Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

UFA of The Day: Kyle Wellwood

Kyle Wellwood's season began in the Kontinental Hockey League where he played for Atlant Moscow Oblast. After being released from his contract in January, Wellwood signed a one year contract with the St. Louis Blues. However, according to League stipulations, Wellwood was forced to go through re-entry waivers upon signing the deal.

Which is when Sharks General Manager Doug Wilson struck.

On January 18th it was announced that Wellwood was claimed off waivers by San Jose. The Sharks, who were tenth in the NHL at the time and in the midst of rebounding from a six game losing streak that began to put their playoff hopes in jeopardy, welcomed Wellwood into the fold in order to shore up their scoring depth on their lower lines. With Ryane Clowe, Torrey Mitchell, and Scott Nichol out of the lineup at that point in the year, Wellwood was given an opportunity to receive playing time from the outset of his tenure with the team.

By all accounts he delivered on that opportunity.

Eventually forming a third line with Torrey Mitchell and Joe Pavelski, Wellwood's puck handling and underrated playmaking ability began to produce dividends for a Sharks team that struggled with secondary scoring for the majority of the season. That line, which Fear The Fin began to call the "Hellacopter Line" (a marriage between the term "Helicopter line" which is given to lines with no natural wingers and a nod to San Jose's Northern California roots), produced spectacularly for the Sharks during their time together, allowing Head Coach Todd McLellan to roll three dangerous scoring lines during a game.

Despite all of this however, Wellwood finished the regular season with 5 goals and 8 assists in 35 games-- averaged out to an 82 game season, that production would have earned him roughly 11 goals and 30 points in total. To say that he is a blue-chip forward, or even one that is essential to San Jose's Stanley Cup chances next season, would be disingenuous. Furthermore, his 1 goal 6 assist performance in the postseason was marred by the relative ineffectiveness of the third line during half of the Detroit series and the entirety of the series against Vancouver. Wellwood is not solely to blame for this of course, as Joe Pavelski and Torrey Mitchell also deserve an equal share of criticism for the third line's performance. This is merely to suggest that the value of Kyle Wellwood is just as much an aesthetic quality as it is a quantifiable one-- he makes the third line appear to be more dangerous by setting up scoring chances, but the ability of Wellwood and his linemates to finish those chances is at times lacking.

However, Wellwood's advanced statistics reinforce the narrative that Wellwood is an extremely solid third line winger, one whose assets vastly outweigh his liabilities. He may be an aesthetic treat to watch, but his quantifiable statistics are quite strong when you depart from the boxcar statistics (goals, assists, points) that permeate the media when discussing an individual's worth.

Star-divide

His quality competition numbers at 5v5 are quite low of course, 12th on the team amongst Sharks who played at least 30 games, and his zone starts are nothing to rave about either. 51.3% of Wellwood's draws came in the offensive zone, good for tenth on the team in terms of difficulty (first being Scott Nichol, another pending UFA). However, taking those blemishes into account, one would hope Wellwood would be able to handle his assignments and come out on the positive side of the ledger.

Which he did with aplomb this season.

Consider this-- amongst Sharks forwards who played at least 30 NHL games, Wellwood was sixth on the team in goals per 60 minutes of ice time (0.65), eighth on the team in points per 60 minutes of ice time (1.55), had the best relative CORSI on the team (18.5), was tied for first in shots for on ice per 60 minutes (33.6), first on the team in penalties taken (0.0), fourth on the team in penalties drawn (1.2), and first in +/- per 60 minutes of ice time (an astounding 1.42).

In other words, Wellwood absolutely destroyed his weak competition while he was on the ice. Wellwood posted some of the best numbers on the San Jose Sharks after you account for his ice time, and there's a very easy case to be made that he is a player more than worthy of a contract proposal this offseason. Although I stated above that he is a non-essential player on the Sharks roster, there is no doubt that he is an extremely important tool for the third line to utilize. Losing Wellwood and replacing him with an AHL call up may not kill San Jose, but if bets are being placed, it's easy to put the steadily decreasing value of the American dollar on the loss of Wellwood being one that would do much more harm than good.

Which is where salary cap concerns enter into the fold. If Doug Wilson is looking to upgrade the backend this season, splurging on third line wingers is not in his best interest as it would decrease the amount of cap space available for him to acquire such an upgrade. And with the penalty kill also a pertinent issue, Wellwood's non-existent value in this role does make him slightly less appealing.

However, those slight dents in his resume do little to reduce that the fact that Wellwood is an extremely effective player who deserves intense attention from the organization in the days leading up to July 1st.

Final Words: Wellwood is a hard target to pin down primarily because of his tenure with the team, potential desires as a free agent, salary cap considerations of the team when acquiring the aforementioned pieces that are more essential to the team's success, and market need for a player of his ability.

Wellwood's usefulness as a third liner is beyond debatable in my eyes. There is so much here to like that it's difficult to think of any reason why the Sharks would fail to re-sign him based on performance alone. Looking forward, if the Sharks were to procure a penalty killing forward from this list to play alongside Pavelski and Wellwood on the third line, the Sharks would boast one of the most impressive top nine forward group in the entire NHL next season.

Where the issues begin to crop up is with salary allocation-- Devin Setoguchi, Ian White, a number two defenseman, and at least one penalty killing foward (two if Nichol is released) are high on the list of needs for San Jose this offseason. As we've mentioned before they have the cap space to do it, but it will require many things to fall the right way.

A short term deal for Wellwood, say two years in the $1.5 MM range, is suitable compensation for his services and would help to shore up a third line that has the potential to turn into a very dangerous one indeed. With how well Wellwood played this season however, expect him to receive some attention from other NHL clubs looking to make an impact. The Sharks can't promise (nor can Wellwood reasonably expect) a legitimate shot at top-six minutes, something that Wellwood may be looking for in the forthcoming months.

Wellwood is an excellent third line winger. It is our hope that he begins next season in teal.

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Did we really lose 10 games in a row? I thought it was only 6?

by orneryeric on Jun 14, 2011 3:17 PM PDT reply actions  

nvrmind either it was changed or i read it wrong

by orneryeric on Jun 14, 2011 3:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I'd like to endorse the assessment in this article.

And second the hoped for outcome.

Believing in the Sharks, one photoshop at a time. GO SHARKS!

by Auth0r on Jun 14, 2011 3:30 PM PDT reply actions  

My problem with Wellwood...

is his speed or lack thereof. With a league heading towards a faster playing style, Wellwood seems like a bad fit. However if he sticks around for the same contract (650,000) it’s hard to pass it up. Hard decision for DW indeed.

Daniel Erlich for President
\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\
GO SHARKS!!!

by SharksFanTillDeath on Jun 14, 2011 3:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Welly is a keeper

I wouldve liked to see him shoot more, but a playmaker he is. I would be pleasantly surprised if he wears teal next season..

Hating the Canucks since 2011

by sharkblood99 on Jun 14, 2011 3:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Agreed

He’s destined to become a fan favorite too. Exciting to watch. Fulfills sort of a “Big Joe Jr” playmaker role. Keeps other teams honest on the 3rd line.
What he really needs is Pavs and Mitchel to have better goal scoring seasons. He’s a set up guy, not a trigger man. My guess is that given “Kyle’s Not-So-Excellent Russian Adventure” he will be more than ready to sign for reasonable buck. We’ll see though.

by psantangeli on Jun 14, 2011 4:30 PM PDT reply actions  

"A short term deal for Wellwood, say two years in the $1.5 MM range"

Yeah I agree, I like Welly. He’s not really fast or big or strong, but he’s smart and a really good puck-handler.

by JenLovesHockey on Jun 14, 2011 4:30 PM PDT reply actions  

Last Night...

I had a dream Welly retired…

"You know what they say about people with big skates......big feet" - Randy Hahn

by DrewRemendaRogaine on Jun 14, 2011 4:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Keep Wellwood!

Dudes had streaks of stardom. I know he has had bouts with depression that affect his on-ice performance, but I think he could make a huge impact in the right locker room.

The artist formerly know as *"Sharks_Fan_In_Toronto"*

"Those of you who volunteered to be injected praying mantis DNA, I have some good news and some bad news: bad news is we've postponed these test indefinitely. Good news is we've got a much better test for you: fighting an army of mantis men! Pick up a rifle and follow the yellow line. You'll know when the test starts."

by Evil Stanchion on Jun 14, 2011 4:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Mid Tied Priority

Priority one are Setoguchi and White. Priority two is Defense. Priority three is Penalty Killing. Then come guys like Wellwood. 2 years at $1.5M is very reasonable, but if you have to pay the premium for defense, so be it.

GO SHARKS!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

Changing signatures is for suckers.

What Jay Leach is to the San Jose Shark's Defense, I am to Fear The Fin's Mod Squad.

by ElvisVF101 on Jun 14, 2011 5:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Eh, I’d say Defense should be the top priority (which White could fit under). And, honestly, I think we should use Seto as trade bait to help with priority number 1, but I suspect I’m in the minority there.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Member of FearTheFin's Mod Squad and The Knights Who Say NI-emi...
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Jun 15, 2011 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't necessarily disagree

But we have a VERY narrow window in which to trade Seto. Those kind of artificial deadlines tend to lead to bad deals. Hence things like trading Joe Pavelski get put on the table, and that’s all manner of madness. Also, Seto has been stepping up his game, and he’s part of that future core of the team. We all thought Seto-Pavs-Clowe was the greatest thing since sliced bread, but that line had to be dismantled, and all three eventually found success throughout the lineup. When HTML were struggling, those three all chipped in. Seto’s youth and versatility make me think he’s worth hanging on to.

GO SHARKS!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

Changing signatures is for suckers.

What Jay Leach is to the San Jose Shark's Defense, I am to Fear The Fin's Mod Squad.

by ElvisVF101 on Jun 15, 2011 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I’m just not convinced Seto will be anything more than a 50-60 point scorer who’s a liability on defense and doesn’t play on the PK. You can find those anywhere. I mean, I like Seto, but if we’re going to have to trade for a top d-man, I see Seto as having, by far, the most value of our expendable pieces. I’m of the opinion that Ferriero could fit into the top 6 just fine and put up similar production…and the defense needs the top end help that badly.

If there’s a way to get a top end D man without trading away anyone, I’m all for it. But if someone has to move, I’d still send away Seto…which makes resigning him less of a priority for me than defense.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Member of FearTheFin's Mod Squad and The Knights Who Say NI-emi...
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Jun 15, 2011 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

My biggest concern is that if Seto’s gone, our top 6 becomes Patrick Marleau and the 5 skaters through molasses. Top 9 guys with speed are pretty much Marleau, Seto and Mitchell, which is disappointing because the latter two are really 6/7 and 9 as far as the top 9 go in order.

This team’s been slow at forward since they traded for Heatley and it’s one of the weaknesses of the roster.

by Kazoonole on Jun 15, 2011 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do like Wellwood...

his puck handling is spectacular at times, he know where to pass, and how to get in the passing lanes. However, Welly is a 2nd liner in a 3rd liners body. He’s not physical, and he saw no significant PK time, which is what we need. But does everything an average “Datsyuk” player can do. He will want 2nd line time, and we cant give him that.

I say sign him if they have no better options, I wouldnt be disappointed if we re-sign him, unless there were better options out there.

Flem: "Tim are you enjoying the party?"
Timmy: "That would be a fair assumption."

by BrandonMK50 on Jun 14, 2011 5:09 PM PDT reply actions  

I really don’t think we should offer Wellwood too much over a million dollars. 1.5 mill even seems to be pushing it a bit, and anything over 1.5 mill shouldn’t get much consideration imo.

I don’t think we can afford to have a 3rd line winger that doesn’t kill penalties, doesn’t play physical, and has trouble finishing on his chances; unless we can sign him at an absolute bargain price that will allow us to make improvements elsewhere.

How do Torrey Mitchell’s stats compare to Wellwoods per 60 minutes of ice time? I’m curious because Mitchell seems better suited to a 3rd line role. Michell seems to play well defensively, he can kill penalties, play physical, and he still has that offensive upside to go with his blinding speed.

by Khaaz on Jun 14, 2011 5:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Keep in mind

Plank’s proposed contract is $1.5 over 2 years, meaning it’s a $750K cap hit. I’d say that’s pretty reasonable.

by Chicago Shark on Jun 15, 2011 5:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hmm i think he meant 1.5 mill per year, but yeah 750k would be a great cap hit for Wellwood.

by Khaaz on Jun 15, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not a keeper

Sorry everybody, but Doug is going to look for a tougher faster 3rd line. Not sure if Wellwood has a spot on this team anymore. But he did have some good games, but he just isn’t the player the sharks need on the bottom 2 lines.

Go Big or Go Home

by ChangoT on Jun 14, 2011 10:06 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

If anything, Wellwood needs better linemates.

There were far too many occasions in the playoffs where Wellwood would draw blood from stone to make a play, only to have the recipient misfire or try to be cute with the puck.

The artist formerly know as *"Sharks_Fan_In_Toronto"*

"Those of you who volunteered to be injected praying mantis DNA, I have some good news and some bad news: bad news is we've postponed these test indefinitely. Good news is we've got a much better test for you: fighting an army of mantis men! Pick up a rifle and follow the yellow line. You'll know when the test starts."

by Evil Stanchion on Jun 14, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Since Ivan's not around...
Kyle Wellwood’s season began in the Kontinental Hockey League where he played for Atlant Oscow Moblast.

Should be Moscow Oblast (oblast is Russian for “province”).

The more you know…

Fear The Fin = Man goes into cage... Cage goes into salsa... Shark's in the salsa... Our shark.

by Mr. K. on Jun 14, 2011 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm a fan of Wellwood

I agree that two years for $1.5 is ideal. I really liked the way he could set up plays but I thought he liked to hold onto the puck for a little too long. So if the coaching staff can work on that with him I would want to hold onto him for sure

"Everybody had a part in this. As you can see, our fans love this. And we love them. And bring on the next team." -Joe Thornton

by waive kent huskins on Jun 15, 2011 3:42 AM PDT reply actions  

I really like Wellwood

I love that when he has the puck, he creates space for being such a small guy (pre-all you can eat buffet summers). He reminds me of Jumbo in that fashion. I would love to see the Hellacopter line back next season- as long as they play like they did in the LA series and the last 20 games of the regular season.

Two year deal at $1.5MM per season sounds good to me. I can’t see other clubs offering him more than that.

Waiting for the Cup to come to SJ since 1991...

GO SHARKS!

Find me on Twitter @njahoda

by winthecupsj on Jun 15, 2011 8:50 AM PDT reply actions  

I’ve liked the idea of resigning Wellwood. In my personal rosterbations (not seen on FTF yet), I’d been penciling him in at 1 million even for the season…so two years for a total of 1.5 seems exceedingly reasonable to me. The Sharks need to do their best to keep their scoring depth in tact this offseason…and a dangerous third line is very important to that.

"If you can accept losing, you can't win." ~Vince Lombardi
Member of FearTheFin's Mod Squad and The Knights Who Say NI-emi...
Tweet Tweet.

by ZeroIndulgence on Jun 15, 2011 9:28 AM PDT reply actions  

I'll be the crazy one to say it

Based on performance, both recent and prior, and the structure of the talent in the franchise, I think Kyle Wellwood is a higher priority to resign than Ian White. If Ian White wants too much money, Justin Braun can step right in. There is no other player in the Sharks’s franchise that has the skill set of Kyle Wellwood.

I don’t care that he is small or slow, I care that he creates scoring chances and prevents them on the other side, which he does in spades. I think he would put in 40-50 points if paired with a true spot-up sniper like Heatley or Setoguchi as opposed to Torrey Mitchell. I certainly did not think it was a coincidence that Dany Heatley had his best game in months (and Wellwood his best game of the series) when Heatley was put on Wellwood’s wing.

I’d agree with Zero, $1mil a year for a dominant 3rd line center sounds like an absolute bargain.

by ruben398 on Jun 15, 2011 9:43 AM PDT reply actions  

Bold statement

I don’t think penciling in Justin Braun to Ian White’s spot is wise. White is a #2, #3 or #4, and Braun is a #4, #5 or #6, who could eventually be a #2 or #3. But he needs at least one FULL season.

As for Wellwood’s skillset, yes, it’s unique, but you have to remember that he’s using that skillset against lesser competition. One could argue Logan Couture has Wellwood’s skillset and more. Wellwood didn’t look great on the Power Play, and has a nagging tendency to pass up shots. The organization DOES need more shooters. If the price for Wellwood isn’t right, he is at least mildly expendable as his spot could be filled with someone with a different skillset that might serve the team better (i.e. a true checking center or a penalty killer).

GO SHARKS!

They're not getting this kind of coverage at "Hockey Night In Canada" folks! - Randy Hahn

Changing signatures is for suckers.

What Jay Leach is to the San Jose Shark's Defense, I am to Fear The Fin's Mod Squad.

by ElvisVF101 on Jun 15, 2011 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

I have to agree… I think Braun is a 5th or 6th for now. After a full season, he might be ready for top 4 D minutes but no way is he White-calibur yet.

Waiting for the Cup to come to SJ since 1991...

GO SHARKS!

Find me on Twitter @njahoda

by winthecupsj on Jun 15, 2011 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

White

I agree that D is the most pressing need right now but White is in no way a #2 or 3, the only reason he’s a #4 is because of his offensive game – his defensive game isn’t that good. He averages around 25-30 points while being able to play against the other teams 3rd/4th lines.

If the Sharks can find a better option in FA I’d be fine letting White walk, I just don’t know that they’ll find a better option.

As for Wellwood, as long as he stays on the wing, I’d be OK keeping him for under $1mil per year. I don’t think he’d be too successful being a full time center in the West.

by milanahalek on Jun 15, 2011 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Lets not forget Ian White has never topped 26 points in a season and was traded twice in 2010-2011. He did very well in his 1/3 season with the Sharks, but I don’t even think he is better than Christian Ehrhoff. Even this year, White was essentially the #5 dman. If we resign him and trade no other Dman, he will be the #5 guy again.

That is not to say I don’t think White is a good player, as I think he will likely outplay that with a better D partner (Wallin just left to Sweden), but is he 5 times better than Braun? Because if he signs for $3.5mil, then he will be making 5x as much.

I cant think of anybody that can step into the 3rd line center spot and destroy other team’s 3rd and 4th lines like how Wellwood did this year.

by ruben398 on Jun 15, 2011 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wellwood played on Pavs wing most of the time so it was Pavs that destroyed the other team.

And White did put up 38 points a couple of years ago but I agree, he’s #5 behind Demers, Vlasic, Murray and Boyle.

by milanahalek on Jun 15, 2011 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

 I thought that Welly looked excellent as Shark, but I think that what we do with him depends on what we do with the rest of the team.

If Pavelski/Setoguchi is traded for a legit #2 Defenseman, then I’d be more inclined to go with a more traditional checking third line, because a third line without Pavelski isn’t nearly as good, and I don’t think the Ferriero is capable of playing top 6 minutes with Clowe and Couture. If they are both retained, then I think that signing Welly is a must.

And just one thing, White is not the answer to our problems. He is not a #2, not a #3. He’s a #4 and we have plenty of those. I don’t want him getting more icetime then Demers because of Todd’s stupid seniority thing.

by Kojo on Jun 15, 2011 4:03 PM PDT reply actions  

one of the discussions I enjoyed at SCoC

in the past few weeks was the use of personal pronous when talking about the team you/we root for. When I first read the discussion thread, I thought that the head writer of SCoC was being too much of a stickler for not liking to say “us” or “we” when talking about the Bruins (in their case, the Sharks in ours), but now, I’ve sort of warmed to his position. There is an accurate sound to his position that I kinda like. Don’t get me wrong, fans are a part of the phenomenon that makes up a “team”, loosely defined, and we, the fans, are indirectly a part of the organization, I would think, but yeah… the thought just occured to me when reading about the trade decisions “we” need to make… :] although I completely understand the discussion that’s happening, and believe me, I’ve done my share of identifying with the Sharks. I’m probably going to continue to do it on some level, but it won’t be as simplistic, I think. The point is largely a semantical one.

Anyways, I’m just having a meta-moment, of sorts. :p Keep discussing.

by anduriliam on Jun 16, 2011 9:05 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Official SB Nation blog of the San Jose Sharks.

Managing Editor

Bender-smoking_small The Neutral

Authors

Pavs2_small idunno723

Poseypavelski_small mymclife

Shark_trek_small jwizzle241

Ovechkin-russia-080518-584_small Ivano M

Xbox360hockey_small Jon Allred

Moderators

2296_s_small Nael M.

Mikeyicon_small ElvisVF101

Z_small ZeroIndulgence

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady