Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Newcastle Battle Injury Woes Ahead of Tottenham

Nabokov On Pace For 71 Starts

San Jose Sharks goaltender Evgeni Nabokov is on pace for 71 starts this season, a workload that will be the highest in his career with the exception of the 77 he saw in 07-08 under Ron Wilson. Thomas Greiss was his backup goaltender that season as well, at least before Doug Wilson signed Brian Boucher from the Philadelphia Phantoms.

Everyone knows I think he's been getting too many starts between the pipes. My concerns are well chronicled, and frankly, have probably become akin to beating a dead horse.

So, instead of lengthy paragraphs rehashing the same arguments, here are some items of note I compiled. If you'll notice, this post isn't labelled under the section "Statistical Analysis." This is because I'm not convinced any of these are compelling proof that McLellan's decision to ride him is bound for failure, nor am I convinced that any of these are proof that the decision will not affect Nabokov in the long run. I think a qualitative approach is best here considering the complexity of analyzing the notoriously difficult to gauge goaltending position, Nabokov's age, and the fact that he will be starting for the 2010 Russian Olympic team.

After the jump are the bullet points; I highly encourage all readers to submit their own in the comments section. If you are interested in advanced statistical analysis of goaltenders, this article is not your number one source; Brodeur Is A Fraud brings the goods.

Star-divide

  • The last goaltender to win a Stanley Cup with over 70 starts is Martin Brodeur, who did so in 2003 with the New Jersey Devils. He had 73 to his name.
  • Since the lockout, the average number of games started for Stanley Cup winning goaltenders is 44.75 games. Cam Ward had 25, JS Giguere had 53, Chris Osgood had 40, and Marc-Andre Fleury had 61.
  • Since the lockout, there have been sixteen cases of goaltenders making 65+ starts and their team getting into the playoffs. In other words, 25% of playoff teams have goalies making 65+ starts.
  • In those sixteen cases, the goaltenders have compiled a .911 SV% before the ASG/Olympic break, and a .916 SV% afterwards.
  • Since the lockout, all goaltenders that made the playoffs and had 65+ starts averaged a .913 SV% in the regular season and a .912 SV% in the postseason.
  • Since the lockout, Cam Ward went the farthest in the postseason with 65+ starts, doing so last year when he led the Carolina Hurricanes the Eastern Conference Finals. They were swept by the eventual Stanley Cup Champion Pittsburgh Penguins.
  • Evgeni Nabokov's best playoff run was during 2004, where he posted a .935 SV% and led the team to the Western Conference Finals. He started 58 games that year.
  • Nabokov's second best playoff run was during 2007, where he posted a .920 SV%. He started 49 games that year.
  • During the rest of Nabokov's playoff runs, he has yet to eclipse a .908 SV%.
  • When Nabokov started 77 games in 07-08, he had a .910 SV% in the regular season and a .907 SV% in the postseason.

 

Go Sharks.

Poll
How do you feel about Evgeni Nabokov's starts this season?
Too many.
372 votes
Too little.
11 votes
Just right.
154 votes

537 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 49 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nabby's fine

Maybe play a little bit less, but I think Nabby needs to stay sharp and get a lot of games. Nabby’s currently on a role and I think it’s due to the fact that he’s been getting consistent playing time.

by thelilaznboy on Jan 27, 2010 5:56 AM PST reply actions  

He's going to put on the black mask and become playoff nabby anyways

It will be like having a new meaner goalie that we’ve never seen before.

by SanJoseLandShark on Jan 27, 2010 7:01 AM PST reply actions  

Playoff Nabby, especially 2009 Playoff Nabby, is not a Nabby I want to see.

I would love to see regular season Nabby.

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by Matthew_Taylor on Jan 27, 2010 7:19 AM PST up reply actions  

that doesn’t give you the occasional mini-heart attack moments

Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin

by ang6666 on Jan 27, 2010 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

It's hard to say...

