I don’t think that’s fair. Yes, it would suck to lose Marleau. But I think people let their love of Marleau, coupled with an irrational hatred of Heatley, cloud their vision on this one.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Sep 11, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

For me

after having the whole summer to think about it, I’ve moved beyond my initial reluctant driven reaction against Heatley and settled fully into not liking HOW he’d be coming here. The trade rumors, the drama, the apparent rift between ownership and Marleau; it’s just too much. I feel like I, as a fan, am being given just as much of the run around as Marleau APPEARS to be.

I’ve spoken with Sens fans who assure me that, when properly motivated, Heatley is a huge boon. I believe them, and he has the numbers to back this up. I just wonder if all this drama is the right way to bring a guy in? I don’t know.

I als am vehemently against losing someone who’s been the face of the franchise in many ways for so long. Maybe being an A’s fan has driven me to want to desperately cling to the familiar in this case. I don’t know.

It’s the same level of discomfort I feel watching models trying to book jobs. (forgive me, I watched Models of the Runway last night after PR. But it relates, I assure you)
They’re being treated like commodities and then it hits me that it’s because they ARE commodities. They are selling their look to someone. Similar to how athletes sell their talents. Who you are doesn’t matter anywhere near as much as what you can do.

Sometimes it just leaves me feeling squidgy, and I’m not sure why.

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 11, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I don’t necessarily subscribe to the theory that the team that comes out with the best player “wins” the trade. I personally would rather see good young players coming back for Marleau rather than a single more elite one. That’s just me. And again, I don’t think Heatley improves any of the Sharks’ past problems

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 11:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was referring to it more along the lines of not getting attached to individual players as much as I get attached to the team itself

I may have misconstrued your words a bit, but some of the point is still valid I think. The A’s have had LOTS of turnover, the Sharks, at the top end at least, have had a recognizable core. As such, they have an identity. (this is not to say the A’s lack and identity).

So yeah, I gather us non-baseball and purely hockey fans are much more attached to the guys wearing the jersey than we might be if we faced the sort of rostercourse that happens in other sports. Maybe that’s just a part of hockey culture.

But yes, I think where you and I disagree is whether Dany is right for the teams. The numbers say yes (even I can’t argue this, more scoring = better). I make the argument that the “character” issues will cost us in the spring.

Then again, arguments could be crafted (and I’ve crafted a good many myself) that Patty’s “character” hurt us in the post-season. Those arguments have been made to death, so, I feel no need to rehash them.

Bottom line:

Patty leaving would make me sad for 5 minutes, then I’d be over it.

Dany Heatley coming to the Sharks would make me sad until we won the Cup. Then I’d be over it. I still don’t know if I’d like him. It’d be like ‘94 when the Niners won the Super Bowl with Deion Sanders. It’s great, but in retrospect, more than a little dirty.

The equation, for me anyway, doesn’t balance. Whether that’s my problem or a real problem would require the trade to actually happen, and it doesn’t look like it will, so, really, this is just me wasting my Friday.

Still, if moving Patty makes us a better team, then godspeed.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Sep 11, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really?

Losing the C is MUCH BIGGER DEAL than losing the A

last top tier talent that wanted to come to sj…………………
call me crazy but believe it or not alot of top tier players would like to play for a presidents cup trophy winning team

an people are upset cause Marleau is not only a great player but also a great person in life and community losing him for someone who is known for being a douch is not what many people want

if we are to go by this logic of who cares about personal lives an how our players act outside of hockey we might as well be the cincinnati bengals of hockey

by sjshark on Sep 11, 2009 12:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Generally speaking...

I agree with everything you say. Marleau hasn’t been treated the way he deserves to be treated over the last few years. However, these guys are professionals. They understand what business they are in. Trade rumors, calling a player out, etc are all things that professional sports players have to deal with. So I think it’s BS that Marleau doesn’t play well when people call him out or don’t have faith in him. The fact is that the best sports players play their best when people challenge them or call them out. And if Marleau gets his feelings hurt instead of conjuring up the will to prove everyone wrong, then he doesn’t deserve to be our captain.

We just traded who for who?!

by BawLa on Sep 11, 2009 11:18 AM PDT reply actions  

What gets to me about all this stuff

is that it seems like DW is acting based on what he reads in articles by Mark Purdy.

I worry that DW thinks that as fans, we are all up in arms about the most recent playoff disaster and that we wont be satisfied until heads roll. It worries me that DW made “stripping” the A’s and C’s so public so long before camp. It’s almost like he was trying to feed what he presumes to be a blood-thirsty Mark Purdy-like public. There is no good reason to drop that story so early, I would have preferred to have the new Captain and Assistants announced just before the first game. They could have made it more of a transition and less of a shitty photoshop on the front page of the merc.

There’s front office fuck up numero uno.

Not putting Patty on the tickets is classless. It’s not the “safe move” as was suggested elsewhere. It’s a dick move. If they had put him on the tickets, worst case scenario he gets traded and some of the tickets have pictures of our former captain/super nice guy. No one would look stupid or feel bad.

There’s front office fuck up numero dos.

I personally dont want Patty to go anywhere, no matter what, ever. I understand that isn’t reasonable, but that’s how love works. (no homo)

What I want even less than Patty leaving, is him leaving for the wrong reason. No heads should roll just because DW thinks that fans feel they should. I’d like to remind everyone, especially DW, that we kicked ass last year, and that maybe we don’t want to mess with that success too much. No matter how happy it will make Mark Purdy.

*As for Heatley, I’d be happy to have him on our team, but not in exchange for Marleau.

**God I hate Mark Purdy. And the merc for putting his shit closer to the front than David Pollak’s.

by perkins.kit on Sep 11, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Purdy

Mark Purdy is a waste I have never seen anyone root against there own home team more than he does.
maybe if he took the time to stop sucking on joe thornton’s stick he would realize it takes all the guys on the team to win games not just one

by sjshark on Sep 11, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Got to make this quick before this fucking browser fucking crashes one more fucking time!

Things we know about DW…

1. He’s extremely patient. He waited a year plus to land Thornton and Boyle. He sunk a lot of time and effort into those two, I think he’s allowed to remind us of that when he protects them right after a playoff stinker.

2. He probably knows better than to alienate a player. I have a feeling that McLellan wanted to pick his own captain when he came aboard, but DW convinced him to wait a season beforehand, hence the timing. Either that, or it was actually DW’s choice to put the captaincy up for grabs after HIS OWN disappointment with the outcome of the season.

Things we know DW has done this summer…

1. Shop Clowe, but apparently only to gauge his value for a new contract.

2. Offer up Ehrhoff and Lukowich to Vancouver for prospects. You guys understand why there wasn’t a big hubbub about that deal on this site, right? Because it was the smart play. He didn’t even use forwards for salary cap relief, since we were already short in that area. I doubt Vancouver was the first team approached about cap relief, too, because…

3. Offer Cheechoo and Michalek for Heatley. We only know happened because it was leaked by Ottawa. DW hates that shit, and I’m pretty sure that he’s come out publicly against leaking proposals to the media. I think he was mad enough about leaks when the Chimera for Ehrhoff proposal came out to just about lose his mind.

Things we don’t know DW has done this summer…

1. Publicly chastise Patrick Marleau. So, maybe he didn’t say, “Marleau is an untouchable when it comes to trades,” but he didn’t say those things about Nabby, Setoguchi, or Pavelski. All four of them have contracts that are up next off-season. If Setoguchi and Pavelski are so vital to the future of the franchise, why aren’t more people up in arms about this? Nabby practically said he’d leave if asked, but no one is writing rampant rumors about his departure.

2. Ensured that Patrick Marleau is on the season tickets. Oh no! Maybe he thought Marleau was going to be trade fodder. Maybe he is trying to de-emphasize his responsibility to the team. Shit, we’ll never know until he tells us. I think if DW knew Patty wasn’t going to be around this season, he doesn’t allow the stripping of captaincy to take place separately from a trade.

3. Finished the team. There will be more moves made – I’m 99% certain.

Sorry if this is all over the place, but I had to deal with browser’s crashing, rewrites, and no fewer than eight interruptions from my wife.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

hahaha
I’m usually right. Just ask my wife

Nice. So I have faith in DW as well, I just have one fear with a parallel worry:

-I’m worried that DW thinks the fans are hungry for massive change and that they blame Patty for the recent postseason disappointment. (Which could very well be true of the majority of the fans)

-I fear that DW will let that sway him in a direction he would not normally go.

I know that DW probably doesn’t care at all what any of us think on an individual basis, but if the fanbase is super unhappy with DW, I don’t think he’d like that.

In a way the fanbase does sign his paycheck. (If I understand the way it works)

Now that’s just my opinion and please don’t ask my girlfriend because she knows I’m wrong already.

by perkins.kit on Sep 11, 2009 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

I have been even headed enough overall that I deserve one freak out per season. Or off season.
:D

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 11, 2009 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

You are

Granted as many as you wish…

Fear the Fin....where being an old guy isn't all bad, and the 2nd round can be bad on the heart

by Dave Valentine on Sep 12, 2009 4:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

whoo!

I mean, HWFO!!!!!!!!!!!

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 12, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also,
But I think people let their love of Marleau, coupled with an irrational hatred of Heatley, cloud their vision on this one.

So what? We watch every game screaming and yelling because of emotion, not cold hard stats. “Fan” is short for “Fanatic” and I don’t think they mean “Fanatic about statiscally beneficial trades.”

I would enjoy watching this team more with Marleau than with Heatley.

by perkins.kit on Sep 11, 2009 12:03 PM PDT reply actions  

Sun Media has confirmed the Sharks have tried to get several teams — including the Kings, Habs and Oilers — involved in a three-way deal because the Senators have refused to accept Sharks winger Jonathan Cheechoo as part of a trade.

So SJ offered Patty AND Cheechoo to Ottawa?

by Section223 on Sep 11, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm guessing that another Ottawa player/prospect/pick

would have to be in the deal. They probably skipped that in the article because speculation is kind of like that.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, depending on whether the Sun is reliable or not

It’s entirely possible that Patty wasn’t even on the table and Doug Wilson was packaging Cheech and prospects for Heatley.

Then again, it’s the Sun. I’m dubious.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Sep 11, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

not necessarily

I think it’s clear (if this is true) that the Sharks offered Cheech to Ottowa. I wouldn’t be surprised if DW thinks he shouldn’t have to give up more than Marleau to get Heatley. I wouldn’t even be surprised if he thought he could keep Patty and still get Heatley.

It seems that a 3-way deal is DW’s way of getting Heatley for less out of pocket. Although it stands to reason that if DW is willing to give up Patty for Heatley, then he would have offered that deal to the Senators.

Either way I hope that patty doesn’t waive his NTC for anyone at this point.

Also I find this line hilarious:

While Senators GM Bryan Murray vehemently denied it, ESPN.com reported the club had completed a three-way deal — first reported by Sun Media —

It seems that they are proud of their misinformative reports, so I wouldn’t give too much weight to anything they print.

by perkins.kit on Sep 11, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sources say talks have heated up in the last 72 hours.

Eklund is writing for them apparently. Anytime I see the words “heating up,” involved with a trade rumor being put out by Canadian Sports Media, I think it’s a clear sign that the paper should actually be set on fire for what it’s worth.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Sep 11, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Either way I hope that patty doesn’t waive his NTC for anyone at this point.

Agreed

by Section223 on Sep 11, 2009 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

New Pollak Post: Marleau wasn't worried

Just posted on WTC. Even though we’re all down in the doldrums (reading the post and comments are pretty depressing actually), here’s some news that’s somewhat reassuring regarding the fake trade situation. Bottom Line is that Marleau said he wasn’t worried b/c “he hadn’t been asked to waive his no-trade clause and that would have to happen first.”

Even if that’s lip service or bull, it’s still nice to hear from Patty’s end. And while this doesn’t shut the door to all the speculation, I’m crossing my fingers that he’ll be able to perform in camp and when the season comes around and we don’t get a repeat of 07-08.

Oh my Goc!!!

by DownRUpLYB on Sep 11, 2009 1:38 PM PDT reply actions  

And also
GM Doug Wilson disclosed this morning that Mitchell, who missed last season because of multiple leg injuries but returned for four playoff games, is being kept off the ice as a precautionary measure because of lingering tendinitis.

Whether or not Mitchell will be ready to go when the season begins Oct. 1 remains to be seen and will be determined by trainer Ray Tufts, Wilson added.

Ugh…

by Section223 on Sep 11, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh come on. Why does he have to be injured? Again?

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Looking more likely that Couture will start the season with the team.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is great for him and all, but why Torrey? Why?

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could see it now.

“Torrey Mitchell will be back in 2 weeks”

4 months later, “Torrey Mitchell will be making his return to the Sharks today”

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t bait me. I still remember reading last September, “Torrey Mitchell will be back in 6-8 weeks, possibly returning in November.” WRONG!

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

That was rather odd.

The Sharks were very secretive about Torrey. There were barely any reports about him too. I remember one open Sharks practice I went to, he couldn’t sign autographs because he had to “carry a bag of pucks” into the locker room when normally players at least sign a few autographs or say something to the fans.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember when his blog randomly dropped off the face of the earth. That was also odd.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he is just sitting out the first few days. Nothing too serious (at least according to the sjsharks.com report)

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.
Fear the Fin: Where Sharks Fans Aren't Like Other Sharks Fans.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Sep 11, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

tendinitis

takes FOREVER to heal. It took years for my shoulder tendinitis to go away and I still occasionally get prickly toes and a sore lower leg from the tibial tendinitis I got doing marathon training. And that was over 2 years ago.

It’s such a bitch of an injury.

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 11, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Mina jinxed him by wearing his jersey the other day…

by AfroPuff on Sep 11, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

in my opinion you can't dangle marleau out there like this all off season

and then just bring him back for next season, it’s just not good for the team, we have to move him and fast.

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 2:12 PM PDT reply actions  

All Rumors.

You have no solid evidence whatsoever.

We were all convinced yesterday, but that wasn’t true though was it?

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chill son.

You are playing the rumor game, you see where that gets us.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

what?

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Morti is right.

There is no evidence that Marleau was dangled all summer. You are assuming he was.

While he probably was brought up in trade talks, it wasn’t like he was publicly shopped.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

as opposed to privately shopped? i don't see the difference

when your gm comes out and says who is protected and the (former) captain doesn’t come up i think it is fair to say he has tried to trade marleau

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think he explored possibilites.

But if both Doug and Marleau publicly said that Marleau has not been asked to waive his NTC, he hasn’t tried to trade anyone.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, it means that he hasn’t been asked to waive his NTC.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, that’s been written multiple times, and confirmed by Pollak and others.

