Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

Sharks get shutout for second straight game, lose 2-0 to St. Louis

After his early season struggles, "Finding Neemo" might be the biggest softball of a pun in the history of punology.

With the Sharks offense struggling to find goals after Tuesday night's loss to the Minnesota Wild, going up against Blues goaltender Jaroslav Halak probably wasn't the best cure for their ails.

And if tonight's shutout is any indication, San Jose could have a mini-crisis of offensive production on their hands.

Halak made twenty five saves in his third shutout of the season, while Matt D'Agostini and David Perron added a goal apiece to keep the Blues undefeated at home to start the year. Their current 12 game home winning streak stretching back to the 2009-2010 season is a franchise best, and one that has put St. Louis at the top of the Western Conference standings.

With Sharks goaltender Antti Niemi getting his first start in over a week tonight, one had to wonder how he would handle a St. Louis team that was pumping 34.6 shots on net coming into the contest, good for second in the NHL. Niemi didn't start out on the right foot however, letting in a weak Matt D'Agostini goal from the far edge of the right circle off the rush with no Blues trailers threatening the backdoor pass. A replay of the shot confirmed that Niemi was playing his angle much too aggressively on the shot, allowing D'Agostini to thread the puck to the far post and across the goal line. It wasn't the start Niemi or the Sharks needed, but it was the one they received.

However, both leading up to and following the goal, Niemi played a very sound game in between the pipes, making some brilliant stops in between some routine ones. His rebound control was spotty at times, with multiple crease crashing plays resulting in a puck being kicked out into the low slot, but for the most part Niemi managed to keep the Sharks in the game. It was likely his best outing since joining San Jose in the summer of 2010, and one that could be seen as a potential turning point for a league-average goaltender struggling to get back to the .910 SV% range.

Star-divide

Throughout the game San Jose continued their recent infatuation with the penalty box, racking up 41 minutes of penalties that forced them to skate a massive 15:00 of the game shorthanded. And while the penalty kill unit did a stellar job tonight, generating numerous quality scoring chances a man down and killing all seven opportunities, there's no doubt that it was a real issue for the team. Staying disciplined during a stint when offensive production has dried up is a hallmark of great teams, something that the Sharks will need to correct in practice before Saturday night's matchup against the red-hot Tampa Bay Lightning.

The lack of offensive production tonight, as well as the season-long struggle with even strength goal scoring, has only recently become something that I find to be concerning. Four games into the season I scoffed at the idea that the Sharks would have difficultly scoring goals, both at even strength and with the man advantage:

In the offensive zone the Sharks have looked fine outside of the giveaways at their own blueline-- their power play entries last night were fairly subpar, but once they gained control of the puck in the zone they moved their feet and opened up some shooting lanes. A post here and there killed whatever momentum they could try and wrangle out of the situation, but it's not like the well has completely dried up in this regard. I'm not concerned about even strength scoring just yet-- the forwards on this team are way too talented to really struggle in this area of the game.

>> Sharks Gameday

While I still think that the current collection of offensive talent amongst the forward group is too good to get shutout on most nights, the lack of even strength scoring against quality teams has begun to worm its way into my brain like a Yeerk looking for a host. It's quite possible I overlooked the contributions of Rob Blake in the offensive end, both on the breakout as well as from the point, as my analysis of the blueline this offseason centered around the defensive zone.

Is it possible that the Sharks offense is struggling due to their inability to generate shots from the point? What about their lack of traffic in front of the net? Outside of Jamie McGinn no Shark has consistently gone to that area. Maybe a focus on running the offense off the halfboards and behind the net has made San Jose easier to defend against, making their gaudy shot totals (34.6 per game, first in the NHL) look better than the scoring chances resulting from those shots. Or perhaps a low team shooting percentage due to luck and other factors outside of their control has played a part in their recent drought.

Whatever the case may be, the Sharks have fallen to 5-5-1, struggling to find consistency in their game all season long.

And while it may not be time to hit the panic button just yet, the Sharks are in a position where each game from here on out seems to feel bigger than they usually do at this time of year.

 

Go Sharks.

Analysis of Joe Thornton's hit on David Perron that earned the Sharks Captain a game misconduct penalty can be found here.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sound analysis.

Niemi was much better tonight, but the team still didn’t look incredibly comfortable with him in nets. It wasn’t an issue like it was in Calgary, but I still get the feeling they aren’t entirely comfortable with Niemi as opposed to Nitty. Hopefully if he builds on this last performance that will stop though.

"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take"-Wayne Gretzky"-Michael Scott.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Nov 4, 2010 9:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree, he was still Niemi, but it looked as though he had been taking some pointers from Nitty.
That was the whole idea behind having the two of them, as stated by management when they signed Niemi (regardless of my opinion on the matter), that each would continually encourage the other to play better.

"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey."
"Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)

by Soloact on Nov 5, 2010 6:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sharks Problems

Continue to be the defense, the first goal should have never happened. Yes, it was a bad angle and Niemi should have made the save, but Huskins should have gone after hte puck instead of just letting the Blues to get the shot off.

Secondly there was no discipline tonight! Way too many penalties taken.

Finally the problem is that beyond the big three of Thornton, Marleau, and Heatley for the most part there hasn’t been any type of scoring. Pavelski needs to step up, Clowe needs to step up, etc….

Defensively the Sharks need help! All defensemen except for Boyle and Demers should be expendable!

by Rocky63215 on Nov 4, 2010 9:35 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll respectfully disagree with your first point

Huskins did the right thing keeping D’Agostini to the outside. If you’re a defenseman there, your job is to keep the player in a low percentage scoring area, which is what Huskins did. The defenseman should worry about the forward, and leave the puck for the goalie. Just like on an odd man rush: D take away the pass, G hopefully takes away the shot. Niemi shouldn’t have let that in, but it was a hell of a shot.

by Chicago Shark on Nov 5, 2010 5:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

You ARE correct here. It IS huskins job to keep the shooter outside the face-off dots on a play like that. I’ve seen the coach talk about it and I’ve seen Drew Remenda discuss it. It was IN NO WAY Huskins fault.

That goal was very similar to a goal Nitty gave up in pre-season vs the Canucks. Any shot from that distance and angle is EXPECTED to be stopped by any goaltender in the NHL PERIOD…

Although Niemi and the defense were not the reason we lost last night…. It should have Bern stopped. Period.

by skilletboy on Nov 5, 2010 9:53 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure Niemi has given up a goal like that in every game he’s played in this year…except maybe the Sweden game. It’s a huge issue for him, not being able to read shots from far away, being slow on the stick side, having no arms.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Nov 5, 2010 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Maybe he’s favoring his glove side by using his body to cover that side of the net, not trusting his glove hand. Or it could just be that he lacks spatial awareness of where he is in the crease. Hell, it could even be that he’s not prepared for a shot from that part of the ice. I’d go with some combination of these, and will say the goaltending coaches should be working with him as if he were a minor league player. He has obvious holes in his game that should’ve been worked out with the Hawks.

by Chicago Shark on Nov 5, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I would love it if he just stood up

Niemi’s strength is covering the net low, and he cheats so much by leaning so far over his center of gravity that I think his lateral movement and reflexes with his arms are affected.

A goalie of his size needs to stand up. He’s a big guy who CAN collapse and take away everything low, but I think it would make him better prepared to move laterally.

Roberto Luongo has had similar problems in his career. He’s such a big guy, but he panics and goes down to easy, and so a lot of easy goals can squeak by because he’s not as disciplined as he should be with his arms and glove, and instead is just trying to block shots.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 5, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Niemi is a competent goalie. Not great, but it is definitely not suicide for any team to have him between the pipes.

I wholeheartedly agree that it was the penalties that did them in. It is really hard to maintain offensive momentum if you keep having to fight back from being a man down.

by Lytning on Nov 5, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Niemi was not the problem

But he was not part of the solution. For all their power play opportunities, I don’t feel like the Blues generated a lot of quality chances. Niemi really gave up 2 less than strong goals. He was just bad on the first, and slow and out of position on the second.

But the team as a whole has to take responsibility for this game. The early penalties set the tone for the game. The team was chasing the whole night. And it may have contributed to some of the edge that created the Thornton hit. I have no doubt Thornton was looking to make a hit coming out of the box. Say whatever you want about the hit. It was unwise.

Time to turn this crap run around on Saturday.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 4, 2010 9:41 PM PDT reply actions  

I thought the whole Joe Thornton ejection was complete BS

I liked seeing Pavelski getting shots on goal, but none went in. Also thought Niemi played pretty well.

Chris Andersen could be in a porno with his 'stache. Too bad he still wouldn't know how to box out.
BTSC's little enforcer!
"God created a light, fluffy, white cake, named it "Angel Food Cake", and said, "It is good." Satan then created chocolate cake and named it "Devil's Food." -Tamera Mitchell-

by Mini Hulk on Nov 4, 2010 9:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Heatley went to the front early on, and scored a couple of goals and assists that way. He has apparently abandoned that strategy, alas.

"I'm listening to the f*cking song!"

by 4th Hanson Brother on Nov 4, 2010 9:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Fair assessment, I think.

I’d really like for us to stop pretending we’re the Thug-Ducks. We can’t force ourselves to play overwhelming portions of games on the PK. It tires out the already shaky defense, keeps the forwards from generating into the other zone (despite all the short handed chances tonight), and forces Nitty and especially Niemi to come up bigger and bigger and risk more of the fluke goals both have been prone to. I feel like the offense will come if we can stay out of the box. The defense is a dead horse and I’m skipping it for tonight.

by Auth0r on Nov 4, 2010 10:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Clearly Niemi's fault.

I mean, if he played a good game this game would have been a 0-1 OTL and the Sharks would have gotten 1 point.

Fear The Fin's Fifth-String Moderator !!

by idunno723 on Nov 4, 2010 10:16 PM PDT reply actions  

hahahahaha

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 5, 2010 7:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Say all you want about Niemi...

The fact that the team with as potent an offense as the Sharks to have not scored in the last 7 periods is stupid! STUPID! This blueline sucked tonight and hasnt been anything close to stellar this season. Look, if the Sharks want a real chance to win, it shouldnt matter who is in net! Not with these lineups! Niemi didnt loose, it was again, a Shark lose with Niemi in net, but you want to crucify the goalie, whatever… I see different problems. The refs sucked this game and tried to make it up… goal unallowed!! HA!! It will be interesting to see if Jumbo’s hit gets a suspension. LAME!!!!

by sharkblood99 on Nov 4, 2010 10:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I apologize if that was too negative. If the ref didnt put his whistle in his pocket for that jabfest the Blues had while the puck was under Niemi (twice), I dont think there would have been so many penalties.. Go Sharks!!

by sharkblood99 on Nov 4, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can shoot all you want...

But you must shoot with purpose. The last two games it seems like there’s been a lack of playmaking and creativity. Blindly throwing the puck towards the net only to have it harmlessly bounce off the pads in hopes of a rebound just isn’t working. Good goaltenders and a responsible D will eat that up all day long. Sure, it looks great on the shot clock, but means nothing when it comes to scoring chances. I see a whole of shoot and not a lot of playmaking and shoot with purpose.

by RBSharkFan on Nov 4, 2010 11:08 PM PDT reply actions  

One more thing...

Neimi is playing on edge. He settled down as the game went on but he still seemed skiddish even at the end. Question is, how long can we afford to let him earn his confidence? The season is 1/8th of the way over, and some very large questions both inside and outside the crease loom.

by RBSharkFan on Nov 4, 2010 11:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Not Niemi's Fault

He played exceptionally well tonight blanking the Blues for 15 minutes of power play time. Also coming up with some pretty huge saves here and there.

Not to worried about this game at all, they just got into real penalty trouble off some lazy plays and some bad calls. Couple this with the beast that is Jaroslav Halak and it’s really not surprising the Sharks lost tonight.

I thought Wallin had a pretty damn good game and that boarding call he got was complete bullshit. Same with the Thornton call.

Seto though, is clearly frustrated with his inability to score.

by Joseph Rice Graham on Nov 4, 2010 11:36 PM PDT reply actions  

He played exceptionally well

I’m sorry, but he gave up two really awful goals. While he wasn’t abysmal (which is an improvement, to be sure)…and if that’s all it takes for us to say Niemi is having exceptional games, that’s pretty sad.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Nov 5, 2010 11:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

He has some holes in his game that's for sure

Rebound Control, glove and stick hands and Positioning are the main ones, but that’s 85% of goaltending!

The first goal he misread the angle on the play, but was also a little deep in his net. Had that been Nabby, he’d have been at least another three feet nearer the shooter to cut off that angle.

The second goal was that one softy a game that we have to let in, otherwise we anger the gods.

by Morti on Nov 5, 2010 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exceptionally

is obviously a relative term and relative to his performances he did play exceptionally well. The Blues are a damn tough team right now and you cannot discount the fact that at times Niemi stood on his head to keep the puck out.

With that said I would hope that it be quite obvious that Niemi is not a top goalie atm and no one should be expecting him to be. That fact was made quite obvious by his first couple of starts.

by Joseph Rice Graham on Nov 5, 2010 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

it should be clear by now that nittimaki should be the one in the net.

we might not have the best defense, but we need a dependable goalie who will make that big save here and there to bail out our defense.

i didnt watch the whole game, or most of the games this season, but it seems like secondary scoring is a real problem

by Wreckonized on Nov 5, 2010 12:00 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree, but Nittymaki still has an awful habit of letting in one fluky goal per game. I’d be surprised if he gets a shutout before February, but feel free to prove me wrong Nitty!

by membraind on Nov 5, 2010 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not sure what's up with all the ragging on Niemi for giving up 2 goals

You should expect your goalie to give up 2 goals, and your offense to score more than 2. We can’t expect Niemi (or Nitty for that matter) to have a shutout every night. Sure, the first goal was weak and the second was questionable puck awareness, but even if he had the shutout the Sharks still wouldn’t have won in regulation. That’s saying something.

by Chicago Shark on Nov 5, 2010 5:10 AM PDT reply actions  

It’s not that he gave up 2 goals…its the kind of goals he gave up. Both were saves any competant goaltender should and have to make. The first one was particularly egregious.

Of course, we still didn’t score, so the loss is on everyone. But we can’t pretend that Niemi had some sort of great game because he only gave up two goals.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Nov 5, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying he had a great game

He had an average game by NHL standards. However, what I am saying is that we should expect our goalies to give up a few bad goals here and there. We ragged on Nabby for his 5 hole problems the last couple years. I’m just saying, bashing Niemi for giving up 2 crap goals is pointless when the offense can’t score in 3 of 4 games.

The Sharks are not the Giants. We can’t rely on shutouts from our goaltenders and only getting one goal to get the win. We’re more like the Rangers: ok defense, but our goal is to outgun opponents in a high scoring game. Right now we’re looking like the Rangers, and it’s terrible to watch.

by Chicago Shark on Nov 5, 2010 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, if you give up 2 goals, you should be able to score 3

But last night, the Sharks competed very hard on the PK and kept the game close.

The times at which Niemi gave up his goals, and the kind of goals he gave up, were very deflating.

A lot of Nabby’s critics said the same thing about him. It’s not the number, it’s the type and the timing.

I dispute the notion that the Blues played a particularly good game last night. They didn’t draw so many penalties as we took them. And they were very undisciplined penalties (boarding, hooking, interference, etc).

Honestly, a team that got out-chanced on their own power plays SHOULD NOT win the game.

The team did dig it’s own hole, and I won’t put the whole thing on Niemi, but on a night when the team needed a big game from it’s goaltender, Niemi did not come up big. If the team has playoff aspirations, Niemi’s goaltending is not going to get it done if he continues to play like this.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 5, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Problem is, the rangers lost :(

by animadiversion on Nov 5, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

When it comes down to it

The Sharks are only one game behind last year’s record at 11 games.
They are currently 5-5-1, where last year they were 6-4-1. Fortunately, this is the case, and it isn’t worse. I know I keep repeating myself, and so do others , when I say that the Sharks need to get someone in the ****ing opposing goalie’s eyes, like almost all the other scoring teams do.
The Sharks do have the scoring talent, if they would use it. Sure the defense is a little on the weak side, but they’ve shown that they can overcome that, in recent past games.
Maybe management and coaches should pay a little attention to what the fans have been saying for awhile.

On another note, the “Sharkstistics” have been updated, with an added stat of games scheduled per “days off” for the whole season.

"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey."
"Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)

by Soloact on Nov 5, 2010 6:21 AM PDT reply actions  

In addition, the only ones I saw making some sort of effort, every so often, of getting in the opposing goalie’s eyes, were Heater and Cooch. It’s at least, a start.

"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey."
"Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)

by Soloact on Nov 5, 2010 6:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Make the slot ours

I guess we’ve accepted the fact that Clowe shows no taste for/isnt the type of player to drop anchor in the slot,sure Heater scores alot from there,but he can score from anywhere,I just think Clowe could be successful if he didnt limit himself to just cycling down low.Like you guys said,a high number on the shot clock isnt worth much if they’re arent quality shots.

R.I.P Andy Irons 1978-2010
Be cool to animals but F#CK PETA!
"They didnt quiet a building,they quieted a nation!"--WJC January 2010
"Hah! Crom laughs at your four winds!"

by tealkegkilla on Nov 5, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly. If we’re worried about the Sharks now, just wait until it’s the All-Star break—the Sharks were horrible in the months surrounding the Olympics last season. Everyone seems to forget that they caught fire for the last weeks of the season and weren’t playing good hockey in the 2 months before.

by membraind on Nov 5, 2010 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Marleau

Is it just me or does Marleau seem lost out there this year? I know in his past he has hot streaks and no show games (offensively), but I haven’t seem any checking or going to the net play from him. I don’t like HTML because I’d like to see McClellan spread the wealth. I think Marleau needs to anchor the second line, freeing up Pavelski to find open space to score or pass to the open shooter. I’m not however overly concerned about the offensive players, although I’m not sure Seto and Mitchell are every going to be big time scorers.

I think the real problem for the Sharks this year (in the absense of Blake) is how to generate scoring from the back. Other than Boyle, I don’t think the Sharks have a guy (perhaps Demers in future years) who can score on the powerplay or fire pucks to the net creating juicy rebounds. Dare I say Vlasic? Is it time to think about moving him? Does he have much value? I think he’s a smart, defensive minded player, but if the Sharks thought of him as having offensive upside, I just don’t see it. I think it’s his 5th year and he has shown me very little offensive acumen.

So if trades need to be made, who goes and who’s available? Sorry, not trying to push the panic button and the next 5 are at home, but we have not had a difficult schedule and the record is below 500. The D looks slow and lacking in offense.

by 1 and done on Nov 5, 2010 7:15 AM PDT reply actions  

Vlasic

is too valuable on the back end. for a defense that lacks 2nd and 3rd pairing depth, you dont give away your best defensive end d-man.

i would agree they need a canon from the point, a guy defenses really have to account for, but getting rid of vlasic shouldnt be the answer.

"We let go of 32 players from 2008 (roster and practice squad) who were here who never played in the NFL again," Xanders said. "There's a plan in place. We're laying the foundation for success. And most of the decisions have been productive

by Jay Fin Anderson on Nov 5, 2010 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think Vlasic, as he’s currently playing, has been our worst defensive end d-man this year. But there in lies the problem…we couldn’t trade him now because he has been so bad and expect to get appropriate value for him. But when he’s playing well and has value, you sure as hell don’t want to trade him because he’s too valuable to the blueline. I’d be willing to trade him for a MFer on the back end who’s much more consistant than Vlasic, but it still wouldn’t solve our issues…we’d still need another shutdown guy…so its probably not feasable.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Nov 5, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'll concur on Marleau

For what he’s getting paid, he’s not doing enough. A man of his pay grade and skill set should be dominant out there, and he’s just not at the moment.

As much as I’ve been ragging on Marleau since last post-season, I’m willing to give him some slack and time, because we have seen what he’s capable of.

Defensive contributions are a concern, certainly, but the bigger problem with the offense has to be the turnovers, and not getting to scoring areas. Shots from the blue-line can help, but at the moment, the fundamental problem with the offense at this point is that they cough up the puck, and they’re not getting enough pucks and people to the net (high shot counts are irrelevant, you need quality shots with traffic to score in the NHL).

If the offense can establish any sort of rhythm, I think it’ll open up chances for the D. You have to force teams to collapse a little in order for shots from the point to make a difference.

For right now, I think it’s fine for the D to concentrate on playing D. And the forwards need to improve their puck possession and always always always back check.

I give the team until the 25 game mark to show that the roster, as is, is capable of playing at least consistent hockey before I worry about roster changes.

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 5, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Blech…

I can understand an astounding lack of discipline when you’re getting vastly outplayed and end up spending most of the game in your defensive zone. Look no further than the Colorado series, or the Anaheim game last week. But I felt like it was by and large a fairly even tilt with regard to possession and SOG, and the Blues were outhit like woah. We’re going to run into hot goaltenders and effective bluelines, even more so this season, and the moment they lose their composure and begin the parade to the box, the game’s all but thrown away.

..:Fear The Fin:..

by OtherKid on Nov 5, 2010 8:45 AM PDT reply actions  

Meant to post this last night, but I fell asleep, my bad


Full-sized version here.

(And no, Niemi did not play bad last night relative to his other starts, but honestly, this pun is too good).

American Heroes: Joe Pavelski, Buster Posey, David Backes
Fear the Fin - Cornering the market on third pairing defensemen since March 2009

by mymclife on Nov 5, 2010 9:01 AM PDT reply actions  

instant classic

R.I.P Andy Irons 1978-2010
Be cool to animals but F#CK PETA!
"They didnt quiet a building,they quieted a nation!"--WJC January 2010
"Hah! Crom laughs at your four winds!"

by tealkegkilla on Nov 5, 2010 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

no goals in 2 straight games

as Alice(Adrienne King ) would say in the original Friday the 13th movie……..“WHAT IS GOING ON!”

by stingfeyd on Nov 5, 2010 9:59 AM PDT reply actions  

The last two games

The sharks have straight up been beat by the better team. The other team wanted it more. Minnesota did that through defense and the Blues through relentless attack (drawing far to many penalties).

The sharks, although talented, are a far stretch from a playoff team as of right now, but that’s ok, they got 71 games to get their act together.

In fact, and I don’t hear this all that often but has anyone else noticed that teams who have it to easy during the regular season end up not making it in the playoffs? With the exception of the Blackhawks last year, the playoffs showed that the regular season record means absolutely nothing. It is struggle that causes people to refine themselves and rise above and success can easily give a false sense of security; ie: Washington.

So no need to panic! We know this team is talented, we know the level of Hockey they can play, let them find their team dynamic and all will be good!

Besides at least people are showing their heart in standing up for the captain (Couture and Frazer).

by Joseph Rice Graham on Nov 5, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Niemi wasn't the issue this game

Okay they “don’t feel comfortable in front of him”. BS. He’s their goalie. I don’t care how he plays, and all the jokes about “excessive rebounding is his style”… they know this.

Moreover, regardless of who’s in net, you have to SCORE to win. If Nemo/Nitty gives up two goals, fine. Score 3.

The defense has actually been tolerable these past few games (4 I’d say). The offense has not. It doesn’t help that we spend most of the game killing of penalties. I’m not sure how the loss of Captain Hook has actually increased our penalties, but it’s not a good sign.

Again, hitting the panic button now would be stupid. But, I would like to see the Sharks play smarter hockey. Finally we’re playing close games, which is a good sign. Now, I just want to win.

Sharks goaltending: because one finn wasn't enough.
The few, the proud: Thrashers fans.

by Bockerz on Nov 5, 2010 12:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Finally we’re playing close games, which is a good sign.

Clearly you are not a San Francisco 49er fan…

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 5, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't really watch football, but I guess I watch the Falcons if I do haha...

But I was just referring to our early losses… it was either win big or lose big (with the exception being CBJ). I’m not a big fan of losing, but I hate being blown out. Keeping the games close means we’re moderately competitive. Now we just have to score.

And the difference between the 49ers and the Sharks is that the Sharks don’t suck :P

Fear The Fin: because one finn wasn't enough.
Bird Watchers AnonymousThe few, the proud, Thrashers fans.

by Bockerz on Nov 5, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was being mostly sarcastic too

I am glad there haven’t been any blowouts since Calgary. We’ve done better on the defensive end. But the offense? Well…

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

by ElvisVF101 on Nov 5, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you for making me go from unbelievably angry about the suspension to abjectly depressed by the 9ers… This friday sucks.

"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda

by Evilducks on Nov 5, 2010 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

animorphs

wow, i did not expect an animorphs reference in a sharks posting. /shocked

by redlandmover on Nov 5, 2010 2:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Loved the animorphs ref in there. GOLD! Makes up for the Go Blues from the gameday!

by animadiversion on Nov 5, 2010 2:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

Managing Editor

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Xbox360hockey_small Jon Allred

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikeyicon_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady