By the numbers: Game 69 vs. Chicago
Scoring chances, zone entries, passing stats, and more from the Sharks' 6-2 loss to the Chicago Blackhawks.
Scoring Chances
Team | Period | Time | Note | Home | Away | State | ||||||||||
Home | 1 | 17:46 | Goodrow from Smith, save | 20 | 21 | 31 | 52 | 88 | 89 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 44 | 50 | 65 | 5v5 |
Home | 1 | 17:01 | Pavelski from Thornton, save | 4 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 41 | 68 | 4 | 27 | 29 | 50 | 81 | 91 | 5v5 |
Home | 1 | 16:56 | Karlsson from Mueller rebound, miss | 4 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 41 | 68 | 4 | 27 | 29 | 50 | 81 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 1 | 13:59 | Sharp from Vermette, save | 31 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 61 | 83 | 7 | 10 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Away | 1 | 13:58 | Sharp, goal | 31 | 44 | 50 | 57 | 61 | 83 | 7 | 10 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Home | 1 | 10:32 | Karlsson from Pavelski, save | 8 | 19 | 31 | 44 | 61 | 68 | 2 | 19 | 23 | 32 | 50 | 81 | 5v5 |
Home | 1 | 3:13 | Irwin from Karlsson, save | 8 | 19 | 31 | 52 | 68 | 88 | 7 | 11 | 27 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 5v5 |
Home | 1 | 3:12 | Karlsson from Irwin rebound, goal | 8 | 19 | 31 | 52 | 68 | 88 | 7 | 11 | 27 | 50 | 65 | 80 | 5v5 |
Away | 1 | 2:58 | Teravainen, save | 4 | 31 | 41 | 48 | 50 | 57 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Home | 2 | 18:30 | Marleau, save (5v4 PP) | 8 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 39 | 88 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 50 | 5v4 | |
Home | 2 | 18:29 | Marleau, save (5v4 PP) | 8 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 39 | 88 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 50 | 5v4 | |
Away | 2 | 18:10 | Toews, save (4v5 PK) | 8 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 39 | 88 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 50 | 81 | 5v4 | |
Away | 2 | 17:52 | Hossa from Seabrook, save (4v5 PK) | 8 | 12 | 31 | 50 | 57 | 88 | 7 | 16 | 27 | 50 | 81 | 5v4 | |
Home | 2 | 17:45 | Tierney from Wingels, save (5v4 PP) | 8 | 12 | 31 | 50 | 57 | 88 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 27 | 50 | 5v4 | |
Home | 2 | 15:56 | Karlsson from Dillon, save | 4 | 21 | 31 | 41 | 68 | 83 | 10 | 32 | 44 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Home | 2 | 14:25 | Tierney from Mueller, save | 4 | 31 | 41 | 48 | 50 | 57 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 44 | 50 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 2 | 13:35 | Shaw from Desjardins, save | 4 | 31 | 41 | 48 | 50 | 89 | 4 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 65 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 2 | 11:32 | Toews from Keith, miss (5v4 PP) | 8 | 12 | 31 | 44 | 61 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 50 | 65 | 81 | 4v5 | |
Away | 2 | 11:16 | Keith from Hossa, goal (5v4 PP) | 8 | 12 | 31 | 44 | 61 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 50 | 65 | 81 | 4v5 | |
Home | 2 | 6:30 | Marleau, save | 12 | 31 | 39 | 44 | 61 | 83 | 2 | 19 | 23 | 32 | 50 | 81 | 5v5 |
Home | 2 | 5:32 | Smith from Irwin, save | 21 | 31 | 52 | 68 | 88 | 89 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 44 | 50 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 18:40 | Saad from Teravainen, goal | 4 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 41 | 68 | 4 | 20 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Home | 3 | 18:21 | Hertl from Wingels, save | 31 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 57 | 88 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 44 | 50 | 91 | 5v5 |
Home | 3 | 16:47 | Couture from Marleau, miss | 12 | 31 | 39 | 44 | 61 | 83 | 2 | 19 | 23 | 32 | 50 | 81 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 15:05 | Bickell from Richards, goal | 31 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 57 | 88 | 2 | 10 | 29 | 32 | 50 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 13:16 | Saad from Vermette, save | 4 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 68 | 88 | 4 | 20 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 81 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 13:01 | Saad from Hjalmarsson rebound, save | 4 | 8 | 19 | 31 | 41 | 68 | 4 | 20 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 8:37 | Bickell from Sharp rebound, save | 8 | 19 | 31 | 52 | 68 | 88 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 29 | 50 | 91 | 5v5 |
Away | 3 | 6:13 | Hossa from Toews, miss (5v4 PP) | 8 | 31 | 44 | 57 | 61 | 2 | 19 | 20 | 32 | 50 | 81 | 4v5 | |
Away | 3 | 5:15 | Teravainen from Sharp, goalpost (5v4 PP) | 4 | 21 | 31 | 83 | 88 | 7 | 10 | 44 | 50 | 86 | 91 | 4v5 | |
Away | 3 | 1:05 | Sharp from Teravainen, save | 4 | 20 | 21 | 31 | 41 | 89 | 4 | 10 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
Home | 3 | 0:26 | Hertl from Dillon, save | 31 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 83 | 88 | 4 | 10 | 27 | 50 | 80 | 86 | 5v5 |
San Jose
Even Strength Scoring Chance Save Percentage: 70.0%
Percent of Even Strength Fenwick events that were Scoring Chances: 35.1%
# | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
4 | DILLON, BRENDEN | 17:46 | 4 | 6 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 01:35 | 0 | 1 |
8 | PAVELSKI, JOE | 13:16 | 5 | 4 | 03:13 | 3 | 2 | 03:14 | 0 | 3 |
12 | MARLEAU, PATRICK | 13:02 | 2 | 0 | 03:13 | 3 | 2 | 03:18 | 0 | 2 |
19 | THORNTON, JOE | 14:10 | 5 | 4 | 03:04 | 2 | 1 | 00:09 | 0 | 0 |
20 | SCOTT, JOHN | 07:27 | 1 | 1 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
21 | SMITH, BEN | 09:52 | 3 | 1 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 01:36 | 0 | 1 |
31 | NIEMI, ANTTI | 13 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |||
39 | COUTURE, LOGAN | 13:11 | 2 | 0 | 03:04 | 2 | 1 | 01:09 | 0 | 0 |
41 | MUELLER, MIRCO | 16:05 | 4 | 5 | 00:06 | 0 | 0 | 00:47 | 0 | 0 |
44 | VLASIC, MARC-EDOUARD | 15:11 | 3 | 2 | 01:30 | 0 | 0 | 04:15 | 0 | 3 |
48 | HERTL, TOMAS | 13:18 | 3 | 3 | 01:54 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
50 | TIERNEY, CHRIS | 13:13 | 3 | 5 | 02:03 | 1 | 1 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
52 | IRWIN, MATT | 14:24 | 6 | 2 | 00:18 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
57 | WINGELS, TOMMY | 12:20 | 2 | 4 | 01:45 | 1 | 1 | 01:42 | 0 | 1 |
61 | BRAUN, JUSTIN | 15:50 | 3 | 2 | 01:26 | 0 | 0 | 04:31 | 0 | 3 |
68 | KARLSSON, MELKER | 14:11 | 7 | 4 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
83 | NIETO, MATT | 12:57 | 4 | 2 | 00:18 | 0 | 0 | 01:45 | 0 | 1 |
88 | BURNS, BRENT | 16:23 | 6 | 3 | 03:41 | 3 | 2 | 02:38 | 0 | 1 |
89 | GOODROW, BARCLAY | 08:57 | 2 | 2 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 00:53 | 0 | 0 |
EVS | PP | SH | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | # | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | # | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | ||
4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||
5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | ||||||||
8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | ||||||
10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | ||||||||
12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | |||||
15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | ||||||||
18 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0 | ||||||||
19 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0 | |||||||
20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | ||||||||
21 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0 | ||||||
25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | ||||||||
27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | ||||||||
37 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 37 | 0 | ||||||||
38 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 38 | 0 | ||||||||
39 | 1 | 1 | 39 | 0 | 39 | 0 | |||||||
41 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0 | |||||||
43 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 43 | 0 | ||||||||
44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | ||||||||
48 | 2 | 2 | 48 | 0 | 48 | 0 | |||||||
50 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 0 | ||||||
52 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | ||||||
57 | 1 | 1 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 57 | 0 | ||||||
61 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 61 | 0 | ||||||||
68 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | ||||||
71 | 0 | 71 | 0 | 71 | 0 | ||||||||
75 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 0 | ||||||||
76 | 0 | 76 | 0 | 76 | 0 | ||||||||
80 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0 | ||||||||
81 | 0 | 81 | 0 | 81 | 0 | ||||||||
83 | 0 | 83 | 0 | 83 | 0 | ||||||||
88 | 0 | 88 | 0 | 88 | 0 | ||||||||
89 | 1 | 1 | 89 | 0 | 89 | 0 |
Chicago
Even Strength Scoring Chance Save Percentage: 90.0%
Percent of Even Strength Fenwick events that were Scoring Chances: 37.0%
# | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
2 | KEITH, DUNCAN | 18:35 | 3 | 3 | 04:00 | 3 | 0 | 02:29 | 1 | 2 |
4 | HJALMARSSON, NIKLAS | 18:16 | 6 | 3 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 03:14 | 1 | 2 |
7 | SEABROOK, BRENT | 11:27 | 3 | 6 | 02:53 | 1 | 0 | 02:38 | 1 | 1 |
10 | SHARP, PATRICK | 13:25 | 5 | 5 | 02:53 | 1 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
11 | DESJARDINS, ANDREW | 08:50 | 1 | 3 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 00:18 | 0 | 0 |
16 | KRUGER, MARCUS | 10:08 | 1 | 1 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 03:15 | 1 | 3 |
19 | TOEWS, JONATHAN | 14:02 | 0 | 3 | 04:00 | 3 | 0 | 01:25 | 1 | 0 |
20 | SAAD, BRANDON | 11:14 | 4 | 0 | 04:00 | 3 | 0 | 02:39 | 0 | 3 |
23 | VERSTEEG, KRIS | 12:31 | 0 | 3 | 01:01 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
27 | ODUYA, JOHNNY | 19:09 | 7 | 5 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 01:53 | 1 | 1 |
29 | BICKELL, BRYAN | 11:46 | 2 | 5 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
32 | ROZSIVAL, MICHAL | 18:17 | 1 | 4 | 00:56 | 1 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
44 | TIMONEN, KIMMO | 10:15 | 0 | 5 | 01:52 | 1 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
50 | CRAWFORD, COREY | 9 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |||
65 | SHAW, ANDREW | 10:13 | 1 | 3 | 03:10 | 2 | 0 | 00:27 | 0 | 0 |
80 | VERMETTE, ANTOINE | 13:00 | 7 | 4 | 00:06 | 0 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
81 | HOSSA, MARIAN | 14:26 | 1 | 5 | 04:00 | 3 | 0 | 02:10 | 2 | 0 |
86 | TERAVAINEN, TEUVO | 13:07 | 6 | 2 | 02:47 | 1 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
91 | RICHARDS, BRAD | 12:34 | 3 | 5 | 02:47 | 1 | 0 | 00:00 | 0 | 0 |
EVS | PP | SH | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | # | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | # | Scoring chances | Chances Assists | Chances "Points" | ||
2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | ||||||
4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||
5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | ||||||||
6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | ||||||||
7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
10 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | |||||
11 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | |||||||
12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | ||||||||
13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | ||||||||
16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | ||||||||
19 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 1 | ||||
20 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | |||||||
23 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0 | ||||||||
24 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 | ||||||||
27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 27 | 0 | ||||||||
28 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 28 | 0 | ||||||||
29 | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 0 | |||||||
32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | ||||||||
42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | ||||||||
44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | ||||||||
57 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 57 | 0 | ||||||||
65 | 1 | 1 | 65 | 0 | 65 | 0 | |||||||
80 | 2 | 2 | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0 | |||||||
81 | 0 | 81 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 81 | 1 | 1 | |||||
86 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 86 | 1 | 1 | 86 | 0 | |||||
88 | 0 | 88 | 0 | 88 | 0 | ||||||||
91 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 91 | 0 |
Period-by-Period Summary
Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
1 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
-San Jose had full control of this game after two periods, having outchanced Chicago 10-4 at evens through forty minutes. Then, for whatever reason, the wheels fell off, and they were outchanced 6-3 in the third period.
-The Sharks' third line got beat pretty bad in this game, with Hertl being the only member of that line to not finish his game with a -2 scoring chance differential
-Once again, the Irwin-Burns pairing found offensive success in this game, as they were on the ice for almost half of San Jose's even strength scoring chances
-Toews' linemates were scrambled throughout the game, seemed like, and these numbers show partly why that happened, as Toews wasn't on the ice for a single even strength scoring chance in this game
-Chicago's line of Saad-Vermette-Teravainen was fantastic in this game, as every member of that line finished their nights with at least a +3 scoring chance differential (Saad was on the ice for zero SJ EVS scoring chances)
Passing Stats
San Jose
# | Pass Attempts | Dumps/Rim Attempts | Shot Attempts | Pass Turnovers | Rim Turnovers | Passes Leading to Scoring Chances | Passes Leading to Goals | Pass% | Rim% | Shot% | Pass Success % | Rim Success % | PLSC% | PLG% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28.57 | 14.29 | 57.14 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 44.44 | 0.00 | 55.56 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 25.00 | 0.00 |
12 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 70.00 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 85.71 | 100 | 14.29 | 0.00 |
19 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 90.48 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 94.74 | 100 | 5.26 | 0.00 |
20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! |
39 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.14 | 0.00 | 42.86 | 50.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
41 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.86 | 28.57 | 28.57 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
44 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.33 | 22.22 | 44.44 | 66.67 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
48 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 12.50 | 37.50 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
50 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63.64 | 0.00 | 36.36 | 57.14 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
52 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 60.00 | #DIV/0! | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! |
57 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 60.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 66.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
61 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.33 | 0.00 | 66.67 | 50.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
68 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 38.46 | 15.38 | 46.15 | 80.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
83 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71.43 | 0.00 | 28.57 | 60.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
88 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
89 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60.00 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Team | 74 | 14 | 49 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 54.01 | 10.22 | 35.77 | 79.73 | 57.14 | 4.05 | 0.00 |
Chicago
# | Pass Attempts | Dumps/Rim Attempts | Shot Attempts | Pass Turnovers | Rim Turnovers | Passes Leading to Scoring Chances | Passes Leading to Goals | Pass% | Rim% | Shot% | Pass Success % | Rim Success % | PLSC% | PLG% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 75.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.67 | 33.33 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.00 | 75.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 66.66666667 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
10 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 41.67 | 16.67 | 41.67 | 100.00 | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | #DIV/0! | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! |
16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 62.50 | 25.00 | 12.50 | 80.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
20 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57.14 | 0.00 | 42.86 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
23 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72.73 | 9.09 | 18.18 | 87.50 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
27 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.33 | 0.00 | 66.67 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
29 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60.00 | 0.00 | 40.00 | 66.67 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
32 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 40.00 | 40.00 | 20.00 | 100.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
44 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 62.50 | 25.00 | 12.50 | 60.00 | 50.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
65 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.78 | 11.11 | 11.11 | 85.71 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
80 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 83.33 | 0.00 | 16.67 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 20.00 | 0.00 |
81 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70.00 | 0.00 | 30.00 | 85.71 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 | 0.00 |
86 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 66.67 | 0.00 | 33.33 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 25.00 | 0.00 |
91 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 44.44 | 0.00 | 55.56 | 100.00 | #DIV/0! | 25.00 | 0.00 |
Team | 71 | 16 | 40 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 55.91 | 12.60 | 31.50 | 85.92 | 68.75 | 4.23 | 0.00 |
-Tierney really had his passing game going in this game, unfortunately his teammates just didn't seem ready to receive his passes quite often, and that partially led to his high turnover count
-Thornton however, was very accurate with his passes in this game, only turning the puck over once on his nineteen pass attempts
-Overall, seemed like these teams were almost always looking to make productive plays with the puck, as they rarely ever just resorted to dumps or rims around the boards to no one in particular
Zone Entries
San Jose
Player | # of successful entries | Shots generated from player's entries | Shots per entry | # of controlled entries | Shots generated from player's controlled entries | Shots per controlled entry | % of entries with control | Failed entries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 100% | 0 |
8 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 25% | 0 |
12 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 100% | 1 |
19 | 6 | 4 | 0.67 | 3 | 3 | 1.00 | 50% | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 |
21 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 67% | 1 |
39 | 4 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | 75% | 0 |
41 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 1 | 2 | 2.00 | 50% | 0 |
44 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
48 | 5 | 3 | 0.60 | 1 | 2 | 2.00 | 20% | 0 |
50 | 5 | 2 | 0.40 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 80% | 0 |
52 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 |
57 | 11 | 4 | 0.36 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 36% | 0 |
61 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
68 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 100% | 1 |
83 | 4 | 3 | 0.75 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 50% | 0 |
88 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
89 | 6 | 2 | 0.33 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 67% | 0 |
Team | 62 | 28 | 0.45 | 34 | 21 | 0.62 | 55% | 3 |
Opp | 58 | 28 | 0.48 | 28 | 23 | 0.82 | 48% | 9 |
Chicago
Player | # of successful entries | Shots generated from player's entries | Shots per entry | # of controlled entries | Shots generated from player's controlled entries | Shots per controlled entry | % of entries with control | Failed entries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI2 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 50% | 0 |
CHI4 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 |
CHI7 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 |
CHI10 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 67% | 1 |
CHI11 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 3 | 3.00 | 50% | 2 |
CHI16 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 25% | 0 |
CHI19 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 4 | 1 | 0.25 | 100% | 3 |
CHI20 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 | 100% | 1 |
CHI23 | 5 | 2 | 0.40 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 40% | 0 |
CHI27 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
CHI29 | 12 | 4 | 0.33 | 7 | 4 | 0.57 | 58% | 0 |
CHI32 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
CHI44 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 0 |
CHI65 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | 0 |
CHI80 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | #DIV/0! | 0% | 1 |
CHI81 | 7 | 4 | 0.57 | 4 | 4 | 1.00 | 57% | 0 |
CHI86 | 6 | 2 | 0.33 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 | 50% | 0 |
CHI91 | 5 | 5 | 1.00 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 40% | 1 |
Team | 57 | 28 | 0.49 | 28 | 23 | 0.82 | 49% | 9 |
-Patty had a pretty good game, managing four carry-ins on his four successful entry atempts
-Thornton, Karlsson, and Nieto also put up good numbers
-Sharp, Hossa, and Richards put up fantastic entry numbers for Chicago
-Bickell generated a lot of entries in this game, and the majority of them were carry-ins, which was good for Chicago, cause his carry-ins were the only entries that they could generate any shot attempts off of in this game
Entry Targeting
San Jose
Player # | # of entry attempts against | Carry-ins against | Failed entries against | Carry % against | Break up % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 75.00 | 0.00 |
5 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
10 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
13 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
15 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
18 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
19 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
25 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
27 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
37 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
38 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
39 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
41 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 62.50 | 0.00 |
43 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
44 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 40.00 | 0.00 |
48 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
50 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50.00 | 0.00 |
52 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 75.00 | 0.00 |
57 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
61 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 55.56 | 22.22 |
68 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
71 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
75 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
76 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
80 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
81 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
83 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
88 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 37.50 | 12.50 |
89 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
Team | 56 | 27 | 4 | 48.21 | 7.14 |
Chicago
Player # | # of entry attempts against | Carry-ins against | Failed entries against | Carry % against | Break up % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 60.00 | 0.00 |
4 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 55.56 | 0.00 |
5 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
6 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
7 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 87.50 | 0.00 |
10 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
11 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
12 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
13 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
16 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
19 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
23 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
24 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
27 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 40.00 | 0.00 |
28 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
29 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
32 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 50.00 | 16.67 |
34 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
42 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
44 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 50.00 | 12.50 |
57 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
65 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
80 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
81 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
86 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
88 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |||
91 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Team | 56 | 30 | 2 | 53.57 | 3.57 |
-Vlasic and Burns were the only Shark defensemen in this game to manage sub-50 carry-in against percentages, as Mueller and Dillon especially had nights to forget
-Chiacgo's D also struggled a bit at preventing carry-ins, as Hjalmarsson, Keith, and Seabrook combined to allow a lot of San Jose carry-ins
-The rest of Chicago's defense did decently though, especially Timonen, who I was pleasantly surprised to see do so well in this game
Zone Exits
San Jose
Player # | Touches | In-Zone Passes | Pass-Outs | Carry-Outs | Turnovers | Icings | Overall Success % | Exit Success % | Turnover % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 40.00 |
5 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
8 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 50.00 |
10 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 |
15 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
18 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
19 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 21.43 | 30.00 | 50.00 |
20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 |
21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
25 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
27 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
37 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
38 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
39 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50.00 | 75.00 | 16.67 |
41 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 22.22 | 28.57 | 55.56 |
43 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
44 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 |
48 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 40.00 | 66.67 | 20.00 |
50 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 30.00 | 37.50 | 40.00 |
52 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7.69 | 16.67 | 30.77 |
57 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.00 | 50.00 | 25.00 |
61 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8.33 | 25.00 | 16.67 |
68 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
71 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
75 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
76 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
80 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
81 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
83 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20.00 | 33.33 | 20.00 |
88 | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 27.27 | ||
89 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 16.67 | 33.33 | 33.33 |
Totals: | 147 | 67 | 14 | 13 | 46 | 7 | 18.37 | 33.75 | 31.29 |
Chicago
Player # | Touches | In-Zone Passes | Pass-Outs | Carry-Outs | Turnovers | Icings | Overall Success % | Exit Success % | Turnover % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 9.09 | 25.00 | 27.27 |
4 | 20 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10.00 | 16.67 | 50.00 |
5 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
6 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
7 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 33.33 | 45.45 | 33.33 |
10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 |
11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 33.33 |
12 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
13 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 |
19 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 40.00 | 50.00 | 40.00 |
20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
23 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 50.00 | 80.00 | 12.50 |
24 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
27 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 25.00 | 37.50 | 41.67 |
28 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
29 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 75.00 |
32 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 42.86 |
34 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
42 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
44 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | #DIV/0! | 0.00 |
57 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
65 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 28.57 | 40.00 | 42.86 |
80 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 66.67 | 80.00 | 16.67 |
81 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.00 | 50.00 | 20.00 |
86 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50.00 | 80.00 | 12.50 |
88 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | ||||||
91 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 66.67 | 66.67 | 33.33 |
Team | 135 | 47 | 23 | 15 | 47 | 3 | 28.15 | 43.18 | 34.81 |
-Hertl and Couture had some pretty good numbers on zone exits, especially Couture, who only turned the puck over once on his six puck touches in the defensive zone
-The rest of the team didn't do well at all though, as the team only managed a successful breakout on under 20% of their touches
-Chicago had a better time on zone exits, managing clean breakouts on over a fourth of their touches, but they also turned the puck over quite a bit, turning it over on about 35% of their touches
-Quite a few of Chicago's forwards did pretty well on zone exits, but I think the performance that stood out most to me in this game was that of Chicago defenseman Brent Seabrook, who showed part of why he's going to be raking in the cash when his next contract comes along