If Nabby feels like he needs to get a lot of time on the ice so he can be confident in himself then I think he should, though he should not push himself just to ‘test his limits’. I’d like to see Greisser play more so we as fans and the coaching staff can kinda gauge where he’s at perhaps build his confidence in case…ya know..i’m not going to say it. 71 games is a lot though.

"Boys only voluntarily hug when someone scores."

"Hockey players wear numbers because you can’t always identify the body with dental records."—Anonymous

by mssjsclowie29 on Jan 27, 2010 8:06 AM PST reply actions  

Greiss needs more starts.

Not only for Nabby to get rest, but to see if he is a valid option in goal in the coming years.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.
Fear the Fin: Where Sharks Fans Aren't Like Other Sharks Fans.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Jan 27, 2010 8:31 AM PST reply actions  

I’m fine with the amount of games Nabokov is playing as far as HE is concerned. He’s Russian and they don’t get tired, saw it on Oprah. Nabokov has been so good of late, you almost can’t help but put him in net each night. At the same time I’d like to see what Spazzy McFlinchpants is capable of for a few games. So enough riding the fence. Put Griess in against the Hawks and let him roll out a couple of games in a row before the Olympic break.

I'll drink that! oh...I'll drink TO that.

by theneverman on Jan 27, 2010 8:42 AM PST reply actions  

i say give him a break before the playoffs start. maybe during the last 15 or so games, alternate nabby and greiss, that way he gets some starts in to keep him from getting rusty and he gets some rest.

MeThinksSports where the only semi-good thing is the poll...

by serrapadre716 on Jan 27, 2010 8:48 AM PST reply actions  

it may not seem like a lot of rest

but, it’s still better than having him start 70+

MeThinksSports where the only semi-good thing is the poll...

by serrapadre716 on Jan 27, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

But, for a goalie who relies so heavily on consistency, missing every other start right before the playoffs would screw with his game.

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by Matthew_Taylor on Jan 27, 2010 8:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Past

Look at Nabby’s playoff save percentage in the years where he plays more than 60 games, its not good at all..The two best playoff years he has had were when he played less than 60 games during the season..

by The Sear on Jan 27, 2010 9:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, it’s too bad that Greiss didn’t make more starts earlier, because alternating them post Olympics makes NONE SENSE.

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by Matthew_Taylor on Jan 27, 2010 9:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Solution

Essentially blasphemy, but maybe let Greiss start 2 or gasp even 3 games in a row if he manages to win a game. Benefit of giving Nabby a longer spell and rewarding Greiss if/when he wins.

If it is Russia vs. Canada in the Gold Medal game, I hope to see Greiss start after the break too. If Nabby himself dictates when he plays (which is probably true for the most part), he’d probably still want to start 90% of the remaining games.

Puck Daddy: You would definitely hate the Ducks more than you'd hate the Kings, right?
Joe Pavelski: Yeah, definitely.

by DownRUpLYB on Jan 27, 2010 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

taking in what TCY said

i like your idea better, maybe give greiss like 4-5 starts after the break to give nabby rest from coming off the olympics, then start him the rest of the way. that way he gets his rest, and some consistent starts before the playoffs

MeThinksSports where the only semi-good thing is the poll...

by serrapadre716 on Jan 28, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

I was initially worried about this

Then I stopped caring. He’s been playing great and to be honest, I don’t even see why he should be “rested.”

I’ve never been a goaltender, I’ve never even played ice hockey, so I can’t really say how much stress it puts on a player, but Nabakov seems to be handling it and maybe having a lot of starts is a good thing for him. It will keep him on his game. I don’t know.

I trust Nabby, I think he’s gonna get sh*t done.

by PNK on Jan 27, 2010 8:49 AM PST reply actions  

There's a reason all goalies are skinny bastards

That gear isn’t light and flopping around like they do, especially with the shot total he’s facing this year is a lot of exercise.

Maybe last year when he was only facing 25 shots a game I’d be fine with it, but we’ve had 40+ a few times this year and usually end in the 30’s with shots against, so Nabby is getting a lot of work out there.

