Craig Anderson strikes again as the Sharks fall 4-1 to the Senators
Craig Anderson in the building.
You know how this one goes.
The Sharks piled on 37 shots tonight to outshoot the Senators 37-21, but some quality play in Ottawa's net, timely goals from their lineup, and a rather dysfunctional attack from San Jose in the final forty minutes of the game would hand the Sharks their third loss of January.
Brad Winchester would score the Sharks lone goal, with Colin Greening (x2), Erik Karlsson, and Kyle Turris scoring for the Senators. And of course the wily Anderson, who made a name for himself amongst Sharks fans with his playoff series with Colorado in 2010, made 36 saves and was excellent throughout the night.
Following the game Sharks Head Coach Todd McLellan spoke about the shot versus scoring chances differential, explaining he liked the offensive effort from his club but needed to see more out of the defensive end of the ice in order for them to succeed.
"There was probably four or five really good chances that Anderson made some saves. Dan Boyle's shot in the slot, and a few rebounds where they got pads or blockers out on it," McLellan said. "The true really good scoring chances were about four or five. After that, the puck got to the net a lot, there were some long rebounds that they did a good job of coralling us or getting underneath our sticks that we couldn't get to."
"It may sound strange but I thought offensively we created enough opportunities to win the game. But defensively we gave up enough to lose it. And that's what cost us."
San Jose got off to a quick lead in a dominating first period effort that saw them outshoot the Senators 16-7 and generate some quality scoring opportunities. Dan Boyle and Andrew Desjardins paired up to connect with the aforementioned Winchester, who notched his sixth goal of the campaign only 3:10 into the first period.
The fourth line has been a breathe of fresh air compared to last season where the Sharks had difficulty amassing a solid fourth line that Sharks Head Coach Todd McLellan could rely on. And while their play on the ice hasn't necessarily reflected in their ice time numbers, as the fourth line trails last year's group by about a shift and a half of ice time per game, that sort of reliability will be important down the stretch.
Equally important will be the Sharks power play, which hasn't had the production many of us expected they would have after adding Brent Burns in the offseason. San Jose's struggles with the man advantage have been rather staggering in the past month and a half-- according to Kevin Kurz of CSN's Sharks Talk the Sharks have gone 10 for 82 since November 23rd, good for a 12.2% success rate.
Puttering to be certain, and something Logan Couture addressed in his post game talk with the media as one reason as to why the Sharks couldn't work their way back into the game.
"We just didn't forecheck, weren't hard enough on pucks. The power play wasn't good at creating chances," Couture said. "They got a power play there and scored, and we didn't. It's a game we didn't play well enough to win."
But before the power play could play a role in this game the Senators would have to come back from an early 1-0 deficit. They would do it in workmanlike fashion, with Kyle Turris delivering the first salvo against Niemi halfway through the first period. After a loose puck got kicked out into the low slot, San Jose would collapse to the net fairly well but fail to locate a white jersey and put a body on the player. Turris would jump on the loose puck and send it to the net where it beat Niemi up high to tie the game at one.
Despite the 1-1 score heading into intermission San Jose had a pretty good first period under their belts in which they outshot Ottawa 16-7. That failed to carry over into the ensuing second period however, as the Senators would fight back to take control of the game.
After a Sharks turnover in the offensive zone resulted in a 3v2 opportunity going the other way Ottawa would take a lead they wouldn't surrender. Kyle Turris carried the puck into the zone before locating defenseman Erik Karlsson high in the slot with a quick and soft feed. Karlsson would make it count as he has done many times this season, ripping a wrister that went past Niemi to the blocker side and into the net. It was a heady play by the 21 year old-- a lot of players will drive hard to the net in that situation, removing themselves as a passing option with the near-side defenseman covering taking that away, but credit Karlsson for pulling up and getting his stick into shooting position where Turris could lay a soft one onto his tape.
I'm no history buff, but it would seem to me that a player with Swedish descent named Karlsson has a decent chance at the Norris trophy considering his Norse heritage.
Anybody viking that joke?
(crickets)
Well alright then. Moving on.
A few failed Sharks power plays after Turris' goal would hurt the Sharks, as Ottawa grabbed their second goal of the period after Jamie McGinn went to the box for kneeing at the 14:28 mark of the second period. Ottawa wouldn't waste any time on the man advantage, scoring a mere 22 seconds into the power play. After picking up a loose puck along the sideboards, Colin Greening would circle around to the circle, use Justin Braun as a screen, and fire a wrist shot that snuck up on Niemi to beat him short side.
The third period was equally disappointing for San Jose, as San Jose would have trouble getting anything going against a dialed in Anderson and an Ottawa defense that did a good job of limiting second chances. Without an ability to locate the loose puck and follow up on a rebound chance, Anderson would make the initial save only to see his team clear the zone and get the puck up the ice.
Greening would make it 4-1 at the 9:34 mark after cutting to the middle and showing off some nice hands to rip a laser that went underneath Niemi's glove. It was one Niemi would like to have back as it effectively put the Sharks out of the game.
A pair of late penalties to Joe Pavelski with under eight minutes remaining would make any hope of a comeback obsolete.
San Jose will look to get back on track this Saturday with an afternoon matchup against the Vancouver Canucks at Rogers Arena. With Ryane Clowe and Martin Havlat on the injured list, and the Sharks possibly without Tommy Wingels (who left the game in the third period), San Jose's lineup will be tested mightily in their attempts to head into the All-Star break with momentum.
As Logan Couture said following the game however, this team isn't looking for excuses.
They're looking for wins and better results from the top.
"We need to be better. I mean, excuses, you can use as many excuses as you want. Guys are hurt around the League. Teams are missing a couple top six forwards on almost every team," Couture said. "Guys need to step up. The top six forwards need to be better. We need offense, we're counted on to score goals and keep pucks out of our net."
"That's something we haven't done lately. We need to start turning it around."
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Team was flat in the last 40
Probably a bit awkward for the people you were sitting next to as well.
"The world is a comedy to those that think; a tragedy to those that feel." - Horace Walpole
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Jan 19, 2012 11:40 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions
Fairly silent throughout with the occasional boos
Except for this one guy behind us who would not stop talking trash about every misuse of the puck. I get it buddy, the Sharks are sucking.
WAR Chris Lytle!
by AwkwardBoner on Jan 20, 2012 12:12 AM PST up reply actions
Anderson was good, yes, but it was...
an equal case of San Jose’s ineffectual offense and non-physical soft battling for the puck striking again as well – seriously Clowe better get better soon, and the team better show more ambition. Taking a whole bunch of shots and crossing your fingers is not the same as getting dirty and fighting for a hard-earned goal or even assist for that matter.
This team may be good at scoring one or two goals per game and somehow getting points out of a hat by way of excruciatingly close games with teams like Calgary or Columbus, but let’s see a rebound victory against a team like Vancouver (very soon upcoming) with a similar effort – not bloody likely. Unless of course the Canucks have an off-day and hit the post a few times and Niemi comes up big, then I suppose a 1 – 0 outcome (probably a shootout win at that) is possible, but yeah, unlikely.
Then again how is a team going to contend with the upper-echelon of the NHL when it may just not be good enough, I suppose it in that case we are witnessing their best efforts somehow, and if it that is the real case, then hey, I am sorry for expecting too much, like a contending franchise after all of these miserably promising years that have already gone to waste. This team is in some trouble, but that’s all too obvious.
We have been swimming these wintry depths for years, succeeding at survival by feeding only upon perennial minnows of sustenance... will we ever get to sink our great white teeth into this so-called Stanely's feast, so that we may finally slay our insatiable hunger in frenzied celebration?
I think one of
main problems is what you said about how the Sharks just aren’t aggressive enough defensively. They don’t or haven’t pushed faster, better puck moving teams like chi and ott off their game. Almost like they let them play or play them at their rhythm. They’re not gonna stand a chance unless they start using a much more physical type of game to their advantage. Instead they play it safe I guess by playing zone and trying to disrupt play with their sticks, then get caught puck watching and eventually beat.
"Not to sound like a complete homer but, that was a bad call." -Drew Remenda
"You tee em up and I'll knock them out." -Randy Hahn
by raphelo on Jan 20, 2012 4:54 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
This happened last season....
…for a while, the goals just stopped coming. This season the Sharks happen to still be winning! The team will get healthier and in all probability luckier. Moves will be made and the roster strengthened. Yes, the past couple of weeks have seen the Sharks play some pretty ugly hockey but barring something crazy, it’s unlikely that they’ll continue this trend. There’s just too much talent on this team.
After the 1st period...
They were very impressive – they have completely bought into their system and play it almost to perfection. They’re actually pretty fun to watch.
What Worries me Most
Is that Doug needs to start making moves now, because once Feb starts the Sharks spend most of their time visiting other cities. Todd is going to have to spread out starts with Griess and Niemi, because he can’t expect Niemi to play too much down the stretch. Also its just my opinion but since the Sharks line up is lacking depth and the scoring is counted on the TOP six only could be too much for them to handle. Hell with Havlat being missing from the whole year and Clowe hurt could be more added pressure which hurts the Sharks
in the long run.
Doug really needs to address this teams lack of depth, because I can’t take more of watching Ferriero, Wingles, Mitchell on the team.
Go Big or Go Home
by ChangoT on Jan 20, 2012 12:39 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Mitchell...
Has been one of the best players on the team during this drought and is certainly a top 9 player on most any team.
Disagree
Mitchell is fast, hustles and is developing into a good/reliable 3rd line guy. His Hits are up this year and his goals/assists are on par with last years #‘s. Staying healthy has been his biggest issue and so far so good. Not sure what you’re expecting from Ferriero? This is really his first year with the big club and for a smallish guy he plays hard. I’ll take his 5 goals this year in 18 games. Havlat (sorry to pick on him) had 2 goals in 26 games and Handzus has 3 goals in 43 games. Guess who’s making more money? Mitchell & Ferriero = $1.9 million. The other guys are sucking down $7.5 million. So perhaps you’re picking on the wrong guys?
Ferriero
Last night he just could not get the puck on his stick. Whiffed shots, un-corralled passes and lost pucks on the boards. I am rooting for him, but I did not think he played well last night. Mitchell has definitely improved since being sat out and I have not been disappointed by Wingels.
He's not great
But he makes $600k this year and has as many goals as Havlat and Handzus combined. I’m guessing he’s the best we have available? At least in DW & Coach’s eyes. I’d like Andrew Murray to play every night and if you have to move him up to the third line once in a while when other guys are hurt, do it.
This ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If you mention ending your life, or show signs of self-harm, I will take you seriously!
"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey. Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)
"He doesn't miss many of those!" --Randy Hahn
"Something's gotta give." --Drew Remenda
Special Teams
Now I don’t want to harp on one particular aspect as being to blame for the lackluster past few weeks of play but I do want to address what has been a season long issue that has gone seemingly unchecked by the coaching staff. Both the power-play and penalty kill are downright ugly. If you have followed the Sharks for any length of time, you will find the former to be particularly disturbing.
The Sharks powerplay this year has been incredibly frustrating to watch after the moves made specifically to add dynamic scoring. They run a fairly basic setup, trying to move the puck from behind the net to create scoring chances on both shots from the point and rebounds from those shots. There is, however, a problem with the way they have been executing it all season long: A serious lack of movement.
Theoretically, when the puck gets moved behind the net whomever is back there controls the flow of the offense and can pick their spots. When the entire offense stands complacently in their assigned spots this leads to flow stagnating and is easily defended through aggressive attacking of the puck-holder. Since the defense can send the man closest to the puck after the puck-holder while still keeping coverage on the statuesque players around the goal, more often then not you see the defender either strip the puck or cause enough disruption as to cause what should be an easy pass to exit the zone effectively making the offense clear itself. Another problem with the lack of movement is that it clogs shooting lanes and makes it ridiculously easy for the defense to control rebounds since they know exactly where everyone is on the ice. When Randy made the comment tonight that the Senators seemed to be getting all the bounces on the rebounds it was due to positioning and planning not dumb luck.
It has been an issue all season and I am finding the lack of any changes troubling. Every team we have played in the last month or so has executed the same penalty killing schematic to basically shut down a power-play that has to have very little confidence at the moment.
As for the penalty kill, I think most would agree that the Sharks should take a lesson from what teams have been doing against them. Watching defenders drift around the circles like they are just learning to skate, a lifeless stick planted firmly in one place, while offensive players creatively skate around the boards to open up screened shots from the goal mouth has me completely baffled. The coaches have to be seeing this. I don’t know if they feel that the team lacks the speed to be aggressive on the puck or that they don’t have faith in the players being positionally responsible but something has caused them to dumb it down to ineffectual. As it stands, no amount of player shifting will fix an already flawed design.
Special Teams
McLellan made an adjustment to the PK about 15 games ago, since then, it’s been very good. Last night was the 5th PP goal they’ve given up since Dec. 17th (been shorthanded 38 times) The PP goal they gave up last night is one Niemi (even though Neil bumped him and threw his balance off for a second) needs to stop…the PK really didn’t do anything wrong.
The PP on the other hand is downright bad. McLellan mentioned on a radio interview the other day that the PP still runs through Joe Thornton, which is should, but that he hasn’t been good enough, that he’s way too predictable. Thornton has had a few very good games this season but for the most part he’s been a huge disappointment to me. He’s still trying to slow the game down to the place that he likes but other teams just don’t ‘fear’ him anymore and play at such a quick pace they’ve taken away all time and space from him.
On top of that,right now, if the 1st PP unit doesn’t score that’s it. They were running a 2nd unit of Handzus, Wingels, Ferriero…I’m sorry but that just horrible! That’s what happens when you’re missing 2 top 6 forwards.
Do you think the Sharks are too predictable with their PP and the passing? In other words, should they be more aggresive and take more chances to get the desired result? With Burns and Boyle, Thornton and Marleau with Pavelski it’s amazing we’re not better on the PP.
I think
That Joe Thornton is way too predictable and the offense, at least on the PP, runs through him…the PP is very static. I honestly don’t think the way the PP looks is the way McLellan wants them to execute. Getting a guy like Thornton to change his game is really, really hard.
But, McLellan got him to play very good two way hockey, hopefully he can JT to adapt his game again.
Game 44
Pathetic.
Game 44 this season: loss 1-4 vs Ott (1-day-off-game)
Game 44 last season: loss 2-4 vs Tor
at 44 games this season: 26-13-5 / 57 pts, 126 GF – 104 GA
at 44 games last season: 21-18-5 / 47 pts, 121 GF – 122 GA
Next 10 games, games 45-54 last season: 8-1-1
Going: L, W, W, SOW, W, SOL, W, W, W, W
Sharks seem to struggle mostly in 1-day-off-games, and really need to get going on those, as they are the majority of scheduled games in a season. They have the lowest points per game in them this season, compared to the last 3 seasons.
Sharks drop to 2nd in the West in the Potential Points Standings.
These, and the rest of the January Sharkstistics have been updated.
Sharks, learn how to pass, quickly and accurately. I really hate to say this, but Vanc has a pretty good passing game (their keep-away game) that other teams could learn from. And,um, skor moar gpalz!
If you mention ending your life, or show signs of self-harm, I will take you seriously!
"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey. Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)
"He doesn't miss many of those!" --Randy Hahn
"Something's gotta give." --Drew Remenda
Sharks goals
At this time last year, how many goals did SJ have?
I keep hearing that “this is the best offensive team on paper that the Sharks have ever had”.
Yet the stats tell another story.
Let’s start with the Captain, the leader of the team, Joe Thornton: Reluctant to shoot on the PP or at any other time, even though the offense is struggling mightily. Reluctant to forecheck and take the body even though he’s 230 lbs. He looks slower this year than last and his passing has been predictable and dangerous with many turnovers on low % passes.
Antti Niemi: Ouch! 4 goals on 17 shots with a 81% save percentage last night. I’d rather see Greiss or Nitty get a chance right now.
Major flaws: Slow skating team, poor forechecking (other than Clowe and Mitchell) and a bad PP and PK all year long.
If this team goes beyond the second round of the playoffs this year I will be amazed!
Goals
If you read the post you responded to…
at 44 games this season: 26-13-5 / 57 pts, 126 GF – 104 GA
at 44 games last season: 21-18-5 / 47 pts, 121 GF – 122 GA
They’re better on both sides of the ice this year.
To be sure
They are better defensively and that’s why the record and points standing are both better than last year. One stat that I found concerning is that Jumbo only has 1 PP goal this year in 44 games. Last year he finished the year with 9 PP goals. His assists are up from last year but his goal production is slightly down. I do wish he’d shoot more, only one shot last night. If Niemi has been better and if we had gotten another goal or two, which could have easily happened, it might have been a great game. Luckily I don’t think Dallas or LA are better than us this year, so we could still wind up with the 3 seed in the first round of the playoffs. Can’t wait for Clowe to get back, boy do we need him on the boards and in front of the net. I like what I’ve seen out of Mitchell and Ferriero, lot’s of hits and good scoring chances. Niemi will bounce back, he always does. Vancouver would be a nice bounce back game, but let’s be realistic. We’re missing 2 of our top 6 guys, so expectations need to be scaled back a little.
Stats can be misleading
There’s no mention of home vs away games, I’d like to see how they compare at the end of this major road trip.
Hahaha
Leslie Knope: "...but it has a lot of heart."
April Ludgate: "That's what people always say when something sucks."
Fear The Fin's Fifth-String Moderator !!
So true
Like shots on goal. We outshot them almost 2 to 1, but who had more/better scoring chances and who was the better netminder? We are better than last year though by points, wins and goals both for and against.
Stats are for losers.
The artist formerly know as *"Sharks_Fan_In_Toronto"*
Official song of the Sharks' late 2nd period:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3tcQI5EEiA
by Evil Stanchion on Jan 20, 2012 11:10 AM PST up reply actions
Man, what a bad game...
The Sharks better show up big time against the Canucks.
And for the love god, work on that PP! There is no excuse for our PP not being absolutely dominant with the lineup that we have. I mean we have TWO all star offensive defensemen playing the points on the same unit! UGHH
I kind of just wanna close my eyes and wait for the playoffs.
Anyone else notice that Couture was a -3 last night? He was also a -1 against Calgary. I didn’t really notice him doing anything that big when he was around, but it seems like without Clowe, the 2nd line is declining. Mind you, the second line has decayed into just Couture and 2 other substitutes, but still.
by JBarrow on Jan 20, 2012 6:15 AM PST via mobile reply actions
Reading these comments
It’s almost as if the Sharks don’t have twice as many victories as they do losses.
I thought we were in last place?
Fire everyone and blow up the team! Oh wait, we’re in first place in the Pacific with 4 games in hand over LA and in third place in the Western Conference. That’s just not good enough! If only we were playing like Buffalo or Montreal, oh wait…
by douchebags on Jan 20, 2012 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Of course this comment is funny and all, but overall....
we make too many excuses for the Sharks because we want to see them win in the playoffs….
Sure, during the regular season these losses are okay because they always happen, but in the playoffs, this kind of garbage finish is completely unacceptable. Even if you lose, you need to go out after playing your heart out like the Sharks did in Game 5 vs. Vancouver.
Go Sharks!
what the hell?
did we seriously lose 4-1to ottawa the same night the wild lost 4-1 to the LEAFS?
This is unacceptable.
Waffles, Digimon, SETOGUCHI
STALOCK GET A ROBOT LEG OR SOMETHING AND COME BACK~WE NEED SOME LOCK STOCK STALOCK HERE!!
Like manga, sci fi, webcomics, and Metaphorical Bazookas? Check out http://firework.the-comic.org!
by YeahTommyB4ZGermansGetThere on Jan 20, 2012 11:02 AM PST reply actions
And...
The Rangers lost 4 to 1 at home to Pittsburgh, and The Flyers lost 4 to 1 to the Islanders at home (ouch!) and Boston beat NJ 4 to 1 and Winnipeg beat Buffalo 4 to 1.
CONSPIRACY!!!
Guess it’s time to go to Detroit. Need some tin foil.
"Logan Couture is a dirty, filthy man. Tell all your friends" - Mr. Plank
Welcome to the NHL, Atlanta Thrashers of Winnipeg.
Pavelski and Offensive Mentality
Needs to step it up. With two of our top 6 out, he’s cooled off way too much since the beginning of the season. He wasn’t anywhere near the puck last night, and seemed to be several steps behind the should-be forecheck. The two penalties in a row didn’t help either.
The Big Pavelski is awesome, but in all honestly, if I have to pick, I’d rather have him than Clowe on the trade block (please have none of them on there). Plus you could get more for him in return as opposed to Clowe. These last few games have really shown Clowe’s importance to this teams forecheck and possession of the puck in the offensive zone.
One more thing, I absolutely can’t stand this whole notion put forth by the coaching staff for hockey games to be ‘a race to three’. WTF. That kind of mentality is definitely a factor in our lack of scoring. Score as many goals as you can. The game is not a race to three, I have no idea who got that idea (I hope TMac didn’t bc he’s a great coach). Look at all the Eastern Conference teams scoring all those goals. Imagine if one of their coaches came up in an interview with that media and said that their game is ‘a race to three’.
"It was good to get banged and give a few bangs." - Jonathan Cheechoo
Are you suggesting that the Sharks could score more if they wanted to?
by Briceratops on Jan 20, 2012 11:39 AM PST up reply actions
Probably not, who knows
But to psychologically and mentally prepare every skater that 3 is the ‘golden number’ for goals doesn’t do anything to help.
"It was good to get banged and give a few bangs." - Jonathan Cheechoo
The Sharks lead the league in shots per game and are one of better puck possession and chancing teams. I don’t think the lack of scoring is because TMAC is telling them that the team that reaches three goals first will win most games.
by Briceratops on Jan 20, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions
Race to 3
I think that the race to 3 is probably preached by most teams. There are 7 teams that average over 3 goals per game…scoring is down (again) this year.
I don’t think anyone on the team believes that McLellan is telling them ‘get 3 goals and you’re golden’…it’s on both ends of the ice, scoring 3 and keeping 3 outta your own net is what he’s getting at.
When can we say that the CBA rules didn't work?
They were supposed to usher in a new offensive era and it’s not really happening.
A random thing.
Anaheim recalled former Sharks failure Mark Bell… It’ll be his first NHL play in over 4 years.
The artist formerly know as *"Sharks_Fan_In_Toronto"*
Official song of the Sharks' late 2nd period:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3tcQI5EEiA
The bad news: the Sharks are struggling to score goals
The good news: they’re the San Jose Sharks
"Logan Couture is a dirty, filthy man. Tell all your friends" - Mr. Plank
Welcome to the NHL, Atlanta Thrashers of Winnipeg.
The good news: they’re the San Jose Sharks
The bad news: We’re San Jose Sharks fans so we don’t realize that they’re a completely normal team because we don’t observe and analyze any other team this in-depth so we think the Sharks are terrible.
Leslie Knope: "...but it has a lot of heart."
April Ludgate: "That's what people always say when something sucks."
Fear The Fin's Fifth-String Moderator !!
I'm generalizing Sharks fans
so obviously not talking about myself, I’m perfect.
Leslie Knope: "...but it has a lot of heart."
April Ludgate: "That's what people always say when something sucks."
Fear The Fin's Fifth-String Moderator !!
There are Sharks fans?
I thought we only had inverse fans.
The artist formerly know as *"Sharks_Fan_In_Toronto"*
Official song of the Sharks' late 2nd period:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3tcQI5EEiA
by Evil Stanchion on Jan 20, 2012 3:50 PM PST up reply actions

by 



























