Trade Targets: Jan Hejda (CBJ)
"Trade Targets" will be a recurring piece on Fear The Fin until the March 3rd deadline, in which Plank and TCY will explore trade possibilities for the San Jose Sharks. Previous pieces of this nature can be found here.
Since we've established the premise for these trade target articles in multiple pieces leading up to today, here's the gist-- TCY and I think San Jose could use an upgrade in the top four on the backend.
Unlike yesterday however, where we tag teamed an article on Tomas Kaberle and came to a disagreement on whether or not the price was right for him, the rest of the series is going to be a little different. He and I have picked "our guys" to profile leading up to the NHL Trade Deadline. A section at the end entitled "Contrarian's Corner" will allow the other party an opportunity to chime in with his take on the proposed deal.
The NHL roster freeze begins this Friday at 3 PM, and ends February 28th at 11:59 PM. We plan on continuing these trade target articles alongside our Olympic coverage later this month, so keep your eyes peeled.
Now on to your regularly scheduled programming.
*****
Jan Hejda is quite possibly one of the most underrated defensive defensemen in the NHL today, a player similar to Robyn Regehr of the Calgary Flames. He faces the toughest competition night after night, sees the most defensive zone draws on the blueline, consistently outshoots the competition, and anchors the Jackets penalty kill. This comes at a price of course-- while he can move the puck out of the zone well with a strong first pass and won't have issues feeding the San Jose breakout, there is little goal scoring ability here. He will not see any time on the power play.
Along with his stellar advanced defensive metrics, he blocks shots (111 this season, good for 22nd in the league) and possesses a a physical presence that is well-suited to playoff hockey (168 hits last season, good for 19th in the league). If the Sharks are looking to add a player that can slide in and play against some of the better lines in the Western Conference, Hejda is one of the few available upgrades out there on the market today.
Think of a hybrid between Marc-Edouard Vlasic's shutdown hockey sense and Douglas Murray's physical ability. He doesn't surpass either player in each individual area, but taken as a whole, Hejda is arguably a more complete defenseman at this stage of his career, a great complement to whatever pairing he would find himself on in San Jose (with Boyle, or with Vlasic).
In essence, he is exactly what I am looking for in a defenseman.
All of this comes at the tune of $2.00 M per, with one year remaining on his contract. He is not a rental. The Blue Jackets are mired at the bottom of the Western Conference and just fired head coach Ken Hitchcock last week and are in sell mode, looking to move pieces for the future.
In essence, they are exactly what I am looking for in a trade partner.
With the acquisition of Niclas Wallin this week, Doug Wilson has made it difficult for the Sharks to be able to maneuver under the salary cap. There is no room left; salary must be exchanged equally, and most potential assets in San Jose make too little under the cap to trade away for an equal return (Setoguchi, Pavelski).
Along with that, the lack of draft selections at the upcoming NHL Draft in Los Angeles have also restricted Wilson's bargaining power. He is not able to package some of the marginal salaries together (Huskins, Mitchell) considering they have zero trade value on their own, and without draft picks or a roster player, they are essentially unmovable.
This means Kent Huskins and Ryane Clowe pop up again in trade discussions-- Huskins due to his cap hit, and Clowe due to his skill level and cap hit. But before all of the Clowe supporters (the great irony is that I am one of them to some degree) come out of the woodwork to proclaim we lose a power forward and scoring depth, try this on for size.
Raffi Torres.
Yes, that absolute menace to society, Raffi Torres. 17 goals this season, a gritty winger who you hate to play against but would love to have on your team. Effective along the boards on the low cycle, tenacious on the forecheck, unafraid to go to the front of the net and park himself in front of opposing goaltenders. Very similar to Ryane Clowe in many respects. Both are middling skaters. Torres doesn't have the hands Clowe does, Clowe doesn't have the consistent net presence Torres does. Clowe is locked up for three more years with room to grow, while Torres is on the last year of his contract and will likely test the free agent market.
Which is the real beauty of it.
In one swift motion, this deal does two things-- it makes the Sharks a better team today than they were yesterday by substantially strengthening the blueline with Hedja and filling in goal production with Torres. The cap savings in the deal allows you to bring up Jamie McGinn as well, adding even more goal scoring pop to the lineup.