"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda

by Evilducks on Jan 27, 2010 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Couldn't Agree More

The two years that Nabby has had very good playoff seasons was when he played less than 60 games each year..

He is having his best year now and he has been playing great, but with the pressure of the olympics and then end of the season and playoffs, if he doesn’t get rest and then bombs in the playoffs again(remember the deadly five hole last year), where does it leave this franchise??

They already have all of this negatve scar tissue from past failures and now the press all over north america is on their case about being the biggest playoff chokers ever..

DW and Coach are setting themselves up for serious second guessing from every hockey corner of the world if Nabby and the Sharks do another playoff face plant..

PLAY GREISS IN AT LEAST HALF OF THE GAMES AFTER THE OLMYPICS END, PLEASE!!!

by The Sear on Jan 27, 2010 9:18 AM PST reply actions  

I was concerned about this, but my girlfriend is trying to be zen about it. She’s hasn’t been a hockey fan for too long and she asked me, “Does it matter how many games he starts in the regular season if we win the Cup?”
Similar to what everybody did when the Colts threw the last 2 games of the regular season, I’ll reserve judgement on whether Nabby had too many starts when the playoffs are over.

by fatbabies on Jan 27, 2010 9:19 AM PST reply actions  

Ah, but I still think the Colts were stupid for not going for history. If the Sharks win the Cup and Nabby gets hella starts, all is well!

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 10:09 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with you. An undefeated season would be talked about far more than who won this Super Bowl. However, if your ultimate goal is the Super Bowl, does it really matter how you do it? If Nabby plays 70+ games and we win the cup, I’m fine with that. I’m also fine with, if for some reason, Griess plays and takes us to the Cup ala Cam Ward.

by fatbabies on Jan 27, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Indeed. But the Sharks aren’t going for history. If the Colts had lost legitimately earlier in the season, we’re on the same playing field now.

However, I get your point. I just enjoy bitching about the Colts letting the freaking Patriots remain the only 16-0 team in history. That annoys me to no end.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Totally agree. I hate the fact that the Patriots are the only 16-0 team. New England fans, in all sports it seems to me, were not sore losers, but they sure as hell are sore winners. Bruins fans maybe excepted

by fatbabies on Jan 27, 2010 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

My general rule of thumb is that I’ll cheer for:
1. My favorite teams
2. Whoever is playing a team from New England
3. The Underdog

in that order. New England sports teams’ fans drive me NUTS!

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't forget Chicago

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Jan 27, 2010 2:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh.

Chicago teams have never really gotten under my skin.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Chicago teams don't necessarily get under my skin

Maybe just Blackhawk fans lately. But you’re probably right. They don’t hold a canlde to Baahstin fans.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Jan 27, 2010 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

That’s like me! That’s how I root exactly.

"I think people were ready to watch some hockey. We took up enough of everyone’s time."
-Jody Shelley after an 87 second hockey fight against Cam Janssen

by idunno723 on Jan 27, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I would have been concerned if he looked like he did when Sharks had Toskala…Seemed like there was an attitude/ego/confidence thing happening…and frankly he looks great now.

If the forwards show, sharks win in the playoffs. Captain Marleau aside, the rest need to make a splash and support Nabby, not hang him out to dry.

Yes. Captain.

he is the best leader they have on the ice. and has been, and still is. so there.

go sharks.

Christmas is for shopping and the shopping god is everything. -MGB-

by Aero72 on Jan 27, 2010 9:35 AM PST reply actions  

I really don’t think Nabokov getting a few more days off will make that big of a difference for the Sharks in the end. The Sharks will live and die by Nabby in the playoffs, and if it makes him more comfortable to start this number of games, so be it.

By the way, Brodeur Is A Fraud is one of my favorite sites.

by sharks in oc on Jan 27, 2010 9:56 AM PST reply actions  

“Does it matter how many games he starts in the regular season if we win the Cup?"

Let’s not get ahead of ourselves here. Continuing on the above Colts reference, I understand it’s hard not to run a horse when he’s been as good as Nabby has shown us this whole year, but all of these games are for the regular season. I’m sure we don’t need the 2 banners hanging in HP Pavilion to remind us all that Regular Season Champ is a poor consolation prize for a deep cup run. It’s like that horse-racing game they used to have at Wonderpark, you don’t keep whipping it in the beginning because you’re gonna have nothing left for the final stretch.
He needs to rest more for the time when they’ll need him the most in the months-that-shall-not-be-named as so been eloquently stated here in the past. Especially considering that he’s expected to play for a gold medal contender, that’s just that much more starts that don’t count for SJ in the long run. He’s got plenty of starts in already, he’s definitely still going to see more in Vancouver and after the break, AND he will start every playoff game anyway. Throw Greiss in there – it’s not as if the Sharks throw in the towel every time he starts – he’s shown that he can play from the small sample we’ve seen, and has arguably kept the team in the game in some of his starts.

I say “Too many,” rest him more, final answer.

Puck Daddy: You would definitely hate the Ducks more than you'd hate the Kings, right?
Joe Pavelski: Yeah, definitely.

by DownRUpLYB on Jan 27, 2010 10:04 AM PST reply actions  

I’m less worried about Nabby’s workload, and more worried about Greiss’s lack of a workload. He needs NHL experience. Nabby won’t be around forever (and hell, he may not even be aorund next year), and we’ll need someone who’s ready to step between the pipes when he finally does take off for newer pastures.

I’d be ok with starting Nabby for a stretch the week or two right before the playoffs…let him get in a groove. But before that, Greiss needs more starts. Now, we’re running out of games in which to get him starts and still get Nabby in a groove, but thats what happens when you don’t plan ahead.

And who knows, maybe McLellan is a goaltending workload mastermind, and Nabby will throw up Zeroes in the playoffs.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 10:12 AM PST reply actions  

Totally agree as usual zero! We can’t really get a good idea of Greiss’ abilities until we can see him more than once every blue moon. So far, I think he’s been pretty solid for a back up, in the games that he’s started. And it’s obvious to me his confidence has grown, which as we all know is huge for a goalie.

Only time and more starts will tell if he’s the guy to back up Nabby and to eventually take over when that time comes.

That being said, I don’t like the idea of Nabby taking off for greener pastures, unless they’re retirement pastures lol.

"What an idiot" - Craig Rivet
"Al Stalock, his reflexes are so good he can smell a fart before someone even lays one"

by sharkiesgirl on Jan 27, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

That being said, I don’t like the idea of Nabby taking off for greener pastures, unless they’re retirement pastures lol.

He could always end up in the KHL. I’d be ok with that if we aren’t resigning him. It’d be tough seeing Nabby between the pipes for another team, I agree.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 12:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm gonna say at this point

Nabokov is a lock to be around next year. If they had any intent of considering a regime change to a new “Greiss era,” there’s no way Nabby would have gotten all these starts.

by a10dency2ask on Jan 27, 2010 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Makes you wonder who they’ve already decided they can live without.

by xarexerax on Jan 27, 2010 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I bet Nabby wants a long-term deal, for what will likely be his last contract of his career. Add the fact that he’s having a great year thus far (oh how contract years do that to people), I don’t see him coming cheap.

I personally wouldn’t mind to have him resigned for maybe 2-3 more years, but I can’t imagine that’ll be the best offer he receives either.

This is another topic altogether, but I don’t see them letting Pavs go, Patty seems more amicable to stay. Do the Sharks literally “release the Dragon (Seto)?”

Puck Daddy: You would definitely hate the Ducks more than you'd hate the Kings, right?
Joe Pavelski: Yeah, definitely.

by DownRUpLYB on Jan 27, 2010 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

If you have to choose 2 of 3

Then yes. But if Nabby goes, there’s a chance Seto stays (financially speaking, don’t know who will replace Nabby and at what cost).

Consider this too, depending on Chicago’s level of post-season success this season, the free agent goaltender market could be reasonably cheap. If Huet turns out to be servicable, or Niemmi is the answer, how many teams are going to look to high-priced superstars in net?

Food for thought. A desperate, rebuilding team will always want a stopper in net.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Jan 27, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions  

There will be plenty of teams willing to pony up and pay Nabby. I just don’t see the Sharks as being one of those teams. At least not to a long term deal. Maybe 2-3 years…but 3 would be a stretch.

I think a lot of it depends on whether this team wins the Cup or not. If they do win the Cup, the fanbase will be quelled, and they can go about losing Nabby, and getting Greiss and Stalock up, and not have to worry as much about WINNING NOW, and instead worry about winning more in the long term.

Sometimes the impossible can become possible if you're AWESOME!

by ZeroIndulgence on Jan 27, 2010 11:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Some Greiss please

Why should we believe that McClellan is deciding who starts in net, when Nabby is obviously calling the shots again! He’s about 34 and will have to be amazing in the playoffs, right? So why or how does it benefit SJ to have him overworked come playoff time? Isn’t this what has happened in the past, whereby he’s gone into the playoffs tired? I know he wants to win the MVP for best goalie, but the playoffs s/b way more important in McClellan’s mind. Greiss could use the work and experience, although not tomorrow night.

by 1 and done on Jan 27, 2010 10:47 AM PST reply actions  

As a goalie myself, heir to all the slings and arrows of outrageous madness and ritual that goalies as a group collectively are, I say let him start ’em. 65-70 games seems about right.

I have to applaud you, by the way, for avoiding using GAA as a metric for evaluating gpaltenders, as it’s mostly a team defense stat.

Success in the position goaltending is 98.5% a mental state. Nabby, as much as I love him, plays a somewhat inefficient style as compared to your average butterfly-dominant goaltender. His style is mostly athletic and reflexive, (more reminescient of Kipper or Brodeur, than say your purely positional Huet or Giguere/Hiller) but the main hallmark of Nabokov’s game has always been confidence. How many times have we seen him 4-6 feet out of the crease challenging a shooter?

That confidence in net, at least for Nabby, has been a function of his status of being an ironman – more workhorse than stallion. I feel like it’s telling that Doug Wilson decided to trade defensive depth (Erhoff and Lukowich, and to a lesser extent Michalek) for Heatley, who is not by most accounts a great two-way player, as well as not signing a veteran backup in maybe a Biron or any of the other NHL goalies capable of starting 30 games or so.

This is, by my reasoning, Nabby’s last year in teal, and I think as long as his body stays healthy, Nabby feels like he could start all 82 plus the Olympic and still be playing a career year. There is life after Nabokov, and even if we do hit a bump in the months that shall not be named, we will be rebuilding more in the mode of the Red Wings who have traditionally had playoff success with mediocre to bad goalies.

Always remember, the difference between the worst goalies and the best averages to one goal every game. I wish I could work some stats into this, but I’m posting from an iPhone in philosophy.

Go Sharks.

by innes on Jan 27, 2010 10:51 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

As a coach, I think you gotta trust in your #1 goaltender that when he says he wants to start 70+ games, that he’s not doing it to the detriment of himself and his team. If he believes that playing that many games will contribute to his performance, then so be it.

I agree; confidence is such a huge part of the goalies’ makeup. I think if playing 70+ games gives Nabby that confidence he needs going into the playoffs then you have to trust that Nabby’s not doing for selfish reasons.

Some goalies’ in the past have consistently played 65+ starts with little reduction in their playoff performances. I remember reading that Felix Potvin’s performance was proportionally related to the number of games he started.

Where hockey injuries in San Diego are thumb blisters from playing too much NHL 09

by Will Bulldozer on Jan 27, 2010 11:41 AM PST up reply actions  

How good are those other teams?

Some of the past playoff teams with overworked goalies did not fare well, but I would question whether some of those were marginal playoff teams riding their goalie into the playoffs (a la Irbe).
Nabby seems to be the workhorse because he wants to be, not because the team has no other choice. All our eggs are in one basket, so we better pray he stays healthy, but I’m not worried about his abilities.

by calixtus on Jan 27, 2010 11:24 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Just re-read and noticed it sounds a bit self-contradictory. Nabby is the lone guy because he wants to be, not because it was seem as the team’s only way to survive. However, now that he’s become the lone guy… he IS the team’s only way to survive. Sigh.

by calixtus on Jan 27, 2010 11:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Well here's what the Coach is saying

From yesterday’s DP article re: Time Management of Olympians

One Olympian who isn’t likely to see much reduction in playing time is goalie Evgeni Nabokov, who has competed in 45 of the Sharks’ 53 games.

“For Nabby not to skate Sunday and for Nabby to have the day off Monday, that’s all Nabby needs,” McLellan said of this week’s schedule. "In the long run, it could come back and people could say ‘Why didn’t they rest him more?’ But right now this is what we’re doing.

“Last year we cut him back, and we didn’t get what we wanted, so we’re not going that route again,” the coach added. “We’re trying something different.”

I will defer to TMac’s judgment – there’s a reason he’s the coach – but I respectfully submit my…

Puck Daddy: You would definitely hate the Ducks more than you'd hate the Kings, right?
Joe Pavelski: Yeah, definitely.

by DownRUpLYB on Jan 27, 2010 11:34 AM PST reply actions  

I thought Nabby played fairly well in the playoffs 2 years ago, granted they weren’t his best numbers, but he looked far sharper than he did last year and that was a heavy work load year. Nabby tends to get into the zone, we just have to trust that he did everything he needed to in the offseason to prepare.

"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda

by Evilducks on Jan 27, 2010 1:01 PM PST up reply actions  

We all think Nabby will start at the Olympics, yet nowhere have I read any indication of that from people that matter the most – Coach Bykov and GM Tretiak. I’ll venture to say that Bryzgalov is good enough this season that if Nabby has an off game (like Bryzgalov did when Russia lost to Slovakia four years ago), he won’t hesitate for bench him in favor of Bryzgalov.

by Ivano M on Jan 27, 2010 1:02 PM PST reply actions  

God Forbid Nabby Gets Hurt

What happens if Nabby gets hurt(it is a physical game) and can’t play in the playoffs?? Wouldn’t it be nice if Greiss had some experience playing a few games in a row, so the team could learn how he plays and he could learn about how his teammates play..

You can learn only so much in practice..

by The Sear on Jan 27, 2010 5:43 PM PST reply actions  

Concerning the above "Cup winning goalies"

Most of them have a reduced number of starts because they were injured at some point during the year, not a result of a coaching decision to “save” them for the playoffs.

Every other playoff contending team this year with an outright #1 netminder (who also has been healthy all year) has played their goalie virtually just as much as Nabby.

If he’s healthy, let him play as much as he wants. Now you might be saying, lets rest him more so that he DOESNT get hurt, but as anyone who’s played competitive sports can tell you, playing to prevent injury almost always results in one.

I’m also not worried about the “grueling” Olympic schedule. Even IF Nabby plays EVERY game for Russia (which I doubt) at MOST its 7-8 games over 2 weeks. Heck, the Sharks have tougher stretches than that in the reg season. On top of that, I assure you some of the opponents Team Russia faces in the Olympics will be so overmatched that Nabby could take a lounge chair out to the crease and have a cocktail all game.

In fact, I would venture to say that I’m GLAD Nabby gets to continue to play world-class competition for those two weeks and stays on top of his game, whereas non-Olympian goalies will be at home on the couch for a 2 week vacation.

by BillytheSid on Jan 27, 2010 5:49 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Thank you

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Photo_388_small Mr. Plank

Editor

Slappy_small Matthew_Taylor

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Shfe_small Jon Allred

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikey_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady