By the numbers: Game 69 vs. Chicago

Scoring Chances

Team	Period	Time	Note	Home						Away						State
Home	1	17:46	Goodrow from Smith, save	20	21	31	52	88	89	7	11	16	44	50	65	5v5
Home	1	17:01	Pavelski from Thornton, save	4	8	19	31	41	68	4	27	29	50	81	91	5v5
Home	1	16:56	Karlsson from Mueller rebound, miss	4	8	19	31	41	68	4	27	29	50	81	91	5v5
Away	1	13:59	Sharp from Vermette, save	31	44	50	57	61	83	7	10	27	50	80	86	5v5
Away	1	13:58	Sharp, goal	31	44	50	57	61	83	7	10	27	50	80	86	5v5
Home	1	10:32	Karlsson from Pavelski, save	8	19	31	44	61	68	2	19	23	32	50	81	5v5
Home	1	3:13	Irwin from Karlsson, save	8	19	31	52	68	88	7	11	27	50	65	80	5v5
Home	1	3:12	Karlsson from Irwin rebound, goal	8	19	31	52	68	88	7	11	27	50	65	80	5v5
Away	1	2:58	Teravainen, save	4	31	41	48	50	57	2	4	20	50	80	86	5v5
Home	2	18:30	Marleau, save (5v4 PP)	8	12	19	31	39	88	2	4	16	20	50		5v4
Home	2	18:29	Marleau, save (5v4 PP)	8	12	19	31	39	88	2	4	16	20	50		5v4
Away	2	18:10	Toews, save (4v5 PK)	8	12	19	31	39	88	2	4	19	50	81		5v4
Away	2	17:52	Hossa from Seabrook, save (4v5 PK)	8	12	31	50	57	88	7	16	27	50	81		5v4
Home	2	17:45	Tierney from Wingels, save (5v4 PP)	8	12	31	50	57	88	7	16	20	27	50		5v4
Home	2	15:56	Karlsson from Dillon, save	4	21	31	41	68	83	10	32	44	50	80	86	5v5
Home	2	14:25	Tierney from Mueller, save	4	31	41	48	50	57	7	10	29	44	50	91	5v5
Away	2	13:35	Shaw from Desjardins, save	4	31	41	48	50	89	4	11	16	27	65	91	5v5
Away	2	11:32	Toews from Keith, miss (5v4 PP)	8	12	31	44	61		2	19	20	50	65	81	4v5
Away	2	11:16	Keith from Hossa, goal (5v4 PP)	8	12	31	44	61		2	19	20	50	65	81	4v5
Home	2	6:30	Marleau, save	12	31	39	44	61	83	2	19	23	32	50	81	5v5
Home	2	5:32	Smith from Irwin, save	21	31	52	68	88	89	7	10	29	44	50	91	5v5
Away	3	18:40	Saad from Teravainen, goal	4	8	19	31	41	68	4	20	27	50	80	86	5v5
Home	3	18:21	Hertl from Wingels, save	31	48	50	52	57	88	7	10	29	44	50	91	5v5
Home	3	16:47	Couture from Marleau, miss	12	31	39	44	61	83	2	19	23	32	50	81	5v5
Away	3	15:05	Bickell from Richards, goal	31	48	50	52	57	88	2	10	29	32	50	91	5v5
Away	3	13:16	Saad from Vermette, save	4	8	19	31	68	88	4	20	27	50	80	81	5v5
Away	3	13:01	Saad from Hjalmarsson rebound, save	4	8	19	31	41	68	4	20	27	50	80	86	5v5
Away	3	8:37	Bickell from Sharp rebound, save	8	19	31	52	68	88	2	7	10	29	50	91	5v5
Away	3	6:13	Hossa from Toews, miss (5v4 PP)	8	31	44	57	61		2	19	20	32	50	81	4v5
Away	3	5:15	Teravainen from Sharp, goalpost (5v4 PP)	4	21	31	83	88		7	10	44	50	86	91	4v5
Away	3	1:05	Sharp from Teravainen, save	4	20	21	31	41	89	4	10	27	50	80	86	5v5
Home	3	0:26	Hertl from Dillon, save	31	48	50	52	83	88	4	10	27	50	80	86	5v5

San Jose

Even Strength Scoring Chance Save Percentage: 70.0%

Percent of Even Strength Fenwick events that were Scoring Chances: 35.1%

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
4	DILLON, BRENDEN	17:46	4	6	00:00	0	0	01:35	0	1
8	PAVELSKI, JOE	13:16	5	4	03:13	3	2	03:14	0	3
12	MARLEAU, PATRICK	13:02	2	0	03:13	3	2	03:18	0	2
19	THORNTON, JOE	14:10	5	4	03:04	2	1	00:09	0	0
20	SCOTT, JOHN	07:27	1	1	00:00	0	0	00:00	0	0
21	SMITH, BEN	09:52	3	1	00:00	0	0	01:36	0	1
31	NIEMI, ANTTI		13	10		3	2		0	4
39	COUTURE, LOGAN	13:11	2	0	03:04	2	1	01:09	0	0
41	MUELLER, MIRCO	16:05	4	5	00:06	0	0	00:47	0	0
44	VLASIC, MARC-EDOUARD	15:11	3	2	01:30	0	0	04:15	0	3
48	HERTL, TOMAS	13:18	3	3	01:54	0	0	00:00	0	0
50	TIERNEY, CHRIS	13:13	3	5	02:03	1	1	00:00	0	0
52	IRWIN, MATT	14:24	6	2	00:18	0	0	00:00	0	0
57	WINGELS, TOMMY	12:20	2	4	01:45	1	1	01:42	0	1
61	BRAUN, JUSTIN	15:50	3	2	01:26	0	0	04:31	0	3
68	KARLSSON, MELKER	14:11	7	4	00:00	0	0	00:00	0	0
83	NIETO, MATT	12:57	4	2	00:18	0	0	01:45	0	1
88	BURNS, BRENT	16:23	6	3	03:41	3	2	02:38	0	1
89	GOODROW, BARCLAY	08:57	2	2	00:00	0	0	00:53	0	0

	EVS					PP					SH
#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”		#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”		#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”
4		2	2		4			0		4			0
5			0		5			0		5			0
8	1	1	2		8			0		8			0
10			0		10			0		10			0
12	1	1	2		12	2		2		12			0
15			0		15			0		15			0
18			0		18			0		18			0
19		1	1		19			0		19			0
20			0		20			0		20			0
21	1	1	2		21			0		21			0
25			0		25			0		25			0
27			0		27			0		27			0
37			0		37			0		37			0
38			0		38			0		38			0
39	1		1		39			0		39			0
41		2	2		41			0		41			0
43			0		43			0		43			0
44			0		44			0		44			0
48	2		2		48			0		48			0
50	1		1		50	1		1		50			0
52	1	2	3		52			0		52			0
57		1	1		57		1	1		57			0
61			0		61			0		61			0
68	4	1	5		68			0		68			0
71			0		71			0		71			0
75			0		75			0		75			0
76			0		76			0		76			0
80			0		80			0		80			0
81			0		81			0		81			0
83			0		83			0		83			0
88			0		88			0		88			0
89	1		1		89			0		89			0

Chicago

Even Strength Scoring Chance Save Percentage: 90.0%

Percent of Even Strength Fenwick events that were Scoring Chances: 37.0%

#	Player	EV			PP			SH
2	KEITH, DUNCAN	18:35	3	3	04:00	3	0	02:29	1	2
4	HJALMARSSON, NIKLAS	18:16	6	3	00:00	0	0	03:14	1	2
7	SEABROOK, BRENT	11:27	3	6	02:53	1	0	02:38	1	1
10	SHARP, PATRICK	13:25	5	5	02:53	1	0	00:00	0	0
11	DESJARDINS, ANDREW	08:50	1	3	00:00	0	0	00:18	0	0
16	KRUGER, MARCUS	10:08	1	1	00:00	0	0	03:15	1	3
19	TOEWS, JONATHAN	14:02	0	3	04:00	3	0	01:25	1	0
20	SAAD, BRANDON	11:14	4	0	04:00	3	0	02:39	0	3
23	VERSTEEG, KRIS	12:31	0	3	01:01	0	0	00:00	0	0
27	ODUYA, JOHNNY	19:09	7	5	00:00	0	0	01:53	1	1
29	BICKELL, BRYAN	11:46	2	5	00:00	0	0	00:00	0	0
32	ROZSIVAL, MICHAL	18:17	1	4	00:56	1	0	00:00	0	0
44	TIMONEN, KIMMO	10:15	0	5	01:52	1	0	00:00	0	0
50	CRAWFORD, COREY		9	13		4	0		2	3
65	SHAW, ANDREW	10:13	1	3	03:10	2	0	00:27	0	0
80	VERMETTE, ANTOINE	13:00	7	4	00:06	0	0	00:00	0	0
81	HOSSA, MARIAN	14:26	1	5	04:00	3	0	02:10	2	0
86	TERAVAINEN, TEUVO	13:07	6	2	02:47	1	0	00:00	0	0
91	RICHARDS, BRAD	12:34	3	5	02:47	1	0	00:00	0	0

	EVS					PP					SH
#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”		#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”		#	Scoring chances	Chances Assists	Chances “Points”
2			0		2	1	1	2		2			0
4		1	1		4			0		4			0
5			0		5			0		5			0
6			0		6			0		6			0
7			0		7			0		7		1	1
10	3	1	4		10		1	1		10			0
11		1	1		11			0		11			0
12			0		12			0		12			0
13			0		13			0		13			0
16			0		16			0		16			0
19		1	1		19	1	1	2		19	1		1
20	3		3		20			0		20			0
23			0		23			0		23			0
24			0		24			0		24			0
27			0		27			0		27			0
28			0		28			0		28			0
29	2		2		29			0		29			0
32			0		32			0		32			0
42			0		42			0		42			0
44			0		44			0		44			0
57			0		57			0		57			0
65	1		1		65			0		65			0
80		2	2		80			0		80			0
81			0		81	1	1	2		81	1		1
86	1	2	3		86	1		1		86			0
88			0		88			0		88			0
91			0		91			0		91			0

Period-by-Period Summary

Period	Totals		EV		PP		5v3 PP		SH		5v3 SH
1	6	3	6	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
2	7	5	4	1	3	2	0	0	0	2	0	0
3	3	8	3	6	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	0

-San Jose had full control of this game after two periods, having outchanced Chicago 10-4 at evens through forty minutes. Then, for whatever reason, the wheels fell off, and they were outchanced 6-3 in the third period.

-The Sharks’ third line got beat pretty bad in this game, with Hertl being the only member of that line to not finish his game with a -2 scoring chance differential

-Once again, the Irwin-Burns pairing found offensive success in this game, as they were on the ice for almost half of San Jose’s even strength scoring chances

-Toews’ linemates were scrambled throughout the game, seemed like, and these numbers show partly why that happened, as Toews wasn’t on the ice for a single even strength scoring chance in this game

-Chicago’s line of Saad-Vermette-Teravainen was fantastic in this game, as every member of that line finished their nights with at least a +3 scoring chance differential (Saad was on the ice for zero SJ EVS scoring chances)

Passing Stats

San Jose

#	Pass Attempts	Dumps/Rim Attempts	Shot Attempts	Pass Turnovers	Rim Turnovers	Passes Leading to Scoring Chances	Passes Leading to Goals	Pass%	Rim%	Shot%	Pass Success %	Rim Success %	PLSC%	PLG%
4	2	1	4	0	1	0	0	28.57	14.29	57.14	100.00	0	0.00	0.00
8	4	0	5	0	0	1	0	44.44	0.00	55.56	100.00	#DIV/0!	25.00	0.00
12	7	1	2	1	0	1	0	70.00	10.00	20.00	85.71	100	14.29	0.00
19	19	1	1	1	0	1	0	90.48	4.76	4.76	94.74	100	5.26	0.00
20	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	100.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
21	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0.00	0.00	100.00	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
39	4	0	3	2	0	0	0	57.14	0.00	42.86	50.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
41	3	2	2	0	0	0	0	42.86	28.57	28.57	100.00	100.00	0.00	0.00
44	3	2	4	1	1	0	0	33.33	22.22	44.44	66.67	50.00	0.00	0.00
48	4	1	3	1	1	0	0	50.00	12.50	37.50	75.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
50	7	0	4	3	0	0	0	63.64	0.00	36.36	57.14	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
52	0	2	3	0	0	0	0	0.00	40.00	60.00	#DIV/0!	100.00	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
57	3	1	1	1	1	0	0	60.00	20.00	20.00	66.67	0.00	0.00	0.00
61	2	0	4	1	0	0	0	33.33	0.00	66.67	50.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
68	5	2	6	1	2	0	0	38.46	15.38	46.15	80.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
83	5	0	2	2	0	0	0	71.43	0.00	28.57	60.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
88	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	50.00	25.00	25.00	100.00	100.00	0.00	0.00
89	3	0	2	0	0	0	0	60.00	0.00	40.00	100.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
Team	74	14	49	15	6	3	0	54.01	10.22	35.77	79.73	57.14	4.05	0.00

Chicago

#	Pass Attempts	Dumps/Rim Attempts	Shot Attempts	Pass Turnovers	Rim Turnovers	Passes Leading to Scoring Chances	Passes Leading to Goals	Pass%	Rim%	Shot%	Pass Success %	Rim Success %	PLSC%	PLG%
2	4	0	4	1	0	0	0	50.00	0.00	50.00	75.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
4	1	2	3	0	0	0	0	16.67	33.33	50.00	100.00	100	0.00	0.00
7	1	3	0	0	1	0	0	25.00	75.00	0.00	100.00	66.66666667	0.00	0.00
10	5	2	5	0	1	0	0	41.67	16.67	41.67	100.00	50	0.00	0.00
11	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	100.00	0.00	#DIV/0!	100.00	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
16	2	0	2	1	0	0	0	50.00	0.00	50.00	50.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
19	5	2	1	1	1	0	0	62.50	25.00	12.50	80.00	50.00	0.00	0.00
20	4	0	3	0	0	0	0	57.14	0.00	42.86	100.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
23	8	1	2	1	0	0	0	72.73	9.09	18.18	87.50	100.00	0.00	0.00
27	1	0	2	0	0	0	0	33.33	0.00	66.67	100.00	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
29	6	0	4	2	0	0	0	60.00	0.00	40.00	66.67	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
32	2	2	1	0	1	0	0	40.00	40.00	20.00	100.00	50.00	0.00	0.00
44	5	2	1	2	1	0	0	62.50	25.00	12.50	60.00	50.00	0.00	0.00
65	7	1	1	1	0	0	0	77.78	11.11	11.11	85.71	100.00	0.00	0.00
80	5	0	1	0	0	1	0	83.33	0.00	16.67	100.00	#DIV/0!	20.00	0.00
81	7	0	3	1	0	0	0	70.00	0.00	30.00	85.71	#DIV/0!	0.00	0.00
86	4	0	2	0	0	1	0	66.67	0.00	33.33	100.00	#DIV/0!	25.00	0.00
91	4	0	5	0	0	1	0	44.44	0.00	55.56	100.00	#DIV/0!	25.00	0.00
Team	71	16	40	10	5	3	0	55.91	12.60	31.50	85.92	68.75	4.23	0.00

-Tierney really had his passing game going in this game, unfortunately his teammates just didn’t seem ready to receive his passes quite often, and that partially led to his high turnover count

-Thornton however, was very accurate with his passes in this game, only turning the puck over once on his nineteen pass attempts

-Overall, seemed like these teams were almost always looking to make productive plays with the puck, as they rarely ever just resorted to dumps or rims around the boards to no one in particular

Zone Entries

San Jose

Player	# of successful entries	Shots generated from player’s entries	Shots per entry	# of controlled entries	Shots generated from player’s controlled entries	Shots per controlled entry	% of entries with control	Failed entries
4	1	1	1.00	1	1	1.00	100%	0
8	4	1	0.25	1	1	1.00	25%	0
12	4	2	0.50	4	2	0.50	100%	1
19	6	4	0.67	3	3	1.00	50%	0
0	0	0	#DIV/0!	0	0	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	0
21	3	2	0.67	2	1	0.50	67%	1
39	4	0	0.00	3	0	0.00	75%	0
41	2	2	1.00	1	2	2.00	50%	0
44	1	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
48	5	3	0.60	1	2	2.00	20%	0
50	5	2	0.40	4	1	0.25	80%	0
52	0	0	#DIV/0!	0	0	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	0
57	11	4	0.36	4	2	0.50	36%	0
61	1	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
68	4	2	0.50	4	2	0.50	100%	1
83	4	3	0.75	2	2	1.00	50%	0
88	1	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
89	6	2	0.33	4	2	0.50	67%	0
Team	62	28	0.45	34	21	0.62	55%	3
Opp	58	28	0.48	28	23	0.82	48%	9

Chicago

Player	# of successful entries	Shots generated from player’s entries	Shots per entry	# of controlled entries	Shots generated from player’s controlled entries	Shots per controlled entry	% of entries with control	Failed entries
CHI2	2	2	1.00	1	1	1.00	50%	0
CHI4	0	0	#DIV/0!	0	0	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	0
CHI7	0	0	#DIV/0!	0	0	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	0
CHI10	3	2	0.67	2	2	1.00	67%	1
CHI11	2	3	1.50	1	3	3.00	50%	2
CHI16	4	1	0.25	1	1	1.00	25%	0
CHI19	4	1	0.25	4	1	0.25	100%	3
CHI20	1	1	1.00	1	1	1.00	100%	1
CHI23	5	2	0.40	2	2	1.00	40%	0
CHI27	2	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
CHI29	12	4	0.33	7	4	0.57	58%	0
CHI32	2	1	0.50	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
CHI44	1	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	0
CHI65	0	0	#DIV/0!	0	0	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	0
CHI80	1	0	0.00	0	0	#DIV/0!	0%	1
CHI81	7	4	0.57	4	4	1.00	57%	0
CHI86	6	2	0.33	3	2	0.67	50%	0
CHI91	5	5	1.00	2	2	1.00	40%	1
Team	57	28	0.49	28	23	0.82	49%	9

-Patty had a pretty good game, managing four carry-ins on his four successful entry atempts

-Thornton, Karlsson, and Nieto also put up good numbers

-Sharp, Hossa, and Richards put up fantastic entry numbers for Chicago

-Bickell generated a lot of entries in this game, and the majority of them were carry-ins, which was good for Chicago, cause his carry-ins were the only entries that they could generate any shot attempts off of in this game

Entry Targeting

San Jose

Player #	# of entry attempts against	Carry-ins against	Failed entries against	Carry % against	Break up %
4	8	6	0	75.00	0.00
5				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
8	1	1	0	100.00	0.00
10				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
12	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
13				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
15				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
18				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
19	3	0	0	0.00	0.00
20	1	0	1	0.00	100.00
21	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
25				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
27				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
37				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
38				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
39				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
41	8	5	0	62.50	0.00
43				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
44	5	2	0	40.00	0.00
48				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
50	2	1	0	50.00	0.00
52	4	3	0	75.00	0.00
57	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
61	9	5	2	55.56	22.22
68	2	0	0	0.00	0.00
71				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
75				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
76				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
80				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
81				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
83	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
88	8	3	1	37.50	12.50
89	1	1	0	100.00	0.00
Team	56	27	4	48.21	7.14

Chicago

Player #	# of entry attempts against	Carry-ins against	Failed entries against	Carry % against	Break up %
2	10	6	0	60.00	0.00
4	9	5	0	55.56	0.00
5				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
6				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
7	8	7	0	87.50	0.00
10				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
11				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
12				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
13				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
16				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
19				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
20	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
23				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
24				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
27	10	4	0	40.00	0.00
28				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
29				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
32	6	3	1	50.00	16.67
34				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
42				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
44	8	4	1	50.00	12.50
57				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
65				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
80	1	1	0	100.00	0.00
81	2	0	0	0.00	0.00
86				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
88				#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
91	1	0	0	0.00	0.00
Team	56	30	2	53.57	3.57

-Vlasic and Burns were the only Shark defensemen in this game to manage sub-50 carry-in against percentages, as Mueller and Dillon especially had nights to forget

-Chiacgo’s D also struggled a bit at preventing carry-ins, as Hjalmarsson, Keith, and Seabrook combined to allow a lot of San Jose carry-ins

-The rest of Chicago’s defense did decently though, especially Timonen, who I was pleasantly surprised to see do so well in this game

Zone Exits

San Jose

Player #	Touches	In-Zone Passes	Pass-Outs	Carry-Outs	Turnovers	Icings	Overall Success %	Exit Success %	Turnover %
4	10	5	0	1	4	0	10.00	20.00	40.00
5							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
8	6	3	0	0	3	0	0.00	0.00	50.00
10							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
12	3	0	1	0	1	1	33.33	33.33	33.33
15							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
18							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
19	14	4	0	3	7	0	21.43	30.00	50.00
20	1	1	0	0	0	0	0.00	#DIV/0!	0.00
21	2	1	0	1	0	0	50.00	100.00	0.00
25							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
27							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
37							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
38							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
39	6	2	1	2	1	0	50.00	75.00	16.67
41	9	2	2	0	5	0	22.22	28.57	55.56
43							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
44	12	6	2	1	3	0	25.00	50.00	25.00
48	10	4	2	2	2	0	40.00	66.67	20.00
50	10	2	1	2	4	1	30.00	37.50	40.00
52	13	7	1	0	4	1	7.69	16.67	30.77
57	4	2	1	0	1	0	25.00	50.00	25.00
61	12	8	1	0	2	1	8.33	25.00	16.67
68	2	1	0	1	0	0	50.00	100.00	0.00
71							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
75							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
76							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
80							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
81							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
83	5	2	1	0	1	1	20.00	33.33	20.00
88	22	14			6	2	0.00	0.00	27.27
89	6	3	1	0	2	0	16.67	33.33	33.33
Totals:	147	67	14	13	46	7	18.37	33.75	31.29

Chicago

Player #	Touches	In-Zone Passes	Pass-Outs	Carry-Outs	Turnovers	Icings	Overall Success %	Exit Success %	Turnover %
2	11	7	0	1	3	0	9.09	25.00	27.27
4	20	8	2	0	10	0	10.00	16.67	50.00
5							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
6							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
7	15	4	5	0	5	1	33.33	45.45	33.33
10	1	1	0	0	0	0	0.00	#DIV/0!	0.00
11	3	0	0	2	1	0	66.67	66.67	33.33
12							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
13							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
16	1	0	1	0	0	0	100.00	100.00	0.00
19	10	2	2	2	4	0	40.00	50.00	40.00
20	1	0	0	0	1	0	0.00	0.00	100.00
23	8	3	1	3	1	0	50.00	80.00	12.50
24							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
27	12	4	3	0	5	0	25.00	37.50	41.67
28							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
29	4	0	0	1	3	0	25.00	25.00	75.00
32	14	6	0	0	6	2	0.00	0.00	42.86
34							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
42							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
44	3	3	0	0	0	0	0.00	#DIV/0!	0.00
57							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
65	7	2	2	0	3	0	28.57	40.00	42.86
80	6	1	1	3	1	0	66.67	80.00	16.67
81	5	3	1	0	1	0	20.00	50.00	20.00
86	8	3	2	2	1	0	50.00	80.00	12.50
88							#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!	#DIV/0!
91	6	0	3	1	2	0	66.67	66.67	33.33
Team	135	47	23	15	47	3	28.15	43.18	34.81

-Hertl and Couture had some pretty good numbers on zone exits, especially Couture, who only turned the puck over once on his six puck touches in the defensive zone

-The rest of the team didn’t do well at all though, as the team only managed a successful breakout on under 20% of their touches

-Chicago had a better time on zone exits, managing clean breakouts on over a fourth of their touches, but they also turned the puck over quite a bit, turning it over on about 35% of their touches

-Quite a few of Chicago’s forwards did pretty well on zone exits, but I think the performance that stood out most to me in this game was that of Chicago defenseman Brent Seabrook, who showed part of why he’s going to be raking in the cash when his next contract comes along