It also opens up room for Doug Wilson to lock up the vast amount of players hitting free agency next offseason. This is a secondary concern for me considering the time to win is now, but with the team already improving on the ice immediately, it is a definite plus.
There's no telling what a roster of this magnitude could do.
Heatley - Thornton - Marleau
Malhotra - Pavelski - Setoguchi
Torres - Nichol - McGinn
Shelley/Staubitz - Mitchell - Ortmeyer
Boyle - Murray
Hejda - Vlasic
Blake - Wallin
After a day of ironing out details with SBN's Columbus Blue Jackets representative The Cannon, head blogger Mike MacLean and I came to an agreement.
And the deal that gets it done is...
To Columbus: Ryane Clowe, Kent Huskins, Andrew Desjardins
To San Jose: Jan Hejda, Raffi Torres
*****
Contrarian's Corner (TCY): As sexy as names like Kaberle and Kubina are, this deal takes the cake. Hejda might not put up the points offensively, but the addition of a shutdown defenseman to this squad would do wonders in solving some of the Sharks problems in their own end. Hejda does it all defensively, and the addition of Raffi "Bananaphone" Torres sweetens the pot, especially when Clowe is part of the deal. Not only will Torres replace Clowe's production on either the second or third line, but he's one of the grittiest guys in the NHL. If Scott Nichol is sandpaper, Raffi Torres is an industrial strength commercial belt sander hooked up to a nuclear generator. Plus, Raffi's UFA status opens up space to sign our own RFA's and UFA's in the offseason.
You add a shutdown defenseman, a gritty forward whose production matches that being sent away, free up cap space for a McGinn call up, shed salary for offseason moves, and limit Blake's minutes. A more perfect trade has never been uttered.
*****
Go Sharks.
0 recs |
53 comments
|
Comments
I haven’t really seen Hejda play very much but if he’s as good as you make him sound then this trade sounds too good to be true. Why would Columbus make that trade? Do they really see Clowe as being that much better than Torres?
Comparing stats, Hejda is -12 while Huskins is +13 with more points in the season. Obviously Huskins is playing for a much better team against much easier competition but It still doesn’t look very good on paper.
I’ll take your word for it and say that this trade does sound awesome, and we should do it if possible.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 12:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Torres is a UFA this season and Columbus is out of the playoff picture. They want to move him. Clowe is better than Torres with more upside, but they are similar players in many respects.
+/- is a bad stat to use when comparing players on different teams— look at all of the Jackets defensemen, terrible minuses. I highly recommend Behind The Net blog here on SBN if you’re looking to get into some advanced metrics.
I actually forgot to add Andrew Desjardins into the piece and am going to do that now. No idea how I missed that.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Feb 10, 2010 2:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As i mentioned im not all that familiar with Hejda but even still, i look at this trade and see us trading Clowe for another Scott Nichol (with a little more offensive punch) while getting another defensemen whos equal to or better than Husksins and at the same time freeing up some cap space; all of which i really like.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 12:43 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Where’s the dotted line?
"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda
by Evilducks on Feb 10, 2010 1:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is more to my liking. I said yesterday that I’d hate to shake up the team, but I’m an advanced metrics whore.
I also didn’t realize Raffi Torres was such a goal scorer. He is definitely on a career pace, which might well slow down in the second half, but its a faster way of getting the guy we all want Clowe to grow up and become.
by ruben398 on Feb 10, 2010 10:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where's Seto?
Why is Seto never brought up as an offer? Couldn’t he take Clowe’s place in this deal? Then we would be losing Huskins (bleh) and a guy who has potential but hasn’t been playing good hockey as of late. Is there something I’m missing?
by notw53 on Feb 10, 2010 1:05 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I did just read a reply to my post in the other trade proposal thread about Seto having a lot more potential at a much lower price, so I understand a little more now. If anyone else could shed any more light on the subject though feel free of course.
by notw53 on Feb 10, 2010 1:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cuz Seto has fuck tons of potential and he has a low salary cap hit, unlike Clowe. Seto was playing GREAT this season before he got injured. He’ll get his game back and a be a huge asset for the Sharks in the future.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 1:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Setoguchi will make $821,666 K this season if he doesn’t hit his bonuses. As I mentioned in the piece, that won’t be enough to clear cap space in this deal, or a lot of deals that the Sharks may be looking at down the line.
Setoguchi will not be traded this season, irregardless of whether one feels he is going to be a 30+ goal scorer, or one thinks he will be a 15 goal scorer. There is simply not enough cap room to bring in anything worthwhile.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Feb 10, 2010 2:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bravo Plank, Bravo.
Commander Shepard would be proud.
I would trust my child to anyone on the team --- except ---- well ---- yea, probably everyone. Including Douglas Murray (laughs). - Jody Shelley
by thelilaznboy on Feb 10, 2010 1:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Raffi Torres makes this deal.
A more perfect trade has never been uttered.
someone needs to get DW in contact with Plank.
Now.
by jMoneyBrah on Feb 10, 2010 3:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
agreed
sounds like this deal has to be done
by StevieV17 on Feb 10, 2010 7:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DW aside, is Columbus really going to take this offer? Does it fill any of the holes in their lineup? If they’re basically willing to walk away from Torres, why would they want Clowe?
Jon Casey fan since '84
by stufflife on Feb 10, 2010 8:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Younger, better upside. Signed long term. Torres will look to test the market.
Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.
by That'll Cheech You on Feb 10, 2010 8:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like both Torres and Hejda — they would be great additions to San Jose. But, I’m trying to figure out the carrot here for Columbus.
Agree that Clowe is better than Torres. But, on a team that already has 4 forwards making $3.75M+ for 2 more seasons after this year, do they really need to add Clowe’s $3.625M+ for 3 more seasons — especially since Torres’ $2.25M comes off the books this off-season? Wouldn’t cap space be more valuable for them, especially if they are gearing up to rebuild? And, it doesn’t seem like Columbus would be the type of team to spend to the cap, so they’re even more constrained. Which, if that is the case, probably sucks to be Rick Nash having just signed that long-term deal.
If I’m Columbus, I want Huskins out and Mitchell in. Or something to that nature. I get why San Jose would want to shed Huskins here.
by radinsky on Feb 10, 2010 10:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Sharks are going to add another defenseman, and assuming Vlasic is coming back this year, we have to give up one of our current defensemen to make it work on our own roster. Huskins isn’t the value to the BJs in this trade, he’s the necessary piece SJ has to throw in to make it work on both sides.
"I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." ~Michael Scott
by ZeroIndulgence on Feb 10, 2010 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I get how SJ has to ship out a defenceman in this deal, and preferably Huskins, also because he works cap-wise. But it just makes it seem like the BJs really are wanting to help out SJ here. We get the defensive-defenceman. We get someone to replace Clowe. And he’s also a UFA which helps our cap situation this off-season. And, on top of that, we get to ditch Huskins and his contract.
It’s not totally their problem SJ has to move another defenceman to bring in Hejda unless they really, really want Clowe.
by radinsky on Feb 10, 2010 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see why they wouldn't want Clowe
It’s not exactly like we DON’T want Clowe. The realities of the Salary Cap just mean he’s pretty much what we have to give in order to get.
Hejda is $2M, Clowe is $3.25M. Columbus needs to add something. We ask for Torres, who is $2.75M. We need to shed some salary to accomodate that. So we throw in Huskins. He’s not worth much, so we add a prospect.
I think it’s just pure math that drives the deal. Columbus gets 2 roster players, a prospect, and some stability in a play who is going to be with them for at least another 2 years in Clowe, and Huskins is only signed through next year. They still get cap relief if they want.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I think Clowe has a lotta value here. A rebuilding team will want assets they can count on to be around for a while. And if they see Clowe as a top-6 guy (which he is), and someone they can build a contender around (which he is), then it would make sense for them to ship off an expiring piece in Torres to get it done.
Clowe is a good hockey player (he’s a lousy waiter, though), and his contract hit isn’t unreasonable. Clowe would be the best player in this deal. Just because a trade helps the Sharks doesn’t mean the other team isn’t getting helped out quite a bit too.
"I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." ~Michael Scott
by ZeroIndulgence on Feb 10, 2010 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus a top line of Nash, RJ & Clowe would be great
This line would give some on the ice protection to Nash & dropping KH to the second line adds some sec. scoring. I think this trade is a win for both clubs.
PREPAREDNESS_Because those goddamn zombies aren’t going to kill themselves
by adragon on Feb 22, 2010 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you think the Jackets are getting the short end of the stick, you could always toss in a better prospect and/or third round draft pick. I would still pull the trigger.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Feb 10, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t disagree with what is being said about Clowe and his value. I am just trying to gauge the trade from the other side and what Clowe would add to their team.
Cap space is a huge deal and might be a lot more important to Columbus than having Clowe. Especially if they have cap space available when they start to get good — like LA. They already have Umberger, who is kind of similar, but with a longer track record. And they’ve got two other veteran forwards signed long(er) term in Huselius and Vermette so they’re not exactly hurting in that area. In terms of assets to rebuild around, they have Nash, Brassard, Voracek, and Filatov (if and when he turns) on top of this year’s pick. Clowe is what he is, right? Maybe he has a 30G, 60pt season in him, but he’s not exactly teeming with more potential.
They’re already up to $47.5M for 18 players next year and they’d be adding (slightly) more money in this deal. Plank’s suggestion of additional sweetners would probably get it done and I think everyone would be all right with that.
by radinsky on Feb 10, 2010 12:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Torres’ contract is up this year, so while he’s a steal right now, next year that might not be the case; while Clowe is already signed to contract for a few more years. Also Clowe is better offensively, he’s young, and still has potential for improvement.
and while we all hate on Huskins, he’s actually fairly solid as a 3rd pairing defensemen.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You forget
DW would listen to Plank’s proposal. He’d look across the table, and he’d say:
“Son, I think you’d make a very fine GM in this league. You’ve got a good eye for talent. I think a club like the New York Islanders or the Florida Panthers might have benefited from having a guy like you around a few seasons ago. But I’m going to give you a piece of advice that’s going to take you far in this league. I’m Doug Wilson. I traded Marco Sturm, Brad Stuart and Wayne Primeau for Joe Thornton. You think I need to trade Ryane Clowe to get us a defenseman? Bitch, please!”
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ugh.
Raffi Torres? Really? Raffi F*cking Torres? God I hate that red-headed ass hat.
Well, I guess now that Milan is gone….lol.
I wasn’t keen on Scotty Nichol’s signing either, and now I love the guy…
"What an idiot" - Craig Rivet
"Al Stalock, his reflexes are so good he can smell a fart before someone even lays one"
by sharkiesgirl on Feb 10, 2010 9:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I have seriously despised Torres ever since he blindsided Michalek in the PO’s vs. Edmonton way back. With that said, I could probably get over it quickly if this deal went through.
It is extremely hard, in any sport, to conjure up a truly solid trade idea. You my friend have done so. Bravo.
We just traded who for who?!
by BawLa on Feb 10, 2010 9:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Torres?
Ugh…
Still, good deal. I guess I go for it…
Raffi F*cking Torres…
Please pardon me while I go throw up a little…
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 9:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I have similar feelings about the guy
But I’d rather have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in!
"iaT"S FUCKINGE LIEK CONICO DO MAYO!!!!!111"
Mr. K. 5/5/2009
by Morti on Feb 10, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like this deal but...
Dudes.
I like this deal. While I prefer Tyutin to Hejda, I think Hejda is probably more likely available for a lower price tag. My only question is I don’t think the Sharks can trade Andrew Desjardins. Unless I’m wrong, he is on an AHL deal only, and property of the Worcester Sharks and not on an NHL two-way contract, like Groulx, Callahan and Vesce.
If Columbus wants to their depth, why not throw in Derek Joslin, Dwight Helminen or Kevin Henderson instead?
Go Sharks!
by DougDude on Feb 10, 2010 9:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Do you think
Doug Wilson could convince Columbus to take Shelley and Staubitz instead of Desjardins?
In which case, we could roll:
HTML
Malhotra Pavelski Setoguchi
Torres Nichol Ortmeyer
McLaren Mitchell McGinn
I really dislike the idea of splitting Nichol and Ortmeyer. I think they have great chemistry. And I just really like the line of McLaren Mitchell McGinn. That’s next year’s third line, and I think they deserve a shot playing together as much as possible to build chemistry.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 11:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm...
It’s not Kaberle, but I think this could work. My question here though is what the impact on chemistry will be with someone like Clowe leaving, and Torres coming in. Is Torres a very likeable guy in Columbus?
I still think I would take the Kaberle deal first. The talent of Kaberle exceeds the two pieces involved with this deal, but this could work if Torres is a perfect fit here.
by Ronnibily on Feb 10, 2010 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I’m also taking your word on Hejda. Heard about him, less then stellar stats, but maybe he is the right piece.
by Ronnibily on Feb 10, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hejda is very good. Watch him tonight and see what you think.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Feb 10, 2010 11:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like how everytime you introduce a new trade target we end up playing the team their on the next day so we can check them out. I like your style.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 11:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I get the distinct feeling this was planned.
I’m curious who we get in return for the rat poison you plan on trading to Detroit for tomorrows game.
"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda
by Evilducks on Feb 10, 2010 1:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kaberle is a Salary Nightmare
Between him and Dan Boyle, we’d have over $10M of a falling $56.8M Salary cap invested in offensive defensemen. That’s a huge gamble.
We get some salary spread throughout the lineup here, in addition to some cap relief, and a defenseman that actually fits what we need.
I know Kaberle is a better player. Hejda is a better fit.
The chemistry issue is a concern. Then again, Michael Peca and Darcy Tucker burried the hatchet in Toronto. If Torres brings energy, he’ll fit right in, and that’s basically his role. A goal-scoring spark plug.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 11:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Kaberle a lot too, and I loooove the thought of having either him or Dan Boyle on the ice at all times; but this deal really makes a lot more sense. With this deal we free up a bit of cap space and make it possible to resign patty and nabby next year. With the Kaberle deal it would be really hard to resign them without losing some good players like pavs, seto, etc.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
omg i apparently replied to the wrong person. God i suck lol.
by Khaaz on Feb 10, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
fundamental question for all trades...
What is Hejda, that Huskins is not? Listening to the last Sharks game, they were really talking up Huskins’ value to the Sharks. Reliable, gives good locker room, blah blah blah. So what does Hejda provide that we didn’t just see added in Wallin or in keeping Huskins?
The Torres angle is nice. I like change, toughness and getting rid of Huskins. I also remember how much Clowe was really really missed when he was not in the lineup…
Does Clowe leaving create a bigger negative than the additions this particular player(s) can offset?
When I think about posting, I ban myself.
by Aero72 on Feb 10, 2010 12:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The hope is
Hejda can be more physical. I’m less sour on Huskins than most of the fanbase, but he has a few problems.
Firstly, he’s a $1.7M cap hit. He’s a fine NHL player, he’s just not a $1.7M NHL player.
Secondly, he’s a bit undersized. He’s a tough competitor, no doubt, but teams know he’s not the biggest guy on the ice, and they’ll take runs at him. It’s resulted in a few goals against. Offensively, he’s allright, probably better than Hejda, but it’s assumed the organization has sufficient depth (Demers and Joslin) to overcome that.
In Hejda, we get a legit top 4 guy. We don’t know that Wallin can be that for us, and we’re pretty sure Huskins is not that for us. Wallin makes Huskins redundant essentially, and while both have Cup rings, it’s assumed that Wallin had more to do with his team winning theirs than Huskins did for his. We’ll see if this next stretch of games bears that out.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great article
So I love the take. I’m a huge Clowe supporter, more for the intangables he brings than for his scoring prowess, but am I right in assuming that all of this trade talk is based on the fact that we probably won’t beat Chicago in a 7 game series as the team is constituted now?
This trade solves 2 problems, another defensive defenceman and more gritty sand paper. Torres looks like a serial killer to me (in a good way) and he’s been somewhat of a dissapointment for the 5th overall pick in 2000. But he is in a contract year and has been playing well + he and Hejda add size to our roster.
It will be interesting to see if DW is on the same page and if he’s really willing to give up Clowe to make this move, which seems to make a lot of sense for this year and in the future.
I don’t think we want to give up Seto or Mitchell, as both players are young with favorable contracts and a positive upside.
by 1 and done on Feb 10, 2010 1:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
On a side note
How much is Pav’s worth next year? And Seto? Will Seto get Mitchell money? Will Pavs get about $3.5 or $4.0 and for how many years? Now what about Marleau, Nabby, Malhotra, Ortmeyer, Nichol (if we keep them)? I guess we’ll need as much cap room as possible?
by 1 and done on Feb 10, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been wondering the same thing...
And we won’t know for certain until this offseason, but when I try to compile a roster in my head for next year, I always pencil in Seto and Pavs at about 3.5 million each. Seto probably a little less, Pavs a little more…but they two of them together would probably average out to 3.5 million a piece. Which is definately not chump change.
Marleau we’d be lucky to get at 5 million, and only then with a long, front loaded contract. Nabby likewise at 5 if we’re lucky, although we wouldn’t sign him long term. Malhotra will probably be looking for 1.5-2. He was offered 2/year from Atlanta before signing with us for the year because he wants to try and get a cup. He’ll probably be looking to get paid after this. Orts and Nichol should both be below 1 million.
Anyways, thats how I see it shaking down. Maybe someone who looks at salaries more closely will have different ideas on what we can expect this offseason. Either way, there’s a lotta money we’d need free to sign these players…
"I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." ~Michael Scott
by ZeroIndulgence on Feb 10, 2010 1:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Heatley, Thornton, and Boyle aren’t cheap ($22 million). Damn salary cap!
by 1 and done on Feb 10, 2010 1:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Numbers are pretty well spot on
The thing that always gets me when I try to crunch the numbers is that Pavs and Seto are RFAs, which means there is some mandatory minimum contract or some level or mandatory raise they are due. We simply can’t sign them for less. But given Clowe’s contract, I’d assume it puts them in your stated $3.5M range. I think we can assume combined, they’ll be about $7M (right now, they are about a combined $3.2M I think). The $3.8M difference has to come from some combination of Blake, Marleau and Nabokov. I’d tack on another $1.5M for Manny, because I think he’s pretty much made his case for his value to this team. We’re basically asking each of the three (Blake, Marleau, Nabby) to take about $1M to $3M pay cuts.
Best case is we let Blake walk and then ask Nabby and Marleau to take smaller cuts, and perhaps offer them term instead, with front loaded contracts. This leaves us some room to pick up another D-man and sign everyone. Maybe you let Seto walk to get a big name D-man. But I think you’re pretty much right on.
They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn
by ElvisVF101 on Feb 10, 2010 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This offseason will be interesting to say the least… hopefully I’ll be riding a wave of joy and won’t care.
"Douglas Murray is a humongous human being." – Drew Remenda
by Evilducks on Feb 10, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like that in this trade we would not have to give up a first round pick. And Torres can fill in just fine for Clowe, and would clear out salary to resign Marleau et. al. in the offseason. And Hejda is super solid defensively…and immediate top 2 pairing with Boyle, most likely.
However, I still think I’d rather have Kaberle…for the reasons I posted yesterday. I would not be sad if this trade were to happen instead, though.
"I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." ~Michael Scott
by ZeroIndulgence on Feb 10, 2010 1:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No doubt Kaberle is a stud and only $2 million more than Hejda. I’m not sure CBL will take Huskins, they’re not stupid, and he’s nothing special. We may have to throw in a pic?
by 1 and done on Feb 10, 2010 1:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be okay with that deal.
Like someone said earlier, I am not sure if Wallin can be a Top 4 defenseman, but it sounds like Hejda can. It stinks that in order to get something done, we would have to lose a piece. But, thus is the reality of the salary cap.
Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.
Fear the Fin: Where Sharks Fans Aren't Like Other Sharks Fans.
by SharksFanEst.1994 on Feb 10, 2010 6:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
My idea.
Hejda sounds nice, but I’m not sure if he + torres is better than Kaberle. Also, we most likely lose Torres at the end of the season no matter what, but Kaberle we keep for a year and use a good trade target if he fails. I’m not sure about this…
Go Sharks!
by Dmitriy on Feb 10, 2010 10:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















