Spotlight's on That McGinn Kid
[Editor's Note]: I'll have a much more in-depth look at the entire roster as the season draws near (Fear The Fin is scheduled for our SBN-wide Season Previews on September 27th), but for today let's take a quick look at the team.

Friends!
The top six of San Jose is going to be lights out this season. At the risk of repeating myself (crisis not averted) Heatley is a potential 60 goal scorer alongside Big Joe, and it wouldn't surprise me to see both of them make a run at the Rocket Richard and Art Ross. Setoguchi frees up enough space for himself with his lateral skating, and that space is going to grow exponentially larger once teams figure out that the left circle is where dreams go to die. He's probably good for another 30 goals this season, and at first glance I think you're going to see 100 out of the top line barring a catastrophic yoga injury. Damn downward dog could be the end of us all.
Then you've got Marleau, Pavelski, and Clowe. One guy who's got pure talent, one guy who thrives off his hockey IQ, and one guy who's a wrecking crew as long as he stays away from those damn sideboards he grew fond of late last season. I don't think Marleau puts as many pucks in the net as he did in 08-09, but I probably won't care- in a perfect world McLellan pairs these guys up against opposing team's top forward lines for about 60-75% of the night at The Tank. Patty and Pavs are both top twenty two way forwards in the league today, and should be able to play line one of team X to at least a wash every single night. Now you've got Thornton & Company to clean up against some competition that's going to have issues keeping them in the defensive zone, with little effect on their minutes. Sounds like a plan to me.
After that though you run into a portion of the team I like to call the "don't get all hot and bothered just yet" lines. The bottom guys (Shelley, Nichol, training camp winner) won't be a goal scoring threat, but Nichol played enough on the PK last year with Nashville where the hope is that he can be defensively responsible and not take too many penalties. I've said this before, but I don't think Staubitz is going to be a good fit here considering Nichol fulfills the role of junkyard dog on the team- both guys are known for taking their fair share of penalties, and there's no need for that considering the amount of ice time they're going to be getting. Keep him in Worcester and groom him to take over for Shelley next season*.
*This might be tough with the cap situation though. Didn't take too much time to crunch the numbers, but it would be tight.
Then there's line three. I mentioned this last night, but Mitchell's injury has me concerned given the nature of his game- take away his speed via a recurring injury and he's not nearly as effective. He's not sure if he'll see any preseason time and isn't skating. Not the biggest guy of the bunch either, and while he threw his body around admirably in the four postseason games he played last year, that's not close to holding up during an eighty two game season. He battled an injury all last year, had his return date consistently being pushed back until the playoffs last year, couldn't get 100% after three months of rehab, and still contains lingering issues. I’m not penciling him in until he’s penciled in, and wouldn't be surprised to see Couture on the ice October 1st. Best case it doesn't happen and Logan gets some opportunity to grow his game in the AHL this season, but I'm not holding my breath.
If Couture replaces Mitchell I think he'll do fine, but obviously that's entirely speculation considering he hasn't played at the professional level yet. Throwing out projected performance predictions (read: haphazard guesses) based off a rookie game (he sucks!) or training camp (next Gretzky!) will only make me look like a jackass down the line, so I suppose I'll just try and hide that for the time being.
Anyways, that leaves us with Jamie McGinn. His stint with the big club last year proved that he's a worthy inclusion onto the roster, and his statistics with Worcester last season show that he can put the puck in the net (he had four last year with the big club in 35 GP). He's got some nice speed out there on the wing- not a guy who's really going to blow by defenses per say, but enough where they're going to have to be honest and be think twice about pinching. He goes to the corners hard and was a tireless worker too- always a good trait to have.
At any rate, Jamie McGinn is my key to success because if he falters and doesn't produce those lower lines are going to be mighty light in the goal scoring department, especially with all the uncertainty surrounding Mitchell. Scoring depth was an issue last season and did San Jose no favors in the playoffs. His line is going to see some pretty easy competition considering the amount of attention the top six is going to get, and the hope is that they can capitalize on it so we're not relying on 100% of the forwards production to come from the top six- that's a gamble, and against a great defensive team like Calgary (Bouw, Regehr as your obligatory shutdown pairs) it's a crapshoot on whether it pans out.
Go McGinn, and concurrently, go Sharks.
69 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It’s a contraction of “Spotlight is”, not possessive. I think it might be a colloquial form of grammar, not sure though – still, it does make sense grammatically.
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
Gramma Tically says "hi"
Good read Mr. Plank, I especially enjoyed the yoga visual reference.
I'll drink that! oh...I'll drink TO that.
I totally agree...
And I’m almost thinking that McGinn will produce better with Couture by his side. Not because Mitchell isn’t good, or I think Couture is going to be awesome (even though I do), but because Couture and McGinn are long time friends and linemates with the 67’s. McGinn scored 46 goals and 89 points in 2006-2007 with Couture (himself with 26G-52A that season) dishing him the puck. I think this would do alot to account for the lack of chemistry on the currently haphazard bottom lines.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
Salary cap could be an issue, though.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions
Not really
A lot of our potential cap problems are tied up in bonuses. Guys like Petrecki and Couture aren’t as hard on the cap once you look a little deeper. I suggested this roster on WTC:
Heatley – Thornton – Marleau
Clowe – Pavelski – Setoguchi
McGinn – Couture – Mitchell
McLaren – Nichol – Hinote
Shelley
Boyle – Murray
Blake – Vlassic
Huskins – Patrecki
Dandenault
Nabokov
Griess
ROSTER: 22; PAYROLL: $59.149m; CAP ROOM: $-0.334m BONUSES: $2.015m
Obviously this was before I learned that Seto was on the top line, but my point still stands. While it appears that it’s over the cap, it’s really not. We have 2 mil in cap space tied up in bonuses and lets face it, unless things go stupendously a few of those bonus marks aren’t going to be hit and we’ll be fine.
There is room for any of the kids to make the roster. Camp is going to be fun.
Is this assuming we sign Hinote to the league minimum?
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
No, you’re right. But rolling a roster out that has a speculated negative in space is risky. I know that’s probably what they’ll do… I’m just nervous.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 11:55 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I understand being nervous as it does make me a bit nervous too. There are also the relatively large possibilities that somebody will get hurt this season that makes more than 500k a year which will probably open up enough room. Bonuses aren’t calculated until the end of the year so the odds of that biting us in the ass are very small.
Also, I assumed Hinote and Dandenault would be making the league minimum. If they’re on a tryout contract I can’t imagine them making more than that.
I know Shelley will probably be on the team, but if they are just going to scratch a forward, it might as well just be Staubby. He’s a bit cheaper.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, we can’t send Shelley down to Worcester without exposing him to waivers and re-entry waivers, so he’s probably on the team no matter what. Whether or not we scratch him or Staubitz (or McLaren) in that role doesn’t matter. It takes up the same cap hit. (Staubitz plays and Shelley sits is the same as Shelley playing and Staubitz sitting)
I don’t think any more than one of those guys will skate for the Sharks at a time unless McLaren proves he has some offensive upside.
Somehow I doubt that he’s going to be a real target on the waiver wire.
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
I’m thinking more re-entry waivers.
If a team wants a heavy weight why not make somebody else foot half the bill?
They’re easy to come by, really. Most teams have an inhouse option, and would rather use them then risk screwing up chemistry. That’s my own opinion, though… so it means very little.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions
I see that as a plus, because Shelley is terrible in all ends of the ice. I’d rather have a guy with any possible upside out there.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 1:12 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I completely agree, that’s why I want him scratched. Once he’s on the ice I either expect a fight or absolutely nothing to happen.
He did get that goal against Phoenix once. That was pretty cool.
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
Me too!
Club seats too, ftw. Its the only reason why I remember it.
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
Dont forget that goal he scored against Montreal!
It took a wicked hop over Jesus Price’s shoulder!
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
The sad part is
that’s how some people view hockey altogether.
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Sep 16, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Right, so I’m saying…
If he’s not going to be any help on the ice, and it’s better to have him scratched, why even keep him on the team. I love the guy, but right now he’s a wash with Staubiz… even Staubitz is a better player at this point. If you put Shelley on waivers, there’s no way he gets claimed (IMHO), so it’s just a quick way to save us $100k or so.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats fair. If McLaren and Staubitz continue to impress the coaches I think that’s probably the way it’s going to go. Shelley is a great guy and all, I just don’t think he provides much to the team.
On the other hand, since we don’t view him as having any use or the ability to develop further why not let him ride the pine as a scratch so that if Staubitz or McLaren aren’t going to play they can go to the AHL and at least be developed. Let Shelley sit in the press box and work on his color commentary for the future and then just let him go at the end of the season. I don’t think his 150k extra is going to push us over or get us under the cap.
I’m just trying to push pennies back and forth, and I do see what you say about letting them play (I’m all in favor of that). I guess there are just a few options here, we’ll have to see what DW does.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions
I see that as a plus, because Shelley is terrible in all ends of the ice. I’d rather have a guy with any possible upside out there.
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 1:52 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It’s not as risky as you think as from what I’ve heard is that McGinn is unlikely to hit many if any of his bonuses as they would basically require top 6 minutes (you have to figure that only happens if we have a couple injuries in which case LTIR kicks in). I posted this in the Heatley thread as well as a couple links. I’m not sure about Blake, Seto or any of the rookies though.
More on bonuses
Here are the conditions required for a player to get their ELC bonuses:
http://www.nhlscap.com/Exhibit5.htm
I honestly think only Blake and Setoguchi have a prayer of making them. The rest you almost certainly out.
by Evilducks on Sep 16, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
This is great, thanks!
Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions
LTIR for Mitchell for 10 games
I could see Mitchell going on LTIR for the start of the season to see how Couture does IF Logan plays well enough in camp to justify a longer look.
by IsThisTheYear? on Sep 16, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions
I just hope he isnt on that list as long as Mike Rathje has been
for the Flyers.
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
McGinn certainly showed promise last season, and I’d look for more out of him given that he won’t be playing as much with Shelley (who I actually think is a very underrated passer. Anyone remember the between the legs pass he had to Roenick to set up a goal?).
It IS troubling that Mitchell may not be available, and that injury may be a problem, seeing as how he’s not the biggest guy and is a speed guy.
Just because of the desire to have the guy develop another season in the minors makes me not as excited about McGinn/Coture/Ortmeyer as much as McGinn/Mitchell/Ortmeyer, but hey, every now and again, you need a rookie to have a great year (see Helm, Darren, Abdelkader, Justin).
Great analysis as always Plank.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
Abdelkader?
I though it was Afrogator, or Admiral Ackbar, or Abracadabra?
You just blew my mind!
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
It's a TRAP!!
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 17, 2009 4:14 AM PDT up reply actions

"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
by mymclife on Sep 17, 2009 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Love that.
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.
Fear the Fin: Where Sharks Fans Aren't Like Other Sharks Fans.
by SharksFanEst.1994 on Sep 17, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions
OT but just want to say … yes! I managed to get tickets to the first home game … I love starting out the season by going to the first home game … and being a non-season ticket holder, I have to battle with all the scalpers on ticketmaster … :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 16, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions
I splurged and got all 3 home preseason games and the aforementioned season opener at the Tank. Pretty sad considering I was just recently laid off and should be frugal with what little I have saved…
GO SHARKS!!!!
by SharksFanTillDeath on Sep 16, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions
I use to do one preseason game, but then decided I would rather save my money for the regular season. Altho I would love to watch some hockey, it will have to wait till Oct 1st. :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 16, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I hear ya – I’m soo tempted ’cause I want to see hockey ASAP, but have been reminding myself to try and be patient…we do have a whole season and several rounds of playoffs in front of us…
key on “several rounds of playoffs” … :)
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
by ang6666 on Sep 16, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I couldn’t wait :-(
Does anyone know if they are streaming the preseason games online/radio/etc?
by SharksFanTillDeath on Sep 16, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions
If they are...
They would be at ADTHE.net
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions
*ATDHE
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions
I’m hoping “several” means “four.”
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages
Is there a non-goofy picture of Vlasic at all?
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

Fear the Fin: Where... IMA TAKING UR BLOGZ FRUM U!!
by Matthew_Taylor on Sep 16, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Oh pickles...
Can the season just hurry up and start already? Please!
Yes, I'm from the tropics. Yes, I love hockey. What's not to get?
by workthecycle on Sep 16, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Longest neck in the animal kingdom
Giraffes have got nothing on Celine!
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
Heh, my favorite part of the picture was the guy in the upper left hand corner. Looks like he just wet himself with excitement.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
Thought to ponder
Wouldn’t the increased scoring provided by our defense at least help a little to augment our lower lines’ potential scoring drought? Thoughts?
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 2:39 PM PDT reply actions
you mean decreased scoring?
we traded ehrhoff…
by a10dency2ask on Sep 16, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Um..
I meant from our defense scoring points and not allowing scores (??)… I was also alluding to Blake and Boyle mostly. Huskins’ ability to provide offense has yet to be seen, and we all know the tendencies of Vlasic and Murray. Just something to mull over, we all know that Ehrhoff had a wayward shot and a breakaway every 50 games or so. Are you saying that we are going to be suffering in the defensive scoring department because of his loss?
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions
yes
his ability to provide scoring was his primary asset, since he sucked at defense. Huskins can prove me wrong but there’s no reason to believe he’ll provide much offense.
And Ehrhoff wasn’t replaced – it’s pretty hard to argue that the defense has improved from last year, and last year the increased scoring wasn’t enough to solve the lower line scoring drought problem, so I don’t see why it would this year.
by a10dency2ask on Sep 16, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I can understand your reasoning, with his +/- of -12 last year and with a career high in points (42). But I think it’s worth mentioning that most of his goals were produced in the PP (5). Not necessarily something to rave about… I guess we will just have to wait a year and see how Huskins does and see if we will miss Christian or not. I just would like to see a better shot from the point and more defensive saavy, and with that alone I think it would be a monumental increase over what we had.
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions
i'm talking more
about assists and puck movement than goals, but we’ll see
by a10dency2ask on Sep 16, 2009 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
gotcha
"..." - unknown
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
by SetoThorMarChooSki on Sep 16, 2009 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions
I like this line-up!
Is this finally the year they bring home the Cup? I certainly hope so!
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
Haha, this was posted in two other places. We all must really like this news! Or are both bored and lazy.
"I think I realized after the second or third punch, I should have taken his helmet off sooner." - Ryane Clowe
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" Club
Fools and Sages

by 



