I’ll go by whats written, instead of dreaming things up based on my own opinions of the situation.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

hey morti say you assumed it too

and bucc did write it and so did others

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, I assumed that Marleau was traded.

Now that this is false, and confirmed false, I’ll go back to what the players have actually said.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

you can't confirm

whether someone is telling the truth, only that person knows, there is no confirming involved

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think if you check that mammoth post from yesterday

We all assumed it was true. The problem was with the “Source” not the people involved int he rumor.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just like you are assuming the same in regards to Marleau

being shopped

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not assuming anything. I’m going off confirmed news articles.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

just because doug wilson tells somebody

something that makes it true? we don’t know if he is or is not telling the truth, you are assuming he is telling the truth

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

how do we know

that the players listed on the Sharks roster are REALLY the Sharks players? I guess all of us are just assuming the nhl website is a reliable source

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

it's confirmed

because thats what doug wilson told them, and you assume that doug wilson told them the truth

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

So, by this argument, Setoguchi and everyone else not named Boyle or Thornton was shopped.

Need another shovel, bro?

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

you're missing the point though

thornton boyle marleau are the superstars on the team with contracts that would be the only way would could trade for another marquee player and one of those players wasn’t (protected) and two were

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Again, although your assumption might be correct, it’s still that… an assumption. I personally do not think that Wilson is actively trying to trade Marleau, or else it probably would have happened.

Don’t call people ignorant because they don’t agree with you.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

if there is no shot in hell we are trying to trade marleau

 why doesn’t doug wilson come out and say he’s safe like thornton/boyle

why does bucc come out with a lie? there were definitely trade talk involving marleau for bucc to come out with something like that

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know what Matt, you’re right. You know way more about the situation than any of the rest of us.

I’m going to believe you instead of anthing I’ve read to date.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

so what you are saying is that...

doug wilson has not one time been on his telephone this summer asking other teams (gm’s) if they would like marleau and trying to workout sitautions where they could get players for him, you are saying that it has never happened.

Am I correct on this???

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

I think he’s explored all options, like every good GM would do.

But I don’t think he’s trying to trade Marleau. I think he’ll accept offers, he’ll make loose offers to get an estimate on value, but this is nothing like the situation with Dany Heatley, where Murray is trying to trade him.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wilson called around teams and offered Clowe during the draft...

But do you think he was trying to trade him?

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

do i think they were trying to trade clowe

not really although they would’ve if they got the right deal just so they didn’t have to resign him, the difference to me between clowe/marleau comparison is that I think they have been consistently bouncing this marleau deal around all summer whereas with clowe it was maybe a week or two

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

While I don’t think they have been trying to move Marleau all summer.

If you trust the rumors out there so much, Marleau had little to do with the Heatley rumors until recently.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

he was

in the beginning of the summer, i really don’t know why the heatley marleau deal isn’t done straight up because the sens would get a huge expiring contract in marleau, my feeling is that this straight up deal will happen near the trade deadline but marleau would just veto it so it will never ever ever happen

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

i guess our definitions are just a little different then

because i think he is a little more aggressive than you envision but not totally aggressive, so i really don’t know what you are disagreeing with me

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let’s just drop it here, then.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, I agree to drop it.

I’ve donated enough brain cells to this fruitless cause for one afternoon.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'll just end by saying this,

marleau is my favorite shark just because he has been here for so long and plays both ways so well with speed, however when you shake things up it makes everyone play with more of an edge because like a coaching change the organization is not stable and it makes you have to compete at a higher level, i also think that it will be hard to bring back marleau after all the whirlwind and i predict another 07-08 season from marleau, hope im wrong and hope it was just the wilson doghouse but just my belief, not to mention heatley would be a legit 60 goal threat with thornton on his side

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would rather have Heatley too. I just don’t know how serious the discussion has been.

Don’t disagree on Marleau.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

in your opinon

would marleau accept any trade? hypothetically if that 3 team deal is on the table i could see him possible doing it, definitely not to the sens, it just seems like if we told him we’re not resigning you period he might be more inclined but i don’t know

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think if he was really asked to do it, he’d do it.

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!

by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 11, 2009 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

wow

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hate to jump in here but..

I think ANY player is available for the right price.

DW gets a call from Pitsburgh offering Malkin and Crosby for Big “untouchable” Joe and Dan “new captain” Boyle…he probably pulls the trigger. Its his job.

Here's to the second round!

by Aero72 on Sep 11, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

do we get the easter bunny,

we might have to package santa claus though

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Package

with the tooth fairy with an option on a jackalope?

"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 11, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

i don't know he is

one of our better prospects

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

damn

we’ll have to send it to committee

"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 11, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because Marleau is in the last year of his contract

It makes sense that we dont want to end up with nothing if the season ends and Marleau walks.

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I so

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

It’s so hard not to get caught up in the rumors…hopefully once the season starts we’ll be distracted with hockey. All these rumors make me feel like I’m still teaching middle school girls…

by AfroPuff on Sep 11, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Like ZeroIndulgence up there,

I really don’t get why people are SO anti-Heatley. And what’s with this “Heatley wouldn’t help the Sharks with his skill”? That doesn’t make any sense, the way I see it is he’ll score 50+ goals, what’s wrong with that? His attitude? I don’t think it’s fair for one to say Captain issues are a locker room deal but Heatley has a bad attitude. If Heatley does waive his NTC to go to the Sharks somehow, I’m pretty sure that means he wants to play for the Sharks. He had a “bad attitude” with the Sens because I’m pretty sure he doesn’t want to play there.

And who care’s about Marleau being an important person in the community. Does that really effect the way he plays hockey? Does it help the Sharks win games? Not really.

With that said I’m still anti-Heatley. I just think the counter-arguments up there are BS.

Reasons why Heatley is a bad fit for the Sharks:

If Patty’s gone, the PK is starting to look much more thinner. From what I’ve heard Dany can’t play defense.

Sure Heatley will score a ton of goals, but is that what the Sharks really need? The top two lines are generally the same from last year, and I remember, those two lines were amazing.

He’d put us over the cap, therefore more of the Woostah boys would be playing.

If I didn’t say this before, but this is assuming the trade is Marleau for Heatley straight up.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 2:16 PM PDT reply actions  

the senators should do it

because patty is an expiring contract, but they would prefer prospects

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

One of the reasons why I’m freaking out so much about his attitude is that we all saw what happened with Dallas and Sean Avery last season. Granted, there was an insane amount of injuries that added to the implosion of the team, but still, the situation was so bad that Dallas had to eventually run him out the locker room. While that’s an extremely rare occurrence, it still sticks out in my mind as an example as a worst-case scenario if the Sharks bring in a potential locker room cancer, a category that Heatley can be filed under.

Is it rational? No, but I’d rather stick with what I know – a guy that is respected in the locker room and one of the few playoff performers on the team – than take a chance on something that can go so badly. Plus, I have this love for Patty, and so all of my opinions are going to be colored by that.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sean Avery ≠ Dany Heatley

You could add that last paragraph to the anti-Heatley thingy.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is why I said my opinion is irrational. I know Dany Heatley is not Sean Avery, but I still have that fear in the pit of my stomach.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gotcha

I never really paid attention in math when they talked about irrational numbers….

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

They’re not as bad as you might think, by the name. Most numbers are irrational.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think they're bad,

it’s just well I’ll give you an example. Recently I had a test and it asked for the definition. Obviously i didn’t know. I didn’t think knowing the definitions would be that big of a deal…

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

pro tip

definitions are good things to keep in mind on test day.

(I just had a test yesterday for the first time in awhile, and it too asked for me to define some things)

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 11, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t know what class you’re in now, but I review the definitions of rationals, irrationals, whole numbers, integers, and real vs. imaginary numbers in almost every class. Just as a refresher.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

i don't know what any off that stuff means

and I got a B in calculus

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe that’s why you didn’t get an A in calculus.

/jokes

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very believable.

How’d you do on the AP test, if you don’t mind me asking?

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Calculus

Ewwww… Not the greatest class to be taking my senior year… I had 5 electives, English and Calculus… So I only had to pay attention 1/2 of the morning… lol

"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 11, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going to let you in a on a secret

if it was covered in class, it may be on the test. Even if it’s never explicitly listed as such. Teachers…it’s how they getcha! ;)

resident cartoonist @CouchTarts Endorsed by Mr. K on "CINCODEMYOOR!!!!!" Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club

by CTGray on Sep 11, 2009 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is why I stated it was completely irrational and probably the absolute worst case scenario. Still doesn’t mean that there’s not a feeling in the pit of my stomach that it might happen.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

trust me

winning cures all, and the sharks will win this season, with or without heatley, a lot more with him though

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Get Eklund and Buccigross on the phone!

We’ve been asked to trust someone in regards to the outcome of a hockey based sporting event! They will for sure want to know this information!

"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009

by Morti on Sep 11, 2009 3:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

this generally rings true see: randy moss and richard seymour lol

I don't like you Detroit.

by mattman on Sep 11, 2009 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

to defend my comment about the skill

I just don’t think swapping top-line goalscorers improves a team that had a potent top 2 lines and a horrible bottom 2. In my mind it’s just a fantasy move that doesn’t fix the specific holes in the teams or improve PLAYOFF chances

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

It wouldn't just be "swapping top-line goalscorers"

it would be Heatley scoring 50-60 goals rather than Marleau scoring 30-40 goals. I see that as an improvement. All four lines would be the same, except for Heatley substituting for Marleau of course.

In my mind it’s just a fantasy move that doesn’t fix the specific holes in the teams or improve PLAYOFF chances

So, if the Sharks don’t make that Marleau for Heatley straight up deal, by your argument, they would still be left with the same problems.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

it IS an improvement but not one that helps what our problem was: lower line contribution and playoff grit.

Your second point is true, but we know what we’re getting with Marleau and I would rather he be gotten rid of in exchange for good younger players than a slight upgrade

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Keeping Marleau doesn’t help with lower line contibutions, either, but I am not willing to give up Marleau in exchange for one or more gritty, third liners, even if they’re young. Unless we’re a rebuilding team, there’s no reason to trade proven talent for cheap potential. Yes, we need role players, but not at his expense.

By the way, I don’t think the jump from 35 goals to 50+ goals is “a slight upgrade”. I bet you’d think a trade of a 5 goal defenseman for a 20 goal defenseman is quite an improvement, so why isn’t this?

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

becuase I just don’t think top line players have been the problem, simple as that. We had the statistically best 1st line in hockey last season, and we had the same result becuase the rest of the team wasn’t strong enough. I welcome Heatley if he comes, but I just think the Marleau cap space could be used for better and his defensive capabilities are more useful in the playoffs than Heatley.

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hang on, you’re stepping into dangerous territory. There was no single reason for what happened in the playoffs, but I would like to add to your list.

—(yours) Lower lines didn’t contribute – true, but it was a circus of players moving through there (not a cycle, because it didn’t repeat with any regularity). No chemistry = not trusting that the guy will be in the right place = no creativity = boring, safe plays = stoppable

—Top line didn’t really contribute after the all-star break. I believe this coincided with a couple of the rumored injuries and possible dates of injury. Take a look at Marleau, Thornton, and Setoguchi’s numbers from February onward. Perhaps other teams figured out how to shut them down more effectively, but they weren’t the same line in March and April that they were in November. And that was when they were basically together for the entire season.

—(yours) Nabby’s “broken 5-hole”. Also probably injury-induced, but he certainly wasn’t rested enough to feel better. Has anyone heard anything about rehab or hernia surgery for him? I wouldn’t be surprised.

—Playing against an incredibly strong #8 seed. What would have been different if Columbus had been switched with Anaheim in the rankings?

So, take a team that was capable of winning most games by a score of 3-1. Top line is less effective, take away a goal for. Now it’s 2-1. Goalie with a weakness in his armor, add a goal against. Now’s it’s a 2-2 tie, going to overtime, but we should be good for at least a shootout win, thanks to our 2nd and 3rd lines. Then, take away the odd goals and garbage goals from the checking and grinding lines, and we’ll play about .500 hockey when we used to be unbeatable (like we were in October and November, at least at home).

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, the 5-hole quote was from idunno

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

FYI

when I said problems, I meant problems from the playoffs, not necessarily problems that will plague the Sharks this upcoming season.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but the losses weren’t a big surprise, coming out of nowhere. In the last three games of the regular season, the Sharks went to a shootout with Colorado, tied 0-0, and two nights later lost to Phoenix 4-1. We could only muster one goal (two if you count Pavelski’s shootout winner) in 125 minutes against two lottery teams that had already made their trade deadline rebuilding moves? Ouch. Seriously, ouch.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I’ve now posted about problems in the season and problems in the post-season. Are you seriously telling me that you can predict the problems we’ll have this season before it even starts?

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huh?

I think were making different arguments… I’m confused.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh

I thought you were being sarcastic, like I ignored your point.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't think lower line contribution and playoff grit

were a major problem. I think it had to do with Nabby’s broken 5-hole and the top line having 11 points (4+7=11)in total together.

IF Marleau was moved for younger players, I think it would be a sign of surrendering this upcoming season. Those young players wouldn’t be able to produce at the same level as Marleau. Unless the deal was a steal…

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 10:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

top lines didn’t score much, but the lower lines didn’t score at all. If you disagree that lower line contribution was the problem, then I don’t know what to say – That’s what I thought was the problem, and I think DW agreed based on what eh has done this offseason.

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't disagree,

I just said it’s not a major problem. If your top line isn’t scoring much, that already is a problem and your goalie isn’t playing well, lower line contribution is not the main problem.

I think DW agreed based on what eh has done this offseason.

I really don’t think the lines are that offensively better. McGinn-Mitchell-Cheechoo is going to get a decent amount of goals but Shelley-Nichol-Staubitz or whoever is not going to score very much.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

But Grier-Goc-Cheechoo probably has just as much offensive potential as Shelley-Nichol-Staubitz, just with defense. So then both of the bottom two lines have little to no offense (the other line being some combination of Plihal, Shelley, Staubitz, Roenick, and Semenov). With a line of McGinn-Mitchell-Cheechoo, you have a line where each player can conceivably post at least 10 goals, likely even more. That’s a significant difference that will help even more in the playoffs. And it doesn’t matter as much that the fourth line sucks, because it sucked last year too.

Please tell me if I don’t make sense, because I kind of feel like I’m rambling on incoherently here.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

That’s a good point, having Mitchell back REALLY improves our scoring depth. Grier and Goc combined for 12 goals last year. Mitchell should be able to do that by himself, easily. If McGinn sticks with the team and doesn’t stink it up and Cheechoo can stay healthy (and on the team, but that’s another matter), that line should be able to net 40 goals easily.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure that 12 goals is really pinpointing them as an offensive player, but he was able to put up 10 goals his rookie year. He’s got the speed and the will, I see him as a definite contributor.

Let’s ask mymclife. She seems to be awake, too.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

He had 10 goals in his rookie year playing primarily with Grier, so it wouldn’t be a reach to expect him to put up a few more with the more offensive-minded McGinn and Cheechoo (both of whom could potentially be top 6 players).

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Plus, the training camp roster has the third line set up to be McGinn-Mitchell-Setoguchi. With Seto on the wing, you can bet that Mitchell is going to pick up more than a few assists.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m not going to plan my season on a training camp roster, but I like where you’re going in either case. We might have two second lines. I could deal. That sounds like depth to me.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

The lines project to be:
Michalek-Thornton-Cheechoo
Marleau-Pavelski-Clowe
McGinn-Mitchell-Setoguchi
Staubitz/Shelley/Nichol/Ortmeyer/etc.

Really, I’d consider that two first lines, a second line, and a fourth line. Not bad at all, IMO.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was going off of last year’s top two lines, but I would agree with your analysis. It, I think, makes up for the penalty-fest or whatever on the 4th line. They’ll only be playing <6 minutes a night most nights, I would guess. However, I don’t know much about Ortmeyer or Nichol and haven’t seen a scouting report on “etc.”

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nichol is an agitator that is pretty good defensively and can eat up minutes on the PK. Ortmeyer is apparently great defensively and on the PK, and is a great guy in the locker room, but gives little offense.

And “etc.” covers Hinote, McLaren, Vesce, and so on and so forth.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, I distinctly remember watching that and feeling great amusement from it.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I remember

writing the Dropping the Gloves for that. I remember saying “Since Big Joe is about 7 inches taller, the punches barely hit Joe’s arms.”

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

He’s the little person that fought Big Joe’s elbows.

I do remember that, but I didn’t want to judge him based solely from an embarrassing fight. That and Jumbo’s fight with Steve Ott in the last game of the 07-08 season still make me chuckle.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good point.

I don’t think he should be known as “the guy who punches arms.”

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Then it sounds more like the 4th line will be a PK unit / “Everybody take a breather for a minute” line than the grinder/enforcer line.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, if the Sharks are going to roll the equivalent of two first lines and a second, then the fourth line won’t need to play a whole lot. Might as well fill it with guys that play well defensively and some guys that are going to fight.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I looked up the SBN scouting report:

Assets
Has excellent face-off skills and is also solid in penalty-killing situations. Skates very well and owns some playmaking skills.

Flaws
Isn’t skilled enough in the goal-scoring department to hold down a job on the first or second line at the NHL level. Is undersized for the NHL game.

Career Potential
Checking center.

Those could be completely wrong btw, I don’t even know where they’re from.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

He isn’t really supposed to be a goal-scorer, and certainly not supposed to be higher than a third line center. But with his drive and “never say die” attitude, I can see a good amount of offense from Mitchell, probably around 30-40 points if his linemates also have a bit of an offensive flair. He is small, but small seems to be the new “in” thing in the NHL, and it didn’t seem to give him any problems when he played.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

and for whatever reason, I would rather go for a rebuild now than take one last futile shot at the Cup and end up with a terrible team

by a10dency2ask on Sep 11, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the difference between rebuilding now and taking one last shot

and being terrible is that by taking one last shot, you have put yourself in a position to potentially win. What was it that Gretzky said, “you miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.” I would rather see the Sharks with a Cup, then rebuild for a few seasons, than see them just not take that shot and just rebuild.

I guess I don’t see any difference between your two scenarios, other than the fact that one gives us a chance to win, and the other doesn’t. I for one would be stoked if the Sharks won the Cup this year, regardless of having to rebuild the next year. Dynasties are a lot harder to come by in the Cap era.

by Chicago Shark on Sep 11, 2009 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or the Sharks could take the Anaheim route and rebuild on the fly, cycling out older players and bringing in new ones while still remaining fairly competitive.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I still can’t believe they were able to do all they did without one team stepping in and saying, “Hey, I see what you’re doing there, and my guys are going to make you too dangerous.”

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously. Somehow they were able to walk the thin line between buyers and sellers at the trade deadline. I don’t like it.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

DW fell for it.

/Bonino and Peilmeier had better suck.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Once again, don’t care about Peilmeier because we have 5,000 goalies in the system (and he wasn’t that good during the rookie tournament), but Bonino is going to hurt. I’ve heard Pavelski-like things about him.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

don’t care about Peilmeier because we have 5,000 goalies in the system
Having 5000 Luongos doesn’t mean I want to give them away. The Sharks have trained 10% of the starting goalies in the NHL already, I don’t want to increase that percentage.

