Fear The Fin: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Rumors: Edwin Jackson to the White Sox, DC next?

Sharks Improve Their Play, but the Winless Streak Continues

Looking to end the longest winless streak since December, the Sharks managed to come short again, and instead extended the streak to four games. This losing streak is getting harder and harder to bear, as the last three losses came in regulation, and the Sharks did not have a lead in any of those games. Looking at the players, as they were leaving the ice after the sound of the game ending buzzer, we could see that they felt frustrated once again and as I type this, the locker room must have that same funeral atmosphere that it had two days ago. Should the Sharks continue to feel frustrated, or did we finally see a ray of hope? 

Taken as a whole, this was a better effort from the Sharks, when compared to the last two games against the Ducks and the Stars. The players came out willing to compete for pucks, willing to battle along the boards, and as game progressed, in the 2nd and 3rd period the Sharks started taking over the puck possession and creating more chances. The big turnaround began with a powerful drive to the net by Ryane Clowe as he skated past our old friend Christian Ehrhoff, as it was a pick up game somewhere in Frankfurt, and lifted the puck past Roberto Luongo. Could this have been a moment the Sharks started their sleep at the bottom of the deep ocean? It appeared that way for about 12 minutes until the Canucks pulled away again on a goal by Ryan Johnson. On top of that, Luongo was not going to let that game spin out of control, as he stopped one Sharks attack after another. The last five minutes of the game belonged entirely to the Sharks  after another highlight reel goal by Joe Pavelski, but the Sharks needed two to take the game into overtime and the desperate effort in the final moments of the game did not translate into goals. The local hero for Team Canada Bobby Lou swallowed everything that was thrown his way. 

But when was this game lost?

Star-divide

Once again, the game was lost in the first period. We were expecting the Sharks to fly on the ice after all that talk in the locker room and after an extra practice in Dallas. We thought they would come out and be focused on the task at hand and play like there was no tomorrow. Instead, the team came out flat, and after taking three lazy penalties in a row, they could not kill two of them, as Vancouver took an early lead. The parade of the Sharks to the penalty box at the start of the game has been an issue all season. It kills the momentum, it wears out the defensive forwards and the defense, and especially on the road - it gets the home crowd into the game. 

And while the Sharks still fell short, the last two periods of the game gave a sense of the light at the end of this long tunnel. The Sharks started finding their game once McLellan put the stop to the wild line shuffling he's been playing since the Sharks got on the road. Once Heatley was playing next to Marleau and Thornton beginning with the 2nd period, and Setoguchi was playing next to Pavelksi and Clowe, the game changes its tone and direction, and if not for an outstanding play by Luongo, the outcome could have been different. 

All signs point that the turnaround is not too far away. 

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hey, they played well up until that first penalty.

They were manhandling the ’Nucks for a good 3-4 minutes there, keeping the zone, getting physical, and winning loose puck battles. But that was pretty much it.

by OtherKid on Mar 18, 2010 10:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Plank- respectfully disagree with your assessment of the sharks’ effort after Pavs goal. I thought that the Sharks’ didn’t play with enough urgency to get a tying goal. And that although their effort was much better in the 2nd and 3rd, it was only because it was in comparison to their effort in the 1st. Canucks were very good in the last 5 minutes in doing what they’d done well the first 55. They boxed out Sharks players from getting in front of Lou. They got their sticks on errant pucks. And Sharks committed some mental lapses and errors on breakout passes and neutral zone turnovers during critical moments of last few minutes. Had Pavs not saved a goal on Sedin’s empty netter, I think we might all be in agreement.

Sharks had a really good stretch after the Clowe goal where they applied constant pressure and really had the Canucks’ backed up in their own zone. But for some reason, they stopped applying the pressure and I thought they became complacent once again to finish off the 2nd after the Johnson goal and to start the 3rd. But between the Clowe goal and Johnson goal, that’s the Sharks team I would like to see in Calgary. If they do that, I know this team can be successful.

Patty Marleau: An Erotic Life

Picked overall #2
Admonish man-crush
Trade rumors abound
Turns-around career
Year of the Cup?

by Will Bulldozer on Mar 18, 2010 10:46 PM PDT reply actions  

oops— did I say plank? sorry, ivano.

Patty Marleau: An Erotic Life

Picked overall #2
Admonish man-crush
Trade rumors abound
Turns-around career
Year of the Cup?

by Will Bulldozer on Mar 18, 2010 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I didn’t think they dominated the game either. The key there is that I said they played better “when compared to the last two games against the Ducks and the Stars”. I’m trying to look for positives here, and I think we’ve seen some tonight.

We’ve always struggled against the Canucks trap. I think if we had to face them in playoffs, the only way to beat them would be through Nabby because we sure as hell will struggle to score more than two goals on them.

Fear the Fin - all Evgeni, all the time.

by Ivano M on Mar 18, 2010 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

sure, I agree. The sharks did play much better tonight. It’s a positive, but maybe it wasn’t the type of positive that I was expecting. There’s a lot of desperate teams in the next 12 games, and the Sharks’ effort has to match their opponents. I would be okay had the Sharks lost, if I had seen effort all across the roster and for a full game. Vancouver is a very good team, and they have a very good goalie. It’s not like the Sharks were playing Columbus or Edmonton, all 20 players on the ice knew their best efforts were necessary.

Patty Marleau: An Erotic Life

Picked overall #2
Admonish man-crush
Trade rumors abound
Turns-around career
Year of the Cup?

by Will Bulldozer on Mar 18, 2010 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree with you about the line shuffling.

I understand they need to find who works well, but we had some good if not great line combos before. I would expect RW to do that, but not T-Mac. Oh, and Couture brought a lot of energy tonight. Even from the radio feed it seemed like he was a welcome benefit to the Sharks.

Proud member of the "Don't Trade Marleau" club.
Fear the Fin: Where Sharks Fans Aren't Like Other Sharks Fans.

by SharksFanEst.1994 on Mar 18, 2010 10:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah, I thought the 4th line as a whole played pretty well. They brought a lot of energy and generated some good 2nd and 3rd chances. Couture at one point managed to keep the puck in the offensive zone after some pretty impressive effort and acrobatics. Now if we could just get him consistently on a line with McGinn…

by OtherKid on Mar 18, 2010 11:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

After a few shifts on the fourth line...

Couture saw himself pretty firmly entrenched on line three between Mitchell and Malhotra, and registered more than 11 minutes of ice time. I thought he was one of the best players on the ice tonight, as he brought energy with every shift. We’ll see how this translates to the next game.

I agree with Ivano… you just can’t take that many penalties and expect to win a game, as was the case against Dallas. The Sharks are definitely on a cold streak, but hopefully what we saw in the second and third leads to a more solid effort in the first against Calgary tomorrow. The problem is, they just can’t put any type of complete effort together.

You can tell that they’re pressing, with Joe Thornton painstakingly looking for the perfect pass and Dan Boyle trying to get the team going all by himself. The more than 20 missed shots point to a team that’s gripping the stick too tight.

They need a win, and they need one now.

Fear the Fin: Sharing Joe Thornton's love of wooly mammoths since 2009.

by TCY on Mar 18, 2010 11:41 PM PDT reply actions  

anyone been keeping track of our record with and without demers?

by a10dency2ask on Mar 19, 2010 1:21 AM PDT reply actions  

just looked it up

30-9-6 with Demers (.733 win %) and 13-8-4 (0.6 %)

not sure what it means, but i felt like looking it up

by a10dency2ask on Mar 19, 2010 1:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

those numbers seem to indicate that Demers has a slight positive effect, although I have no idea if the difference is statistically significant. Demers is a talented kid with a lot of promise, but not nearly as integral a part of the worcester crew as Couture or McGinn are to the sharks in my opinion. Also, Demers is a good offensive defenseman, but his defense needs a lot of work. So while a nice shot from the point (Seeing Murray work point was uninspiring) sounds tempting, I think that spot could be better utilized by more of a stay-at-home defenseman.

by waive kent huskins on Mar 19, 2010 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

i totally disagree, I think demers has been one of the bright spots of the whole year

by a10dency2ask on Mar 19, 2010 2:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like Demers a lot, but he plays against the easiest competition on the blueline and is prone to turning the puck over in the defensive zone.

When Vlasic comes back, you have four surefire blueliners— Pickles, Boyle, Murray, Blake. You can’t sit any of those guys. DW made a trade for Wallin because he believes in him, so he’s not sitting.

That leaves you with Huskins, Leach, or Demers. With Couture up (like waive kh said, I think he’s probably more important than Demers to the success of the club), your lineup is at the 23 roster max and can’t take on Demers.

He’s great at the point, and the power play is deadly with him. But ultimately, it comes down to Couture & Huskins or Demers. I take the former every time, because as horrible as Huskins’ contract is under San Jose’s current salary structure, he has done pretty well in that 6 spot this season.

"San Jose is where I want to be at the end of the day, and there's an opportunity now to make it there. It is where my heart is." - Jamie McGinn, 2/22/10
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Mar 19, 2010 5:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

That leaves you with Huskins, Leach, or Demers. With Couture up (like waive kh said, I think he’s probably more important than Demers to the success of the club), your lineup is at the 23 roster max and can’t take on Demers.

What the hell are you talking about, that’s only 22 players without Demers. Idiot.

"San Jose is where I want to be at the end of the day, and there's an opportunity now to make it there. It is where my heart is." - Jamie McGinn, 2/22/10
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Mar 19, 2010 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Huskins actually has been pretty ok as of late. At least, I’ve noticed him on occasion making a good play, instead of noticing him for making bad ones. As a 3rd pairing D-man, he should be just fine heading forward. We need Vlasic back (and healthily back) soon.

"I want people to be afraid of how much they love me." ~Michael Scott

by ZeroIndulgence on Mar 19, 2010 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think that spot could be better utilized by more of a stay-at-home defenseman.

Ironically, that would be Kent Huskins ;)

"San Jose is where I want to be at the end of the day, and there's an opportunity now to make it there. It is where my heart is." - Jamie McGinn, 2/22/10
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution

by Mr. Plank on Mar 19, 2010 5:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

nice summation ivano

those extended pk stints hurt. the team looked flat in the 1st after all that time in their own zone. then Luongo just turned it on. the overall effort was encouraging though.

still, this slide suuuuuuucks.

"That was the Manny Factor. And that was not manufactured." - Randy Hahn
"I cannot believe you just said that." - Drew Remenda

by DownRUpLYB on Mar 19, 2010 1:56 AM PDT reply actions  

and another thing

If the Sharks don’t find a way to snap this losing streak soon with Nabby manning the net, I bet he’ll start digging around in his closet for the old fish-head mask.

"That was the Manny Factor. And that was not manufactured." - Randy Hahn
"I cannot believe you just said that." - Drew Remenda

by DownRUpLYB on Mar 19, 2010 2:01 AM PDT reply actions  

Overall

I was more pleased with the effort, if not the outcome; again, though, the aging demon of inconsistency was in full force. The first period started out alright, but after the string of silly-at-best penalties taken, the Sharks lost any steam they could’ve had for the rest of the first frame of play.

Following that, the play to open the second was similarly flat until Clowe’s dynamo sneak-through goal — probably the first solid play by the boys all game, and it definitely got them sparked up for the rest of the second, at least until Johnson’s return goal. In the third they played well again, but not quite well enough — 3min left is too late to be bringing the game back within one unless you’ve got a team with a good, strong history of making the 6-on-5 work — and the Sharks most certainly do not.

All told, there’s a full-60 effort that just isn’t there, and hasn’t been since … well, hasn’t really been there all season, but while they could put up 45-50 solid play minutes, it’s been dragging closer to 30min/game of straight-up hockey play since mid-January or so (certain games, of course, notwithstanding).

by xarexerax on Mar 19, 2010 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Throwing out all relatively smart thinking out the window

It’s coming down to desperation in other teams and the lack of in the Sharks organization. I think of it like your last semester before graduation but you still have to have finals. Sure you can coast in and think, “I can still skip class and get to final’s week and do well there. Probably not study and party then go off my own skill and God given intelligence to do well overall in the class.”

That seems like their mentality. They know they are in. They know if they are in first in the Pacific, they may face Detroit. If they keep faltering, sure they MAY have an easier match up in the bracket but what happened to their study habits that took them through the whole “school” year? Their lack of continuous effort is really discerning, especially with time running out; and less and less time to practice and study.

Note: Sorry for all the school analogies, just have mid-terms coming up and my nose has been in a book for awhile.

by ilooklikeafat16 on Mar 19, 2010 9:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.
Start posting about the Sharks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

P5070331_small
July OT Thread #2

Recent FanPosts

Crosbyjersey_small
Sharkweek starts August 1 at 9pm.
Avatar_small
Setoguchi's Contract
Anaheimsucks_small
FA Defensemen in 2011
6137johnmayerprofile_small
YOUR BRAIN IN SUMMER
P5070331_small
World Cup Final
Small
Yahoo! Sports FAIL
Sharks_clean_small
This could be our team to the deadline
Small
Modano to the Sharks?
Ianyanni_small
Why I hope the NHL doesn't go back to ESPN

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEWARK NJ - JULY 20:  Ilya Kovalchuk of the New Jersey Devils poses for photographs following the media opportunity announcing his contract renewal at the Prudential Center on July 20 2010 in Newark New Jersey.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) +9 updates

With Arbitrator And Hearing Date Set, Is Kovalchuk Contract Mess Set To End?

In this photo taken on Monday, July 19, 2010, Atlanta Thrashers forward Andrew Ladd, formerly of the Stanley Cup champion Chicago Blackhawks, spends his day with the Stanley Cup atop Crown Mountain, British Columbia., north of Vancouver. Ladd, a two-time Stanley Cup champion, was flown by helicopter to the top of Crown Mountain to watch the sunrise. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press,  Mark L. Johnson) +55 updates

NHL Free Agency: Andrew Ladd Avoids Arbitration, Signs With Thrashers

FILE - In this May 7, 2009, file photo, Milan Michalek, front left, of the Czech Republic attacks Swedish goalie Jonas Gustavsson, right, during a quarterfinal at the Ice Hockey World Championship in Bern, Switzerland. Sweden's Carl Gunnarsson is seen behind on left. The Toronto Maple Leafs landed Gustavsson with a one-year contract on Tuesday, July 7, 2009. The 24-year-old netminder, nicknamed "The Monster," was also heavily pursued by Dallas, San Jose and Colorado. (AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus, File) link

Euro Hockey For Dummies: A Primer On How European Hockey Leagues Work

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

N3625599_32203920_2275-1_small Mr. Plank

Editor

Mandalorian_small TCY

Authors

Pattypavslarge_small mymclife

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Moderator

Captain_marleau_small Mr. K.