Scoring Chances: Game 48 v. Columbus
It's difficult to evaluate the Sharks' performance last night based on scoring chances alone. After Joe Thornton staked the team to a 2-0 lead midway through the first period, score effects predictably took hold as the Sharks were reasonably content to sit back and allow Columbus to control possession for an extended period. That lead to San Jose being outchanced by the Jackets 7-3 in the middle frame although it was of little consequence as the Sharks added two more goals for an overwhelming advantage on the scoreboard.
Columbus really didn't play that poor of a game prior to the third period but Steve Mason was full value for what's now an abysmal .880 SV% on the season. Sadly for Jackets fans, if Mason had even mirrored Curtis Sanford's extremely average .912 SV% this year, Columbus would have allowed 38 fewer goals and likely have the playoffs, rather than Nail Yakupov, in their sights. The Sharks dominated the third although at that point, realistically, neither team had much to play for which is exactly the kind of atmosphere that lends itself to Dan Boyle dropping the gloves with Derick Brassard.
Best EV Forward: Patrick Marleau (+5)
Worst EV Forward: Brad Winchester (-6)
Best EV Defenseman: Dan Boyle (+4)
Worst EV Defenseman: Douglas Murray (-4)
| Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
| 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 16 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | Period | Time | Note | SJS | Opponent | |||||||||||
| CBJ | 1 | 16:48 | Johansen | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 31 | 43 | 1 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 58 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 1 | 15:48 | Umberger | 3 | 12 | 31 | 39 | 78 | 88 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 15:33 | Couture | 12 | 22 | 31 | 39 | 44 | 78 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 13:06 | Pavelski | 8 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 44 | 69 | 1 | 22 | 23 | 50 | 51 | 61 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 12:07 | Goal - Marleau | 5 | 12 | 31 | 39 | 61 | 78 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 10:19 | Thornton | 8 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 44 | 69 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 50 | 51 | 61 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 10:17 | Goal - Thornton | 8 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 44 | 69 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 50 | 51 | 61 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 1 | 8:21 | Vermette | 3 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 69 | 88 | 1 | 22 | 23 | 50 | 51 | 61 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 1 | 8:20 | Nash | 3 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 69 | 88 | 1 | 22 | 23 | 50 | 51 | 61 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 1 | 7:51 | Russell | 5 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 61 | 64 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 58 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 1 | 0:02 | Boyle | 8 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 88 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 16:54 | Pahlsson | 2 | 3 | 10 | 31 | 43 | 88 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 58 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 14:09 | Dorsett | 2 | 10 | 22 | 31 | 43 | 44 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 18 | 26 | 58 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 14:08 | Dorsett | 2 | 10 | 22 | 31 | 43 | 44 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 18 | 26 | 58 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 2 | 12:25 | Boyle | 12 | 22 | 31 | 43 | 44 | 78 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 50 | 58 | 61 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 10:17 | Dorsett | 3 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 64 | 88 | 1 | 15 | 23 | 25 | 26 | 51 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 9:11 | Nash | 12 | 22 | 31 | 39 | 44 | 78 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 50 | 61 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 2 | 3:44 | Pavelski | 5 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 61 | 69 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 2 | 3:05 | Goal - McGinn | 3 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 64 | 88 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 23 | 25 | 26 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 2:03 | Johansen | 2 | 5 | 10 | 31 | 43 | 61 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 2 | 1:37 | Umberger | 8 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 44 | 69 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 18:58 | Couture | 3 | 12 | 31 | 39 | 78 | 88 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 18:08 | McGinn | 5 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 61 | 64 | 1 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 50 | 58 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 18:07 | Handzus | 5 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 61 | 64 | 1 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 50 | 58 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 18:06 | Goal - Handzus | 5 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 61 | 64 | 1 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 50 | 58 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 3 | 17:03 | Lebda PP | 3 | 12 | 17 | 31 | 88 | 1 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 23 | 51 | 4v5 | |
| CBJ | 3 | 14:57 | Gillies | 3 | 10 | 31 | 43 | 78 | 88 | 1 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 24 | 58 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 9:06 | Goal - Thornton | 3 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 69 | 88 | 1 | 19 | 22 | 23 | 50 | 51 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 7:17 | Ferriero | 12 | 22 | 31 | 39 | 44 | 78 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 24 | 40 | 5v5 |
| SJS | 3 | 4:24 | Thornton | 8 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 31 | 44 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 18 | 61 | 5v5 |
| CBJ | 3 | 0:52 | MacKenzie SH | 2 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 64 | 88 | 1 | 23 | 24 | 58 | 61 | 5v4 | |
| # | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
| 2 | J. VANDERMEER | 11:05 | 0 | 5 | 0:15 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | D. MURRAY | 18:48 | 3 | 7 | 1:45 | 0 | 0 | 0:50 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | C. WHITE | 17:15 | 5 | 3 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:22 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | J. PAVELSKI | 14:13 | 7 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | B. WINCHESTER | 12:12 | 0 | 6 | 1:45 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | P. MARLEAU | 13:05 | 7 | 2 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0:50 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | T. MITCHELL | 12:40 | 4 | 2 | 0:18 | 0 | 1 | 0:50 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | J. THORNTON | 13:23 | 7 | 3 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0:22 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | D. BOYLE | 17:41 | 8 | 4 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0:48 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | M. HANDZUS | 14:09 | 4 | 2 | 1:13 | 0 | 1 | 0:28 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | A. NIEMI | 52:52 | 16 | 13 | 5:08 | 0 | 1 | 2:00 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | L. COUTURE | 13:20 | 4 | 2 | 2:10 | 0 | 0 | 0:42 | 0 | 0 |
| 43 | J. MCCARTHY | 12:55 | 1 | 6 | 0:31 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | M. VLASIC | 17:05 | 7 | 4 | 2:43 | 0 | 0 | 0:48 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 | J. BRAUN | 16:30 | 5 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:22 | 0 | 0 |
| 64 | J. MCGINN | 14:36 | 4 | 2 | 1:13 | 0 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 69 | A. DESJARDINS | 14:09 | 5 | 3 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:48 | 0 | 0 |
| 78 | B. FERRIERO | 13:23 | 5 | 3 | 2:12 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
| 88 | B. BURNS | 17:33 | 4 | 6 | 1:13 | 0 | 1 | 0:50 | 0 | 1 |
Head-to-head scoring chances:
Fourth line really struggled tonight. Wouldn't be surprised if this is the last we see of the Jim Vandermeer as a forward experiment. Murray and Brent Burns had some trouble handling the Rick Nash line in their relatively brief time against them while up front the Thornton line won their matchup against that unit.
More stats from the game: Corsi/Fenwick, Shift Charts, H2H Ice Time, Zonestarts, Play-By-Play, Box Score
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I always thought the + / - on players
was due to if they were on the ice for a goal or a goal against. But if Winchester had a -6, then I must have that completely wrong. Is it shots against / for while on the ice?
by Dermal Denticles on Feb 1, 2012 10:25 AM PST reply actions
Sorry
I should probably be clearer – whenever I’m referring to +/- in a scoring chance post it’s always Sharks chances a player was on the ice for at even strength minus opponent chances that player was on the ice for at even strength .
Also I should have mentioned that 4 of the Sharks’ 6 goals were off rebound opportunities (5 of their last 7 dating back to the Ferriero goal against the Flames). Generating more of those would be optimal.
Yup. Thornton has a hard shot that he should use more to break up the rhythm of the opponent’s defense. He’ll always be a pass-first player, but if he always is looking to pass, he’s easier to defend. Putting a hard shot on net for a rebound should always be an option, but especially so when our AHL guys are on his wing.
Picklesnakebit since 2011.
@shampeon
I didn't realize the scoring chances were that close
Nice change to take a lot of those chances and turn them into goals.
If you mention ending your life, or show signs of self-harm, I will take you seriously!
"Take a deep breath sometimes, a break, and play some hockey. Hockey is a great way to take a pause from day-to-day hard work." -- Lt Gen. D.H. Huntoon Jr. (paraphrased)
"He doesn't miss many of those!" --Randy Hahn
"Something's gotta give." --Drew Remenda (mumbled under breath on the air)

by 





