I love Pavelski, don’t get me wrong, but we’ve got enough players like him. Couture plays like him. Pavelski plays like him (yes, I amuse myself). Apparently we need either some new analogies or more variety in the dressing room.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

True, but he wasn’t even close to being a top goalie in the system, especially with Sexsmith, Stalock, and Sateri around. And now you can even add Karlsson to the mix. In all honesty, he probably wasn’t going to see any NHL time with us due to his place on the depth chart, so might as well get something for him, no matter how temporary it was.

Oh, and I understand about the Pavelski thing, but still. Third-favorite player we’re talking about here.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Was it an oversight on my part, or did Karlsson not attend the rookie games? And who is Heemskerk? Anybody have scouting reports on either?

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Karlsson did not attend, because he’s over in Sweden, and it’d likely cost too much to fly him out here. Plus, he’s already committed to playing in the SM-Liiga next year, so there was no chance that he’ll join the Sharks at any point this year.

And Heemskerk is an undrafted free agent who plays for some team in the WHL (I’m too lazy to look it up right now). He was given a tryout by the Sharks so they could see if they want to draft him next year.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you, Encyclopedia Mymclife-ia. I just looked up Stalock and realized he’s another Minnesotan.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

No problem. If I wasn’t as tired, I’d probably try to get actual scouting reports, but I’m asleep at the keyboard here, so I’ll leave it up to you.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pavelski plays like him (yes, I amuse myself).

I laughed.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sharks don't rebuild,

they reload!

I remember someone saying that about the A’s a few years ago.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

The good thing is.

The Sharks don’t need to rebuild if Marleau leaves. You got Thornton signed for a year more, Boyle’s signed for a looooonnnggg time. Most likely they’re going to sign Devin Setoguchi and Joe Pavelski. Couture and Petrecki should be ready in a few years. It’s still going to be a good team no need to rebuild just yet.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very true. The great thing about having consistently good drafting that can find good players in the later rounds or as undrafted free agents is that there’s less of a chance of a complete tank and rebuild phase, just a sort of changing of guard from the old to the young.

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 11, 2009 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

The only way the Sharks have to go through a true rebuild is if, in 5-8 years, Marleau, Thornton, and Boyle all decide to retire unexpectedly, but in the same year.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

still confused.....

is Heatley going to be a Shark or not?

by StevieV17 on Sep 11, 2009 9:07 PM PDT reply actions  

Now I have a question,

players can still be traded even though they’re in camp right? But this probably doesn’t happen much, correct?

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I imagine it is the same as trading someone during the season.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 11, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought that too but,

wouldn’t it be odd to say “your playing with these people” and then you trade them.

Then again I have never been on a hockey team, what do I know?

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's all business.

A player without a NTC knows he can be moved at any time.

Shark: "Are you drunk?"
Mouse: "NOT DRUNK ENOUGH!"

by joe579 on Sep 11, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know that...

I just thought it’s odd that you were training with these players to start the year off with, then you leave to a team you have no prior experience with breaking up “team chemistry.” As I said above though, I never played on a hockey team so I don’t know exactly what that “team chemistry” means.

by idunno723 on Sep 11, 2009 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

TSN reports

Heatley for Milan Michalek, Jonathan Cheechoo and a second round pick

by Section223 on Sep 12, 2009 11:30 AM PDT reply actions  

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Better than Marleau, but still. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by mymclife on Sep 12, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Way better than patty

I’m sad to see Milan go but I think this is a pretty reasonable deal.

But didn’t we hear somewhere that the Sens wanted nothing to do with Cheechoo?

by perkins.kit on Sep 12, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

I remember that, too. I just used capgeek and found we’re both under the cap now.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 12, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have heard that this will be an especially weak draft, so that probably isn’t much different from the 2nd rounder we gave up.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 12, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

All right, I've got a theory.

McLellan takes away the C from Marleau because he knows that he’s going to get Heatley eventually and that he wants a legitimate shot at earning it. Nothing like assuaging a possible diva by being really nice to him when he arrives.

Jon Casey fan since '84

by stufflife on Sep 12, 2009 11:50 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thank you

Recent FanPosts

Snapshot_of_me_1_small
Hypothetical: California Classic OR Petition: Sharks Outdoor Game
Sharkslogotail_small
Sharkstistics - February 2012
297235_228875923843877_197693266962143_697284_1857293148_n_small
Defending the Blue Line Needs Your Vote
Small
What would you give for Jeff Carter
Snapshot_of_me_1_small
Hypothetical: If the Coyotes had to move...
Small
Selling 2 Club Level seats for tomorrow's game vs Columbus and others
Pavs2_small
All-Stars Skill Competition Open Thread
P257268-san_jose-opening_ceremonies_of_san_jose_sharks_game_small
Ryane Clowe Trade Rumors
Sharkslogotail_small
NHL Magic Numbers, Tragic Numbers, & Potential Points Standings - 2011-12 Running Charts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Photo_388_small Mr. Plank

Editor

Slappy_small Matthew_Taylor

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Shfe_small Jon Allred

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikey_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady